https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Rainer Bielefeld changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||38542
--- Comment #173 from Rainer Bi
Uses xinerama to get the size of the primary screen
0001-Splash-screen-fix-for-multi-head-on-Linux-bug-33214.patch
Description: Binary data
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libr
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 02:56:04PM -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'd like to have the following commit
>
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/calc/commit/?id=8da78944e7c4fcae9ae40bea7162898d20db6329
>
> cherry-picked to -3-4 and -3-4-2 in order to fix
>
> https://bugs.freedes
On Jul 19, 2011, at 7:34 AM, Matúš Kukan wrote:
> On 19 July 2011 14:22, Joseph Powers wrote:
>>
>> A List<> would be better; however, it's a list of pointers so the size
>> isn't that big.
>>
> So why not use it ?
> I did not mean the actual size in memory but the number of elements.
> I've
Hello,
(2011/07/19 16:12), Caolán McNamara wrote:
If you use "--enable-epm" (you can drop the explicit
--with-package-format="rpm deb"), then when you do a "make" there should
them be rpms created under
instsetoo_native/unxlng*/some/sub/dir/use/find/to/find/them
FWIW, distro-configs/LibreOffic
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
--- Comment #172 from mariosv 2011-07-19 15:15:22
PDT ---
Bug 36555,
Prevents read Microsoft Access database.
Is a regression from OOo 3.3
Works well in 3.4
Seems as something is no shipped with 3.4.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesk
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
mariosv changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||36555
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.free
Hi there,
I'd like to have the following commit
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/calc/commit/?id=8da78944e7c4fcae9ae40bea7162898d20db6329
cherry-picked to -3-4 and -3-4-2 in order to fix
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39236
which is a nasty crasher which took me almost a f
Hi Caolan, *,
Am Dienstag, 19. Juli 2011, 12:23:20 schrieb Caolán McNamara:
> On Sun, 2011-07-17 at 00:17 +0200, Andreas Mantke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I tried to build LibO on Linux-x64 with KDE 4 (openSUSE 11.4-x64) from a
> > fresh cloned master and the build failed inside the module vcl. I
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Bug 35673 depends on bug 37763, which changed state.
Bug 37763 Summary: Define a range name prevents recognition of a label
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37763
What|Old Value |New Value
---
Florian Effenberger schrieb:
Hello,
sorry to bother you, but I'm getting continous requests from our
co-sponsor to give them some details on the hackfest agenda. :-)
The proposed items list at
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Hackfest2011#Ideas is rather empty
for now. Anyone would like to ad
Hi guys,
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 10:13 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Having said that - I'm not a pure PITA if there is an accurate and
> complete patch of what actually changed here to review - then we can
> review it - but I'm not a fan of approving big, confused, un-quantified
> changes at
Hello,
sorry to bother you, but I'm getting continous requests from our
co-sponsor to give them some details on the hackfest agenda. :-)
The proposed items list at
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Hackfest2011#Ideas is rather empty
for now. Anyone would like to add their ideas and plans to
Andreas Radke píše v Út 19. 07. 2011 v 00:09 +0200:
> Nice, you've almost fixed all of them expect some *rc files:
>
> -r--r--r-- 1 root root 126 Jul 18 22:01
> /build/pkg/libreoffice-common/usr/lib/libreoffice/ure/bin/versionrc
> -r--r--r-- 1 root root 1.1K Jul 18 22:01
> /build/pkg/libreoffice
Hi Tor,
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 08:45 -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> This seems to fix fdo#34805. If I understand correctly, the autosave
> files are always written in ODF formats, but the recovery code still
> tried to load them using the filter for the original document.
:-)
> It should o
Hi,
there have been created the libreoffice-3.4.2.2 tag for 3.4.2-rc2 release.
The corresponding official builds will be available by the end of the week.
It will be used as final if no blocker is found.
See the attached list of changes against 3.4.2-rc1.
