[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Changes to 'refs/changes/31/231/2'

___ Libreoffice-commits mailing list libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Changes to 'refs/changes/31/231/1'

___ Libreoffice-commits mailing list libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Changes to 'refs/changes/32/232/3'

___ Libreoffice-commits mailing list libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Changes to 'refs/changes/32/232/2'

___ Libreoffice-commits mailing list libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Changes to 'refs/changes/32/232/1'

___ Libreoffice-commits mailing list libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Changes to 'refs/changes/32/232/4'

___ Libreoffice-commits mailing list libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits

Re: Gerrit review patch query helper...

Sebastian Spaeth writes: > querrit can perform easy queries and code review. It provides shortcuts > and convenience features. For example: got my examples wrong. Obviously gerrit query mine --> querrit query mine While at it, one last example that is nice (all open patches menti

Re: Gerrit review patch query helper...

Hi, sorry for shameless self-plugs but I think this tool has become really useful now: querrit can perform easy queries and code review. It provides shortcuts and convenience features. For example: gerrit query mine lists all open review requests that were submitted by me. (achieved by putting [

Gerrit review patch query helper...

Hi all, I was annoyed by the oververbose gerrit query output so I fixed it for me. I learned too late that David has something similar as logerrit in the core repository. But it is in shell script, and I have written a small query helper in python. It lists outstanding patches similar to "git log"

My experience: Gerrit from a casual contributors view

Hi all, I just pushed my first test patch to gerrit and would like to share my steps and issues: 1) Registered account using openid: painless. Being able to use your gmail/yahoo/launchpad account is a boon. Not another random password :) Added ssh key. This was an easy process. 2) Failed to

[PATCH] sw/.../crsrsh.cxx: Translate some German comments

: Sebastian Spaeth --- sw/source/core/crsr/crsrsh.cxx | 127 ++-- 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-) diff --git a/sw/source/core/crsr/crsrsh.cxx b/sw/source/core/crsr/crsrsh.cxx index 386798b..abd0447 100644 --- a/sw/source/core/crsr/crsrsh.cxx +++ b/sw

MPL/LGPL blanket license

Just in case some code actually ends up in LibO: All of my past & future contributions to LibreOffice may be licensed under the MPL/LGPLv3+ dual license. Sebastian Spaeth ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org

Re: [Libreoffice] Remove CREDITS.odt?

On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 12:24:55 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: > > It was planned to create it automatically via a script. For now, I > > simply run it from time to time on my laptop, creating an .html file > > which had been manually converted to .odt. > > Ah - so, we can prolly do that during

Re: [Libreoffice] Remove CREDITS.odt?

On Sat, 09 Jul 2011 15:11:53 +0200, Thomas Arnhold wrote: > This is a good point. Is there any packaging script if a release rolls > out? Maybe credits.odt update could be done automatically within this. It was planned to create it automatically via a script. For now, I simply run it from time t

Re: [Libreoffice] howto tar or deb package

On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 10:07:31 +0100, Ralf Saalmüller wrote: > Is there a way to make a package or to build a deb package? A howto? > It is a little bit of a mess to tell people it will work but you have > to run the compiler all day long. Offering a community-build would be > great. ./confi

Re: [Libreoffice] De-Java-ise flat XML export

On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 22:30:50 +0100, Peter Jentsch wrote: > Hi Michael, > > I'm from Germany, where XSLT at least currently is slightly more popular > than COBOL. But compared to, say, python, both are just background noise :) http://www.google.com/trends?q=COBOL%2C+XSLT%2C+python&ctab=0&geo=d

Re: [Libreoffice] LO status bar annoyances

improved, other should remain customizable. I do know that there is a reason and a proponent behind all those items. > The only proper way to have a "Sebastian Spaeth" UI of LibreOffice I > see: > Convince your developer collegues to build an UI framework which allows > such ch

Re: [Libreoffice] v2 of the configure.in/scp2 patch to allow selecting themes

On Thu, 9 Dec 2010 13:20:08 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > I'd prefer if those would only be set in scp2 module when those are > actually used, and not globally. Sorry, for this my build system foo of LibO is too limited and *I* am not capable of just creating defines in a single module. This

