Re: [Libreoffice] Eclipse CDT IDE & LibreOffice, hints & tips needed

2011-07-29 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Olivier Hallot wrote: > Can a charitable soul tell me if using Eclipse CDT (or netbeans) for > LibreOffice hacking does make sense? > > I keep crashing both IDE's upon defining ~/git/libo/ as project, looks like > it is too big for the vanilla IDEs (java out of heap space , bla bla bla). > What f

Re: [Libreoffice] svt::AcceleratorExecute duplication

2011-07-29 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Kohei, On Friday, 2011-07-29 13:43:06 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > It seems that there are two places where svt::AcceleratorExecute is > implemented. One is in framework > > framework/source/accelerators/acceleratorexecute.hxx > framework/source/accelerators/acceleratorexecute.cxx > > and

Re: [Libreoffice] Ridiculous xml?

2011-07-29 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Ryan, On Friday, 2011-07-29 11:30:43 +0100, Ryan Jendoubi wrote: > Recently noticed something very odd about the contents of > content.xml. It looks like a text span has been placed around every > individual word, with a different one around every individual space: > > text:style-name="T1">W

Re: [Libreoffice] problems in number format dialog

2011-07-29 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Markus, On Friday, 2011-07-29 00:54:19 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote: > can someone from the Thai community check whether these two patches cause > any problems. They remove some part of the bug fix for > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33089 with patch > http://cgit.freedesktop.or

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Allow GoUpSel, GoDownSel, GoLeftsel, GoRightSel to use "By" property

2011-07-29 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Caolán, On Friday, 2011-07-29 12:26:04 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > I left > > SID_CURSORBLKDOWN_SEL > > SID_CURSORBLKUP_SEL > > SID_CURSORBLKLEFT_SEL > > SID_CURSORBLKRIGHT_SEL > > > > untouched because repetitions makes no sense to them AFAIK > > I see that the pre-existing ::ExecuteC

[Libreoffice] Proposta Coloratus

2011-07-29 Thread Wesley Almeida
Title: Documento sem título   Contato: Wesley Almeida Tel: (31) 3433-1516 / 3433-3153 / 3454-7175 Email: cont...@coloratusdesign.com / Bom dia, meu nome e Wesley Almeida, represento a Coloratus Design. Formamos uma agência esp

[Libreoffice] Unix permissions in scp2/inc/macros.inc

2011-07-29 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I was looking onto installed files by the libreoffice default install method and noticed that they are not world writable. This is caused by definition in bootstrap/scp2/inc/macros.inc around line 94 where it says: #define BIN_FILE_BODY \

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] fix Kabyle_Algeria [kab_DZ] absent currency symbol

2011-07-29 Thread Eike Rathke
* In locale data replaceTo must not be empty if replaceFrom isn't. + Also added check to locale data compiler to prevent this in future. * Fixed a currency format's group separator. * Marked LANGUAGE_USER_KABYLE (0x0659) obsolete as LANGUAGE_TAMAZIGHT_LATIN (0x085F) is used instead, actually com

[Libreoffice] My patches' license note

2011-07-29 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi, The following [PATCH] fix Kabyle_Algeria [kab_DZ] absent currency symbol is licensed under LGPLv3+ and MPL 1.1, as all further patches will be. Enjoy Eike ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-07-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 vitriol changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||39659 --- Comment #177 from vitriol 2011-07-2

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix field values in export to docx

2011-07-29 Thread Lubos Lunak
On Friday 29 of July 2011, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 17:14 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote: > > > -// Find another way for hyperlinks > > > -RunText( rInfos.pField->GetFieldName() ); > > > +String sExpand( rInfos.pField->ExpandField( true ) ); > > > +sE

[Libreoffice] svt::AcceleratorExecute duplication

2011-07-29 Thread Kohei Yoshida
Hi there, It seems that there are two places where svt::AcceleratorExecute is implemented. One is in framework framework/source/accelerators/acceleratorexecute.hxx framework/source/accelerators/acceleratorexecute.cxx and the other is in svtools svtools/inc/svtools/acceleratorexecute.hxx svtool

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEWED] [PUSHED 3-4] fix for bnc#707486

2011-07-29 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 16:48 +0100, Noel Power wrote: > perfect sense. In this case, I don't see it will make any difference, so > you can change the order to the way it was or not as you wish ( I have > no preference ) Ok. Pushed to -3-4 with the lines flipped back (so that I can rest easy).

