LibreOffice / license ...

2012-03-18 Thread Robert Nagy
All of my past & future contributions to LibreOffice may be licensed under the MPL/LGPLv3+ dual license, including the go-oo code ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] About merging and people not paying attention

2011-07-27 Thread Robert Nagy
I am talking about things that were fixed once and then overwritten by a merge. I mean it conflicts for a reason! On (2011-07-27 13:32), Tor Lillqvist wrote: > >> If a patch/merge touches all of the platform files then it should be > >> sent to the developers responsible for that part of the tree

Re: [Libreoffice] About merging and people not paying attention

2011-07-27 Thread Robert Nagy
On (2011-07-27 20:31), Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 20:06:06 +0200 > Robert Nagy wrote: > > > If a patch/merge touches all of the platform files then it should be > > sent to the developers responsible for that part of the tree directly, > > Comp

Re: [Libreoffice] About merging and people not paying attention

2011-07-27 Thread Robert Nagy
On (2011-07-27 15:53), Thomas Arnhold wrote: > On 07/27/2011 02:35 PM, Robert Nagy wrote: > >I would like to ask my fellow developers to be more careful > >about merging and _touching_ files at all that they don't > >understand. During the last two days I had to fix sev

Re: [Libreoffice] About merging and people not paying attention

2011-07-27 Thread Robert Nagy
On (2011-07-27 10:50), Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > Having done massive merge with conflicting files numbering in the > thousands, I would be less quick to throw a stone here. > I also had to iron some kink on MacOs this week-end as a fallback of > gnumake4 merge... but all in all it 'cost' me few hou

Re: [Libreoffice] About merging and people not paying attention

2011-07-27 Thread Robert Nagy
On (2011-07-27 10:03), Kohei Yoshida wrote: > On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 14:35 +0200, Robert Nagy wrote: > > I would like to ask my fellow developers to be more careful > > about merging and _touching_ files at all that they don't > > understand. During the last two

[Libreoffice] About merging and people not paying attention

2011-07-27 Thread Robert Nagy
I would like to ask my fellow developers to be more careful about merging and _touching_ files at all that they don't understand. During the last two days I had to fix several problems that were introduced by merging changes, hell I even found files with _conflicts_ in them and the guy who pushed i

[Libreoffice] add newlines to EOF where missing to avoid compile time warnings

2011-06-20 Thread Robert Nagy
Hi I got fed up by the warnings while compiling. Okay to commit? diff --git a/sc/source/core/data/documen8.cxx b/sc/source/core/data/documen8.cxx index 23cb408..90fdf5c 100644 --- a/sc/source/core/data/documen8.cxx +++ b/sc/source/core/data/documen8.cxx @@ -1621,4 +1621,4 @@ void ScDocument::Trans

Re: [Libreoffice] Making our Own Banned.h

2011-06-20 Thread Robert Nagy
On (2011-06-20 05:48), Tor Lillqvist wrote: > > I have to say, I'm kind of unenthusiastic about deprecating strlen and > > memcpy. > > I agree fully. > > I was under the impression that LO mostly uses its own (too many) string > classes anyway, and usually for strings of UTF-16 (16-bit) elemen

Re: [Libreoffice] Making our Own Banned.h

2011-06-20 Thread Robert Nagy
On (2011-06-20 15:30), Marc-André Laverdi??re wrote: > >> - Gcc TODO For GCC you could redefine all of the functions with the deprecated attribute like: #include int printf(const char *format, ...) __attribute__((deprecated)); int main() { printf(""); return 0; } Which will e

Re: [Libreoffice] Making our Own Banned.h

2011-06-20 Thread Robert Nagy
: strcpy() is almost always misused, please use strlcpy() On (2011-06-20 12:09), Robert Nagy wrote: > Hello, > > Well you don't have it any other supported platforms either. > You can't just use macros to use those whenever they are supported, > we would have to walk thr

Re: [Libreoffice] Making our Own Banned.h

2011-06-20 Thread Robert Nagy
implementing something, I'm suggesting ISO/IEC TR > 24731. This looked like the best API for avoiding buffer overflows. > > It is implemented by Microsoft, but sadly it seems like we don't > have it in glibc > > > Marc-André Laverdi??re > Software Security S

