Re: [Libreoffice] Suggestion about the Developers wiki page

On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 4:19 PM, julien2412 wrote: > Hello, > > I noticed that we regularly ask about the environment (IRC or on the forum) > (Windows, Mac, Linux + 32 or 64 bits). > It could be interesting to give some details on the page > http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Developer

Re: [Libreoffice] Autogen.sh --with-distro="LibreOfficeMacOSX" gives warning about unrecognized option --with-extension-integration

On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 08:52:03PM +0200, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --with-extension-integration > > This configure option was remed to --enable-... Should be fixed with commit 47a101d70d2c90d080f4dc8862f17709d60e, next time please take care of it your

[Libreoffice] Suggestion about the Developers wiki page

Hello, I noticed that we regularly ask about the environment (IRC or on the forum) (Windows, Mac, Linux + 32 or 64 bits). It could be interesting to give some details on the page http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Developers. Of course, more and more users, especially devs, have more t

[Libreoffice] License for my previous and future patches

All my previous and future patches to LibreOffice project are under LGPLv3+/MPL1.1 dual license and future versions of the licenses. Julien. (should have done it before :-)) -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/License-for-my-previous-and-future-patches-tp3356818

Re: [Libreoffice] Writer delete row gives a segment violation

Hi Joost, Joost Eekhoorn wrote (21-09-11 22:25) In the current master I got a segment violation, when I create a table in Writer and the delete a row. [...] Is this only on my machine, or a real regression? Oops, just a last mail before turning the computer off ;-) Guess it's this one: https

[Libreoffice] Writer delete row gives a segment violation

Hi, In the current master I got a segment violation, when I create a table in Writer and the delete a row. The bt: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x03a2a7e4 in SvPtrarr::Count (this=0xd0d0d0d1) at /home/joost/work/git/libo/solver/350/ unxlngi6.pro/inc/svl/svarray.hxx:455

[Libreoffice] FYI: Draft Advisory on Digital Signature Namespace Handling

FYI: ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] Autogen.sh --with-distro="LibreOfficeMacOSX" gives warning about unrecognized option --with-extension-integration

configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --with-extension-integration This configure option was remed to --enable-... Tom ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] Build in xmloff fails on Mac OSX

Hi Alex, On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 18:32 +0200, Alexander Thurgood wrote: > While trying to build from master, I get a fail in xmloff with the > following error I believe this is an artifact of a non-re-build offapi - if you can; go into offapi and 'make clean' 'make'. Of course, ideally - it

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED][PATCH] Improving saving information icon in status bar (#39430)

On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 16:07 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > I think everyone was waiting basically for the original easy-hack author > or some of the people involved in the original discussion to take > ownership of integrating this, Yeah that could've been me. Sorry for having overlooked this.

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED][PATCH][REVIEW 3-4] Fix for fdo#38391

2011/9/21 Caolán McNamara > Did I just break this, or were they always so broken ? No, I had tested on OOo 3.3 just now - same devilry. > And do you want to fix it ? :-) Yeah, I want. But since I'm newbie to source code, I'm working slowly. However, if this is not time-critical, I will try. ___

[Libreoffice] Autogen.sh --with-distro="LibreOfficeMacOSX" gives warning about unrecognized option --with-extension-integration

Just noticed that my autogen.sh also outputs a warning about extension integration : ./autogen.sh 'CC=ccache gcc-4.0' 'CXX=ccache g++-4.0' --with-max-jobs=4 --with-num-cpus=2 --with-distro="LibreOfficeMacOSX" --disable-build-mozilla --disable-mozilla running ./configure with 'CC=ccache gcc-4.0' '

[Libreoffice] Build in xmloff fails on Mac OSX

Hi all, While trying to build from master, I get a fail in xmloff with the following error /Users/alex/DevHack/git/libo/core/xmloff/source/core/xmlexp.cxx: In member function ‘void SvXMLExport::addChaffWhenEncryptedStorage()’: /Users/alex/DevHack/git/libo/core/xmloff/source/core/xmlexp.cxx:1284:

Re: [Libreoffice] help with linking error in iofficebean?

