Re: [Libreoffice] Platform-specific OUTPATH variables

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:15:50AM -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > > I have no idea how cross-compilation is currently implemented, but can't > > that > > be done with the same build directory name for all platforms ? > > Not unless the way it is done currently is changed. New ideas, and patches t

Re: [Libreoffice] Platform-specific OUTPATH variables

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 01:07:03AM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:51 AM, Francois Tigeot > wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:17:33AM -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > >> > I'd like to consolidate the different OUTPATH values to a single one or > >> > two > >> > at mo

Re: [Libreoffice] Platform-specific OUTPATH variables

> I have no idea how cross-compilation is currently implemented, but can't that > be done with the same build directory name for all platforms ? Not unless the way it is done currently is changed. New ideas, and patches to implement them welcome. But don't just break it. The tools that we build

Re: [Libreoffice] Platform-specific OUTPATH variables

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:51 AM, Francois Tigeot wrote: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:17:33AM -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote: >> > I'd like to consolidate the different OUTPATH values to a single one or two >> > at most (unx and wnt). Thoughts ? >> >> That will break cross-compilation as currently imp

Re: [Libreoffice] Platform-specific OUTPATH variables

On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:17:33AM -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > > I'd like to consolidate the different OUTPATH values to a single one or two > > at most (unx and wnt). Thoughts ? > > That will break cross-compilation as currently implemented. It isn't entirely > unthinkable that somebody might

Re: [Libreoffice] http://libreoffice.boldandbusted.com/ cppcheck report jobs stalled... no longer! :)

Hi Julien, Replies in-line below. On 08/29/11 03:19, julien2412 wrote: > Hello Jesse, > > Just to be sure, is the cppcheck scan on the Master or on another branch ? > jesse@dell-gx620 ~/source/LibreOffice/core $ git status # On branch master nothing to commit (working directory clean) jesse@de

[Libreoffice] Unknown property

Hello, I've got this when i open a ppt file : Error: PropertySet::implSetPropertyValue - cannot set property "NumberingLevel" From File /home/maryline/compile-libreoffice/libo/oox/source/helper/propertyset.cxx at Line 176 I thought this patch would be ok : diff --git a/sd/source/core/stlsheet.cxx

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Use a custom string to make numbering more flexible

This patch is a try to make outline numbering more flexible. I just want to know the feedback of community. To make outline numbering more flexible, a LabelText property is added to SvxNumberFormat and some elements to ui. So if the LabelText is not empty, governs the format of numbering. The plac

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] BUG 36594

Hi Jenei, On Monday, 2011-08-29 19:10:32 +0200, Jenei Gábor wrote: > Let me to have some questions about your review: Sure. > >>+const sal_Unicode* sCopy=sQuery.getStr(); > >>+int nQueryLen=sQuery.getLength(); > >>+bool bIsText1=false; > >>+bool bIsText2=false; > >>+bool bCo

Re: [Libreoffice] [GSoC 2011][svgexport][PATCH] Fixed a buf in the JavaScript animation engine

On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 21:34 +0200, Marco wrote: > I'm planning to switch to OneGit, anyway I'm not sure where my patches > have been pushed at present. I see several commits under your name in the svg-export branch: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/log/?h=svg-export Perhaps this is

Re: [Libreoffice] background in LTR interface shows BrOffice instead of LibreOffice

On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 23:32 +0300, Lior Kaplan wrote: > > Could we also have this done for the next 3.3.x release ? > > Not sure there will be another 3.3.X ? > > Fair enough. Is there a branch to commit to (just in case) ? Kaplan ___

Re: [Libreoffice] [GSoC 2011][svgexport][PATCH] Fixed a buf in the JavaScript animation engine

On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 10:04:34 +0200, Tor Lillqvist wrote: I attached a new patch set based on the master branch, as it was on Monday July 7, Hmm, I am afraid that is a quite long time ago, and the all-over whitespace cleanup done when we did the OneGit conversion overlaps a lot with the

Re: [Libreoffice] [GSoC 2011][svgexport][PATCH] Fixed a buf in the JavaScript animation engine

On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 10:04:55 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote: Marco wrote: skip I attached a new patch set based on the master branch, as it was on Monday July 7, that includes a bug fix: in my haste I missed to make animations on the starting slide work properly. Since all patches from y

Re: [Libreoffice] unnecessary build of obj/bootstrap.o?