Now, you might switch your current 3-4
I am terribly sorry I am sending the minutes this late :-(
Present: Kendy, Andras, Mitch, Petr, Rainer, Rene, Caolan
* Finished Action Items:
+ conference papers
+ Andras:
+ l10n panel / BoF
* Pending Action Items:
+ Easy Hacks - completion
Cor Nouws píše v Út 19. 07. 2011 v 09:12 +0200:
> Hi all,
>
> Nino Novak wrote (14-07-11 22:48)
> > Am Donnerstag, 14. Juli 2011, um 14:29:53 schrieb Florian Effenberger:
> >
> >> The list of fixed bugs in this release is here:
> >>
> >> http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/src/bugfixes-
Hi Markus,
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 13:19 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
> It fixes that we can't use database ranges in formulas because
> ScNameToken always used ocName but it could also be ocDBArea for
> database ranges. It's nothing special, just added an optional
> parameter to the constructor o
This seems to fix fdo#34805. If I understand correctly, the autosave files are
always written in ODF formats, but the recovery code still tried to load them
using the filter for the original document. That caused the bug, for the
specific case described in the initial bug report, it tried to use
Hi Laurent,
On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 19:41 +0200, Laurent Godard wrote:
> it would also be great for me if it could be part of the 3.4.x branch as
> this would affect a large number of my users instead of being stuck to
> OOo 3.2.1
So, with the bug in the function object now fixed, I've pushed your
On 19 July 2011 14:22, Joseph Powers wrote:
>
> A List<> would be better; however, it's a list of pointers so the size isn't
> that big.
>
So why not use it ?
I did not mean the actual size in memory but the number of elements.
I've seen there around 150 elements when I tried to print the size.
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 07:24 +0200, David Tardon wrote:
> (I haven't pushed Laurent's patch.)
Thanks, David. I've just pushed Laurent's patch with my sign-off.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffic
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 22:18 +1000, Troy Rollo wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 July 2011, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> > Well, this'll work I guess, and I'm minded to push it, but why ;-) Is
> > there a concrete bug this fixes ?
>
> Yes, but it is a little obscure. If you take the attached ODT file, save it
>
Hi Lubos, all,
On 2011-07-19 at 13:49 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> could I get reviews for the attached patch for 3-4 and 3-4-2 too, if
> possible? It is actually just removing checking for header in the
> bWrapAllowed expression. This is fdo#39155 and I do not see a reason for the
> check the
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 12:05 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 16:57 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> > Just to tone down this statistics a bit. The vast majority of changes
> > are in fact code relocations with no changes
>
> So - I've pushed it to -3-4-2 - after doing my bes
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Italo Vignoli wrote:
> On 7/19/11 2:53 PM, plino wrote:
>
>> I understand that it is the version you are supposed to distribute. BUT it
>> still needs a CHECK because there are NEWER security fixes.
>
> Although I don't use Windows, I've seen a recent update of the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Jan Holesovsky changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|39155 |
--- Comment #171 from Jan Holesovsky
On 7/19/11 2:53 PM, plino wrote:
> I understand that it is the version you are supposed to distribute. BUT it
> still needs a CHECK because there are NEWER security fixes.
Although I don't use Windows, I've seen a recent update of the C++
Redistributable Package under Windows 7 on a friend's PC.
David Tardon píše v Út 19. 07. 2011 v 15:02 +0200:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 02:35:42PM +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
> Okay.
>
> I have pushed the fix to 3.4.1 as is (but the addendum is still in 3.4,
> should we want it).
I see it in 3-4-2 branch => updated subject.
Thanks for help.
Best Rega
Fridrich Strba píše v Út 19. 07. 2011 v 15:08 +0200:
> Looks perfectly OK.
>
> +1 from me
Andy told me on irc that it worked for hit. I took it as 3rd approval
and pushed into 3-4-2 branch.
Best Regards,
Petr
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@
Looks perfectly OK.
+1 from me
F.