Re: [Libreoffice] Making our Own Banned.h

2011-06-19 Thread Robert Nagy
Hey, Oh I just love this code, but are we actually planning on using the size-bounded string functions like strlcpy(3)? Because then you have to consider that these are not part of glibc so we will have to ship our own version which is not a big deal at all It would be a huge effort to switch all

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] fix quickstart on platforms using GTK and use the correct plugin name

2011-06-19 Thread Robert Nagy
After switching to gbuild ENABLE_SYSTRAY_GTK was not defined in the sfx target and the plugin name for libqstart was also hardcoded for linux. --- sfx2/Library_qstart.mk|7 +++ sfx2/Library_sfx.mk |9 + sfx2/source/appl/shutdownicon.cxx |2 +- 3 fi

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] fix fdo#37110 --quickstart shouldn't show start center

2011-06-19 Thread Robert Nagy
--- desktop/source/app/app.cxx |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/desktop/source/app/app.cxx b/desktop/source/app/app.cxx index d8483a2..8c86886 100644 --- a/desktop/source/app/app.cxx +++ b/desktop/source/app/app.cxx @@ -1784,7 +1784,7 @@ int Desktop::Main()

Re: [Libreoffice] Robert Nagy: Problems with your python library patch

2011-04-20 Thread Robert Nagy
After discussing this with Michael it seems the best solution would be to use python-config, it even makes configure.in smaller ;) Please test it with python3 too. diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in index 470aa39..4dd7a4e 100755 --- a/configure.in +++ b/configure.in @@ -4107,12 +4107,9 @@ e

Re: [Libreoffice] Robert Nagy: Problems with your python library patch

2011-04-20 Thread Robert Nagy
Better diff (note that this still requires a shared library and will not work static ones): diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in index 470aa39..0d06542 100755 --- a/configure.in +++ b/configure.in @@ -4108,11 +4108,11 @@ elif test -n "$with_system_python" -o -n "$with_system_libs" && \ A

Re: [Libreoffice] Robert Nagy: Problems with your python library patch

2011-04-20 Thread Robert Nagy
On (2011-04-20 10:14), Michael Meeks wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 09:52 +0200, Andreas Becker wrote: > > Really not. > > The reason is, that the old version does not always work: > > For me, print(distutils.sysconfig.get_config_var('VERSION')); prints > > "3.2", but the library

Re: [Libreoffice] Robert Nagy: Problems with your python library patch

2011-04-20 Thread Robert Nagy
On (2011-04-20 09:52), Andreas Becker wrote: > Robert, > my patch: > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/bootstrap/commit/?h=libreoffice-3-4&id=6c3539d8e1dbad13264b862e1344e3c3a8690dec > your patch: > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/bootstrap/commit/?id=2b03888a918b7020a1f9330686dc53122

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] freebsd support

2011-02-01 Thread Robert Nagy
Hey, I am not sure that the a/desktop/scripts/soffice.sh diff is needed on FreeBSD, I tought $ORIGIN works fine there. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix configure check for BerkleyDB where db_create is macro

2011-01-09 Thread Robert Nagy
if we use that simol it might break other versions of db. On (2011-01-10 10:16), Gökçen Eraslan wrote: > Perşembe 06 Ocak 2011 günü (saat 20:03:28) Petr Mladek şunlar?? yazm??şt??: > > Hi, > > > > this fixed the problem described in the attached mail. > > > > Gökçen, Robert, could you please tes

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] set the icons size based on the DPI just like we do on Mac

2011-01-05 Thread Robert Nagy
Hi I am *not* using any themes, it's the default GTK one. Anyways that does not matter now. On (2011-01-05 19:15), Christian Lohmaier wrote: > Hi Robert, *, > > On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 7:02 PM, Robert Nagy wrote: > > > > We should just ignore all the theming here >

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] set the icons size based on the DPI just like we do on Mac

2011-01-05 Thread Robert Nagy
Hi We should just ignore all the theming here since a lot of people are not running gnome or whatever window manager and just use stock gtk. On (2011-01-05 18:59), Christian Lohmaier wrote: > Hi Robert, *, > > On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Robert Nagy wrote: > > It seems t

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] set the icons size based on the DPI just like we do on Mac

2011-01-05 Thread Robert Nagy
It seems to me that gedit uses GTK_ICON_SIZE_MENU which is 16x16. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] set the icons size based on the DPI just like we do on Mac

