[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: helpcontent2

helpcontent2 |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) New commits: commit 006884d7928c6b32cf0bb3f48e31bbac87d1d5ea Author: Joel Madero Date: Wed Oct 26 13:02:16 2016 -0700 Updated core Project: help 578e1e320daaa82b2d3b8c0eeea84bf704967939 tdf#103397 - added

[Libreoffice-commits] help.git: source/text

source/text/scalc/01/04060107.xhp | 123 +- 1 file changed, 120 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) New commits: commit 578e1e320daaa82b2d3b8c0eeea84bf704967939 Author: Joel Madero Date: Wed Oct 26 13:02:16 2016 -0700 tdf#103397 - added example for

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Getting LibreOffice Writer 5.0.6 bibisected regression free against LibreOffice 4.4.0

Hi All, Was tested by Cor and Terrence and closed as WFM. One down :) Best, Joel On 03/29/2016 12:24 AM, Miklos Vajna wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 03:17:09PM +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen > wrote: >> LibreOffice Writer has only 8 unresolved, fully confirmed, triaged and >> bibisected r

Re: help request on proposed VCL code patch

On 12/14/2015 06:46 AM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > Was Caolan's commit, you said you would test "not before this weekend" > (a month ago), and to please poke you again "by Sunday" but nobody > poked you. (The poke fell through the list of things *I* have to do.) > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/

Re: help request on proposed VCL code patch

On 12/14/2015 06:13 AM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > Do you think you can take a look at it "fast" or should we revert? I don't remember why/how I was involved with this? Did I say I would test it and somehow it fell through the list of things that I have to do? What should I "look at"? Was it my

QA Meeting About How To Move Regressions Forward

Hi All, QA is going to have a meeting second week of December about regressions and what we (QA) can realistically do to help move things forward. The goal is to address all concerns/suggestions, talk about the realities of the project, and discuss what has already been rejected by ESC (such as a

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Base QA request

I'll take a look but it won't be before this weekend. If someone else can check first that would be appreciated (please let me know so I don't duplicate work). If I don't respond by Sunday please poke me again. Best, Joel On 11/11/2015 03:07 AM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > Hi, > > In the context

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla: Adding new Status for 'abandoned' bugs?

> > > I think we should keep labeling those as INVALID > > IMHO the time spent to implement this new > ABANDONED/EXPIRED/WHATEVERstate will be almost useless... > > in both cases the fault of the bug closure is the reporting user > so I really do not care at all being diplomatic with people who do

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla: Adding new Status for 'abandoned' bugs?

On 11/09/2015 11:15 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 07:10:44PM +0100, Eike Rathke wrote: >> Insufficient Data though can also be used for situations where a bug can >> not be reproduced due to, well, insufficient data.. i.e. happened one >> time crash and no stack trace, no

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla: Adding new Status for 'abandoned' bugs?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > > Insufficient Data though can also be used for situations where a bug can > not be reproduced due to, well, insufficient data.. i.e. happened one > time crash and no stack trace, no exact steps to reproduce, even if the > reporter was or would be w

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla: Adding new Status for 'abandoned' bugs?

> * ABANDONED > * INSUFFICIENT DATA (RedHat) > * EXPIRED (Launchpad) Of these I like ABANDONED as it indicates that the user abandoned his/her own bug. Insufficient Data is really wordy to me, Expired indicates that the user could just set the bug back to UNCONFIRMED and say "this is still a vali

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bibisecting: Over 1000 bibisects served!