[Libreoffice] v3 of the configure.in/scp2 patch to allow selecting themes

DOH, here comes v3, I left a debug output in configure.in in v2, otherwise no change. Sorry Sebastian >From 6c379488250f5a3349dfc2d805f70a0f084fe07d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sebastian Spaeth Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 12:23:55 +0100 Subject: [PATCHv3] Introduce an --enable-theme=&quo

[Libreoffice] v2 of the configure.in/scp2 patch to allow selecting themes

gp Description: PGP signature >From 6c379488250f5a3349dfc2d805f70a0f084fe07d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sebastian Spaeth Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 12:23:55 +0100 Subject: [PATCHv2] Introduce an --enable-theme="theme1 theme2..." option By default, we include all defaults as before, but if given, we can limit the nu

[Libreoffice] Don't harcode theme list

this, but I might also not have time to do so. So here you go for inclusion and further refinement. >From cf3c35b5d76f2074b721dc6acfeb20662dec1f5a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sebastian Spaeth Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 12:23:55 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Introduce an --enable-theme="theme1 the

Re: [Libreoffice] Easter eggs, was: Re: Comments on RC1

> Thanks Sebastian for the link. It helps. Saddly, I don't see references on > easter eggs for Office 2003 and later. They could just not be found as the code is closed. In contrast to LibO :-P Really, we are not talking virii. We are talking scrolling contributor credits on some key presses and

Re: [Libreoffice] Easter eggs, was: Re: Comments on RC1

On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 11:09:33 -0700, "Tor Lillqvist" wrote: > Just in case anybody is counting votes, I am against removing Easter eggs. I > think we need more of them. And more rude comments in the source code. In obscure languages! Perhaps German? Ahh no wait... pgp1ntXNd0TLY.pgp Descripti

Re: [Libreoffice] Easter eggs, was: Re: Comments on RC1

Your IT department should not allow the use of MS products then: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Easter_eggs_in_Microsoft_products :) Emacs is the worst. It even contains Tetris :-). Sebastian ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org

Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1

On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 08:04:30 -0800 (PST), plino wrote: > No. LO is NOT working on it. This has been discussed on other topics since > late Nov (Beta1 or 2) Yes, they are. Michael Meeks disected the Windows installer and posted information about it just recently. Stop pretending you know what peopl

Re: [Libreoffice] Bundled fonts

On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 13:05:16 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Is not sufficient afaik, writer uses opens___.ttf, too afaik. opens___.ttf is universally installed, independt of what configure options you use. Sebastian pgpGCv6hekX7Q.pgp Description: PGP signature __

Re: [Libreoffice] Bundled fonts

On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 12:30:00 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > > Not quibbling about the option naming here (--with vs --enable etc), do > > we really need to bundle those fonts by default? > IMHO: Yes. ... > But not the Graphite variants. And that matters in developer installs how? :-) Distros a

Re: [Libreoffice] Bundled fonts

oth options are turned off by default, distros that want fonts bundled need to set that in their distro conf. Optinions? opens___.ttf will still be bundled in any case >From f58b6d6d322d3dbb035117644fcdf7ae3093f97a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sebastian Spaeth Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 12:21:09

Re: [Libreoffice] RC1 / size redux ...

On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 09:29:03 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > dat 24 Mb As I said, I built without language support, and still got an English AND a french thesaurus installed. The french one is 4.6MB of uncompressed text. I don't know french. Any chance to only install language fil

[Libreoffice] Bundled fonts

By default, we bundle 20MB of TTF fonts that I mostly have installed as system fonts already. We have 2 badly documented configure options: --without-fonts (--with-fonts is the default) and --enable-extra-font (not enabled by default, putting more .ttfs on your disk). Not quibbling about the op

Re: [Libreoffice] RC1 / size redux ...

On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 17:55:19 +, Michael Meeks wrote: > So - as we all know, RC1 is too large; ... > http://users.freedesktop.org/~michael/sizes.ods This is a phantastic analysis, thanks for doing that Michael. Amazing that OTP + license files make 50% of our used space :). As someo

Re: [Libreoffice] new bootstrap: How do the devellop[ install?