2011-01-05 Thread Robert Nagy
inch)" dimensions:1920x1080 pixels (518x291 millimeters) resolution:94x94 dots per inch It is strange for me tho that linux *hardcodes* 75. Where is taht hardcoded? On (2011-01-05 17:14), Michael Meeks wrote: > Hi Robert, > > On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 16:24 +0100, Robert Nagy

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] set the icons size based on the DPI just like we do on Mac

2011-01-05 Thread Robert Nagy
On (2011-01-05 14:27), Michael Meeks wrote: > So - I would prefer to stick with large icons; and not use the DPI > setting. I suggest instead, that we only use large icons if the true Y > resolution > 768 - how does that sound ? Oh wait, I misunderstood. That is wrong. I am on a 1920x1080 di

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] set the icons size based on the DPI just like we do on Mac

2011-01-05 Thread Robert Nagy
On (2011-01-05 14:27), Michael Meeks wrote: > So - I would prefer to stick with large icons; and not use the DPI > setting. I suggest instead, that we only use large icons if the true Y > resolution > 768 - how does that sound ? > > ATB, > > Michael. That would work fine

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] set the icons size based on the DPI just like we do on Mac

2011-01-02 Thread Robert Nagy
--- vcl/unx/gtk/gdi/salnativewidgets-gtk.cxx |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/vcl/unx/gtk/gdi/salnativewidgets-gtk.cxx b/vcl/unx/gtk/gdi/salnativewidgets-gtk.cxx index f7a1cf2..fe7791d 100644 --- a/vcl/unx/gtk/gdi/salnativewidgets-gtk.cxx +++ b/vcl/unx/gtk

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] colon needed for LD_LIBRARY_PATH set but empty

2010-12-10 Thread Robert Nagy
Yaeh it works fine, do not forget unopkg.sh either. On (2010-12-10 20:49), Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 03:43 +0900, Takeshi Abe wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Poking desktop/scripts/soffice.sh for an Easy Hack, I wonder if there > > exists a slight possibility of a trailing ':' of LD_L

Re: [Libreoffice] Different x86 ABI on BSDs and MaxOSX

2010-12-09 Thread Robert Nagy
On (2010-12-08 20:38), Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 18:52 +0100, Robert Nagy wrote: > > Hey, > > > > Sweet! > > > > Should I do a full build with it on i386 or did you test it already > > on the box? > > I tested that testtools wou

Re: [Libreoffice] Different x86 ABI on BSDs and MaxOSX

2010-12-08 Thread Robert Nagy
Hey, Sweet! Should I do a full build with it on i386 or did you test it already on the box? On (2010-12-08 16:49), Caolán McNamara wrote: > So, checking this out on Robert's OpenBSD box and digging into MacOSX > land it appears that Linux has different x86 struct returning rules than > MacOSX an

Re: [Libreoffice] Release tag convention

2010-12-07 Thread Robert Nagy
sure On (2010-12-07 16:36), Petr Mladek wrote: > Hi, > > there is a proposal to use the tag "libreoffice-3.3.0.1" instead of > "LIBREOFFICE_3_3_0_1" and mention it in the LibreOffice/About dialog as > is. It is more clear and understandable. > > Would you mind if we do this change for LibO-3.3-r

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Don't override CFLAGS and LDFLAGS

2010-12-03 Thread Robert Nagy
Yes please. I have this diff too, so just push it to both master and stable. On (2010-12-03 15:39), Thomas Klausner wrote: > Hi! > > I'd like to push the attached patch to bootstrap. > Currently, when finding X (on all platforms but WIN32, DARWIN with > Aqua and OS2), CFLAGS and LDFLAGS are overr

Re: [Libreoffice] new credits up, now with less contributors

2010-12-03 Thread Robert Nagy
Sorry I don't like my colour :) On (2010-12-03 11:49), Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > http://libreoffice.org/credits.html has been updated. On Wol's request > it contains now the last commit date too, to see how up to date it is. > > This is the first version without the "build" repo being included in

[Libreoffice] PATCH: Try to find the proper berkeley db headers and incs

2010-12-01 Thread Robert Nagy
Hi, So this is a modified versio nof patches/dev300/system-db-check.diff to find the proper berkeley db headers and libs. I really would like to get this into bootstrap so please test and comment. Thanks >From 8f5b9b8c85ae9d95dbe13b38abc3b473c045a138 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Robert N