On 10/16/2015 08:29 PM, Robinson Tryon wrote: > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Joel Madero wrote: >> Great news. Do we have any stats on the % of those that are now resolved? >> > Sure thing: 62% of the bugs currently bibisected are RESOLVED or CLOSED. > > (CLOSED bugs

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bibisecting: Over 1000 bibisects served!

e settings: > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa > Problems? > http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ > Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/arch

Interoperability Test File

Hi All, I don't know if anyone has a repository of test files for interoperability but one of our great users provided a test file and reported a whole slew of interop bugs about it. https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=118139 Bug #'s https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla: Temporarily reverting patch to Importance fields

On 07/16/2015 05:35 AM, Robinson Tryon wrote: > Hi all, > > As we've run into some unintended side effects from our latest local > changes to Bugzilla, I've reverted our field-restriction patch for the > time being. Now that we've actually had people testing it - is the only issue the NEEDINFO to

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] MAB/Priority and Severity

On 06/23/2015 12:32 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 01:14:54PM -0700, Joel Madero wrote: >> So the time has finally arrived that we are moving forward with _locking >> out priority/severity_. This means that *MAB will be retired*. > I'

MAB/Priority and Severity

Hi All! So the time has finally arrived that we are moving forward with _locking out priority/severity_. This means that *MAB will be retired*. What this mean: 1) If you notice that you lack privileges then just email me and I'll add you to the list (add your bugzilla email account)[1][2] 2) *MAB

Cosmetic Bugzilla Cleanup

Hi All - Just a request that if someone is interested in doing a mass cleanup (like with whiteboard or keyword) please ping me (and cc Robinson) first and one of us will temporarily turn off email notifications. I've gotten a complaint from a well respect developer that the mass emails create a lo

Goodbye MAB - Hello "Highest"

Hi All, It's time to try moving away from "MAB" list and towards using priorities correctly. That being said: 1) "Highest" reflects that it's equivalent to a MAB; 2) Highest can be matched with any severity (minor, normal, major, critical, blocker) but should be dictated by common sense logic: *

[TEST] locking priority, severity, assignee, QA contact in bugzilla

Hi All, I've hacked bugzilla a bit but it needs some thorough testing before we commit it to our actual bugzilla instance. *What I've done*: * Locked the following fields to anyone that does not belong to group "contributors" or are assigned the bug o QA Contact; o Assignee;

Automatic Stats from Bugzilla - Feedback needed

Hi All - Our very own Liongold is attempting to implement better statistic collection and analysis so that we can readily assess how the project is going without having to download a ton of raw data and then get the stats ourselves. That being said, he's looking for feedback. If there are any part

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugs with Backtrace but Not Reproduced

On 03/06/2015 12:11 AM, Alex Thurgood wrote: > Le 06/03/2015 05:52, Joel Madero a écrit : > > Hi Joel, > >> I'm curious if anyone has any thoughts about bugs that have backtraces >> but QA has been unable to repro. Should these just be pushed to NEW ? >> &

Bugs with Backtrace but Not Reproduced

Hi All, I'm curious if anyone has any thoughts about bugs that have backtraces but QA has been unable to repro. Should these just be pushed to NEW ? Currently there are 8 UNCONFIRMED crashers - at least one or two of those have backtraces but have had other members of QA say they cannot reproduc

needAdvice bugs

Hi All - With the great work of QA our bug count is quite manageable these days but we do have a few buts (~20) that are in needAdvice status and we'd really appreciate some developer input. Some of these bugs are in NEW or NEEDINFO status but I think they could still use a fresh set of eyes from

Easy Hacks (ProposedEasyHacks)

Just poking the list again to point out that we have >130 potential easy hacks that are awaiting some code pointers to become actual easy hacks. I think that these would be great to move forward to encourage more "new blood" :) https://bugs.freedesktop.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASS

Re: Unconfirmed bug with WinDB log

> Done. Awesome, thanks Moggi. Best, Joel ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Unconfirmed bug with WinDB log

Hi All, We have someone who took the time to get a WinDB log for a crash he's seeing but no one in QA is seeing the same problem. Can someone take the time to look at the log to see what's going on (or if it's even enough to move it forward to NEW). I like to try to respond to users who go the ext

VPS2 Semester of Code - Interest?