Re: [Libreoffice] curiosity in OResultSet.cxx

2011-07-29 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 11:21 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote: > libs-core/connectivity/source/drivers/odbcbase/OResultSet.cxx > has a line which raises my suspicions. > Is the scalar delete really intended? If so, it might be > worth a comment just to humour paranoids like me. nah, the delete in ORes

Re: [Libreoffice] [review for 3.4] fix for bnc#707486

2011-07-29 Thread Noel Power
Hi Kohei On 29/07/11 15:59, Kohei Yoshida wrote: after applying your patch, because, before your change, FillScRange was called first *then* xModel was assigned an instance, but you got them flipped in your new code. aha gottcha This may not affect anything but I've seen in the past a differen

Re: [Libreoffice] Link external libraries before internal ones

2011-07-29 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi Petr, On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 16:55:59 +0200 Petr Mladek wrote: > Heh, I have asked for help too fast. The attached patch does the job > here. > > I have to try a clean build. If there are no objections, I will do > this change in master. as said in the other mails: this should be already fixed

[Libreoffice] curiosity in OResultSet.cxx

2011-07-29 Thread Terrence Enger
libs-core/connectivity/source/drivers/odbcbase/OResultSet.cxx has a line which raises my suspicions. Looking for references to m_pRowStatusArray, I see (*) two instances of array new, (*) one instance of array delete, and (*) an instance of scalar delete in OResultSet::setFetchSize(sal_Int32)

Re: [Libreoffice] About merging and people not paying attention

2011-07-29 Thread Tor Lillqvist
> and after a while in a generalized abuse of git commit -n Indeed. Once you have been bitten by git commit hooks misbehaving a few times (like when they used to revert the rest of your changed files if you committed just a subset of them), you "learn" to use --no-verify just to be safe and it

Re: [Libreoffice] About merging and people not paying attention

2011-07-29 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 4:01 AM, Miklos Vajna wrote: > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 03:53:18PM +0200, Thomas Arnhold > wrote: >> I think this was not intended. Simple solution would be to add some >> '<<< HEAD' .* '===' .* '>>> master' stuff to git hooks. So >> git would block commits wit

Re: [Libreoffice] [review for 3.4] fix for bnc#707486

2011-07-29 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 11:26 +0100, Noel Power wrote: > If I understand what you mean then I think it is the patch output is > confusing things Hmm... I'm not sure about that. Basically what I was suggesting was to make the following change --- a/sc/source/ui/vba/vbarange.cxx +++ b/sc/source/ui

Re: [Libreoffice] Eclipse CDT IDE & LibreOffice, hints & tips needed

2011-07-29 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Olivier, *, On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Olivier Hallot wrote: > Hi > Can a charitable soul tell me if using Eclipse CDT (or netbeans) for > LibreOffice hacking does make sense? > > I keep crashing both IDE's upon defining ~/git/libo/ as project, looks like > it is too big for the vanilla

Re: [Libreoffice] Link external libraries before internal ones

2011-07-29 Thread Petr Mladek
Petr Mladek píše v Pá 29. 07. 2011 v 16:40 +0200: > Hi Bjoern, > > --as-needed link flag has been enabled by default since openSUSE-11.3 or > so. It requires to mention libraries in the link flags in the right > order. I have troubles to link libqstart_gtklx.so. I get: > > In fact, the 3rd party

Re: [Libreoffice] Link external libraries before internal ones

2011-07-29 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 16:40:20 +0200 Petr Mladek wrote: > It would help me to put $(GTK_LIBS) after shutdowniconunx.o on the > command line. > > In fact, the 3rd party libraries should be mentioned at the end of the > command line because neither of use symbols from the internal > libraries. > >

Re: [Libreoffice] Link external libraries before internal ones

2011-07-29 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 16:40 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote: > I am a bit lost how to solve this with the GNU make. Could you please > help me? master has this fixed FWIW C. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedeskt

[Libreoffice] quick update on hackfest

2011-07-29 Thread Florian Effenberger
Hello, FYI: The folks from Café Netzwerk (http://www.cafe-netzwerk.de) kindly offered that we can sleep at their venue, or use their kitchen for cooking, or deposit stuff there. Café Netzwerk is located about 10-15 minutes by foot from the main venue. The only drawback is that they don't have

[Libreoffice] Link external libraries before internal ones

2011-07-29 Thread Petr Mladek
Hi Bjoern, --as-needed link flag has been enabled by default since openSUSE-11.3 or so. It requires to mention libraries in the link flags in the right order. I have troubles to link libqstart_gtklx.so. I get: --- cut --- [ build LNK ] Library/libqstart_gtklx.so R=/usr/src/packages/BUILD && S=$R/

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Clean-up of bugfix fdo#32895 for the -3-4 branch

2011-07-29 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Peter, On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 16:58 +0200, Péter Rabi wrote: > I attached the patches that fix bug fdo#32895. I eliminated the baroque > castings and reused the duplicated function as you suggested. Great - I've pushed to -3-4, and I'll cherry-pick to master on top of the previously pus

Re: [Libreoffice] How to suggest new features for libreoffice?