Re: [Libreoffice] 5 times LGPL installed

2010-11-17 Thread Robert Nagy
What I meant was, remove the .odt and make the menu open the cleartext one. On (2010-11-17 16:18), Robert Nagy wrote: > Well remove it from the menu then. > > On (2010-11-17 16:15), Rene Engelhard wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 03:46:23PM +0100, Robert Nagy wrote: >

Re: [Libreoffice] 5 times LGPL installed

2010-11-17 Thread Robert Nagy
Well remove it from the menu then. On (2010-11-17 16:15), Rene Engelhard wrote: > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 03:46:23PM +0100, Robert Nagy wrote: > > Just keep the plaintext one and kill the odt and > > the html ones. They are useless. > > That's no true, the odt is us

Re: [Libreoffice] 5 times LGPL installed

2010-11-17 Thread Robert Nagy
Just keep the plaintext one and kill the odt and the html ones. They are useless. On (2010-11-17 15:37), Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > We use up 3 MB in order to copy the LGPL 5 times in my LO install > folder. I know we care about obeying to licensing, but isn't that a bit > over the top? And I guess

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Use a generic unxgcc.mk

2010-11-17 Thread Robert Nagy
Move unxlng.mk to unxgcc.mk and use that on OpenBSD and Linux too as a default and then overwrite or add variables. --- solenv/inc/unxgcc.mk | 279 + solenv/inc/unxlng.mk | 253 +--- solenv/inc/unxobsd.mk |

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] just find all .sdf files and do not use GNU find arguments

2010-11-13 Thread Robert Nagy
This one is wrong, it was missing a chunk. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] just find all .sdf files and do not use GNU find arguments

2010-11-13 Thread Robert Nagy
--- bin/localize-ooo |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/bin/localize-ooo b/bin/localize-ooo index d253d6d..46ea56c 100755 --- a/bin/localize-ooo +++ b/bin/localize-ooo @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ done # it looks for files "any-name-.sdf", e.g. "gallery-hu.sdf" # it

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] just find all .sdf files and do not use GNU find arguments

2010-11-13 Thread Robert Nagy
--- bin/localize-ooo |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/bin/localize-ooo b/bin/localize-ooo index d253d6d..5b1b86f 100755 --- a/bin/localize-ooo +++ b/bin/localize-ooo @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ done # it looks for files "any-name-.sdf", e.g. "gallery-hu.sdf" # it i

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Install to the correct directory based on PREFIX

2010-11-13 Thread Robert Nagy
--- bin/package-ooo | 18 +- 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/bin/package-ooo b/bin/package-ooo index f5d5c43..0d6dcac 100755 --- a/bin/package-ooo +++ b/bin/package-ooo @@ -176,11 +176,11 @@ case $VENDORNAME in # Icons and menu stuff is han

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] use the correct tar binary on OpenBSD

2010-11-12 Thread Robert Nagy
ACK On (2010-11-12 03:41), Tor Lillqvist wrote: > The "outer" configure.in already takes a --with-gnu-tar option and sets the > GNUTAR autoconf substitution, isn't it easier to use that, and make the > indicated GNU tar propagate to bin/install-artwork some way? (Sourcing > bin/setup and using

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] use the correct tar binary on OpenBSD

2010-11-12 Thread Robert Nagy
Hi Al the stupid GNU double dash arguments, in this case --exclude :) On (2010-11-12 09:44), Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 21:32:44 +0100, Robert Nagy wrote: > > +if test "z`uname -s`" = "zOpenBSD"; then > > + TAR=gtar > > +else

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] add /usr/local/sbin and /usr/local/bin to the gen{brk, ccode, cmn} searchpath

2010-11-11 Thread Robert Nagy
On (2010-11-11 22:42), Rene Engelhard wrote: > Can that be made conditional on OpenBSD, please? I've seen already too many > f*ups because > someone had old libraries/binaries in /usr/local (on Linux), so I'd want to > prevent > that from happening if possible and this makes it even more likely t

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] use the correct tar binary on OpenBSD

2010-11-11 Thread Robert Nagy
Oh sure I missed that. Otherwise can I push it? On (2010-11-11 20:55), Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 21:32 +0100, Robert Nagy wrote: > > - tar -C $src/layout --exclude=.svn -cf- default_images ooo_custom_images > > | tar -C $dest -xf- > > + ${TAR} -C