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 13:55 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 16:58 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > the below patches should fix two more problems reported by Andy. I would
> > like to get them into libreoffice-3-4-2 branch.
>
>
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 02:35:42PM +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
> Hello David,
>
> I think the original version should be safe. Our formula api can't deal with
> broken documents during import especially the oox import can't deal with
> errors of any kinds in formulas. But a broken document won't
Hi guys,
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 16:58 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> the below patches should fix two more problems reported by Andy. I would
> like to get them into libreoffice-3-4-2 branch.
I've pushed them to libreoffice-3-4; and I attach them here, two more
ack's needed, I understand Andr
Andreas Radke píše v Po 18. 07. 2011 v 18:18 +0200:
> Am Mon, 18 Jul 2011 16:58:03 +0200
> schrieb Petr Mladek :
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > the below patches should fix two more problems reported by Andy. I
> > would like to get them into libreoffice-3-4-2 branch.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Petr
> >
> >
Hello David,
I think the original version should be safe. Our formula api can't deal with
broken documents during import especially the oox import can't deal with
errors of any kinds in formulas. But a broken document won't create a crash
only a #Name entry in the cell that is not correct.
I know
Hi Michael,
> Hey ! - so unit tests are -never- useless, particularly if they are
> fast, small and run during the build. Indeed - I would -love- to have
> much more unit test coverage of calc.
I also like the Idea of unit tests and an Easy Hack with calc unit tests
is on my radar :)
>
On Jul 19, 2011, at 12:51 AM, Matúš Kukan wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> On 19 July 2011 06:40, Joseph Powers wrote:
>> I'd like someone doing a Unix build to review this for me. I compile Mac and
>> this is Unix only code so I don't just want to push and hope...
>>
> First I thought it would compile a
On Tuesday 19 July 2011, Korrawit Pruegsanusak wrote:
> Hello Troy,
>
> Digging mailing-list archive and just glancing at your patch,
> isn't this patch against fdo#33960 ?
> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33960)
> IMHO it isn't likely to be 33898.
It should have said 33893 (althou
On Tuesday 19 July 2011, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> Well, this'll work I guess, and I'm minded to push it, but why ;-) Is
> there a concrete bug this fixes ?
Yes, but it is a little obscure. If you take the attached ODT file, save it as
an RTF, and then load the RTF, the prefix to the paragraph num
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 04:29:32PM +0530, Muthu Subramanian K wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +if( maCurrCell.mnSharedId >= 0 )
> +{
> +Reference< XFormulaTokens > xTokens( maCurrCell.mxCell,
> UNO_QUERY_THROW );
> +ExtCellFormulaContext aContext( *this, xTokens,
> maCur
Hi,
On 2011-07-19 at 12:05 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> > Looks fine except for a typo in scriptListCount definition. I have fixed
> > it by
> > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-gui/commit/?id=bfa455e31ab2356b4ee0cf499bb71138e837e6c7
> >
> > Could you please approve this typo fix?
Hello,
could I get reviews for the attached patch for 3-4 and 3-4-2 too, if
possible? It is actually just removing checking for header in the
bWrapAllowed expression. This is fdo#39155 and I do not see a reason for the
check there anyway, the change applied only makes text in a header wrap
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Bug 35673 depends on bug 38095, which changed state.
Bug 38095 Summary: Character classification for Western or Asian text font
differ since conventional version.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38095
What|Old Value
> Looks good to me. Will push it to 3.4.
>
> 2011/7/19 Muthu Subramanian K
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > It would be great if somebody could review+push the attached patch to
> > 3.4 branch(s). This is _not_ a problem in master.
> > Without this patch shared formula(s) would not be imported correctly in
>
Hello,
I fear I'm a bit late for this patch to be included into 3.4.2 but at least
we should push it to 3.4
It fixes that we can't use database ranges in formulas because ScNameToken
always used ocName but it could also be ocDBArea for database ranges. It's
nothing special, just added an optional
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 11:18 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> Yes, it will be in 3.4.2. I am going to make sure that all patches are
> in, do test build, tag, and branch.
