Appearance theme refactored at 25.8, previous themes will no longer function

Folks, Just a heads-up if folks had missed https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=166942 The published appearance themes that were key to UX at 25.2 will no longer function at the 25.8 release. Need some additional themes with the refactored appearance theme framework in place

MAR incremental update packaging status

Question on the MAR infra: what should we expect on availability for the TDF posted MAR incrementals. How soon after the update packages are released to mirror channels will the MAR incrementals be generated and posted to the TDF server? Seems there is considerable delay, no MAR incremental fo

back port to 7.6.5 for tdf#158442 to open LO hybridPDF in correct module

Looks like this got forgotten: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/160306 -- Stuart

Re: [libreoffice-accessibility] Re: high contrast accessibility application guidelines?

Caolán, * These Microsoft notes are helpful in general with some specifics for Windows os/DE implementors: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/winauto/high-contrast-parameter https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/controls/supporting-high-contrast-themes Stuart __

Re: sigma symbol tailoring

Also, the Formula bar's split button implementation uses an opcode to choose the action to apply. They are not GTK .UI button linked UNO commands. However, there is the .uno:AutoSum that does the original action. So, you can customize to assign to Menu, a Toolbar, a Context menu, or a Keyboard

Going to need an rc4 build of 7.1.0, some unacceptable omissions

Prominent UI warts suggest 7.1.0 is not ready to go out the door: tdf#139781 - missing icons from Start Center tdf#138051 - buttons for the "new" UI Picker feature are blocked Another rc with those patches applied, please. ___ LibreOffice mailing list L

Sidebar deck HIG discussion - calculated minimum-width vs. resize to collapse

The Sidebar HIG -- is currently silent on behavior of width of the Deck and as a result we have issues like tdf#89984 and ill-conceived fixed-width "lets return to src" dis

Re: Status of Windows builds TB77

Christian Lohmaier-3 wrote >> ... as a workaround I created an additional jobconfiguration that > disables the switch. OK confirm the new configuration is posting a nightly build. But seems the packaging drops a VC++ runtime that is needed to run. On launch get a missing VCRUNTIME140_1.dll (

Re: Status of Windows builds TB77

sberg wrote > On 03/03/2020 08:49, Noel Grandin wrote: >> I have reverted the libmerged patch that likely triggered this. >> >> Lets see if tonight is any better. Still no joy. The build log suggests a Visual Studio configuration issue... brief Build Log for tree: MASTER Created at: Thu Mar 5 0

Re: Status of Windows builds TB77

sberg wrote > On 27/02/2020 17:22, Noel Grandin wrote: >> scheduled an admin_slave_cleaning job for tb77, lets see if that helps > > Before you schedule an admin_slave_cleaning job, you must set the > relevant computer's # of executors to 1, and set it back to the original > value after the clea

Re: Status of Windows builds TB77

So, https://gef6d1789e45cc9b3ab8a351d84d98dd81cfd84a0^! may have rolled, but TB77 is still stuck. The other Jenkins Windows builds seem to be turning, but none of them upload a TDF conf

Status of Windows builds TB77

The Jenkins hosted TB77 nightly for 64bit Windows builds has not posted a package since 14 Feb, does it need a nudge? Logs are obtuse. But the other Windows TBs (TB72, TB73) seem to be building. Stuart ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.fre

An MDI as a new MUFFIN feature, tdf#37124 and the framework/source/tabwin legacy

In hopes of moving tdf#37124 along and suggest another MUFFIN feature to support an MDI -- Tabbed multi-document interface, was poking around in dark areas of source and found this gem [1]: https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@framework.openoffice.org/msg00065.html The GSOC 2005 project was for a

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

From: Libreoffice-qa on behalf of Michael Meeks Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2018 9:35 AM To: libreoffice-dev; libreoffice...@lists.freedesktop.org > * CTRL+ALT+E isn't opening the extension dialog but inserts a "é" > + https://bugs.documentfounda

Re: freieFarbe/freeColour HLC colour system to be accepted as a national standard for "Open Colour Communication" in Germany

"Christoph Schäfer" wrote > ... > > Currently, an older version of the HLC palette is already included in > Scribus 1.5.3+ (L*a*b*) and the latest LibreOffice (sRGB). And speaking of > Scribus, the juicy bit is that the colour reference will most likely be > produced with Scribus 1.5.4svn, because

Re: Windows / font / text futures ...