Hi All, http://vps2.semesterofcode.com/ https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A2=ind1412&L=vals-soc&F=&S=&P=54 We have until January 15th if there is interest to do this. Anyone have the bandwidth to go through the process and any mentors available to take on a student or two? Best, Joel

UNCONFIRMED Unit Test/Compiling Bugs

Hi All, This set of bugs would be probably most manageable by developers Compiling/unit tests: Bug 83241 - Failing unit test sw_ooxmlimport building master on OSX 10.9.4 / Xcode 5.1.1 Bug 82694

Remaining Unconfirmed Bugs - Useful Categorization

Hi All, Well thanks to some amazing work by multiple new and old faces - our bug count has reached record lows :) To simplify things, Beluga went ahead and made some cool grouping (no clue howbut it's cool none the less) that might help experienced developers and QA members target the harder b

FDO - New Milestone

Hi All, A *huge* thank you for all of your tremendous efforts in managing the chaos which is FDO :) Due to all of your great work we have hit a new milestone._*599*_! We're under 600 for the first time in years. 175 of these are marked as enhancements. Remember the bar for an enhancement

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Release Notes Whiteboard Keyword

Hi Jay, Hi All, I had recently been listening to a podcast and they mentioned that a linux or bsd distro would have a keyword in its bug tracking system for bugs that are worth mentioning in the release notes. So i was thinking that a whiteboard keyword of the same could be done so that it is e

REOPENED Bugs

Hi All, So I'm just about done moving these around, we're down to 40 left on the list (down from over 300 a few days ago I think). Couple questions: _Questions _1. What should we do about bugs that are REOPENED but unassigned? IMHO these should be pushed back to NEW 2. Should we ping developers wh

143 Potential Easy Hacks (kind of ;) )

Hi All, Just wanted to point out that we have a growing list of the equivalent of "proposedEasyHack" (remember we took this away per Markus' suggestion). My first is since we left that naming scheme the list is no longer looked at--perhaps this is wrong. So as a reminder - whiteboard status "need

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] "No activity" warnings - EasyHacks

On 10/24/2014 02:59 AM, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > Hi, > > I've seen a > > "Your bug was confirmed at least 1 year ago and has not had any activity > on it for over a year. Your bug is still set to NEW which means that it > is open and confirmed. It would be nice to have the bug confirmed on a > newe

Spam Apologies

I made a bad query to poke old bugs and left a comment on 75 bugs - some of which shouldn't have been included in the query. Apologies :( ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoff

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Changes to 'refs/changes/01/1701/1'

___ Libreoffice-commits mailing list libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Changes to 'refs/changes/01/1701/2'

___ Libreoffice-commits mailing list libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Changes to 'refs/changes/10/6010/1'

___ Libreoffice-commits mailing list libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Changes to 'refs/changes/10/6010/2'

___ Libreoffice-commits mailing list libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Changes to 'refs/changes/90/6690/2'

___ Libreoffice-commits mailing list libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Changes to 'refs/changes/87/2287/2'

___ Libreoffice-commits mailing list libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Changes to 'refs/changes/78/5378/2'

___ Libreoffice-commits mailing list libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Changes to 'refs/changes/87/2287/1'

___ Libreoffice-commits mailing list libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Changes to 'refs/changes/78/5378/3'

___ Libreoffice-commits mailing list libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Changes to 'refs/changes/81/5381/2'

___ Libreoffice-commits mailing list libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Changes to 'refs/changes/78/5378/1'

___ Libreoffice-commits mailing list libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Changes to 'refs/changes/90/6690/1'

___ Libreoffice-commits mailing list libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Changes to 'refs/changes/81/5381/1'

___ Libreoffice-commits mailing list libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Changes to 'refs/changes/81/5381/3'

___ Libreoffice-commits mailing list libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Changes to 'refs/changes/73/2273/2'

___ Libreoffice-commits mailing list libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Changes to 'refs/changes/73/2273/1'

___ Libreoffice-commits mailing list libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Changes to 'refs/changes/49/1849/1'

___ Libreoffice-commits mailing list libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Changes to 'refs/changes/27/3727/1'

___ Libreoffice-commits mailing list libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Changes to 'refs/changes/73/5373/1'