On Tue, 7 Dec 2010 10:39:41 +0100, Joost Eekhoorn wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > bin/ooinstall is not mentioned on the new webpage. yep, I removed it. > Can you mention "make dev-install" on the webpage? Done, although everything going beyond there real basic instructions is supposed to be in the w

Re: [Libreoffice] new bootstrap: How do the devellop[ install?

On Tue, 7 Dec 2010 09:19:52 +0100, Joost Eekhoorn wrote: > Now I want to do something like: > bin/ooinstall -l /home/joost/work/libretest > > But there is no bin/ooinstall ooinstall should actually be available in the path after a build as the Linux*.sh file gets sourced during build. But it's

[Libreoffice] Commit notifications (was: Use GtkStatusIcon instead of libegg)

On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 16:12:50 +, Christopher Backhouse wrote: > PS - is there a git commit notification list I can subscribe to? The git > web interface is a royal pain to navigate. You could subscribe to the RSS feed at: http://cia.vc/stats/project/LibreOffice which should give you reason

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Use GtkStatusIcon instead of libegg

On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 14:08:36 +, Michael Meeks wrote: > Thanks so much for this Christopher ! what is your next planned > feat ? :-) Perhaps removing the bundled libegg project and disable copying it in our install package? :-) Sebastian pgpfAQ227kXmt.pgp Description: PGP signature ___

Re: [Libreoffice] new credits up, now with less contributors

On Fri, 03 Dec 2010 09:32:11 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > Hmm. My stat looks weird. > > Kohei Yoshida > Commits: 643 > Joined: 2009-06-19 Yep, incredible but true, that happened when taking away the "build" repo. Per IRC discussion added back in. Stats are back to normal. Sebastian pgpuHkHc

[Libreoffice] new credits up, now with less contributors

http://libreoffice.org/credits.html has been updated. On Wol's request it contains now the last commit date too, to see how up to date it is. This is the first version without the "build" repo being included in the analyses (just the 19 LO repos), and we are down to 307 individuals in total... (se

Re: [Libreoffice] defaulting to --without-java ... (?)

On Fri, 03 Dec 2010 01:50:24 -0700, "Tor Lillqvist" wrote: > Aren't you mixing up two orthogonal issues here? Whether to use Java when > building LibreOffice, and whether to have and distribute parts of the > LibreOffice end product requiring a Java runtime. > > Isn't Java used during the build

Re: [Libreoffice] defaulting to --without-java ... (?)

On Thu, 2 Dec 2010 20:31:02 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > > On Thu, 2 Dec 2010 17:45:17 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > >> >>        would anyone scream if we defaulted configure to --without-java ? > &

Re: [Libreoffice] defaulting to --without-java ... (?)

On Thu, 2 Dec 2010 17:45:17 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > >>        would anyone scream if we defaulted configure to --without-java ? > > I would. I would not. > >> [ this is primarily for developers ], should make it easier to build > > Come on, what is hard about installing a JDK? My L

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] Fix for bug/feature request i#8288

On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 15:31:56 +0100, Lubos Lunak wrote: > I've figured it out. SwCrsrSaveState only saves the state on the stack, the > actual restoring is done by SwCursor::RestoreSavePos(). I'll change the code > to use it. While you are understanding the code, can you add some comments to the

Re: [Libreoffice] [Release note 3.4] Re: Fix for bug/feature request i#8288

On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 14:30:41 +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > > Patch ensures that after doing "replace all" the cursor is left at > > original position, rather than moved to the position of the last > > replacement. > > Wow! - what a great usability improvement, with few lines of code :-) > Pushed

Re: [Libreoffice] Script to find undocumented classes

On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 18:50:17 +0100, Lubos Lunak wrote: > On Tuesday 30 of November 2010, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > > Additionally, I think most classes don't necessarily need detailed > > docs for all methods in the first place (which may also hurt later > > merging from OOo), but would already be

Re: [Libreoffice] LO status bar annoyances

On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 16:22:36 +0100, Regina Henschel wrote: > Sebastian Spaeth schrieb: > > Am I the only one finding the current status bar pretty much useless? > Yes ;) OK, let me be more precise "has improvement potential in its current form" :) > To learn more about t

Re: [Libreoffice] LO status bar annoyances

On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 19:50:28 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote: > Information given by the status bar, plus the control options it gives, > often is important for users I advise. Nobody, lest I, doubts or denies that. But do your users like to remember on which items they have to single, or double-click t