Apologies for reviving this thread rather than spinning anew, think this is germane. A year on and Khaled's clean-up of the the HarfBuzz common layout implementation is mostly done, including a bunch of work that was needed for font handling. Thanks! But there are a few warts with the results on

Re: LODev 5.4.0 TB62 x86 test build for Windows XP

s/Breakbad/Breakpad / -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LODev-5-4-0-TB62-x86-test-build-for-Windows-XP-tp4210986p4210987.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ LibreOffice mailing list Libre

LODev 5.4.0 TB62 x86 test build for Windows XP

@Cloph, * The TB62 test build for Windows XP Version: 5.4.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: 3d53ec9b2d1c4514adf90ea68915f20ce4d5bc81 CPU threads: 1; OS: Windows 5.1; UI render: default; Locale: en-US (en_US); Calc: group with https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=c4c40632f1de6f64f0f9039

Windows TB builds

None of the Windows TB builds of master (TB 39, 42, 62) are posting. Don't know the cause, but we're waiting on a TB build to get a look at some of Khaled's latest for font handling for Default and OpenGL rendering. Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Minutes of the Design Hangout: 2017-Feb-09

mhenriday wrote > ​... > Many thanks, Heiko, to all of you for the work you are doing on this > matter. Would it be possible to request the option to customise toolbar > *location*, so that it could be moved from the right to the left side by > those of us who, for one reason or another, are so inc

Re: Need for a 5.2.4.3 build? Windows font handling issue.

The BZ issue for this is tdf#105015 -- Crash in: ImplReleaseTempFonts(SalData &) . -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Need-for-a-5-2-4-3-build-Windows-font-handling-issue-tp4204127p4204375.html Se

Need for a 5.2.4.3 build? Windows font handling issue.

In a late change to 5.2 for tdf#103514 5.2.4.2 went out with a glitch in salfont.cxx not picked up in 5.2.4.1 Khaled has reverted, but errors are piling up against 5.2.4.2 http://crashreport.libreoffice.org/stats/signature/ImplRelea

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Branch 'libreoffice-5-3' - extras/Package_palettes.mk extras/source

792d7d29688a0273f346a9baa23d415a7f8f55d8 Author: V Stuart Foote Date: Fri Nov 25 15:16:31 2016 -0600 tdf#80196 - rename palette to tonal.soc and adjusting names for 5.3.0 renamed from tonal_column.soc and removed abbreviations Change-Id: I72dbbab2688709e8266be93b40040c4c6c970d55

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: extras/Package_palettes.mk extras/source

98419425080f58880f2d0d85749a4a55e8abb40b Author: V Stuart Foote Date: Fri Nov 25 15:16:31 2016 -0600 tdf#80196 - another attempt at renaming to tonal.soc and adjusting names now for 5.4.0 master and dropping abreviations Change-Id: I72dbbab2688709e8266be93b40040c4c6c970d55 Reviewed

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: extras/source

extras/source/palettes/tonal.soc | 161 --- 1 file changed, 161 deletions(-) New commits: commit 2bea44c420c3d2dcc55504c3922aea8562a35db8 Author: V Stuart Foote Date: Mon Nov 21 19:22:14 2016 + Revert "tdf#80196 - Standardize color palette

HarfBuzz common layout -- needs 64-bit build testing on Windows

The new HarfBuzz (1.3.2) based common layout with GDI and OpenGL rendering on Windows is really an improvement. I've not experienced any major issues with SAL_USE_COMMON_LAYOUT, but all my testing has been with 32-bit TB Windows builds. I'm leaning toward Khaled's position that it be enabled by

Re: Merging feature/commonsallayout branch

On Windows 8.1 & 10 builds (32-bit master TB62) and the Alpha1 build, HARFBUZZ unified text is having some issues with OpenGL rendering. With default GPU rendering it is doing pretty well. See tdf#103365 - Text isn't showing in the new commonsallayout if OpenGL is on

Re: minutes of ESC call ...

