On Wednesday 21 of September 2011, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 12:55:44 +0200 > > Lubos Lunak <l.lu...@suse.cz> wrote: > > You forgot Qt4/KDE4. LO does not use STL with it, so this is just to > > show that it's not so trivial to check if there's a potential > > problem. And I seriously doubt there's a good way how to check for > > this automatically, so the only way to find such a problem would > > presumably be getting a strange crash. > > > > But I'm not against, if not having STL debug enabled on Linux makes > > building on Windows even more of a nightmare, then I guess we could > > live with that. > > Well, since both kde integration and stl debug building would be > toogled by configure (right?), it could refrain to continue on a "both > kde and stl debug"-combo. Debug builds are developer builds, they > rarely need kde on every compile anyway.
That is right, but that is not my point. What I meant was that if we enable STL debug, we'll inevitably miss a problematic case from time to time (although most probably it is still worth it). -- Lubos Lunak l.lu...@suse.cz _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