Re: [Libreoffice] LO status bar annoyances

On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:54:37 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > > a) This is the standard state of my documents (see, I tend to modify > > docs in a editor, DOH), and that exclamation mark purports some > > sense of urgency and failure. > Sorry I have to disagree there. Thanks for the

Re: [Libreoffice] [UX] LO status bar annoyances

Part 2 on the Changed icon part. On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 22:31:44 +0100, Christoph Noack wrote: > DOCUMENT CHANGED INDICATION> > A solution should: > * just work > * be unobtrusive (don't catch attention if it isn't required, > don't waste space) > * be self-explanatory (if

Re: [Libreoffice] [UX] LO status bar annoyances

On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 22:31:44 +0100, Christoph Noack wrote: Thanks, I am going to reply to this in 2 parts. One on the general status bar part and one on the changed icon issue to keep them separated and the mails readable. > STATUS BAR > For example, the little '*' is mainly caused by the need for

Re: [Libreoffice] LO status bar annoyances

On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 11:26:54 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > Am I the only one finding the current status bar pretty much useless? May I propose these changes to the writer statusbar? These have been achieved by modifying a few lines of .xml and are much cleaner IMHO. See the old and the

[Libreoffice] LO status bar annoyances

Am I the only one finding the current status bar pretty much useless? About the only thing I actually use there, is the zoom slidebar (and I wouldn't use that if I were able to have a single "set 'optimal' zoom button in my toolbar which doesn't seem possible). - What annoys me most is the "docum

Re: [Libreoffice] High contrast issue

On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:28:58 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > Hey guys I am experiencing a really nasty HC issue. > > I am using the obsidian theme on KDE. Doesn't OOo/LO switch to Highcontrast automatically with a dark theme? I know a lot of people that would be unhappy if this were really th

Re: [Libreoffice] rtl_alloc_cache microopt question (& patch)

On Fri, 26 Nov 2010 13:42:29 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > -if (n >= SAL_MAX_SIZE - (RTL_MEMALIGN + RTL_MEMALIGN - 1)) > +if (n > SAL_MAX_SIZE - 2 * RTL_MEMALIGN DOH, as all those CAP-Macros are constants anyway, the compiler would probably evaluate that to a const valu

[Libreoffice] rtl_alloc_cache microopt question (& patch)

judge this. The new code is easier to read in any case (I think). Would someone have a quick look at the patch? >From 4b1be5485c54b0e2cdf3c1e88479cbbdc7703888 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sebastian Spaeth Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 13:25:11 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Simplify rtl_alloc_cache so

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice WikiHelp

On Fri, 26 Nov 2010 11:22:02 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > how do you guys carry out the conference calls are they carried out on > skype? Ho Jonathan, if you actually had a look at the link that was given, you would see how they are carried out. > > [1] http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Doc

[Libreoffice] main.xdg 2 largest sections not needed on startup?

Hi all, after looking at kcachegrind for a while, I found that a significant amount of our startuptime comes from allocating string memory and comparing strings 400k times, much of it reading the configuration files. I just looked at the .xcd files now and of that I focused on main.xcd because this

Re: [Libreoffice] Are ISC/BSD-licensed contributions acceptable?

On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 13:21:33 +, Wols Lists wrote: > > and edited. Tracking which line of code is licensed under which license > > combo is a job for lawyer detectives that nobody wants to pay in the > > end. And most probably they could not give you definitive answers anyway > > as that case ha

Re: [Libreoffice] ucb/source/ucb compilation error

On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 10:47:22 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > > +#define OSL_LOG_PREFIX (OSL_THIS_FILE, ":", OSL_THIS_FUNC, ":", > > OSL_MACRO_VALUE_TO_STRING( __LINE__ ), "; ") > > On OOo there is a bug open to remove OSL_THIS_FUNC (or was it an E

Re: [Libreoffice] ucb/source/ucb compilation error

On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 09:40:53 +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote: > -#define OSL_LOG_PREFIX OSL_THIS_FILE ":" OSL_THIS_FUNC ":" > OSL_MACRO_VALUE_TO_STRING( __LINE__ ) "; " > +#define OSL_LOG_PREFIX (OSL_THIS_FILE, ":", OSL_THIS_FUNC, ":", > OSL_MACRO_VALUE_TO_STRING( __LINE__ ), "; ") On OOo there is