Michael Meeks-5 wrote > * UX Update (Heiko) > * 'Muffin' concept proposed by marketing > + extended toolbar vs. notebookbar > + http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=muffin > + concern wrt. naming (Norbert) --MUFFIN-- from "MUltiple INterface Form Factors" was coined by Ita

Re: MSVC 14.0 U3: LO msi package put VC redist libraries in wrong directory

Checked and all the VS2015 runtime elements listed in https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/msvc-x86_64#Unsolved_problems_.28help_wanted.29 were installed to C:\Windows\System32 as desired. Nothing ended up in a C:\System64

Re: MSVC 14.0 U3: LO msi package put VC redist libraries in wrong directory

@David, * OK, sucess. But had to do a bit to meet the KB2999226 issue to get your VS2015 build to run. Following guidelines of the KB 2999226 article and clear the api-ms-win-crt-convert-l1-1-0.dll requirement, have to first install KB 2919355 (and its requirements). So... Windows 8.1 Update fo

Re: MSVC 14.0 U3: LO msi package put VC redist libraries in wrong directory

@David, * Spun up a new Windows 8.1 Ent 64-bit en-US as a virtual machine on VMWare 12 The C:\Windows\System32 directory contains msvcp60.dll msvcr100_clr0400.dll msvcr120_clr0400.dll msvcp120_clr0400.dll CLI install msiexec.exe /i LibreOfficeDev_5.3.0.0.alpha0_Win_x64.msi WRITEREGISTRY=1 Sele

Re: A toolbar option that makes it easier to type using unicode

Additionally, we already support this with the Special Character dialog. It allows one to select by Unicode block, and has the Characters field to compse with, picking glyphs and inserting into a paragraph when ready. In fact, the only missing element now for handling Unicode as requested by OP

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Markus Mohrhard wrote >> + Most Pressing Bugs: >> http://tdf.io/mostressingbugs >> + tdf#100295 - LibODev-5.2.0.0.b2 does not run in Windows_XP (32 >> or 64 bit) >> + Interest in fixing ? (or is this a 'feature' ?) >> + Tor - thinks a feature. >>

Re: Save as pdf - should we embed the document?

@Wol,* Wols Lists wrote > I know developers love to add bells and whistles, and aiui when you > "save as pdf" from LO it can now embed the original document in the pdf > to make it easy to get the document back into editable form, but the > attached email below makes me think "is this wise?".

Re: Fwd: LIbreOffice integration into accessible software project

@Jan, Regina H. and Fred W. were some of the last to poke at the math formula editor. Unfortunately, the StarMath syntax while comfortable has stagnated as W3C MathML evolved, and LaTex remained mainstream--we don't natively enter either and have to filter or extend to work with them. Regina rec

Re: Keyboard Shortcut

Yes, those are reserved here http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/vcl/source/app/svapp.cxx#99 -- fundamental to navigating keyboard only without mouse. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Re-Keyboard-Shortcut-tp4176943p4176975.html Sent from the Dev mail

Are vcl Global Shortcuts and localized accelerators diverging?