2011-07-29 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Parag, Great to meet you. On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 13:53 +0530, Parag Agrawal wrote: > I am an avid Ubuntu user ... > So, I was wondering is there a way users can suggest features and > changes that they would like to see in the future versions of > libreoffice. Yes - it is a ve

[Libreoffice] Eclipse CDT IDE & LibreOffice, hints & tips needed

2011-07-29 Thread Olivier Hallot
Hi Can a charitable soul tell me if using Eclipse CDT (or netbeans) for LibreOffice hacking does make sense? I keep crashing both IDE's upon defining ~/git/libo/ as project, looks like it is too big for the vanilla IDEs (java out of heap space , bla bla bla). OTOH, if it does make sense, a page o

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [REVIEW 3.4] FindBar silently reuses options from the Search & Replace dialog

2011-07-29 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Christoph, On 2011-07-29 at 00:38 +0200, Christoph Noack wrote: > > > resets whatever flags the user has set in the Search& Replace dialog > > > too. This is not easy to fix, so I wonder if you consider this stop-gap > > > solution bearable for the users? > > Kendy, you mention "is not easy

[Libreoffice] Minutes of the tech. steering call

2011-07-29 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Present: Rainer, Mitch, Norbert, Kendy, Andras, Bjoern, Caolan, Petr, Kohei, Michael, Christian, Francois * Finished Action Items: + conference papers: + Michael + meet the ESC panel ... + status report for the last year's wor

Re: [Libreoffice] note on unused destructors in unused.easy

2011-07-29 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 13:52 +0200, Thomas Arnhold wrote: > On 07/29/2011 12:05 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > If a destructor is listed in unused.easy as unused then its probably > > after detecting a leak if at least one of the constructors is used, i.e. > > construction without destruction somewh

Re: [Libreoffice] Libreoffice build error :(

2011-07-29 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 12:21:10 +0100 Michael Meeks wrote: > > Which reminds me; why are we not checking in configure for > make 2.82 ? IIRC there was some to/fro on that - but I forget the > result; not checking for a make with the fix we need is a tad odd > right ? Yes, there seems to be a

Re: [Libreoffice] note on unused destructors in unused.easy

2011-07-29 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 07/29/2011 12:05 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: If a destructor is listed in unused.easy as unused then its probably after detecting a leak if at least one of the constructors is used, i.e. construction without destruction somewhere. Thanks! You mean HttpRequest::~HttpRequest, right? I'm still w

Re: [Libreoffice] About merging and people not paying attention

2011-07-29 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 07/29/2011 01:45 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 13:37:20 +0200 Miklos Vajna wrote: 15:47<@Sweetshark> shm_get: I just killed the hooks dir with maximum prejudice. Yes, because the changes from master that I merged into the branch didnt conform to the tests in githooks (

Re: [Libreoffice] About merging and people not paying attention

2011-07-29 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 07/29/2011 01:37 PM, Miklos Vajna wrote: On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:46:21AM +0200, Thomas Arnhold wrote: Yeah, I've already found that file. Strangely we already have such a check: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/bootstrap/tree/git-hooks/pre-commit#n61 Oh, now I remember how such

Re: [Libreoffice] About merging and people not paying attention

2011-07-29 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 13:37:20 +0200 Miklos Vajna wrote: > 15:47 <@Sweetshark> shm_get: I just killed the hooks dir with maximum > prejudice. Yes, because the changes from master that I merged into the branch didnt conform to the tests in githooks (I assume the hooks got stricter since the time of

[Libreoffice] Fwd: [dev] Re: Debugging Hanging OOo

2011-07-29 Thread Knut Olav Bøhmer
Hi, It does not look like this patch is included in LibreOffice. What can we do get it included? -- Forwarded message -- From: Carsten Driesner Date: 6 December 2010 13:56 Subject: Re: [dev] Re: Debugging Hanging OOo To: d...@openoffice.org Am 06.12.2010 12:32, schrieb Knut Ol