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] use the correct tar binary on OpenBSD

2010-11-11 Thread Robert Nagy
--- bin/install-artwork |8 +++- 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/bin/install-artwork b/bin/install-artwork index 7695e4a..621cde3 100755 --- a/bin/install-artwork +++ b/bin/install-artwork @@ -7,6 +7,12 @@ dest=$2 echo "do artwork tweaks ..." +if test "z

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] add /usr/local/sbin and /usr/local/bin to the gen{brk, ccode, cmn} searchpath

2010-11-11 Thread Robert Nagy
--- configure.in |6 +++--- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in index b92e597..0b812c2 100644 --- a/configure.in +++ b/configure.in @@ -5399,15 +5399,15 @@ if test -n "$with_system_icu" -o -n "$with_system_libs" && \ AC_LANG_PUSH([C++

Re: [Libreoffice] smoketest

2010-11-10 Thread Robert Nagy
Hi I also get some Java crashes randomly running regcomp, since OOo 3.3rc2. 3.2 was fine so there has to be a change somewhere. On (2010-11-11 01:55), Jan Holesovsky wrote: > Hi Norbert, > > Caolán McNamara píše v Po 08. 11. 2010 v 13:47 +: > > > > There is some improvement on the smoketest

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] fix linking the hyphen library

2010-11-08 Thread Robert Nagy
On (2010-11-08 16:29), Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 20:42 +0100, Robert Nagy wrote: > > If the internal hyphen library is used which does not > > build a shared object, then link to $(SOLARLIBDIR)/libhyphen.a, > > instead of using -lhyphen on UNX + GCC.

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] fix linking the hyphen library

2010-11-08 Thread Robert Nagy
If the internal hyphen library is used which does not build a shared object, then link to $(SOLARLIBDIR)/libhyphen.a, instead of using -lhyphen on UNX + GCC. --- .../hyphenator/altlinuxhyph/hyphen/makefile.mk |8 +--- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/lingu

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] fix linking the hyphen library

2010-11-07 Thread Robert Nagy
If the internal hyphen library is used which does not build a shared object, then link to $(SOLARLIBDIR)/libhyphen.a, instead of using -lhyphen on UNX + GCC. Also remove the unneccesary HNJLIB because that is defined in solenv/inc/lib.mk already. --- .../hyphenator/altlinuxhyph/hyphen/makefile.mk

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] use LIBTARGET=NO to avoid multiple definition of target recipe

2010-11-07 Thread Robert Nagy
The diff makes i18npool/source/paper/makefile.mk define LIBTARGET=NO just like other makefiles in the i18npool/source/ directory. Without this patch I always get: dmake: /home/robert/build/build/libreoffice-3.2.99.2/solenv/inc/_tg_lib.mk: line 1020: Error: -- Multiply defined recipe for targe

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] remove -d from gunzip flags

2010-11-06 Thread Robert Nagy
Hey I don't really care which one goes in. I think gzip -d might be a better idea then. Any other comments? On (2010-11-05 21:41), julien wrote: > Hello, > > It's also possible to replace gunzip by gzip like the other lines of > this file : > # unpack the Crystal icon set > $(MISC)$/crystal.flag

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] use linux bridge code on all BSDs

2010-11-06 Thread Robert Nagy
On (2010-11-06 12:12), Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 00:16 +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote: > > Pushed, thanks! > > Something of a historic moment when Linux, OpenBSD, FreeBSD and NetBSD > unify something :-) > > C. > Oh there is more coming :) _

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] use linux bridge code on all BSDs

2010-11-05 Thread Robert Nagy
wiz, does this work on NetBSD? It does on OpenBSD, so i would like to push it. thanks ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] remove -d from gunzip flags

2010-11-05 Thread Robert Nagy
-d is not needed for gunzip because it will do a decompress anyways and -d is not available in every gunzip implementation --- packimages/pack/makefile.mk |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/packimages/pack/makefile.mk b/packimages/pack/makefile.mk index 471f5

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Use the correct db includes and obey LDFLAGS

2010-11-05 Thread Robert Nagy
Hi I'd personally not give the freedom to the user to pick whatever sleepycat db they want to use, just make a dependency for one only and check for that. On (2010-11-05 15:11), Hanno Meyer-Thurow wrote: > Hi Robert, > you may have a look at what we do for Gentoo Linux, where we have > the possib