So this got into 3.4.2 - for the record.
Thanks,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@novell.com <><, Pse
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 16:57 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> Just to tone down this statistics a bit. The vast majority of changes
> are in fact code relocations with no changes
So - I've pushed it to -3-4-2 - after doing my best at reviewing the
changes; but I'm really unhappy with this.
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 12:49 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> Looks fine except for a typo in scriptListCount definition. I have fixed
> it by
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-gui/commit/?id=bfa455e31ab2356b4ee0cf499bb71138e837e6c7
>
> Could you please approve this typo fix?
Oops, yes. Th
Looks good to me. Will push it to 3.4.
2011/7/19 Muthu Subramanian K
> Hi,
>
> It would be great if somebody could review+push the attached patch to
> 3.4 branch(s). This is _not_ a problem in master.
> Without this patch shared formula(s) would not be imported correctly in
> builds from 3.4 bra
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 03:06 -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> > 2 more reviews needed for the current 3.4.2
> +1
And pushed to libreoffice-3-4-2; thanks - and lovely to see the unit
test there to prevent regression :-)
ATB,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@novell.com <>
Caolán McNamara píše v Út 19. 07. 2011 v 09:50 +0100:
> On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 01:14 +0900, Takeshi Abe wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > According to a discussion on the Japanese local mailing list,
> > the following issue may prevent some users from migrating
> > to 3.4.x series:
> > https://bugs.freede
Hi there,
On Sun, 2011-07-17 at 18:50 +0200, Maciej Rumianowski wrote:
> > Hmm, well I've now added a sylk import unit test to sc, i.e.
> > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/calc/commit/?id=8ac49ef8ab4f065d7b729dcb15505c602c77
> >
>
> Thanks, but as Nigel pointed out it's hard to unit
Hi,
It would be great if somebody could review+push the attached patch to
3.4 branch(s). This is _not_ a problem in master.
Without this patch shared formula(s) would not be imported correctly in
builds from 3.4 branches.
Thanks to Markus (moggi) for debugging this to quite some level (and
also f
On Sun, 2011-07-17 at 00:17 +0200, Andreas Mantke wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I tried to build LibO on Linux-x64 with KDE 4 (openSUSE 11.4-x64) from a
> fresh cloned
> master and the build failed inside the module vcl. I then did source
> ./LinuxX86-64Env.Set.sh and walked to vcl and run a make -r. Th
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 00:32 +1000, Troy Rollo wrote:
> +/* \'00 is a valid internal character in a
> +* string in RTF, however ByteString::Append
> +* does nothing if '\0' is passed in. It is
> +
Hi Mike,
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 16:07 -0700, Mike Eberdt wrote:
> seriously yet. And as I understand it, a transition is underway to GNU
> make, so I guess I've been a bit reluctant to put a lot of time into
> learning the old build system.
Yes - there is some horrible sterilisation of
On Sun, 2011-07-17 at 22:53 +0200, Matúš Kukan wrote:
> And also when converting to new build system I still don't understand
> some things. For example with libraries and RepositoryFixes.
> And I found commit:
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/bootstrap/commit/?id=f0d67eeeac0c615a928004082
On Sun, 2011-07-17 at 15:06 -0700, julien2412 wrote:
> Yifan J wrote:
> >
> > Firstly, I found smoketest fails on the HEAD (with error
> > officeconnection.cxx:140), then I tried to launch soffice.bin in
> > solver/350
> > manually, but soffice.bin crashes immedialy even before splash screen
> > a
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 00:23 +0800, imacat wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Hi. This is imacat from Taiwan. I received a mail from some friend
> in Canonical, Taiwan. What do you think about this, to change the title
> from "LibreOffice Calc" to "LibreOffice Calc Spreadsheet"?