___ Libreoffice-commits mailing list libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Changes to 'refs/changes/73/5373/2'

___ Libreoffice-commits mailing list libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Changes to 'refs/changes/89/6689/1'

___ Libreoffice-commits mailing list libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Changes to 'refs/changes/49/1849/2'

___ Libreoffice-commits mailing list libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Changes to 'refs/changes/73/5373/3'

___ Libreoffice-commits mailing list libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Changes to 'refs/changes/22/6022/1'

___ Libreoffice-commits mailing list libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits

Lower case Greek letters (FDO#80650)

Hi All, Just wanted to raise awareness of this one. If anyone has some time to poke it. Regression with nearly 50 comments on it and I get pinged daily with dupes or more people saying that it's still an issue in a comment. Thanks Best, Joel ___ LibreO

User wants to say thanks

Thought I'd pass this along as it meant something to me at least :) https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83264 Best, Joel ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Suggestion for the use of pre-written responses

Hey there, Jay, *, Not sure that codifying a bunch of "approved" QA exchanges is in the best interest of moving the QA process along--especially if we have to dig them out of a WiKi. It would not do much to improve the QA flow, nor improve the readability of issues over their life span. O

Internal Updater

Hi All, I know we've discussed this already a few times - both within ESC and within the QA call but I wanted to get a better sense of what is needed to move forward with getting it fixed. FWIW I've closed 3 bugs this at least tangentially related to the subject. So - from what I understand the e

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Whiteboard: Let's use wimpyCaps consistently

> >> Hi all, >> >> At the QA meeting today we discussed the importance of consistency in >> the tags that we use in the Whiteboard on our bug reports. We decided >> that to make things simple for both old and new contributors, it would >> be best for QA to use 'wimpyCaps' for all of our tags. >> >

Whiteboard Consistency

Hi All, Including dev list on this because I know developers are using the whiteboard status' to do queries so I wanted to give you all the chance to voice opinions. Currently we are not consistent with whiteboard status' and I'd like to update these so that we are. There are two blaring examples

Unconfirmed Bugs that Need Developer Input

Hi All, Our NeedAdvice list is growing a bit. These are bugs that QA just hasn't been able to confirm for one reason or another. Some have comments that have pointers to what some QA members think might be going on, others can't be confirmed but there are debug logs from the original reporter. Som

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Whiteboard Status'

On 06/17/2014 02:46 AM, Michael Stahl wrote: > On 16/06/14 23:39, Joel Madero wrote: >> *Status* *Question* >> complextest Is this useful? If so – when should we use it? >> unoapitest We have “uno” is that sufficient? > these two are very similar, maybe we could c

Whiteboard Status'

Hi All, I've put quite a bit of time updating the wiki site after pulling FDO and viewing all of the whiteboard status' have been used. It isn't complete (needs organized and cleaned a bit more) but it's located here:https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Whiteboard/Advanced Below

4.3 RC Bug Hunting Session

Hi All! Well after our incredible showing with Beta 1 we're going a second round of bug hunting against 4.3 Release Candidate 1 to try to catch any lingering nasty regressions before release. Literally anyone can help and we encourage everyone to jump into the QA chat and see what it's all about.

Developers in the US July 26-27?

Hi All, We're looking for a couple developers to be at our US hackfest at the end of July. Anyone going to be around? Specifically on the east coast? Best, Joel ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org

Presentation Video Bug - Need Dev/QA Feedback

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56847 We've had an extensive discussion on the QA channel about the above MAB and we're looking for guidance. Our findings are quite inconsistent - we're testing on multiple platforms and some are seeing as a regression (comment 61), but I tested on 3.