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Use the correct db includes and obey LDFLAGS

2010-11-05 Thread Robert Nagy
A little bit more explanation: On OpenBSD there is a db.h in /usr/include which is not sleepycat db4, and of course it gets picked up and the compile test fails. On (2010-11-05 12:22), Robert Nagy wrote: > --- > configure.in | 15 ++- > 1 files changed, 10 inserti

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Use the correct db includes and obey LDFLAGS

2010-11-05 Thread Robert Nagy
--- configure.in | 15 ++- 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in index aab3995..6f72931 100644 --- a/configure.in +++ b/configure.in @@ -4368,11 +4368,16 @@ if test -n "$with_system_db" -o -n "$with_system_libs" && \ test "$

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH 3/3] use linux bridge code on all BSDs

2010-11-04 Thread Robert Nagy
Just sent the new diff. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH 3/3] use linux bridge code on all BSDs

2010-11-04 Thread Robert Nagy
On (2010-11-04 16:53), Thomas Klausner wrote: > One thing though: there are some checks for FreeBSD version like: > > +#if __FreeBSD_version < 602103 > +: m_hApp( dlopen( 0, RTLD_NOW | RTLD_GLOBAL ) ) > +#else > : m_hApp( dlopen( 0, RTLD_LAZY ) ) > +#endif > > a) does this work as intend

Re: [Libreoffice] OpenBSD bootstrap diffs

2010-11-04 Thread Robert Nagy
On (2010-11-04 08:58), Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 22:02 +0100, Robert Nagy wrote: > > Hey > > > > Attached some diffs to make LibreOffice boostrap on OpenBSD. > > As a matter of interest, would it be possible to e.g. just > > .INCLUDE :

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] OpenBSD needs /usr/local/lib in SOLARLIB

2010-11-03 Thread Robert Nagy
--- set_soenv.in |8 ++-- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/set_soenv.in b/set_soenv.in index 834bd34..79e79bd 100644 --- a/set_soenv.in +++ b/set_soenv.in @@ -1369,12 +1369,16 @@ elsif ($platform =~ m/linux|netbsd|osf1|aix|freebsd|openbsd/) { $SOLARLIB

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] --exclude is gnutar

2010-11-03 Thread Robert Nagy
--- bin/install-artwork |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/bin/install-artwork b/bin/install-artwork index 7695e4a..5f1721d 100755 --- a/bin/install-artwork +++ b/bin/install-artwork @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ if test -d $dest/default_images; then cp $src/layo

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] OpenBSD needs /usr/local/lib in SOLARLIB

2010-11-03 Thread Robert Nagy
--- set_soenv.in |8 ++-- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/set_soenv.in b/set_soenv.in index 834bd34..79e79bd 100644 --- a/set_soenv.in +++ b/set_soenv.in @@ -1369,12 +1369,16 @@ elsif ($platform =~ m/linux|netbsd|osf1|aix|freebsd|openbsd/) { $SOLARLIB

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Use /usr/bin/env bash

2010-11-03 Thread Robert Nagy
--- bin/g |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/bin/g b/bin/g index f0928de..b1c80fc 100755 --- a/bin/g +++ b/bin/g @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -#!/bin/bash +#!/usr/bin/env bash # # Wrapper for git to handle more subdirs at the same time # -- 1.7.3.1 __

Re: [Libreoffice] OpenBSD bootstrap diffs

2010-11-03 Thread Robert Nagy
Thanks, yeah git is kinda stupid :) On (2010-11-04 00:46), Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 10:02:12PM +0100, Robert Nagy wrote: > > Attached some diffs to make LibreOffice boostrap on OpenBSD. > > Thanks, added/pushed. > &g

Re: [Libreoffice] OpenBSD bootstrap diffs

2010-11-03 Thread Robert Nagy
Yeah I could but now it's easier for the commiter just to copy it. Next time, I will add it first. On (2010-11-04 00:37), Miklos Vajna wrote: > Could you please use 'git add' for unxobsd.mk, then 'git commit -a', > write the commit message, finally 'git format-patch -1' to produce the > patch? Tha