On Aug 29, 2011, at 5:12 PM, Kevin Hunter wrote: > In tracking down another issue, I've run across a number of object files that > we appear to build but not use. Example: > > g++ -o sal/unxlngx6/obj/bootstrap.o [...] > > A few lines later in the build, we build this, with a few extra g++ > ar

Re: [Libreoffice] few queastions about building sal

On Aug 29, 2011, at 8:35 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 15:53 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: >> On Aug 29, 2011, at 2:50 PM, Matúš Kukan wrote: >>> rtl_hashfunc, rtl_hashentry_destroy and 5 more rtl_hashtable_* from >>> rtl/source/locale.c >> >> Ah, I see. Yes, indeed, appears

Re: [Libreoffice] few queastions about building sal

On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 15:53 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On Aug 29, 2011, at 2:50 PM, Matúš Kukan wrote: > > rtl_hashfunc, rtl_hashentry_destroy and 5 more rtl_hashtable_* from > > rtl/source/locale.c > > Ah, I see. Yes, indeed, appears they have erroneously been added to > sal.map once, and

Re: [Libreoffice] Update of AutoText "numbered formula"

On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 10:50 -0700, jumbo444 wrote: > => in standard.bau, you should modify: > standard.bau\NF\Obj0012E65F\settings.xml ... > => file standard.bau\NF\content.xml is wrong formatted ... > I made the modifications for the fr locale... > > My question is how could this contribution be

[Libreoffice] development summary: year 2011, week 34

Hi, this time a brief summary of what happened during the 34th week in 2011 on LibreOffice repositories and the living branches: + master:LO-3.5 development + libreoffice-3-3: fixes for LO-3.3.5 bug fix release + libreoffice-3-4: fixes for LO-3.4.4 bug fix

[Libreoffice] Update of AutoText "numbered formula"

Hello, AutoText "numbered formula" in Writer suffers from two points that I like to raise, with their solutions: - OOo issue 75665 http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=75665 inserted formula is pre-formated with text in italic which is not the default behavior. => in standard.bau, you

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] BUG 36594

Hello Eike, Let me to have some questions about your review: 2011. 08. 22. 21:47 keltezéssel, Eike Rathke írta: Hi Jenei, On Sunday, 2011-08-21 14:59:26 +0200, Jenei Gábor wrote: +::rtl::OUStringBuffer sTemp; Construct the buffer with a sufficient capacity beforehand so no memory alloca

Re: [Libreoffice] unnecessary build of obj/bootstrap.o?

Hi Kevin, On 29 August 2011 17:12, Kevin Hunter wrote: > Hullo List, > > In tracking down another issue, I've run across a number of object files > that we appear to build but not use.  Example: > > g++ -o sal/unxlngx6/obj/bootstrap.o [...] > > A few lines later in the build, we build this, with

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Escaped non-ASCII characters from source files.

Hello all, The attached patch solves a compilation error in libxml2 which occurs on Windows with some Asian locales. I would appreciate if someone pushes this. Best regards, Takashi Nakamoto From c629ba7abc1316b1d66a4eefa0407523f62f0613 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Takashi Nakamoto Date: Mon,

[Libreoffice] unnecessary build of obj/bootstrap.o?