On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 13:34 +0200, Noel Grandin wrote: > Hi > > My build on Windows using Visual Studio seems to be failing in module > tail_build while linking iofficebean.lib. > > Anybody have any ideas? Seems to be that it missing user32 as a link lib as the major part of it, the other then i

Re: [Libreoffice] Problem with embedded images

On Sun, 2011-09-04 at 12:57 +0200, Cor Nouws wrote: > Hi, > > tka0330 wrote (03-09-11 14:43) > > Here is the bug report with an attachment: > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=50866 > > And this is the issue: > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40599 A tricky, but old I

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED][PATCH][REVIEW 3-4] Fix for fdo#38391

On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 16:56 +0400, Ivan Timofeev wrote: > See results of my small test (in normal mode) for docs with 20 pages: > > Range Draw&Impress CalcWriter > > No pages (!) 1-201-20 > 1-51-51-5 1-5 > q1-5 1-5 (!)

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED][PATCH] Improving saving information icon in status bar (#39430)

On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 15:03 +0400, Dmitry. A. Ashkadov wrote: > Hello! > > I had resent this letter because there are no answers to my patch in > mailing list after one week. I think everyone was waiting basically for the original easy-hack author or some of the people involved in the original d

Re: [Libreoffice] cygwin soffice.bin.exe -> soffice.bin gotcha

>From my testing, it only seems to occur when there are 2 dots in the source >file name. So either using mv, or renaming some of the intermediate files to only have one dot in the name should work. Tor Lillqvist wrote: >> $ touch soffice.bin.exe >> $ cp soffice.bin.exe soffice.bin >> cp: cannot

Re: [Libreoffice] cygwin soffice.bin.exe -> soffice.bin gotcha

> $ touch soffice.bin.exe > $ cp soffice.bin.exe soffice.bin > cp: cannot create regular file `soffice.bin': File exists mv, however, works...: $ touch soffice.bin.exe $ mv soffice.bin.exe soffice.bin $ ls -l soffice* -rw-r--r-- 1 tml None 0 Sep 21 17:50 soffice.bin --tml ___

Re: [Libreoffice] cygwin soffice.bin.exe -> soffice.bin gotcha

On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 16:13 +0200, Noel Grandin wrote: > what version of cp are you using? (cp --version) $ touch soffice.bin.exe $ cp soffice.bin.exe soffice.bin cp: cannot create regular file `soffice.bin': File exists $ cp --version cp (GNU coreutils) 8.10 Packaged by Cygwin (8.10-1) tor point

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] patch for openoffice Bug 89286 - RTL characters kerning broken

Even better (: Thanks for the quick response. Kaplan On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Maxim Iorsh wrote: > Don't bother, Libre Office already has a better patch by Khaled Hosny. > > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Lior Kaplan wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Apache accepted a patch today to deal with

[Libreoffice] Development summary: week 38 of 2011

Hi, this is a brief summary of what happened during the 38th week in 2011 on LibreOffice repositories and the living branches: + master:LO-3.5 development + libreoffice-3-3: fixes for LO-3.3.5 bug fix release - no changes on that branch + libreoffice-3-4: fixes f

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] patch for openoffice Bug 89286 - RTL characters kerning broken

Don't bother, Libre Office already has a better patch by Khaled Hosny. On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Lior Kaplan wrote: > Hi, > > Apache accepted a patch today to deal with font kerning in RTL scripts ( > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=89286) > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/

Re: [Libreoffice] cygwin soffice.bin.exe -> soffice.bin gotcha

Hi, 2011/9/21 Caolán McNamara : > So, it seems that, some versions at least, of cp in cygwin have a > feature where > > cp foo.exe bar > will create a > bar.exe not an unsuffixed bar My Cygwin has cp (GNU coreutils) 8.10 Packaged by Cygwin (8.10-1) and it works normally. What version do you have?

Re: [Libreoffice] cygwin soffice.bin.exe -> soffice.bin gotcha

what version of cp are you using? (cp --version) Caolán McNamara wrote: > So, it seems that, some versions at least, of cp in cygwin have a > feature where > > cp foo.exe bar > will create a > bar.exe not an unsuffixed bar > > and we use cp in gbuild/Deliver.mk > > The problem if, as in desktop, w

[Libreoffice] cygwin soffice.bin.exe -> soffice.bin gotcha

So, it seems that, some versions at least, of cp in cygwin have a feature where cp foo.exe bar will create a bar.exe not an unsuffixed bar and we use cp in gbuild/Deliver.mk The problem if, as in desktop, we build a soffice.bin.exe and then want to... cp soffice.bin.exe soffice.bin we want to ge

