Re: [Libreoffice] consistent SCCOL use?

Hello Kevin, > A quick question to any more-knowledgeable-than-me person on whether there's > a reason these spots in the calc code base are hard-coded to sal_Int16, It is sal_uInt16 which is not the same as SCCOL. > rather than using SCCOL? > There are 3 different cases here: - pivot.hxx may

[Libreoffice] consistent SCCOL use?

Hullo SC Devs, A quick question to any more-knowledgeable-than-me person on whether there's a reason these spots in the calc code base are hard-coded to sal_Int16, rather than using SCCOL? Thanks, Kevin diff --git a/sc/inc/pivot.hxx b/sc/inc/pivot.hxx index 705f794..b6bded9 100644 --- a/sc/i

[Libreoffice] binfilter dependencies

Matus, I noticed that you added basic to tail_build in feature/gbuild_extensions. Be warned that when feature/gbuild_extensions gets merged to master binfilter/prj/build.lst will have to get changed from depending on basic to depending on tail_build simultaneously. Thanks, Peter ___

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix fdo#42783 get rid of CPU define/build system variable

On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > > IMHO (other might disagree), we should get rid of these opaque names in the > long run anyway. INPATH and OUTPATH should only be "build" or "host". > Sure, but then stuff like rm -fr */$INPATH may end-up having unexpected consequences

Re: [Libreoffice] calc: Re: com.sun.star.container.XNameContainer.removeByName() fails v3.5b0+ (linux)

Hello Tomas, 2011/12/20 Michael Stahl : > > On 20/12/11 14:52, Tomas Hlavaty wrote: >> could you please advise me how to build and run the test case? >> >> I did: >> >> $ cd sc/ >> $ make >> >> and it built the tests. >> >> It seems to have run something called CHK from the console log, but >> w

Re: [Libreoffice] SDK installation problem was: libreoffice-3.4.99.1 tag created (3.5.0-beta1)

Petr Mladek píše v Čt 15. 12. 2011 v 11:09 +0100: > Andreas Radke píše v St 14. 12. 2011 v 22:48 +0100: > > build is done in a clean chroot each time. shouldn't be a problem. the > > beta0 built fine here. > > > the only difference to beta0 is the changed internal libvisio src bump. > > tried auto

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] fix EasyHack FDO42454, remove code associated with unused icons

Hi! Fix for EasyHack FDO42454 ( https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42454) in attachment for review. I have found 8 high-contrast cross icons in images.zip: res/sx03241.png res/lx03241.png res/commandimagelist/lc_splitparentvertical.png sw/res/anchor.png sw/res/danchor.png fpicker/res/li

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-qa] Bugs in Portable LibO Versions

> I do not know at all how bug fixes for Portable LibO Builds will be > proceeded. I believe hints in > are not > useful. > > What do you think? Are there any specific Portable LO errors? I assume that the Portable version works 100%

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [patch] translate some german comments in /svx

On 19/12/11 12:56, Noel Grandin wrote: > Hi > > More translations, work by Mike Whiteley and Noel Grandin, patch is > under MPL/LGPL+ > > Regards, Noel thanks for your patch, pushed to master: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=c5ed0b8f95600c3ceacbcd4511dc3a7b4cabcbae

[Libreoffice] Hi ! We are new on libo! 2/2

Hi, to follow my friend Martius, i'm introducing myself. I'm Julien Levesy, french student in CS. As a school project, I'll will help Martin in reworking file picker, and implementing new features he has presented in his previous mail. All this work is mentored by Cedric Bosdonnat. My nickname in

[Libreoffice] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-3.4.99.2 tag created (3.5.0-beta2)

Hi, there have been created the libreoffice-3.4.99.2 tag for 3.5.0-beta2 release. The corresponding official builds will be available within 3 days or so. See the attached list of changes against 3.5.0-beta1. See also the schedule at http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan#3.5_release an

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Update French dictionaries

Sorry. Here is the patch: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/file/n3601795/0001-Update-French-dictionaries.patch 0001-Update-French-dictionaries.patch -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/PATCH-Update-French-dictionaries-tp3601788p3601795.html Sent from the Dev

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Update French dictionaries

Hello, Here the attached patch to update the French dictionaries: 1. Spelling dictionary 4.3 to 4.4: approx. 1500 new entries http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/file/n3601788/0001-Update-French-dictionaries.patch 0001-Update-French-dictionaries.patch cleaning and few fixes 3. Hyphenation rul