FDO Versions

Hi All, I've gone ahead and hidden most 3.6 pre release versions on FDO (kept 3.6.0.beta0 because this is the equivalent of "before bibisect"). Two questions: 1. Can I do the same for 4.0 or should I wait longer ? 2. Thoughts on adding a new version called "PreBibisect" and we can replace th

build error - don't want to make clean:-/

Hi All, I got an error earlier so I did a pull and tried building again and now hitting this: make[1]: *** No rule to make target `/data/libreoffice/workdir/UnpackedTaRball/boost/boost/mpl/iterator_tags.hpp', needed by `/data/libreoffice/workdir/CxxObject/sw/source/core/fields/flddat.o'. St

US Hackfest July 26-27

Hi All, So Robinson, Immanuel and myself are in the midst of planning a US hackfest in Boston. We're trying to get a sense of who will be there so we can plan accordingly. If you're at all interested please respond so we can get you on the list. Date: July 26-27 Location: Boston, MA Accommod

Code Pointers for Removing Toolbar from Database Form Design

Hi All, Hoping to get some guidance on this: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76752 Apparently the toolbar I made is automatically showing in database forms (as empty). Weird thing is that once you uncheck the toolbar in View --> Toolbars the toolbar disappears from the list ("Change

[QA] Bug Tracker Feature Request

Hi All, So we're getting really into the planning stages of our own instance of bugzilla. That being said we are compiling a list of requests that could improve how users/devs/and QA interact with it. If you have any ideas feel free to add: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Projects/Ideas/Sel

4.2.2.1 FDO Reporting Data Corruption

Hi All, So the Sergio Callegari (reported quite a bit) has seen some data corruption with 4.2.2.1. Unfortunately he didn't have any reproducible steps or a file so I closed the bug but he said it was more to "raise awareness early" which I agree with. FWIW I haven't seen any data corruption with 4

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Metabug for Form Controls and docx export

As far as i see, LibreOffice still cannot export form control fields to a docx file, while it can export to doc format. There are some bug reports pointing specific form controls, like "checkbox is missing when saving docx, text field is missing" etc. LibreOffice cannot save any variations i

Re: Unmet Dependencies Ubuntu 13.10

Hey Bjoern & Anurag, 'libboost1.54-dev (>= 1.39)' should be in 13.10 (saucy): https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/saucy/+package/libboost1.54-dev So you'll have to find out why apt thinks its a a bad idea to install it ('but it is not going to be installed'). To find out more, one easy step would be

Unmet Dependencies Ubuntu 13.10

Hi All, So something is up and I'm getting errors when I try to build the dependencies needed to build LibreOffice: joel@Studio-1737:/data/libreoffice/instdir/program$ sudo apt-get build-dep libreoffice [sudo] password for joel: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading

ProposedEasyHack Changed to NeedsDevEval

Hi All, Just got done changing all ProposedEasyHack to NeedsDevEval. Having ProposedEasyHack was causing some confusion and caused some headaches for queries so the new status is once agains *NeedsDevEval. *Change: Old: ProposedEasyHack New: NeedsDevEval I left Resolved bugs alone just to avoid

FDO Cleanup

Hi All, Once again doing a massive cleanup of NEEDINFO - any FDO emails in the next 3-4 minutes are likely to be part of this cleanup and can thus be ignored. I will be doing more either today or tomorrow with a follow up email. All the best, Joel ___

Code Pointer Request - FDO 74064: Period Detection for Save As (Linux)

Hi All, Looks like we have a new contributor who wants to tackle this one but needs some assistance for code pointers. In Linux when you do Save As the first period is detected for the file name instead of the last so you'll get partial file names highlighted if the file name as a period in it.

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] FDO Cleanup

> > just curious to know if you have detailed stats about each one of this > NEEINFO-->INVALID cleanups > how many of the bugs become INVALID? I did the first round but stats take a lot of time and I just don't have it. The first round it was about 75% went to INVALID and 25% moved forward - which

FDO Cleanup

Hi All, Just got done with a large FDO cleanup so apologies for any flood in the email - any FDO mails in the last 5 minutes or so can be ignored/deleted as they just contain a standard message for NEEDINFO bugs. All the best, Joel ___ LibreOffice mai