Hullo List, In tracking down another issue, I've run across a number of object files that we appear to build but not use. Example: g++ -o sal/unxlngx6/obj/bootstrap.o [...] A few lines later in the build, we build this, with a few extra g++ arguments. This is the version that actually gets

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] core.git only repo-mirror. Using git instead of ./g

On 08/26/2011 11:57 PM, hrikjsenvagt...@yahoo.dk wrote: > Hi Bjôrn > > > Could not totally remove > './g checkout `git name-rev --name-only HEAD`' as I got an > error but replaced it with 'git checkout master' > './g -f stash pop' had to be replaced with 'git stash pop || :' > as it generated an

Re: [Libreoffice] cleaning definitions about cpu

Hi, maybe somebody could do this ? 2. Then also somewhere has to be defined architecture for rtl/source/macro.hxx, but I could not find where it is for build    and may be we need add this to gbuild/platform/* >>> >>> solenv/inc/settings.mk: CDEFS=-D$(OS) >>> >> OS is the first par

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Add numbering type in persian word.

Hi Tor, On Monday, 2011-08-29 03:12:51 -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > >> +// Tables used for numbering in persian words > >> +static sal_Unicode *table_PersianWord_decade1[]={ > >> +(sal_Unicode[]){0}, // 0 > >> +(sal_Unicode[]){0x06cc, 0x06a9, 0}, // 1 > > Unfortunately that code wasn't

Re: [Libreoffice] build error

Hello, For a while I did not have this error,but now it appears again. Actually I did a totally normal build without debug symbols and dbglevel setting, but still it appears. It seems to be a makefile error of LibreOffice. Has anyone already met the problem? 2011. 08. 26. 14:49 keltezéssel,

Re: [Libreoffice] few queastions about building sal

On Aug 29, 2011, at 2:50 PM, Matúš Kukan wrote: > On 29 August 2011 09:48, Stephan Bergmann > wrote: >> On Aug 28, 2011, at 11:57 PM, Matúš Kukan wrote: >>> I was working on gbuildizing sal and few problems showed up: >>> >>> 1, in sal/osl/unx/system.h:75 there is #if GLIBC >= 2 >>>but I coul

Re: [Libreoffice] few queastions about building sal

On 29 August 2011 09:48, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On Aug 28, 2011, at 11:57 PM, Matúš Kukan wrote: >> I was working on gbuildizing sal and few problems showed up: >> >> 1, in sal/osl/unx/system.h:75 there is #if GLIBC >= 2 >>    but I could not find how is GLIBC defined. In Env.Host.sh I have >>

Re: [Libreoffice] few queastions about building sal

On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 09:48:29AM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On Aug 28, 2011, at 11:57 PM, Matúš Kukan wrote: > > I was working on gbuildizing sal and few problems showed up: > > > > 1, in sal/osl/unx/system.h:75 there is #if GLIBC >= 2 > >but I could not find how is GLIBC defined. In E

Re: [Libreoffice] smoke test fail

On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 18:32 +0200, Jenei Gábor wrote: > Can you tell me how to fix them? You're on a higher debug level that "standard" I think. You probably need to get backtraces, and get a debugger in there, so... http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/FAQ#The_smoketest_failed.2C_how_

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] knowing where LibreOffice will install into ? e.g. make pyuno work with system python

On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 13:34 +0200, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > Attaching the patch without the .sh altering. I want the outcome of what the patch does, but right now... a) PREFIXDIR isn't honoured I think, so the current sub wouldn't point to the place it gets installed into for the "make install" cas

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] DrawPolyLine on Windows

Anyway, I committed and pushed your patch, thanks! Please do follow up with more patches if you notice other problems. Please confirm that you license your code under our normal LGPL/MPL combination. --tml ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lis

[Libreoffice] stucked with a bug

Hi! I've been having fun with Bug 33794 for a while. In some translations the Open button's text on LibreOffice start window is overlapped by the small triangle symbol on the right of the open button which is for recent files popup menu.

