Re: [Libreoffice] Can I compile and build only libreoffice writer component instead of whole LO suite ?

2011-08-12 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 12:20 AM, Partha Chowdhury wrote: > Hello all.This is my first post to the list.So if I have not provided > necessary information or overlooked something obvious, please point me in > the right direction. > > I have build libreoffice 3.3.3.1 from source using the > "./confi

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Series of fixes and migration to One Git for contrib/dev-tools/ubuntu-jenkins

2011-08-12 Thread Henrik Jensen
On Thursday, 11 August 2011, 0:56 Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Henrik Jensen >wrote: >> Patches licensed under LGPLv3+/MPL 1.1 ( or what ever Bjoern Michaelsen >> prefers :-) ) >> TODO: >> - Add the ccache lines to './autogen.sh' command line instead of >> concaten

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH][PARTIAL PUSH] More perl cleanup (fdo#39747)

2011-08-12 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 11:14 PM, Jordan Ayers wrote: > A few more patches to clean up parts of the solenv perl scripts. > > The first is just removing pieces that became useless after prior > patches, or that were added as part of a larger patch, even though > they were never used.  (I'm basing t

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Series of fixes and migration to One Git for contrib/dev-tools/ubuntu-jenkins

2011-08-12 Thread Henrik Jensen
> I guess Bjoern knows most about this, adding him to cc list, think he is on > vacation now but surely will look when he gets back > >Noel Ok, I've put Bjoern Michaelsen on CC for some further small patches. Hope his is alright with that. --Henrik Jensen (HenrikJ on #libreoffice-dev) __

[Libreoffice] Can I compile and build only libreoffice writer component instead of whole LO suite ?

2011-08-12 Thread Partha Chowdhury
Hello all.This is my first post to the list.So if I have not provided necessary information or overlooked something obvious, please point me in the right direction. I have build libreoffice 3.3.3.1 from source using the "./configure;make;bin/ooinstall ;" .However, I need office only to create

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Series of fixes and migration to One Git for contrib/dev-tools/ubuntu-jenkins

2011-08-12 Thread Henrik Jensen
A few more suggested patches to 'setup-ubuntu-jenkins.sh' ( committed to local clone after  0007-Install-Jenkins-in-current-dir-instead-of-.jenkins.patch so I guess they are dependent ) Patch descriptions: --

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Improve the "alien save" dialog (part one)

2011-08-12 Thread Josh Heidenreich
Fantastic, thanks mate. I'll have another one next week with more complicated changes to make it even better so that should be good. Josh ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreo

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] dbaccess/xmlfilter.cxx

2011-08-12 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 20:16 +0200, Jenei Gábor wrote: > Hello, > > I found out that on make -sr debug=true dbglevel=2 dbaccess did not > compile successfully, the problem is with xmlfilter.cxx, it uses > OStringBuffer, but there is no include to use it, so cxx says: > "OStringBuffer is not a me

Re: [Libreoffice] Class Time and its funny ideas about time

2011-08-12 Thread Lubos Lunak
On Thursday 11 of August 2011, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > Lubos Lunak wrote: > > As much as I don't like it, I can possibly see at least some reason for > > time having 25 hours, but 10 seconds without 20 seconds being 10 seconds > > (and there is actually explicit code to ensure that)? > > > > Do

Re: [Libreoffice] Class Time and its funny ideas about time

2011-08-12 Thread Lubos Lunak
On Thursday 11 of August 2011, Eike Rathke wrote: > > 2) Why should GetSec() of a negative delta return a negative amount of >seconds? I didn't say it should be negative, it just should be sane. Which in this case should be ... uhm ... oh well, another botched API. > The probability that so

[Libreoffice] [patch] unused variable in Windows build

2011-08-12 Thread Pierre-André Jacquod
Hello, a small patch to suppress an unused variable (within a WNT define) according cppchecker Since I can not build on Windows, if someone could review / compile it for me before pushing ? Thanks and regards Pierre-André 0001-unused-variable-in-Windows-build.patch Description: applicatio

Re: [Libreoffice] oox fun in bringing it into tail_build...

2011-08-12 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 15:27:11 +0200 Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > It would remove the touch-target of the animations header (the empty > file that signals to the build system 'everything for the header > target is done'), yes -- but it would not remove the headers > themselves: It doesnt even know ab

Re: [Libreoffice] oox fun in bringing it into tail_build...

2011-08-12 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 01:59:37 -0500 Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > that would break the per-module build-ability, as you noticed below. No it shouldnt. > > headers because I found: > > > > define gb_LinkTarget_add_package_headers > > $(foreach package,$(2),$(call > > gb_LinkTarget__add_internal_heade

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-08-12 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 mariosv changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|39919 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedeskt

Re: [Libreoffice] patch for preserving the table alignment

2011-08-12 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 10:45 +0100, Noel Power wrote: > > composite -compose difference old.pdf new.pdf - | identify -format %k - > did that for the document at iz#1291 and it shows no changes ( e.g. > result of 1 ) on my system That's good enough for me really. I'd say make your changes unless so

[Libreoffice] http://dev-www.libreoffice.org/bundles/ updated to OneGit

2011-08-12 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Hi, following opengrok and other services, the tar bundles of the git repos at http://dev-www.libreoffice.org/bundles/ are now also using the new OneGit layout. http://dev-www.libreoffice.org/bundles/libreoffice-git.tar.bz2 contains core, dictionaries, and help http://dev-www.libreoffice.or

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Improve the "alien save" dialog (part one)

2011-08-12 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 14:02 +0930, Josh Heidenreich wrote: > Hi all, > > There has been a heap of discussion about this in another thread, and > I posted a patch there, but I though I should post a [PATCH] one too. > > This is version 3 of the patch. LGPLv3/MIT. Pushed now I believe. C. __

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] "Confirmation of save format" dialog

2011-08-12 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 15:35 +0930, Josh Heidenreich wrote: > > I have the third version of the patch. > Oops, forgot to attach Hmm, its a patch against the original state of affairs, rather than a patch against the current one. Tweaked it up to apply and pushed. Best to update your sources (ensu

Re: [Libreoffice] patch for preserving the table alignment

2011-08-12 Thread Noel Power
Hmm seems I really need to return to this, comparing on windows ( where we really have like for like fonts ) it seems the problem returns ( because the column width issue comes into play again ) On 18/07/11 10:41, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 16:35 +0100, Noel Power wrote: Hi

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Bug 38486

2011-08-12 Thread Jenei Gábor
Hello, Here is the patch that fixes the Query wizard, it seems that it works fine now, however the problem mentioned in the patch was a minor problem, wizard worked wrong for all queries where I wanted to sort by an aggregate field. Please review it,and push it to git. Thanks, Gabor >From 3210fc

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] BUG 38486

2011-08-12 Thread Jenei Gábor
Hello, Here is a patch for the mentioned bug, actually the problem mentioned in the bug info was just the minority, wizard didn't work for all the queries where I wanted to sort by an aggregate field. I did several tries,and it seems to be ok now, however without "group by" in an aggregate query i