Re: [Libreoffice] About merging and people not paying attention

2011-07-29 Thread Miklos Vajna
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:46:21AM +0200, Thomas Arnhold wrote: > Yeah, I've already found that file. Strangely we already have such a > check: > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/bootstrap/tree/git-hooks/pre-commit#n61 Oh, now I remember how such conflicts could be still introduced: 15

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Allow GoUpSel, GoDownSel, GoLeftsel, GoRightSel to use "By" property

2011-07-29 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 06:30 -0300, Olivier Hallot wrote: > Here is a patch to allow GoUpSel, GoDownSel, GoLeftsel,GoRightSel to > receive "By" property Looks good. > a test file appended as well. Run Main macro to test patch > > I left > SID_CURSORBLKDOWN_SEL > SID_CURSORBLKUP_SEL > SID_CURSORBL

Re: [Libreoffice] [review for 3.4] fix for bnc#707486

2011-07-29 Thread Noel Power
On 29/07/11 11:49, Caolán McNamara wrote: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/calc/commit/?id=38cae5f0a09508f48825a7049cb1508b0251fbf0 is apparently the commit that removed the last use of the three argument CopyRangeNamesToClip variant. C. And needless to say that this really is a valid fin

Re: [Libreoffice] Libreoffice build error :(

2011-07-29 Thread Michael Meeks
On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 12:39 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > > Sorry for bothering, but does anyone have the idea what went wrong > > while making the build? Which reminds me; why are we not checking in configure for make 2.82 ? IIRC there was some to/fro on that - but I forget the resul

[Libreoffice] [REVIEWED] fdo#39392 crash in moving things in the gallery to end

2011-07-29 Thread Michael Meeks
On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 12:29 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > proposing for 3-4 Looks golden, pushed :-) Michael. -- michael.me...@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lis

Re: [Libreoffice] [review for 3.4] fix for bnc#707486

2011-07-29 Thread Noel Power
On 29/07/11 11:49, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 11:36 +0100, Noel Power wrote: On 29/07/11 10:40, Caolán McNamara wrote: Are you sure? on master ScDocument::CopyRangeNamesToClip(ScDocument* pClipDoc, const ScRange& rClipRange, SCTAB nTab) was changed to ScDocument::CopyRangeNam

Re: [Libreoffice] problems with scp2

2011-07-29 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi Matúš, all, On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 12:46:43 +0200 Matúš Kukan wrote: > I have tried to move salhelper to new build system and it builds nice > (for me) but there is problem with scp2. > In old system we were creating libuno_salhelpergcc3.so.3 and > libuno_salhelpergcc3.so was just link to it. >

Re: [Libreoffice] [review for 3.4] fix for bnc#707486

2011-07-29 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 11:36 +0100, Noel Power wrote: > On 29/07/11 10:40, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 12:48 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > >> Ok. So, I did verify that that particular ScViewFunc::CopyToClip() > >> method > > Maybe unrelated but I saw the word "Clip" and I see th

[Libreoffice] problems with scp2

2011-07-29 Thread Matúš Kukan
Hi all, I have tried to move salhelper to new build system and it builds nice (for me) but there is problem with scp2. In old system we were creating libuno_salhelpergcc3.so.3 and libuno_salhelpergcc3.so was just link to it. So now I'm getting: ERROR: File not found: libuno_salhelpergcc3.so.3 fro

Re: [Libreoffice] building Basis/sdk/examples/DeveloperGuide/ProfUNO/CppBinding on Windows

2011-07-29 Thread Knut Olav Bøhmer
2011/7/28 Knut Olav Bøhmer : > 2011/7/28 Knut Olav Bøhmer : >> 2011/7/28 Caolán McNamara : >>> On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 15:31 +0200, Knut Olav Bøhmer wrote: On 28 July 2011 15:22, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 15:16 +0200, Knut Olav Bøhmer wrote: > >> Now make say

Re: [Libreoffice] Libreoffice build error :(

2011-07-29 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 15:54:43 +0530 swagat sharma wrote: > Sorry for bothering, but does anyone have the idea what went wrong > while making the build? looks like: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/make-dfsg/+bug/759704 Best, Bjoern -- https://launchpad.net/~bjoern-michaelsen ___

Re: [Libreoffice] [review for 3.4] fix for bnc#707486

2011-07-29 Thread Noel Power
On 29/07/11 10:40, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 12:48 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote: Ok. So, I did verify that that particular ScViewFunc::CopyToClip() method Maybe unrelated but I saw the word "Clip" and I see that the three argument void ScDocument::CopyRangeNamesToClip(ScDocume

[Libreoffice] Ridiculous xml?