[Libreoffice] [REVIEW] patch for openoffice Bug 89286 - RTL characters kerning broken

Hi, Apache accepted a patch today to deal with font kerning in RTL scripts ( https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=89286) http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/ooo/trunk/main/vcl/source/glyphs/gcach_layout.cxx?r1=1173604&r2=1173603&pathrev=1173604 (patch by Maxim Iorsh) I would be happ

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED][PATCH] bug fdo#37164

On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 17:13 +0100, Noel Power wrote: > > How do we test this thing again ? > > > always it seems with difficulty and pain, but... Seems sane and appears to work. So pushed to 3-4, doesn't affect much outside of the testtool itself really. Another quirk of the testtool is that the

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED][PATCH][REVIEW 3-4] Fix for fdo#38391

2011/9/21 Caolán McNamara : > Isn't it a good thing that the previous range isn't the one selected > anymore when an invalid range has been entered ? Maybe it is. But other apps have different behavior on processing invalid range. See results of my small test (in normal mode) for docs with 20 pa

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] libstdc++ STL debug

On Wednesday 21 of September 2011, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 12:55:44 +0200 > > Lubos Lunak wrote: > > You forgot Qt4/KDE4. LO does not use STL with it, so this is just to > > show that it's not so trivial to check if there's a potential > > problem. And I seriously doubt the

Re: [Libreoffice] Questions about Easyhack 37007 Add Math symbol "There does not exist"

On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 21:27 +0200, Julien Nabet wrote: > Version is also a point I spoke about. Since I didn't know if there was > a license pb, I just added the symbol to the font, I didn't change > anything in copyright or version number. So even with the commit > 55961e2d, the pb would still

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED][PATCH] Removed redundant pointer check in /sw/source/ui/uno/unomailmerge.cxx

On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 19:55 +0200, CaStarCo wrote: > Hello, I've removed a redundant pointer check in the file > core/sw/source/ui/uno/unomailmerge.cxx (in the line 630). The check > can be removed because the pointer is checked before in the line 622 > (and if the pointer is null throws a RuntimeE

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] libstdc++ STL debug

On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 12:55:44 +0200 Lubos Lunak wrote: > You forgot Qt4/KDE4. LO does not use STL with it, so this is just to > show that it's not so trivial to check if there's a potential > problem. And I seriously doubt there's a good way how to check for > this automatically, so the only way

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED][PATCH][REVIEW 3-4] Fix for fdo#38391

On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 14:53 +0400, Ivan Timofeev wrote: > Ok! Problems with incorrect pasting eliminated. But one problem still > exists... > If in brochure mode we input range, that is incorrect at all (e.g. > "foo") or starts with illegal characters (e.g. "foo1-4"), previous > range will be lost

[Libreoffice] help with linking error in iofficebean?

Hi My build on Windows using Visual Studio seems to be failing in module tail_build while linking iofficebean.lib. Anybody have any ideas? Thanks, Noel Grandin Disclaimer: http://www.peralex.com/disclaimer.html CObject/desktop/source/app/copyright_ascii_ooo.o is linked in by Library/isoffic

Re: [Libreoffice] Proposal: slowcheck -- some numbers for sc

On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 11:28 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: > On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 09:50 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > So I've now added a timer listener to our cppunit launcher to tell us > > how long each test takes[1] and indeed it takes about 70ms to load a > > .xls, 370ms for an equivalent .o

Re: [Libreoffice] Proposal: slowcheck -- some numbers for sc

On Wednesday 21 of September 2011, Michael Meeks wrote: > On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 09:50 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > In an ideal world I imagine the best spent effort would be on improving > > the import speed for .ods and .xlsx, seeing as that improves the > > real-world case too. > > Agr

Re: [Libreoffice] Proposal: slowcheck -- some numbers for sc

Hello Caolan, Michael, 2011/9/21 Michael Meeks > > On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 09:50 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > So I've now added a timer listener to our cppunit launcher to tell us > > how long each test takes[1] and indeed it takes about 70ms to load a > > .xls, 370ms for an equivalent .ods a

[Libreoffice] [REVIEWED 3-4][PUSHED] Fix for fdo#38391

On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 11:04 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > I think this is really worth cherry-picking to 3-4, i.e. > b7d874f49b102eabe2974c4dee1272d2cf6053a3 Done - thanks :-) Michael. -- michael.me...@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] libstdc++ STL debug