Hey "Devs", Please excuse me for poking in here out of turn... But, seems like there is some divergence and loss of function for Global short-cuts as defined in keycod.cxx and behavior of Accelerators assigned in Acc

Re: Some problems in LibreOffice 5.1

jan iversen wrote >> On 11 Feb 2016, at 17:27, Carlos Molina Palma < > cmolinap@ > > wrote: >> ... >> 2. The Exit of LibreOffice command (Ctrl + Q) in File Menu doesn’t >> work. > This sound like real problem, can I please ask you to file 2 bug reports > using: > https://bugs.documentfounda

Re: [libreoffice-users] Creating High Res Images in Draw or Impress

This is easily done from within Draw. 1. Open a new draw document 2. Use the page dialog to set orientation, and page size, also I prefer to remove margins--setting the page allows you to work with the whole drawing and pass it for export rendering. 3. Use the Insert -> Image, or the Drawing too

Re: Unable to use Writer as a publication tool

@madrosh, > The major bug I have is applying a "register-true" to an entire document > at a time. I use OL to put together a periodical, with columned text and > many images (which are put in frames and anchored to specific pages). It is LO not OL, or better LibreOffice. Believe the best prac

Re: [IMPORTANT] Google OpenId End-of-Life, Gerrit users need to take action

Ashod Nakashian-2 wrote > So, unless Gerrit has decided not to, or is unable to, migrate to OpenID > Connect by the deadline, migrating to OpenID Connect should be seamless > and > uneventful. > > Do we know whether or not Gerrit will have migrated by the deadline? > (Granted, warning people to av

Re: [IMPORTANT] Google OpenId End-of-Life, Gerrit users need to take action

V Stuart Foote wrote > Hmm, so looks like there is an issue with gerrit project's implementation > of openid4java and StackExchanges OpenID (also using openid4java). s/(also using openid4java)/(using DotNetOpenAuth)/ -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfou

Re: [IMPORTANT] Google OpenId End-of-Life, Gerrit users need to take action

Hmm, so looks like there is an issue with gerrit project's implementation of openid4java and StackExchanges OpenID (also using openid4java). Looks like StackExchange is serving OpenID AX attribute type/value pair exchanges to a namespace alias "alias3" rather than the OpenID prototypical alias "

Re: [IMPORTANT] Google OpenId End-of-Life, Gerrit users need to take action

Trying to accomplish the "Link Another Identity" process for my LO gerrit account. Username vsfoote Full Name V Stuart Foote Email Address vstuart.foote AT utsa.edu Registered Oct 2, 2014 2:18 PM Account ID 1000805 But the WebIdentities ?link an account page is a l

Re: Request for late push to 4.4.1

@Tamás, Getting the first in to correct the MAB for 4.4.1 is probably enough. Thank you. As to even bringing the second down to 4.4, I'll have to do some bench marking comparing t a 4.4.2 nightly and a 4.5.0 master with the "sw: avoid temporary object creation to build GraphicPrimitive2D" patch.

Re: Request for late push to 4.4.1

@Miklos, *, Of course that is how it would work if all participants of the project were able and currently building from source. I don't. No excuses, I just don't. I should, and freely acknowledge that I need to. So, that said and out of the way--opportunity here to fix a nasty 4.4 MAB regressi

Request for late push to 4.4.1

Request for late review for 4.4.1 http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=c7e907f58f8d0791ee304b42de769f43102522e9 http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=ad14ed0bbf80dd95dca6e0dea6edbe5fb68f9f26 The first corrects 4.4 MAB tdf#88935 and has been picked up in 4.4

Re: Discussion about highlighting (MS compatibility issue)

Zolnai, * Did not realize there were actually two OOXML/MSO attributes that had to be manipulated to handle highlighting in MS Office formats. And that we'd been fudging it with just one--your patch with just one attribute--RES_CHRATR_HIGHLIGHT manipulated as background fill in LO. This recent

Re: OS X build signature

Jonathan Aquilina wrote > There is a way around that all one has to do to open libreoffice is go to > system preferences and go to securty and you can do one of two things > > 1) change gatekeeper settings > 2) open libreoffice. After that it doesnt prompt you again. Of course-- there are work ar

OS X build signature

So with release of 4.4.0 we appear to still have issues with OS X 10.9 and 10.10 Gatekeeper fussing over the package signing. An easy work around to by-pass Gatekeeper, but it seems like we have a correct Apple v2 signature and should not have to be asking folks to. Is that not the case? https