[Libreoffice] offapi needs to be rebuilt twice after change

Hi, Forgot to mention that offapi needs to be rebuilt twice after a change (as in latest Persian numbering) to regenerate the corresponding .hdl file. If someone familiar with gbuild could take a look at that? Thanks Eike -- PGP/OpenPGP/GnuPG encrypted mail preferred in all private communica

Re: [Libreoffice] http://libreoffice.boldandbusted.com/ cppcheck report jobs stalled... no longer! :)

Hello Jesse, Just to be sure, is the cppcheck scan on the Master or on another branch ? Do you think the machine which runs automatic cppcheck scan is stable enough to consider using the git version of cppcheck or do you want to test it more to detect other RAM pbs ? It would be really great to h

Re: [Libreoffice] buglet in 1ec7b6a4 (?)

On Aug 28, 2011, at 8:59 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > 2011/8/28 Eike Rathke : >> Hi Matúš, >> >> On Sunday, 2011-08-28 19:04:08 +0200, Matúš Kukan wrote: >> >>> On 22 August 2011 18:17, Tom Tromey wrote: Commit 1ec7b6a4 changed autogen.sh to create autogen.lastrun only if some argumen

Re: [Libreoffice] background in LTR interface shows BrOffice instead of LibreOffice

On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 23:32 +0300, Lior Kaplan wrote: > Could we also have this done for the next 3.3.x release ? Not sure there will be another 3.3.X ? C. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mai

[Libreoffice] Fwd: [PATCH] Add numbering type in persian word.

> > Unfortunately that code wasn't accepted by MSVC. It doesn't seem to like > array literals or whatever one should call them. I changed it a bit and > committed. Yay for C++ portability. > Sorry. I was going to change it to be more portable. I cloned the source again as Eike said; but had some p

Re: [Libreoffice] unusedcode.easy and debug build

On Sat, 2011-08-27 at 02:04 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote: > Hello Caolan, all, > > I just had some problems with my debug build in ucb and discovered > that at least one method only needed in a debug build has been > removed. It seems it was mentionend on unusedcode.easy, so my question > is how w

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Add numbering type in persian word.

>> +// Tables used for numbering in persian words >> +static sal_Unicode *table_PersianWord_decade1[]={ >> +(sal_Unicode[]){0}, // 0 >> +(sal_Unicode[]){0x06cc, 0x06a9, 0}, // 1 Unfortunately that code wasn't accepted by MSVC. It doesn't seem to like array literals or whatever one should

Re: [Libreoffice] few queastions about building sal

On Sun, 2011-08-28 at 23:57 +0200, Matúš Kukan wrote: > 4. This is not problem for me, but in sal/inc/sal/cppunit.h I have > seen typo: LibreOfficeProtect*e*r. So, it is unused, > and I'm just wondering where and how it should be used ? It is > something new ? Fixed now. I tweaked some existi

Re: [Libreoffice] [GSoC 2011][svgexport][PATCH] Fixed a buf in the JavaScript animation engine

Marco wrote: > It seems that I have passed the final evaluation!! :) > Indeed - congrats, well done! :) > I attached a new patch set based on the master branch, as it was on > Monday July 7, that includes a bug fix: in my haste I missed to > make animations on the starting slide work properly. >

Re: [Libreoffice] [GSoC 2011][svgexport][PATCH] Fixed a buf in the JavaScript animation engine

> I attached a new patch set based on the master branch, as it was on > Monday July 7, Hmm, I am afraid that is a quite long time ago, and the all-over whitespace cleanup done when we did the OneGit conversion overlaps a lot with the whitespace fixes in your patches, for instance. Do you think

Re: [Libreoffice] few queastions about building sal

On Aug 28, 2011, at 11:57 PM, Matúš Kukan wrote: > I was working on gbuildizing sal and few problems showed up: > > 1, in sal/osl/unx/system.h:75 there is #if GLIBC >= 2 >but I could not find how is GLIBC defined. In Env.Host.sh I have > GLIBC="2REDHAT60" but that is something else probably. >