>
> I know that thi
Hi Maciej,
On 2011-07-16 at 17:22 +0200, Maciej Rumianowski wrote:
> > I have changed it and now building again if it works, I will send a
> > Patch. It will be my first :)
>
> Patch in attachment, ofcourse on LGPL3+/GPL3+/MPL.
Thank you very much for the patch! :-) Joseph has pushed it the oth
Hi Imacat,
This really belongs on the design list; please reply only to there,
unless you have a patch or are seriously considering doing the work;
as/when you are committed there - then:
libreoffice-ux-adv...@lists.freedesktop.org
is a better forum. My personal take is t
It seems like Bjoern unintentionally wrote this just to me:
Hi all,
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 10:54:32 +0200
Matúš Kukan wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> On 19 July 2011 01:07, Mike Eberdt
> wrote:
> > My 'dmake' fu is basically non-existent, so I haven't poked at this
> > seriously yet. And as I understand i
On 07/18/2011 11:07 AM, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
On 07/16/2011 05:02 AM, Ta Duc Tung wrote:
Hi,
1. How to get current page number for printing?
We've found a variable mnCurPage from printdlg.cxx but it
seems not to be the right one. I think it is current page number for
prev
Hi Kohei,
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 16:57 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> Just to tone down this statistics a bit. The vast majority of changes
> are in fact code relocations with no changes e.g. the change in
> rectangle_set is purely moving code from one file to another.
:-) Any chance of a
Hi all,
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 10:54:32 +0200
Matúš Kukan wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> On 19 July 2011 01:07, Mike Eberdt
> wrote:
> > My 'dmake' fu is basically non-existent, so I haven't poked at this
> > seriously yet. And as I understand it, a transition is underway to
> > GNU make, so I guess I've
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 04:20 +0700, Nguyen Vu Hung (KiEi) wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> How can I build *rpm installation set under CentOS 5.6?
>
> I know that
>
> ./autogen.sh --with-distro=LibreOfficeLinux --with-lang="vi"
> --with-max-jobs=20 --with-num-cpus=5 --with-package-format="rpm deb"
> --w
Hi Kohei,
Thanks for review!
> First, for your svl patch:
>
> 1) in SfxIntegerListItem::GetList(), you do
>
> +rList.insert( aIt, m_aList[n] );
>
> but you can simply call push_back here to append new data to the end of
> the vector. Also, let's use pre-increment on iterators in the "f
> 2 more reviews needed for the current 3.4.2
+1
--tml
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
I cherry-picked to the 3-4 branch, 2 more reviews needed for the current
3.4.2 I guess.
F.
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 09:50 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 01:14 +0900, Takeshi Abe wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > According to a discussion on the Japanese local mailing list,
> > the
Hi Mike,
On 19 July 2011 01:07, Mike Eberdt wrote:
> My 'dmake' fu is basically non-existent, so I haven't poked at this
> seriously yet. And as I understand it, a transition is underway to GNU
> make, so I guess I've been a bit reluctant to put a lot of time into
> learning the old build system
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 01:14 +0900, Takeshi Abe wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> According to a discussion on the Japanese local mailing list,
> the following issue may prevent some users from migrating
> to 3.4.x series:
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38095
Looking for ack-s for 3-4 and 3-4-2
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Caolán McNamara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||38095
--
Configure bugmail: https://b
Hi Joe,
On 19 July 2011 06:40, Joseph Powers wrote:
> I'd like someone doing a Unix build to review this for me. I compile Mac and
> this is Unix only code so I don't just want to push and hope...
>
First I thought it would compile and want just to write something but
then I tried and it doesn't
Hi all,
Nino Novak wrote (14-07-11 22:48)
Am Donnerstag, 14. Juli 2011, um 14:29:53 schrieb Florian Effenberger:
The list of fixed bugs in this release is here:
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/src/bugfixes-libreoffice-3-4-release-3.4.2.1.log
for a clickable version, look at
h
75 matches
Mail list logo