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Branch 'libreoffice-4-4' - sw/source

sw/source/core/doc/DocumentStylePoolManager.cxx |4 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) New commits: commit aa474a538315c20128d0853bac97bfa3e66a2c12 Author: V Stuart Foote Date: Wed Dec 24 20:10:23 2014 +0400 fdo#82041 restore heading 3 and 4 color to automatic (4.4) Change

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: sw/source

sw/source/core/doc/DocumentStylePoolManager.cxx |4 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) New commits: commit 889f4705b90147d5653b08491579c51a7aca12be Author: V Stuart Foote Date: Wed Dec 24 20:10:23 2014 +0400 fdo#82041 restore heading 3 and 4 color to automatic Change-Id

V Stuart Foote license statement

my past & future Artwork and Design contributions to the LibreOffice project, and similarly to The Document Foundation, placing such contributions under CC0: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0 V Stuart Foote San Antonio, T

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Branch 'libreoffice-4-4' - extras/source

extras/source/palettes/standard.soc |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) New commits: commit fa2ac4cf5fc268b07dab42c2f610fb62f214a69c Author: V Stuart Foote Date: Thu Dec 4 17:08:53 2014 +0100 fdo#86511: Fix the RGB value of 'Sky blue 1' color.

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: extras/source

extras/source/palettes/standard.soc |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) New commits: commit e95ae3278b71fc56fa6cdab9ecff4c5bdbdda583 Author: V Stuart Foote Date: Thu Dec 4 17:08:53 2014 +0100 fdo#86511: Fix the RGB value of 'Sky blue 1' color.

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Release Notes Whiteboard Keyword

Top posting reply to Joel's note... Actually, it makes a lot of sense in that release notes really need a more descriptive narrative for substantive enhancements and bug fixes. As is we often simply list the fixes against prior releases. Envision this whiteboard tagging would support two aspec

Re: UOF v2.0, the PRC national XML standard for Chinese Office documents--what to do with it in LibreOffice?

jonathon-4 wrote > What happened to the Chinese language team? > zh.libreoffice.org is in English, even though that is not on the There is a pretty vibrant Chinese user community here: http://www.libreofficechina.org/forum.php And the truth is, it is not that difficult to gist most document and p

Re: UOF v2.0, the PRC national XML standard for Chinese Office documents--what to do with it in LibreOffice?

@Kohei, Kohei Yoshida-7 wrote > It seems to me that you probably know more about UOF than the rest of > us. I'd like to hear your opinion of what should be done. And if your > answer is "we should take this further to support Chinese users", then > who do you think should provide the developmen

Re: UOF v2.0, the PRC national XML standard for Chinese Office documents--what to do with it in LibreOffice?

Robinson Tryon wrote > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:37 PM, V Stuart Foote < > VStuart.Foote@ > > wrote: >> >> Since then, the Chinese Office suite development by the likes of RedFlag >> 2000 (defunct), KingSoft, YozoSoft and CS2C with state sponsorship and >

Re: UOF v2.0, the PRC national XML standard for Chinese Office documents--what to do with it in LibreOffice?

Tor Lillqvist-2 wrote >> Should filters be removed from >> core and repackaged as an extension to externally provide document >> conversion? >> > If they are broken anyway, what would be the point with that? Well, I would expect that if someone were to take the time to implement as an appropriatel

UOF v2.0, the PRC national XML standard for Chinese Office documents--what to do with it in LibreOffice?