Re: [Libreoffice] quick starter applet/systray defaults and various confusion

On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 21:49:38 -0500, Kevin Hunter wrote: > Frankly, I think the > QuickStart solution was always the wrong answer. It represents to me a > quick and (truly) dirty solution. I believe the "correct" answer is to > streamline LO. However, the latter solution involves a bit more >

[Libreoffice] Licenses (was: Impress)

Sorry for getting back to this minor issue, but it annoyed the heck out of me :): On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 15:33:08 +, Michael Meeks wrote: > and are we still shipping a per-language, duplicate license ? Apropos Licenses, I had a look at our LICENSE (13kb) and the hidious THIRDPARTYLICENSES.html

Re: [Libreoffice] HC Cleanup

On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 11:48:01 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > To my absolute shame, I had filed the marker bug to not forget it but > still haven't done or moved anything. So that should be resolved at the > same time, or has Joe already done it? If so, can you mark as resolv

Re: [Libreoffice] HC Cleanup

On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 20:57:47 +, "Andrew C. E. Dent" wrote: > I've uploaded the files for the HC theme > here:http://people.bath.ac.uk/ea2aced/OOo/svx.zip > However, Sebastain has been rocking the HC theme and moving files via > Git.Perhaps he could upload the files, or just git copy and ren

Re: [Libreoffice] Windows installer: what languages in multi/all_lang? - SDK: Why different version number?

On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 03:21:50 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > It is easy to differentiate between Linux, windows and Mac, but it's > not that easy to distinguish between linux deb and linux rpm (any > suggestions on that one?) Taking the user agent string to search for major distributions? Se

Re: [Libreoffice] Windows installer: what languages in multi/all_lang? - SDK: Why different version number?

On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 15:55:39 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > The question was more targeted with regard to (automatically) creating > a download page - first iteration > http://pumbaa.ooodev.org:7780/home/download-and-sub/ - modeled after > the initial one from Stefan > http://wiki.documentfound

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Impress

On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 15:33:08 +, Michael Meeks wrote: > Oh - seems reasonable; there is no saving in git repos size by removing > it I suppose. So - you need to checkout: Thanks, I think I'll cope once I find time. > Which is wonderful; that is in now ? perhaps we should back-port

Re: [Libreoffice] Are ISC/BSD-licensed contributions acceptable?

On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 16:36:59 +0100, Gioele Barabucci wrote: > Currently the LibO code base is quite liberal wrt copyright statements > and tracing code authors. For example, copyright years and other little > (?) details are way out-of-date. Some projects require script like >

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Impress

On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 20:55:05 +, Michael Meeks wrote: > PS. really pleased to see the image size decrease in the new theme from > 4.8Mb to 3.3Mb - still lots of low hanging fruit there, with the > duplicate "missing icon" icons, and the res/commandimagelist -> cmd/ > rename to save that space .

Re: [Libreoffice] 5 times LGPL installed

On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 15:45:08 +, Michael Meeks wrote: > Hi there, > > On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 13:53 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > > - Module readlicense_oo needs to be modified to not produce them. Patch > > is in git (and reverted again). > > oh - shame -

Re: [Libreoffice] Icons

Hi Ace_dent, you've been asking for the new extracted images for the default set and the hicontrast set. You can see the icons 'live' here http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/artwork/tree/ The are in the default_images and in the custom_ooo_images/hicontrast folders. You can download the whol

[Libreoffice] (no subject)

Hi all, here some nice stats. Summary, is that we lost 34,000 lines of code since we started to code on LO... I used SLOCCount by David A. Wheeler to check our project size. At the time of the "fork" ie the LIBREOFFICE_CREATE tag our clone directory was this big: Total Physical Source Lines of Co

Re: [Libreoffice] 5 times LGPL installed

On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:51:32 +, Michael Meeks wrote: > Personally, I love the LGPL - so, having it five times could be a > feature ;-) And +2 per language supported. And +2 per extension installed :) > I'll add an easy hack to remove the other versions, unless someone here > wants

