Hi Michael, Michael Stahl <mst...@redhat.com> writes: > you are much more likely to get a reply for this kind of bug on the > dev list.
sorry I haven't got the feel for the right places yet;-) > sounds like a bug to me. guess you should file it in bugzilla and set > the "regression" keyword. ok, I'll do that when I'm confident it's a regression. > in sc you should find some new C++ unit tests and old Java unit tests > (in qa/complex). Thank you for the pointer. > i guess 3.4.4 is this: libreoffice-3.4.4.2 > beta0: libreoffice-3.5.0.0 > beta1: libreoffice-3.4.99.1 > > yes, really :) Is that somewhere documented? Or wouldn't it be better if it was obvious from the tag names? Thank you, Tomas _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