ESC, TDF Board, *, LibreOffice's support for the Chinese national standard for XML documents was added to the OOo CWS mid-2006 and seems to comply with just a portion of the UOF V1.0 standard--it is a flat XML implementation. Technical comparison between UOF v1.0 and ODF packaged XML is in a note

Spelling dialog regression in calc

Just discovered we have a pesky regression we picked up on the 4.1 -> 4.2 transition with the Spelling dialog not resetting underline of the misspelled words when corrected. All seems correct if the spelling is corrected with context menu. So, suspect it to be mishandling of the bPaintWrong valu

Windows TB 39 & 42 builds of master need some help

Thorsten, Kendy, * TB42 dumped core and the libo-master~2014-10-10_23.17.23_LibreOfficeDev_4.4.0.0.alpha0_Win_x86.msi is only a partial installer package at 93MB. Not much in the build log--guess it got truncated. Nor has Kendy's TB39 spun a build since Monday the 6th--and of course correspondin

Re: Windows daily build broken on Windows 8.1

All good now with todays build on TB39, have a uno.ini again located in the URE/bin directory contents match prior builds. Version: 4.4.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: be775a1ab40ccedfbc9659120b82867d6c128e6a TinderBox: Win-x86@39, Branch:master, Time: 2014-09-19_18:16:31 -- View this message in context:

Re: Windows daily build broken on Windows 8.1

sberg wrote > Is there a uno.ini file somewhere else in C:\Program Files Only a pythonloader.uno.ini -- no uno.ini present in the installed build. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Windows-daily-build-broken-on-Windows-8-1-tp4122701p4122726.html Sent from

Re: Windows daily build broken on Windows 8.1

Confirmed, looks to be Stephan B. and Tor L.'s recent work implementing an louno. I think the damage was done here: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/gitweb?p=core.git;a=commitdiff;h=d1a734cef0ed5d655774c2f8ac7a2203f8c0a385 https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/gitweb?p=core.git;a=commitdiff;h=332f6a5f9

cgit repo offline

Cloph, *, So Code Review on gerrit.libreoffice.org is churning along nicely, but the cgit.freedesktop.org repo stopped showing commits 24 hours ago. Intentional? Stuart -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/cgit-repo-offline-tp4122436.html Sent from the De

TinderBox 39, 47 & 51 builds offline, so no Windows symbols

Cloph, Kendy, *, Hate to pester, but your Windows TB's for Master--and Symbols--dropped off line ~12-14 Aug. Thorsten's TB 42 has continued to grind out builds of master, so the missing builds have not been too big a deal. However, with Samuel M.'s refactoring of the SideBar done today https://g

Windows OS dictionary and spell check madness, going to need to roll another RC build for 4.3.0

Cloph, *, Windows only RC3 issue fdo#81511 has corrupted spelling check--every word is marked wrong; looks to be patched already per fdo#80363 ) but that needs to be confirmed. Anyway,

RE: Windows TinderBoxes of Master need attention

Kendy, *, Thanks, but that "give a little love" was from the last TB's off-line cycle in February =) Anyhow, here are the range of commits since the last solid build 30 April and the first crashed TB-39 build still showing in TB logs: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/log/?qt=range&

Re: ImageMagick convert -- a required bundle to handle EPS on Windows and OSX?

Christian, *, Not sure I would characterize EPS as simply a niche use. EPS, still much more so than SVG, is the preferred format for preparation of vector based technical images, graphs and charts for academic and scientific publication. When you consider that Windows continues to hold the high

Re: ImageMagick convert -- a required bundle to handle EPS on Windows and OSX?

So, poking around on this in Bugzilla and OpenGrok, seems there is no "native" handling of EPS in LibreOffice, and the filters (input & output) are a mess. There has been a call for built-in EPS rendering as fdo#67464 as an enhancement. Unfo

ImageMagick convert -- a required bundle to handle EPS on Windows and OSX?

Looking at issue fdo#62051 , why no versions of LibreOffice seem to handle insertion of EPS. Looking in OpenGrok at ieps.cxx Linux seems to use the GhostS

Ref issue 75489, what is intended purpose for the "non visible" buttons that now show on context menu of each toolbar?