Re: [Libreoffice] installation and package for Linux SYS distro sucessful

On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 07:04:56 -0400, werner wrote: > I reclaimed about problems with the installer. Meanwhile, > after many work by hand, I get it installed (the most > complete installation I got, was with 'make install', not > with 'bin/ooinstall'). The build program needs to be > improved

[Libreoffice] RFE: abolish memory settings

I hate the options dialog in general :), but one thing that has always confused the heck out of me is the "memory settings" and I propose that could be a nice project for someone: HOW am I supposed to know if 20MB for the LO graphics cache is plenty? And why should care about the space we want to

Re: [Libreoffice] STAR_RESOURCEPATH env variable

On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 19:50:01 +, Michael Meeks wrote: > This is used by 'ooenv': > > export STAR_RESOURCEPATH=`pwd`/../basis-link/program/resource Ooops, thanks for the pointer. I am glad I asked before removing seemingly obsolete code pieces. Perhaps I should insert a code comment expla

Re: [Libreoffice] feature/rip-build-repo - branch for removal of the need of the 'build' repo

On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 04:18:46 +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > Hi, > > In case you are interested to try to build without the 'build' repo (the > rawbuild/ way), you can try to get the feature/rip-build-repo branch > which I hope is going to become the 'official' way of building soon ;-) > > git cl

Re: [Libreoffice] feature/rip-build-repo - branch for removal of the need of the 'build' repo

On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 04:18:46 +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > In case you are interested to try to build without the 'build' repo (the > rawbuild/ way), you can try to get the feature/rip-build-repo branch > which I hope is going to become the 'official' way of building soon ;-) Very cool, I look fo

[Libreoffice] STAR_RESOURCEPATH env variable

in /libs-gui/tools/source/rc/resmgr.cxx we load resource files either from "$OOO_BASE_DIR/program/resource" or from the path specified in the env variable STAR_RESOURCEPATH. Is it save to assume that this is a historical leftover that I can delete? Sebastian 209 RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRING

Re: [Libreoffice] use dbglevel=1 for --enable-debug builds?

On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 13:01:42 +0100, David Tardon wrote: 1) > one would just run build -- dbglevel=2 in the desired module similarly > as one runs build -- debug=true today. 2) > As an alternative, we could add optional level argument to > --enable-debug or add another option, say, --enable-asserti

[Libreoffice] Tango icon theme leftovers

Hi all, this is a list of 412 icons that are in the tango theme, but not in the default_images theme. Some of the are obvious High contrast icons that can be killed. But what about others? Should I delete those? (I kept the .xcb.bz2 and .svg as source files in the tango theme). See the full list o

Re: [Libreoffice] setting ulimit before running soffice

On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 14:01:18 -0500, Kevin Hunter wrote: > At 11:07am -0500 Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > Nah, I don't run as root ulimit -c unlimited works fine. I'd guess > > that there some hard limits set that ordinary users aren't allowed > > to override set for you. > I suppos

[Libreoffice] 5 times LGPL installed

We use up 3 MB in order to copy the LGPL 5 times in my LO install folder. I know we care about obeying to licensing, but isn't that a bit over the top? And I guess that if I installed more languages I would get it even more often... .: 164K LICENSE.odt 629K LICENSE.html 419K LICENSE licenses: 62

Re: [Libreoffice] Icons

On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 19:54:17 +, "Andrew C. E. Dent" wrote: > * brand/shell * Still in Default (not sure if this is used? Would suggest > deletion...):backing_hc-pt_BR.png , backing_right_hc-pt_BR.png > All artwork in hicontrast is just stock (not hc). I have created a HC > replacement (just h

Re: [Libreoffice] Icons

On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:15:39 +, "Andrew C. E. Dent" wrote: > I think the Classic theme should no longer be shipped, in the same way we > dropped Industrial. > > I also can not see the point of including Oxygen, with less than 1% of > original artwork... I'll defer decisions as to which ico

Re: [Libreoffice] (no subject)

On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:28:46 +, Michael Meeks wrote: > Fun - so, of course, statistics without a robust interpretation can be > rather dangerous :-) Right, and netto LOC is a pretty bad measure of productivity and effectiveness, even if things like COCOMO (?) models andwhatnot suggest ot

