On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 15:27:11 +0200 Bjoern Michaelsen <bjoern.michael...@canonical.com> wrote:
> It would remove the touch-target of the animations header (the empty > file that signals to the build system 'everything for the header > target is done'), yes -- but it would not remove the headers > themselves: It doesnt even know about them as they are declared in > animations. So apart from a few possible superfluous relinkings of > libs using the animations headers, everything is fine. > > gb_Library_add_package_headers is the way to go. OTOH, the packages are registered in the module anyway, so a "make clean" in sd will remove the sd packages anyway. So maybe the dependency of the LinkTarget clean target on the package clean target can/should be removed anyway (thereby preventing the superfluous relinking)? Best, Bjoern -- https://launchpad.net/~bjoern-michaelsen _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