North America Touching Basis

Hi All! This is just touching basis with the North America team as it's been awhile since we've all had time to talk. The chat has been a little quiet lately, I'm sure everyone is busy but wanted to say hello and to wish everyone a belated happy new year. Hope all is well with everyone and that p

Re: New Feedback Page

On 01/09/2014 09:49 AM, Charles-H. Schulz wrote: > > Well just a heads up: there will be a redesigned feedback page in the > upcoming website and it will draw on the existing one :-) > lol dangit - go figure I'd give the green light a bit too early ;) Still I think it's good for 4.2 release that we

Re: New Feedback Page

> I think we discuss this in a QA call and it will be translated but the > wording will explicitly be that bugs or enhancements are in English > while the happy/not happy will be in the user language (I don't know if > this part is still available, but we should then also decide who will > take car

New Feedback Page

Hi All, Robinson and Christian did some great work here. We have our new feedback page live and linked. If you go to Send Feedback from within LibreOffice you will see the new page with nifty options and clean "get involved" links. Thanks to Robinson and Christian for getting this done :) I'm no

FDO Maintenance

Hi All, Wanted to give a heads up that for the last 5 minutes I've been spamming some bugs to close NEEDINFO and give warnings about stale NEEDINFO bugs. Likely any FDO email from the previous 5ish minutes can be disregarded and deleted. Apologies for the noise, just trying to keep our bug t

Does someone have access to ftp server?

Hi All, I'm hoping someone will grant me (or test for themselves) temporary ftp access to a server. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62981 I need to verify that this is still a problem with 4.1 - bug is super old and I'd like to just take care of it once and for all. I tried a c

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: sc/source

sc/source/ui/src/scfuncs.src |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) New commits: commit 42463328f5803d7d34a3bb05fbe1e24cdc02dff8 Author: Joel Madero Date: Fri Nov 15 11:07:46 2013 -0800 fdo#71652 - change thousand separate description Minor change to the text

Updating Whiteboard/Keyword Wiki - Need Input

Hi All, I'm going to be updating the wiki for whiteboard and keyword to make it more legible. There has been talk about taking a minimilistic approach to the wiki, less formal, less "rules" (although we don't have rules, just guidelines), this vs. the "comprehensive, answers any question some

Reminder - QA Call Public Time Poll

Hi All, Just a reminder that we are discussing changing our QA public call time. If you're at all interested in joining and the current time does not work, please take a few minutes to look at the options and add your desired time. http://doodle.com/z5xic72ng9q3hz8v7aqhxbgt/admin?#table Al

10 Oldest Bugs Needing Triaged

Hi All, These 10 bugs are the oldest bugs that are lingering for triaging, please take a moment and see if you have the skills/setup required to triage them. Please triage directly on the bug (not via email), mark as NEW and leave a comment if you can confirm, if you cannot confirm (behavior

QA BiWeekly Call Time (Doodle Poll)

Hi All, Once again our crazy schedules have complicated things. We're trying to figure out if there's a better time that works for more people now that schedules have stabalized and what not. http://doodle.com/z5xic72ng9q3hz8v PLEASE NOTE: All times are in your LOCAL TIME - from what I could

Collapsing 3.5.x FDO Maintenance

Hi All, I've begun the process of collapsing 3.5.x to 3.5 all releases. I've already hidden all RC's and Beta's other than 3.5.0. Beta0 (we're still using this as "pre-bibisect" version, QA still needs to figure this out as it's confusing/misleading). This is to be consistent with what we did

Re: North America Pub Chat

doodle it will make things easy for you to determine day and time. On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Joel Madero <mailto:jmadero@gmail.com>> wrote: hip. Really 1 hour a month is enough time to give back a bit. Hi, I dont know if I can make it this Fr

Re: North America Pub Chat

hip. Really 1 hour a month is enough time to give back a bit. Hi, I dont know if I can make it this Friday, but could you also point out the time in UTC too? For a continental european guest a time like "12:00pm EST" is ultimately confusing -- is that EST or 2400EST? Sure, apologies for th

  1   2   3   4   5   >