Here is a mixed UX and Dev question... As submitted by a vigilant user, "OfficeUser" (Norbert N.), https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75489";>fdo#74589 raises an interesting UI question, introduced for 4.2, what is intended purpose for the "non visible" buttons that now show on co

Windows TinderBoxes of Master need attention

@Marcus, @Kendy, @Christian Other than Thorsten's TB 42, the Windows TinderBoxes of master (TBs 38, 39 and 47) have been missing in action... Could you each give them a little love as time permits. Thanks! Stuart -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Windows

OS X Accessibility regression bug 74121

Have a nasty regression in Apple OS X accessibility fdo#74121 Looks to have been caused by an AOO contributed refactoring attempting to isolate VCL Window type naming from NS Window and NS View type naming. Something was not quite correc

Keyboard navigation in StartCenter and Template Manager

@Kendy, @Zolnai Thanks for the work on the backingwindow.cxx and thumbnailview.cxx keyboard navigation to resolve fdo#71763 and fdo#71764. Will test the F6 navigation as the next TB builds of master roll around. Since you've already gotten so far into the key board navigation might I be able to

Re: A stack trace for BZ bug 73464 - 4.2.0.2 RC2 QA Blocker -- crash when IA2 bridge is active and ENTER key is pressed

Unfortunately looks like the same IA2 crashing issue continues with the RC3 build. Not fit for release. fdo#73464 -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/A-stack-trace-for-BZ-bug-73464-4-2-0-2-RC2-QA-Blocker

Windows TB builds of master have all sputtered

If no one has noticed, the four TB Windows builds of master went bad late on the 21st. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Windows-TB-builds-of-master-have-all-sputtered-tp4093494.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: A stack trace for BZ bug 73464 - 4.2.0.2 RC2 QA Blocker -- crash when IA2 bridge is active and ENTER key is pressed

With the pending 4.2.0 RC3 spin, I can't say I'm comfortable with current state of resolving fdo#73464 . Hey, I'd even be happy if someone else can report reproducing the crash on the 4.2.0.2 RC2 build, ;-) I've posted up a set of the DrMem

Re: Grouping UI elements

Tamás, As you look at adjusting the UI grouping of the 'Help' and 'Extension' buttons, a currently annoying aspect of the Nested GtkBox's used is that each level of the box gets picked up and announced by screen reader AT. Although not set to focus, each GtkBox seems to get picked up as empty "W

Re: A stack trace for BZ bug 73464 - 4.2.0.2 RC2 QA Blocker -- crash when IA2 bridge is active and ENTER key is pressed

I've added additional Windows WinDbg based stack traces (soffice.bin attached to WinDbg, and of a ProcDump generated dump file). Posted to the BZ issue: fdo#73464 -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/A-st

A stack trace for BZ bug 73464 - 4.2.0.2 RC2 QA Blocker -- crash when IA2 bridge is active and ENTER key is pressed

I've posted up stack trace for the the IAccessible2 related hang of the Windows 4.2.0.2 RC2 builds to BZ. fdo#73464 It looks to be an OLE32 issue, but I'm not clear (or I could be too late in the crash to have the correct point of failure).

Re: minutes of ESC call ...

Michael Meeks-5 wrote > + decide on whether to remove legacy Java Access Bridge from 4.2 > (Michael S) > [ decided not to for now, historically good to have old RTF + new > RTF > filters, so it's easy to try out if new bugs are causd by new > code ] While probably sound, th

Win-X86@42 TB needs some TLC

@Thorsten, Could you give the Tinderbox Win-X86@42 a bump. There are a couple of 4.2.0beta2+ commits that I'd like to review. Thanks! Stuart -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Win-X86-42-TB-needs-some-TLC-tp4087500.html Sent from the Dev mailing list arch

Re: is the UIConfig folder in root of install direcotry correct? fdo#72451

Matúš K. fixed the regression. Useable TB builds again as of 10 Dec. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/is-the-UIConfig-folder-in-root-of-install-direcotry-correct-fdo-72451-tp4087443p4087498.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _

is the UIConfig folder in root of install direcotry correct? fdo#72451

Seems like something didn't go quite right with recent refactoring of UIConfiguration. From 7 Dec builds of master we've had a directory UIConfig in the root of the install directory and we seem to be missing .UI configuration details needed on launch--with Fatal Error resulting. Have fdo#72451 <