[Libreoffice] Bugs in Portable LibO Versions

Hi, I do not know at all how bug fixes for Portable LibO Builds will be proceeded. I believe hints in are not useful. What do you think? Discussion please in "libreOffice-QA" Kind regards Rainer ___

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix fdo#42783 get rid of CPU define/build system variable

On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 04:43:41AM -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > a/ > if ( "@WITH_MOZILLA@" eq "YES" and "@BUILD_MOZAB@" ne "TRUE" and > "@SYSTEM_MOZILLA@" ne "YES" ) > { > print("Checking for prebuilt Mozilla libraries ..."); > my $mozbinfile = $SRC_ROOT."/moz/zipped/"; > - $mozbinf

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix fdo#39639 [EasyHack] Fix duplicate longname IDs

Hi Victor, On 2011-12-20 at 17:34 +0900, Victor Lee wrote: > the attached patch simply removes duplicated and unused IDs in > BackgroundsDialog. Thank you for the patch, and welcome to LibreOffice! :-) Just wanted to ask you how did you find these? I mean, it seems to me that "HID:WIZARDS_HID_

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED][PATCH] Fix for fdo43460 Part XI getLength() to isEmpty()

marking as pushed... ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix for fdo43460 Part XI getLength() to isEmpty()

Hi Olivier, 16.12.2011 23:33, Olivier Hallot пишет: Please find attached a partial fix for Easy Hack FDO43460 Part XI Module cui sorry for the delay, (he-he, now I know how to resolve conflicts :) pushed: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=1375183d465fb17db513dfe16ac522e4

Re: [Libreoffice] calc: Re: com.sun.star.container.XNameContainer.removeByName() fails v3.5b0+ (linux)

Hi Tomas, On 2011-12-20 at 13:23 +0100, Tomas Hlavaty wrote: > > i guess 3.4.4 is this: libreoffice-3.4.4.2 > > beta0: libreoffice-3.5.0.0 > > beta1: libreoffice-3.4.99.1 > > > > yes, really :) > > Is that somewhere documented? Or wouldn't it be better if it was > obvious from the tag names?

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Bug 35673 depends on bug 36991, which changed state. Bug 36991 Summary: crash when duplicating draw page with linked wmf pictures https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36991 What|Old Value |New Value -

Re: [Libreoffice] calc: Re: com.sun.star.container.XNameContainer.removeByName() fails v3.5b0+ (linux)

On 20/12/11 15:51, Tomas Hlavaty wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Michael Stahl writes: >> i guess 3.4.4 is this: libreoffice-3.4.4.2 > > libreoffice-3.4.4.2 tag doesn't exist:-( Any other ideas? Are there > any rules how tags are created and named? And branches? the 3.4 stuff does not exist in the

Re: [Libreoffice] calc: Re: com.sun.star.container.XNameContainer.removeByName() fails v3.5b0+ (linux)

Hi Michael, Michael Stahl writes: > i guess 3.4.4 is this: libreoffice-3.4.4.2 libreoffice-3.4.4.2 tag doesn't exist:-( Any other ideas? Are there any rules how tags are created and named? And branches? Thank you, Tomas ___ LibreOffice mailing lis

Re: [Libreoffice] calc: Re: com.sun.star.container.XNameContainer.removeByName() fails v3.5b0+ (linux)

Hi Bjoern, Bjoern Michaelsen writes: > Any you could try bibisect: http://sweetshark.livejournal.com/7683.html > to close in on the bug even more (and thus make it get fixed faster). bibisect is brilliant but unfortunatelly dosn't cover the range I would need for this (v3.4.4+). Regards, Tomas

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-qa] calc: Re: com.sun.star.container.XNameContainer.removeByName() fails v3.5b0+ (linux)

Hi Markus, > Ok, I wrote a simple c++ based test for that and can't reproduce your > problem. could you please advise me how to build and run the test case? I did: $ cd sc/ $ make and it built the tests. It seems to have run something called CHK from the console log, but where can I find the

Re: [Libreoffice] LoadComponentFromUrl misuse lead to crash

Hi Caolan > This still a problem for you? if so can you run it under gdb and get a > backtrace. cedric & noel submited a patch yesterday i did not have the time to check, but will do Thanks a lot, i let you know Laurent ___ LibreOffice mailing list Li

Re: [Libreoffice] Build problems (and some solutions) in Mac OSX

Hi Michael, *, On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: > On Tue, 2011-12-20 at 19:04 +1300, James C wrote: >> I have burned about 1.5 GB of metered network bandwidth, so far, >> following these instructions: >> There is also a human-sized problem, with some instructions on the >> w

