On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 02:19:26PM +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 18:48 +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote:
> >
> > Caolán, is there a special reason you added the access() checks ?
>
> Yes, so that you don't end up using a tmp dir you're not able to write
> to and probably fall
(2011/07/16 7:46), Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
2011/7/15 Nguyen Vu Hung (KiEi):
Hello all,
I had followed the build instruction[1] and setup my environment for a few
weeks ago.
As I thought the code was a little out of date, so I have tried to pull the
latest code
and make, but it seems that wget
2011/7/15 Nguyen Vu Hung (KiEi) :
> Hello all,
>
> I had followed the build instruction[1] and setup my environment for a few
> weeks ago.
>
> As I thought the code was a little out of date, so I have tried to pull the
> latest code
> and make, but it seems that wget could not wget a dependency.
>
>
> Please let me know if it looks problematic
Looks great :)
--
Regards Jonas Finnemann Jensen.
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 18:25, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> Hi Jonas,
>
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 01:45:42PM +0200, Jonas Finnemann Jensen <
> jop...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Your patch looks good, have you
Hello all,
I had followed the build instruction[1] and setup my environment for a
few weeks ago.
As I thought the code was a little out of date, so I have tried to pull
the latest code
and make, but it seems that wget could not wget a dependency.
I am not sure what it is.
Any help is appreciate
Greetings,
Configure.in eventually gets parsed by /bin/sh, and on Free/Net/OpenBSD
/bin/sh is not synonymous with bash. Therefore, bash-isms in configure.in
can be problematic.
This patch eliminates a "test: : bad number" diagnostic on FreeBSD.
Contributed under LGPL3+/MPL.
Thanks,
Mike E
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Rainer Bielefeld changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||39236
--- Comment #170 from Rainer Bi
Hi all
Here is my first patch and want at first thanks a lot everybody who
helped me starting my build and especially Kohei for his patience and
deep knowledge in calc. Kohei is a great mentor :-)
The purpose of this patch is to speed up things when sheet.link is used.
It is based on the 3.4 bran
Hi Jonas,
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 01:45:42PM +0200, Jonas Finnemann Jensen
wrote:
> Your patch looks good, have you pushed it?
I just did so.
> I don't think it hides a deeper problem (except lack of comments :) ), as
> far as I remember there're other places where pViewShell->GetEditWindow()
Hi all,
I have some questions about feature/gnumake4 branch.
It can now start. I'm sending two more patches. First needs review,
the second should be good but I did not push that either.
There was some issue with creating ..Env.Set.sh.
What's the plan with that branch? Just to merge and then dele
Hi Caolán
could you have a look at this patch
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/writer/commit/?id=95351a519bec2833f5d936c20e3916a4e283b0f6
This should be a nice stroll down memory lane for you as it seems
related to http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1291, yes
issue #1291 !!
On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 12:29 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> is there really supposed to be one CppunitTest*mk per
> unittest? This way module toplevel directories are going to be full of these
> files if we one day get to having a decent unittest coverage.
Well, one .mk per output test library anywa
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Rainer Bielefeld changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||37499
--- Comment #169 from Rainer Bi
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Rainer Bielefeld changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||33379
--- Comment #168 from Rainer Bi
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Rainer Bielefeld changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||33593
--- Comment #167 from Rainer Bi
On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 20:57 +0200, Matúš Kukan wrote:
> On 14 July 2011 20:33, Ta Duc Tung wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've run make clean and make but still failed, same error:
> >
> Is it possible you did git pull -r in libs-gui but not in ure ?
>
> 'Exception on createRegistryServiceFactory
> file:
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 18:48 +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 09:16:33AM -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > Do we
> really want to have those access() checks there? > > I am not evil
> enough to think of a way to abuse that code (insert maniacal
> laughter), but in general, isn'
On 14 July 2011 10:27, Chr. Rossmanith wrote:
> Hi,
http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118283 vs.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39194
Now, fight! :D
>>>
>>> If there is a relation we try to avoid with OOo developers, then that's
>>> fighting, I t
2011/7/13 Michael Meeks :
> Hi Knut,
>
> On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 16:54 +0200, Knut Olav Bøhmer wrote:
>> Now, fight! :D
>
> This is a developers forum, not a place for sending E-mails about
> reported bugs :-) It is only on-topic if you have a patch, or you want
> advice and code pointers to h
Hi,
Your patch looks good, have you pushed it?
- Otherwise please do, my LibreOffice clone isn't up to date at the moment
:(
in case my patch would just hide a deeper problem.
I don't think it hides a deeper problem (except lack of comments :) ), as
far as I remember there're other places where
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
--- Comment #166 from Regina Henschel 2011-07-15
03:52:06 PDT ---
I just tested LO3.4.2rc1 and now wmf-pictures print fine for me. So I cancel
the nomination.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- Y
On Monday 11 of July 2011, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 15:32 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > who knows how to add a unit test?
> >
> > http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Unit_Tests is incomplete
> > (what if there is no qa/makefile.mk?) and obsolete (it
Hi,
I've been running smoketest module on the build on SLED 11 sp1 i586,
and tried to manually launch and did some random test.
All pass :)
Best wishes,
Yifan
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 02:29:53PM +0200, Florian Effenberger wrote:
> Hi *,
>
> for 3.4.2 rc1, we're now uploading builds to a public
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Regina Henschel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rb.hensc...@t-online.de
--- Comment #1
you can use the model com.sun.star.awt.UnoControlEditModel.
Take a look to this page:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/ES/Desarrollo/Add-on_de_Soporte . I
couldn't find it in english but the code fits your needs pretty well ;)
Greetings
2011/7/15 Stanislav Pika
> Hi!
>
> How to create a
On 14/07/11 23:42, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
Hi there,
I would like to commit the attached change to the -3-4 branch and
hopefully to the 3-4-2 branch as well.
This fixes
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37767
The refresh of data pilot table (or pivot table) was broken from the
UNO API
On 15/07/11 08:27, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
Review, sign-off etc appreciated.
/me raises hand. One more needed for the 3-4-2 branch.
--tml
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libre
Hi!
How to create an inputbox in LibreOffice Python? I've spent many days
trying to figure that out, and it seems that while there is an interface
XMessageBoxFactory, there is nothing like XInputBox. That is, something
that allows user text input.
XMessageBoxFactory allows only the following mess
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 12:43 AM, Mike Eberdt wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> This started as a simple and obvious one-liner, but somehow the code morphed
> into something that seems a bit more clear (to me, at least). Sanity-checked
> on FreeBSD and Ubuntu. Contributed under LGPL3+/MPL.
Thanks, Pushed
>> Review, sign-off etc appreciated.
/me raises hand. One more needed for the 3-4-2 branch.
--tml
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
> Would that be more acceptable ?
Well, I am not saying they are unacceptable.
I just wanted a bit of discussion with perhaps somebody actually clueful about
security issues giving their opinion;)
Quite possibly the checks make good sense, and are not a risk as nobody is
going to run LibreOff
31 matches
Mail list logo