Re: [Libreoffice] Error Building

> As I think you're already discovered, you'll find "lxh" mentioned in > a .src file in svtools, and it'll have a matching define in the > associaated .hrc, so you need to remove the HICONSTRAST resource from > the .src file, remove the define from the .hrc and then fix > whatever .cxx and .hxx fil

Re: [Libreoffice] Error Building

On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:28:28 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 10:06:38 +, Nigel Hawkins wrote: > > Just done a pull and am now getting a build error: > > Entering .../build/rawbuild/svtools/util > > Making:svten-US.res > > Compiling: r

Re: [Libreoffice] Error Building

On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 10:06:38 +, Nigel Hawkins wrote: > Just done a pull and am now getting a build error: > Entering .../build/rawbuild/svtools/util > Making:svten-US.res > Compiling: rsc_svt > f268: Error: The image(s) http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] Icons

On Tue, 02 Nov 2010 10:21:49 +, Michael Meeks wrote: > Currently our hicontrast theme is built by packimages/pack/makefile.mk: > > # generate the HiContrast icon set > $(MISC)$/hicontrast.flag .PHONY : > $(PERL) $(SOLARENV)$/bin$/hicontrast-to-theme.pl > $(SOLARSRC)$/default_images

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Easy Hacks: Translation of Comments from German to English

On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 23:54:33 +0100, Daniel Di Marco wrote: PUSHED. Nice translations. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM in base

On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 17:32:47 +0100, Pierre-André Jacquod wrote: > hello, > it seems base in now clear (this one had spaces,...) PUSHED ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffic

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix the last commit in build repository.

On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 16:09:26 +0100, Giuseppe Castagno wrote: > --- a/bin/install-artwork > +. bin/setup While that patch might fix things, I believe a script in ./bin should not assume anything about what the current working directory is. We should either use a relative directory, relative to the

Re: [Libreoffice] High Contrast Cleanup

On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 14:35:48 +0100, Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai wrote: > Hi! > > What about to not to move but copy the HC set and crate the new HC set > now? This way we have more time to test (and/or) fix @ optimize the > newly created HC inconset. Copying them over would mean, our download tarballs q

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] remove some comments / dead code in calc

Pushed ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] SvxHyperlinkDlg still used?

On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:46:19 +, Michael Meeks wrote: > On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 11:12 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > > Heh! The short story is that this dialog code still *is* used, as a > > Hyperlink *toolbar*. +1 for removing that beast anyway. Sebastian pgpiwvdu3P3U0.pgp Description: PGP

Re: [Libreoffice] Calc usability improvements

On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 10:32:04 +, Michael Meeks wrote: > > > - Shift+Del permanently removes the file right then. > > Which makes me wonder; should shift-del give you this 'delete contents' > option in that mode (or is the menu sufficient). Yes, that is how I would expect it. del doing th

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] use the correct tar binary on OpenBSD

On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 03:41:05 -0700, "Tor Lillqvist" wrote: > The "outer" configure.in already takes a --with-gnu-tar option and > sets the GNUTAR autoconf substitution, isn't it easier to use that, > and make the indicated GNU tar propagate to bin/install-artwork some > way? The inner configure.

Re: [Libreoffice] LO crash

Gtk:ERROR:/build/buildd/gtk+2.0-2.22.0/gtk/gtkfilesystemmodel.c:746:gtk_file_system_model_sort: assertion failed: (r == n_visible_rows) > > Looks very much like a gtk+ issue. Perhaps related to memory corruption > (but unlikely) - what version of gtk+ are you using ? and/or is there > anyth

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] use the correct tar binary on OpenBSD

> Al the stupid GNU double dash arguments, in this case --exclude :) It tries to exclude .svn. Do we need that or can't we get rid of it? We are a git-shop. :) Sebastian ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedes

Re: [Libreoffice] LO crash

DOH, was missing the last 10 backtrace lines. Here they are from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #34 0x7fffedbdf24d in GtkXLib::Yield(bool, bool) () from /opt/libreoffice/basis3.3/program/libvclplug_gtklx.so #35 0x7312a571 in Application::Yield(bool) () from /opt/libreoffice/program/.

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Removed BmpColorMode from too classes in libs-gui

Pushed ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

  1   2   >