Re: [Libreoffice] Build problems (and some solutions) in Mac OSX

Hi James, *, On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 7:04 AM, James C wrote: > [building on Mac] > There is also a human-sized problem, with some instructions on the > web-site being wrong: > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43920 Your issues show that you got a polluted environment, you have macpor

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-qa] calc: Re: com.sun.star.container.XNameContainer.removeByName() fails v3.5b0+ (linux)

Hi Markus, Markus Mohrhard writes: > Ok, I wrote a simple c++ based test for that wow, thank you very much! > and can't reproduce your problem. Hmm, I'll dig into it. I noticed there were some changes in the code regarding string handling, so maybe it might be related. > The test ( > http://

Re: [Libreoffice] calc: Re: com.sun.star.container.XNameContainer.removeByName() fails v3.5b0+ (linux)

Hi Michael, Michael Stahl writes: > you are much more likely to get a reply for this kind of bug on the > dev list. sorry I haven't got the feel for the right places yet;-) > sounds like a bug to me. guess you should file it in bugzilla and set > the "regression" keyword. ok, I'll do that when

Re: [Libreoffice] LoadComponentFromUrl misuse lead to crash

On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 13:58 +0100, Laurent Godard wrote: > Hi caolan > > > Can you attach a demo ? > > > > here is a macro showing the problem > just change the myFile.ods so that it points to a file of your filestem Checked this locally (finally), and I get no crash. I get a "unsupported url"

Re: [Libreoffice] Build problems (and some solutions) in Mac OSX

Hi James, On Tue, 2011-12-20 at 19:04 +1300, James C wrote: > I have burned about 1.5 GB of metered network bandwidth, so far, > following these instructions: Grief; hopefully the meter doesn't roll too quickly. Of course, once you have the git repository - you should fetch only deltas fr

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix fdo#42783 get rid of CPU define/build system variable

On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 2:52 AM, Victor Lee wrote: First welcome to LibreOffice... > This patch substituts $CPU to $CPUNAME in makfiles and has been > successfully built on my Linux/x86 machine. >  However, there are two > questions remain: > 1) Statements setting $CPU="U" (looks like it should

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] [Fwd: Fwd: gcc 4.6.2]

On Tue, 2011-12-20 at 10:13 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > fixes for 3.4.5-rc2 need triple review, so I forward this mail to the > mailing list. We've seen this problem recently with our rawhide gcc as well and 3.4.X, though 3.5.X doesn't seem to have the problem (though whether that

[Libreoffice] [Bug 37361] LibreOffice 3.5 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361 Petr Mladek changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||43752 --- Comment #59 from Petr Mladek 20

[Libreoffice] [REVIEW] [Fwd: Fwd: gcc 4.6.2]

Hi Rafael, fixes for 3.4.5-rc2 need triple review, so I forward this mail to the mailing list. I am not sure why your mails are moderated. Are you subscribed to the mailing list? If not, please try to do so at http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice If you are subscribed and st

Re: [Libreoffice] Build problems (and some solutions) in Mac OSX

Anyway, I forgot to say: Welcome to hacking on LibreOffice! We will try to help you in all ways we can. Especially for Mac OS X, many of the system APIs used by the code are slightly obsolete, to put it mildly. It would be very much welcome, if you are a Mac expert, if you could help in modernisin

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH][PUSHED] Build problems (and some solutions) in Mac OSX

On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 12:04 AM, James C wrote: > Hello All, > > I have burned about 1.5 GB of metered network bandwidth, so far, > following these instructions: > > http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/How_to_build#Getting_the_sources > > I have found and, I think fixed, problems which

Re: [Libreoffice] Build problems (and some solutions) in Mac OSX

You fail to give useful information to help you with your problems... - What version of MacOSX are you running? What Xcode? - What branch of the source code are you building? - What exact error messages do you see, at what point in the build? - How exactly did you configure your build? What does y

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix fdo#39639 [EasyHack] Fix duplicate longname IDs

Hello, the attached patch simply removes duplicated and unused IDs in BackgroundsDialog. Victor Lee diff --git a/wizards/com/sun/star/wizards/common/HelpIds.java b/wizards/com/sun/star/wizards/common/HelpIds.java index 12af48a..4c9971b 100644 --- a/wizards/com/sun/star/wizards/common/HelpIds.java