2011-07-29 Thread Ryan Jendoubi
Hi all, Recently noticed something very odd about the contents of content.xml. It looks like a text span has been placed around every individual word, with a different one around every individual space: Webtext:style-name="T2">. text:style-name="T1">But ittext:style-name="T2"> text:style-nam

Re: [Libreoffice] [review for 3.4] fix for bnc#707486

2011-07-29 Thread Noel Power
Hi Kohei On 28/07/11 17:48, Kohei Yoshida wrote: Hi Noel, [...] where these lines ScUnoConversion::FillScRange( aRange, thisRange.getCellRangeAddressable()->getRangeAddress() ); uno::Reference< frame::XModel > xModel = excel::GetModelFromRange( mxRange );and the line are flipped before and a

[Libreoffice] Libreoffice build error :(

2011-07-29 Thread swagat sharma
Hi all, Sorry for bothering, but does anyone have the idea what went wrong while making the build? /bin/bash: line 1: 15233 Segmentation fault make -s -r -j2 dmake: Error code 139, while making 'all' --- Oh dear

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Bug 39167

2011-07-29 Thread Jenei Gábor
Hello, Here is a patch for the above mentioned bug, for me it resolved the issue on 3.5 main version in english, unfortunatelly I couldn't have it done in other national versions. Please review it, and put it into the main version if it's ok. Gábor >From 5a73827b9981c0481c7eaba6ece7042a9cd2f9e6 M

[Libreoffice] note on unused destructors in unused.easy

2011-07-29 Thread Caolán McNamara
If a destructor is listed in unused.easy as unused then its probably after detecting a leak if at least one of the constructors is used, i.e. construction without destruction somewhere. C> ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org h

[Libreoffice] REMINDER: Release 3.3.4-rc1 from libreoffice-3-3 branch

2011-07-29 Thread Petr Mladek
Hi, please note that the commit deadline for 3.3.4-rc1 is on Monday, Aug 1, 2011. The branch libreoffice-3-3-4 is going to be created the day after and only commits with 3 reviewers will be allowed for that branch. See also http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan#3.3_release http://wiki.d

Re: [Libreoffice] About merging and people not paying attention

2011-07-29 Thread Thomas Arnhold
On 07/29/2011 11:01 AM, Miklos Vajna wrote: On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 03:53:18PM +0200, Thomas Arnhold wrote: I think this was not intended. Simple solution would be to add some '<<< HEAD' .* '===' .* '>>> master' stuff to git hooks. So git would block commits with conflicts. Goo

Re: [Libreoffice] [review for 3.4] fix for bnc#707486

2011-07-29 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 12:48 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > Ok. So, I did verify that that particular ScViewFunc::CopyToClip() > method Maybe unrelated but I saw the word "Clip" and I see that the three argument void ScDocument::CopyRangeNamesToClip(ScDocument* pClipDoc, const ScRange& rClipRange,

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix field values in export to docx

2011-07-29 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 17:14 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote: > > -// Find another way for hyperlinks > > -RunText( rInfos.pField->GetFieldName() ); > > +String sExpand( rInfos.pField->ExpandField( true ) ); > > +sExpand.SearchAndReplaceAll( 0x0A, 0x0B ); > > This line loo

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Allow GoUpSel, GoDownSel, GoLeftsel, GoRightSel to use "By" property

2011-07-29 Thread Olivier Hallot
Rewinding... (should have read the wiki on patch submission) HI Here is a patch to allow GoUpSel, GoDownSel, GoLeftsel,GoRightSel to receive "By" property a test file appended as well. Run Main macro to test patch I left SID_CURSORBLKDOWN_SEL SID_CURSORBLKUP_SEL SID_CURSORBLKLEFT_SEL SID_CURSOR

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-07-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Rainer Bielefeld changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|39215 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.

Re: [Libreoffice] About merging and people not paying attention

2011-07-29 Thread Miklos Vajna
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 03:53:18PM +0200, Thomas Arnhold wrote: > I think this was not intended. Simple solution would be to add some > '<<< HEAD' .* '===' .* '>>> master' stuff to git hooks. So > git would block commits with conflicts. Good idea - care to send a patch? The pre-com

[Libreoffice] How to suggest new features for libreoffice?

2011-07-29 Thread Parag Agrawal
Hi, I am an avid Ubuntu user and hence, I have had the opportunity to work on libreoffice. I work proffessionaly in the research industry and thus, we use office suites extensively. What is still surprising is that there is no customized software to create forms/ questionnaires. So, I was wondering