On (2011-07-27 20:31), Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 20:06:06 +0200 > Robert Nagy <rob...@openbsd.org> wrote: > > > If a patch/merge touches all of the platform files then it should be > > sent to the developers responsible for that part of the tree directly, > > Completely unworkable for a cws that was open (not integrated) at OOo, > needed huge rework (endless rebases) to make into a linear patch queue, > had to migrated over to git and be merged again with master (50KLOC > change in over 200 dirs and over 100 changesets IIRC). We also discussed > testbuilding the feature branch on the ESC (I proposed that), but that > was turned down as it would have bound quite some resources. > > > instead of sending it to the development mailing list which has too > > many traffic to actually follow (for me at least). > > You are free to do so, but if you do, please dont expect complaining to > exactly _that_ _list_ where the big, fat warning was posted two days > before the merge will win you flowers. ;)
I aggree, I will bitch in private next time :) _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