Re: [Libreoffice] Set COPYRECURSE to -R on OpenBSD too instead of -r

2010-11-03 Thread Robert Nagy
It probably is yes. On (2010-11-04 00:28), Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 10:24:37PM +0100, Robert Nagy wrote: > > diff --git a/solenv/inc/unitools.mk b/solenv/inc/unitools.mk > > index 6bf0653..c6055d1 100644 > > --- a/solenv/inc/unito

[Libreoffice] OpenBSD patches for ure

2010-11-03 Thread Robert Nagy
Patches for ure, neeed by OpenBSD diff --git a/cppu/source/uno/data.cxx b/cppu/source/uno/data.cxx index 77243fd..5a8de8a 100644 --- a/cppu/source/uno/data.cxx +++ b/cppu/source/uno/data.cxx @@ -360,7 +360,8 @@ sal_Bool SAL_CALL uno_type_isAssignableFromData( #endif #if defined(INTEL) \ -&&

Re: [Libreoffice] OpenBSD bootstrap diffs

2010-11-03 Thread Robert Nagy
Ooops the boostrap.diff and unxobsd.mk files were wrong. Here are the correct ones. diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in index 52d7c8f..94c1ba8 100644 --- a/configure.in +++ b/configure.in @@ -1556,9 +1556,21 @@ case "$build_os" in test_cups=no test_randr=no test_free

[Libreoffice] Set COPYRECURSE to -R on OpenBSD too instead of -r

2010-11-03 Thread Robert Nagy
diff --git a/solenv/inc/unitools.mk b/solenv/inc/unitools.mk index 6bf0653..c6055d1 100644 --- a/solenv/inc/unitools.mk +++ b/solenv/inc/unitools.mk @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ PERL*=perl TYPE=cat CDD=cd COPY=cp -f -.IF "$(OS)"=="MACOSX" || "$(OS)"=="NETBSD" +.IF "$(OS)"=="MACOSX" || "$(OS)"=="NETBSD" |

[Libreoffice] OpenBSD bootstrap diffs

2010-11-03 Thread Robert Nagy
Hey Attached some diffs to make LibreOffice boostrap on OpenBSD. diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in index 52d7c8f..94c1ba8 100644 --- a/configure.in +++ b/configure.in @@ -1556,9 +1556,21 @@ case "$build_os" in test_cups=no test_randr=no test_freetype=yes - P

[Libreoffice] remove misplaced ; from test

2010-11-03 Thread Robert Nagy
diff --git a/bin/build-ooo b/bin/build-ooo index 361e8f0..e4ab354 100755 --- a/bin/build-ooo +++ b/bin/build-ooo @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ fi export TARFILE_LOCATION -if test "z$BUILD_WIN32" = "z" -a "z`uname -s`" != "zSunOS" -a "z`uname -s`" != "zDarwin"; -a "z`uname -s`" != "zOpenBSD"; then +if tes

[Libreoffice] gunzip -d is not available on every gunzip implementation

2010-11-03 Thread Robert Nagy
Hi The Subject says everything, not to mention that gunzip will always decompress, so there is no need for -d. gunzip: unknown option -- d usage: gunzip [-cfhlNnqrtVv] [-o filename] [file ...] -- diff --git a/bin/setup.in b/bin/setup.in index 6133d77..a802598 100755 --- a/bin/setup.in +++ b/bin

Re: [Libreoffice] OpenBSD patch #1

2010-10-28 Thread Robert Nagy
env bash is needed since not every system has it in /bin (that basically includes everytihng except linux, mac and solaris?) Maintaining the csh style files are not needed and it just duplicates the work. If you want to build it, use a bourne-shell or go and download the binary packages. On (2010

Re: [Libreoffice] OpenBSD patch #1

2010-10-28 Thread Robert Nagy
In my opinion people should only write scripts for posix shells, but that'd be a huge development i guess, so just using #!/usr/bin/env bash is fine, and make bash as a dependency if it is not already. On (2010-10-28 01:13), Tor Lillqvist wrote: > Should we change all the shell scripts that use

[Libreoffice] OpenBSD patch #1

2010-10-27 Thread Robert Nagy
Hello, I've started to work on a LibreOffice port for OpenBSD and i'd like to start pushing my diffs slowly, here is the first one. diff --git a/bin/build-ooo b/bin/build-ooo index 1f10182..361e8f0 100755 --- a/bin/build-ooo +++ b/bin/build-ooo @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ fi export TARFILE_LOCATION -i