First off, thanks to everyone who tried to help me with my strange
cross compilation endeavor. I am happy to say that I finally got it
working. Although I cannot post proper patches to fix the cross
issues, still I would like to provide a starting point, in case
someone else wants to clean this
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 01:50:42PM +0200, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 12:21:24PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Forgot git fetch --tags?
>
> I did 'git remote update origin', and I thought that includes tags.
Now I see. The tag 'libreoff
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 12:21:24PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Forgot git fetch --tags?
I did 'git remote update origin', and I thought that includes tags.
Hm.
Thanks,
Richard
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://l
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 05:57:38PM +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
> On 08.05.2015 16:53, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> > In any case:
> >
> > if test "$cross_compiling" != "yes"; then
> > libo_CHECK_SYSTEM_MODULE([cppunit],[CPPUNIT],[cppunit >= 1.12.0])
> > fi
> >
> > in configure.ac where cppunit is di
Dear list,
It appears that LO Fresh 4.4.3 is not tagged in git.
git tag | grep libreoffice-4
...
libreoffice-4.4.0.1
libreoffice-4.4.0.2
libreoffice-4.4.0.3
libreoffice-4.4.1.1
libreoffice-4.4.1.2
libreoffice-4.4.2.1
git branch -a | grep libreoffice-4
...
remotes/origin/libreof
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 08:56:31AM +0200, Richard Cochran wrote:
> Thanks, that is very useful to know.
Actually, that target fails in the same way as 'build' does:
In file included from
/mnt/storage/git/libreoffice/sal/cppunittester/cppunittester.cxx:28:0:
/mnt/storage/git/libreo
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 06:41:06AM +0200, Andras Timar wrote:
> On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Richard Cochran
> wrote:
>
> > I specifically did 'make build' in order to avoid the tests, but the
> > build system compiles the tests anyhow.
>
> The 'bu
On Sat, May 09, 2015 at 06:59:47PM +0300, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> I think you missed the meaning of "host" in GNU autoconf terminology;) (np,
> I confuse those constantly myself, too, unless I am ver careful)
Yes, the gnu terminology is confusing to me, too.
But no, this time I am not confused! B
On Sat, May 09, 2015 at 02:31:16PM +0200, David Tardon wrote:
> > At the very least, you would need to be consistent about passing
> > --host and --build to the externals:
>
> Cross-compilation support for the bundled projects was added to these
> that needed to be cross-compiled. Doing it for all
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 08:07:19PM +0300, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> Well, we have tinderbox slaves that cross-compile for Android and iOS
> constantly, so it can't be totally broken.
Those only work because the makefiles are full of special hacks for
those two targets. For example:
find external -
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 07:07:01PM +0200, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> What's your cross-compilation target?
x86_64
> http://tinderbox.libreoffice.org/MASTER/status.html says that the
> Android and iOS cross-compilation targets work fine (those columns are
> green), as far as I see.
That doesn't surpri
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 04:53:49PM +0200, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 03:55:35PM +0200, Richard Cochran
> wrote:
> > Ok, it is somehow related to the cross compile configuration. The
> > 'make cppunit.all' works as expected with a native build.
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 03:31:39PM +0200, Richard Cochran wrote:
> I should probably add that I am trying to cross compile LO (I know, I
> know, don't ask why), and it is clear that building cross is not fully
> implemented, but in this case I think it should still work.
Ok, it is s
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 02:48:53PM +0200, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 02:12:45PM +0200, Richard Cochran
> wrote:
> > Can't I just force cppunit to build manually beforehand?
>
> make cppunit.all
Tried that already, too. Here
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 12:08:23PM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 05/08/2015 10:45 AM, Richard Cochran wrote:
> >1. Where is the dependency from sal->cppunit specified?
>
> in sal/Executable_cppunittester.mk:
>
> >$(eval $(call gb_Executable_
Dear list,
I am trying to build Version 4.4.0.3 with a -j30 parallel build, but I
am running into this error.
In file included from
/git/libreoffice/sal/cppunittester/cppunittester.cxx:28:0:
/git/libreoffice/include/cppunittester/protectorfactory.hxx:24:31: fatal
error: cppunit/Protector.h:
16 matches
Mail list logo