Re: debug symbols for current Windows TB-39 LODev 4.3.0.0 master build

@Kendy, Thanks! The symbols are up and I'm able to parse for a debug review with Process Monitor v3.05 on XP with addition of current Win7 SDK dbghelp.dll and .NET 4 framework. Now I just need to figure out where the thing goes south on XP... been through it twice already and nothing is jumping o

debug symbols for current Windows TB-39 LODev 4.3.0.0 master build

@Kendy, Any chance of putting up Windows debug symbols to go with the "--enable-debug" configured debug build of master you're spinning on TB-39? Have a crash fdo#72185 with limited log details when running on Windows XP with the IAccessibl

Re: ia2 branch sucessfully integrated with trunk as rev 1542312

And of course this is on the "upstream" AOO project side, implementing and IAccessible2 based native bridge for Windows. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/ia2-branch-sucessfully-integrated-with-trunk-as-rev-1542312-tp4083537p4083539.html Sent from the Dev mai

ia2 branch sucessfully integrated with trunk as rev 1542312

Steve Yin's ia2 branch has been successfully merged into trunk as rev 1542312, nightly Windows buildbot build for 16 Nov #837 is functional with a native Windows bridge provided by IAccessible2. Please report any issues against AOO bugzilla issues i107914

Re: UNO API doesn't work as expected when ATT enabled

Stephan Bergmann-2 wrote > I cannot reproduce any problem with a current master build, at least on > Windows 7 with MS Narrator (Control Panel - Ease of Access Center - > Start Narrator) enabled. Expert Config comes up relatively quickly even > and appears fully functional. Not sure you'd hav

TinderBox script build question

So noticed that the TB 27 builds of the 4.1 branch has .dmg installers that are being named as 4.0.6 builds. I sent Thorsten a note about it, and he had not been aware but was just running the build scripts. So anyone know wha

Re: Shortcuts not displayed in menu's

Believe they get recorded into a panel specific .xcu file, or the generic GenericCommands.xcu http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/officecfg/registry/data/org/openoffice/Office/UI/GenericCommands.xcu Entries to receive a shortcut (aka. accelerator) are tagged with a tilde "~" Also, seems li

Re: Making VS2012 builds usable with XP

Jan Holesovsky-4 wrote > ...@39 updated now, the next build should be usable on XP. Yep, confirmed working on 32-bit Windows XP sp3 with today's 2013-10-04_08.16.05 TB 39 build of master. Thanks! -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Making-VS2012-builds-usable

Re: Making VS2012 builds usable with XP

Markus, Great! Unfortunately build logs for Kendy's TB 39 of master show that is not yet configured to build with that flag. I guess adjusting it to do so should resolve fdo#69517 . Kendy? Stuart -- View this message in context:

Windows build failures - no viable Tinderbox builds

So, not to pester but figured I'd give Pedro a break. Any prognosis for the Windows builds? The two active Windows TB (39 & 42) have been failing builds for several days now. Stuart -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Windows-build-failures-no-viable-Tin

Re: Question on Java JDK build environments impacting JRE use

Noel, You have continued to say that simply changing the byte code does nothing. Even if we accept that, the issue remains that there are functional differences between the current feature set represented by J2SE 5.0 targeted bytecode and the current feature set that JDK SE 7 is configured to p

Re: Question on Java JDK build environments impacting JRE use

David, David Ostrovsky-3 wrote > But anyway i can conduct a new and shiny "51" byte code version of LO if > you would like to try it and see if we have any improvements with JAB > with it? I would still very much like to explore this further if you are able to generate viable Java 1.7 bytecode o

Re: Question on Java JDK build environments impacting JRE use

David, Yes! I will happily work with your JDK 7 based build with Java 7 bytecode to see if that restores the JAB function Oracle clobbered when they moved Java Access Bridge into the base JRE at 1.7u6. Thanks for the history... Can't fault Tor's work on fixing the compiler java_target_version to

  1   2   >