On Thursday 15 of September 2011, Michael Stahl wrote: > On 15.09.2011 16:34, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 14:34 +0200, Michael Stahl wrote: > >> of course what also needs to be prevented is linking against system > >> libraries that expose STL in their interface; a quick search

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED][PATCH][REVIEW 3-4] Fix for fdo#38391

2011/9/21 Caolán McNamara : > So I reckon we might be better off modifying > StringRangeEnumerator::getRangesFromString to always clear its page > vector argument, and then its probably worth being more forgiving and > output what valid ranges in the text can be extracted before the > invalid chars

Re: [Libreoffice] gcc bug reduction script....

On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 21:25 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: > Jan was demoing a particularly sexy gcc bug code reduction script at > the OpenSUSE conference, that would remove code at random and reduce the > size of the problem to a manageable test-case. It seems Jan sent me some more d

Re: [Libreoffice] Proposal: slowcheck -- some numbers for sc

On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 09:50 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > So I've now added a timer listener to our cppunit launcher to tell us > how long each test takes[1] and indeed it takes about 70ms to load a > .xls, 370ms for an equivalent .ods and about 500ms(?!) for an > equivalent .xlsx Ooh :

Re: [Libreoffice] [GSoC] link-time optimization

Hi Honza, On 14 September 2011 11:59, Jan Hubicka wrote: > Hi, > thanks to Michael I made some progress on building Libreoffice on my setup. > The problem of configury was that -flto was not passed at linktime and also > -fuse-linker-plugin was missing. > -flto should be passed when linking dynam

Re: [Libreoffice] License for my patches

Hi Samphan, On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 09:55 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > Please don't forget to update And thanks for the clear statement :-) Michael. -- michael.me...@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot ___

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED][PATCH][REVIEW 3-4] Fix for fdo#38391

On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 22:10 +0400, Ivan Timofeev wrote: > 2011/9/20 Caolán McNamara : > > Hmm, if in normal mode I type in 3-4 I get that range previewed, change > > it to "foobar" and it stays previewing 3-4, which isn't great either > > really. > > In normal layout in Writer and in any modes in

Re: [Libreoffice] Proposal: slowcheck -- some numbers for sc

On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 11:27 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote: > The sc unit tests are slow because we use the filter-tests as an way > to test not only the import but also the first recalculation. We > havenow already about 10 files that we import and check and I have > some additional that are not yet

Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice.boldandbusted.com] cppcheck's "unusedFunction" check activated

Great ! The false positive we talked about are gone ! Thank you ! Julien. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice-boldandbusted-com-cppcheck-s-unusedFunction-check-activated-tp3348745p3354804.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __

Re: [Libreoffice] License for my patches

On 09/21/2011 09:37 AM, Samphan Raruenrom wrote: All my patches to LibreOffice project are under LGPLv3+/MPL1.1 dual license and future versions of the licenses. Please don't forget to update accordingly. -Stephan __

[Libreoffice] License for my patches

All my patches to LibreOffice project are under LGPLv3+/MPL1.1 dual license and future versions of the licenses. -- _/|\_ Samphan Raruenrom. Open Source Development Co., Ltd. Tel: +66 38 311816, Fax: +66 38 773128, http://www.osdev.co.th/ ___ LibreOffic

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] change font name in Thai fall-back font lists in VCL.xcu

All my patches are under LGPLv3+/MPL1.1 dual license and future versions of the licenses. Thanks, Tantai Thanakanok On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 12:25 PM, David Tardon wrote: > On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 11:26:31AM +0700, Tantai Tanakanok wrote: > > I change font name from "TH SarabunNew" to "TH Sarab

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED][PATCH] OSL_TRACE: Remove trailing newlines

Thanks, I pushed it. There was one file where the patch was not applying, so I changed it manually and pushed in another commit. Thanks again F. On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 10:21 +0200, Thomas Arnhold wrote: > Hi, > > I've removed all trailing newlines from OSL_TRACE calls. See attached patch. > >

[Libreoffice] Replace SvULongs and SvUShorts in svx with std::vector

Hi, This is another one patch replacing SvULongs and SvUShorts with std::vector. Cheers, Maciej >From 06db1aa6489e2fac7b088f30fe6cd85629c7ef08 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Maciej Rumianowski Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 09:19:50 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Replace SvULongs and SVUShorts with std: