On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 09:16:33AM -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> Do we really want to have those access() checks there?
>
> I am not evil enough to think of a way to abuse that code (insert maniacal
> laughter), but in general, isn't that exactly the kind of coding that could
> be a security vul
Greetings,
This started as a simple and obvious one-liner, but somehow the code
morphed into something that seems a bit more clear (to me, at least).
Sanity-checked on FreeBSD and Ubuntu. Contributed under LGPL3+/MPL.
Thanks,
Mike Eberdt
>From bca781bca606d7bab5908d6eb2f39d4439984846 Mon Se
Hi Jonathan, all!
Am Donnerstag, den 14.07.2011, 13:17 +0200 schrieb Jonathan Aquilina:
> On 14/07/2011 13:14, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
> > Jonathan Aquilina píše v Čt 14. 07. 2011 v 12:45 +0200:
> >
> >>> This is exactly the behavior I had reverted from the reasons I have
> >>> described; to summari
Looks sane to me. Pushed to the 3-4 branch.
Two more reviews for 3.4.2 needed.
2011/7/15 Kohei Yoshida
> Hi there,
>
> I would like to commit the attached change to the -3-4 branch and
> hopefully to the 3-4-2 branch as well.
>
> This fixes
>
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37767
Looks sane to me. pushed to the 3-4 branch
2 more reviews for 3.4.2 needed
2011/7/14 Kohei Yoshida
> Hi there,
>
> I'd like to have the following commit:
>
>
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/calc/commit/?id=cdb8cf074c8536aa3ea30102bcb9b34feda21833
>
> cherry-picked to the -3-4 as well
It looks sane too me, too. I build with it and tested with some of the test
documents and had a quick look at the patches for 0.5.3. I hope that this is
enough for an external lib.
So one review needed to get it into 3.4.2. It is an quite important fix as
we got several reports where people report
Hi there,
I would like to commit the attached change to the -3-4 branch and
hopefully to the 3-4-2 branch as well.
This fixes
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37767
The refresh of data pilot table (or pivot table) was broken from the
UNO API because the code there had not been adopt
as it is a dutch question I forwarded it to the dutch list.
M.V.G.
Rob Snelders
On 14-07-11 23:51, Ben Engbers wrote:
Ik heb zojuist LibreOffice 3.4.1 inclusief Nederlands taalpakket en help
geïnstalleerd op mijn Fedora 14 systeem en zo te zien is daar niets mis mee.
Ik vind het echter wel slor
Ik heb zojuist LibreOffice 3.4.1 inclusief Nederlands taalpakket en help
geïnstalleerd op mijn Fedora 14 systeem en zo te zien is daar niets mis mee.
Ik vind het echter wel slordig dat na uitvoering van
libreoffice3.4-redhat-menus-3.4-103.noarch.rpm, LibreOffice terug te
vinden is onder kantoortoep
Hi Petr,
2011.07.12. 16:02 keltezéssel, Petr Mladek írta:
> there have been created the libreoffice-3.4.2.1 tag for 3.4.2-rc1 release.
> The corresponding official builds will be available by the end of the week.
>
> See the attached list of changes against 3.4.1-final.
I saw changes in the bugf
Am Donnerstag, 14. Juli 2011, um 14:29:53 schrieb Florian Effenberger:
> The list of fixed bugs in this release is here:
>
> http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/src/bugfixes-libreoffi
> ce-3-4-release-3.4.2.1.log
for a clickable version, look at
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/User
Hi there,
I'd like to have the following commit:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/calc/commit/?id=cdb8cf074c8536aa3ea30102bcb9b34feda21833
cherry-picked to the -3-4 as well as the -3-4-2 branch, in order to fix
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36688
This is a simple, one-lin
On 14 July 2011 20:33, Ta Duc Tung wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've run make clean and make but still failed, same error:
>
Is it possible you did git pull -r in libs-gui but not in ure ?
'Exception on createRegistryServiceFactory
file:///home/tatung/mhst2011/git/libo/solver/350/unxlngi6.pro/lib/bootstrap.u
Hi,
I've run make clean and make but still failed, same error:
~
/usr/bin/perl ../../util/check.pl ../../unxlngi6.pro/bin/odkcommon linux
"" ../../unxlngi6.pro/misc/checkbin.txt
Check for linux
check binaries:
check packaging files:
On 07/14/2011 10:55 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 22:44 +0700, Ta Duc Tung wrote:
Hi,
After getting the code from repo, I could build it very well. Then I
tried to modify some trivial code, building's still OK. However, after
half of a day of browsing source code and *maybe*
«Эффективные деловые переговоры» в Турции
Курорт Кемер
Отель VOGUEHOTELAVANTGARDE 5* Deluxe
Даты: с 26.08.11 – 02.09.11 ( 8 дней/7 ночей)
Стоимость: 1713$ за человека при проживании в двухместном номере
2353$ за человека при проживании в одноместно
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Kohei Yoshida changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||36688
--- Comment #164 from Kohei Yoshid
BY vv GYG b Y3 Y3
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Ht
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 22:44 +0700, Ta Duc Tung wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After getting the code from repo, I could build it very well. Then I
> tried to modify some trivial code, building's still OK. However, after
> half of a day of browsing source code and *maybe* modified some code
> (I'm not sure ab
Hi,
After getting the code from repo, I could build it very well. Then I
tried to modify some trivial code, building's still OK. However, after
half of a day of browsing source code and *maybe* modified some code
(I'm not sure about this cause I think I've disable all of my changes),
I've com
Hi,
When I try to open
http://people.freedesktop.org/~vmiklos/math.word2007.docx on master
(with experimanl features disabled, so the inline formula editor is
disabled), double-click on the math formula, Math opens, finally I click
on the formula, Math crashes.
The attached patch fixes the proble
Hi *,
for 3.4.2 rc1, we're now uploading builds to a public (but non-mirrored
- so don't spread news too widely!) place, as soon as they're available.
Grab them here:
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/
If you've a bit of time, please give them a try & report *critical* bugs
not yet
On 14/07/2011 13:14, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
Jonathan Aquilina píše v Čt 14. 07. 2011 v 12:45 +0200:
This is exactly the behavior I had reverted from the reasons I have
described; to summarize: somebody who wants to print a selection knows
what she wants to achieve, but somebody who selected some
Jonathan Aquilina píše v Čt 14. 07. 2011 v 12:45 +0200:
> > This is exactly the behavior I had reverted from the reasons I have
> > described; to summarize: somebody who wants to print a selection knows
> > what she wants to achieve, but somebody who selected something by
> > mistake does not noti
[SNIP]
On 14/07/2011 12:39, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
This is exactly the behavior I had reverted from the reasons I have
described; to summarize: somebody who wants to print a selection knows
what she wants to achieve, but somebody who selected something by
mistake does not notice the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Bug 35673 depends on bug 36816, which changed state.
Bug 36816 Summary: Document statistics: Paragraph Count doesn't work
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36816
What|Old Value |New Value
-
Hi Jonathan,
Jonathan Aquilina píše v Čt 14. 07. 2011 v 12:30 +0200:
> but if something is highlighted
> selection is automatically selected.
This is exactly the behavior I had reverted from the reasons I have
described; to summarize: somebody who wants to print a selection knows
what she wants
On 14/07/2011 12:24, Andre Schnabel wrote:
[SNIP]
Hmm .. Ctrl+Shift+p is actually bound to superscript. So don't care to much
about "Persona Andre".
Then what is what seems to be the universal standard Ctrl+P bound to.
Why not have that pop up the print dialogue box and have an option like
Hi,
> Von: Jan Holesovsky
> >
> > If we had a persona "Andre" this would love to just select a range and
> text,
> > press Ctrl+P, Return. As we do not have such a Persona, it's only
> > my very private use case ;)
>
> For this, the 'Print directly' functionality is particularly useful - it
>
On Wednesday 13 of July 2011, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 10:35 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > On Monday 11 of July 2011, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> > > I reckon we probably have to bite the bullet and drop -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG
> > > from solenv ?
> >
> > I think we could simply force
2011/7/14 Matúš Kukan
> Hi Xisco,
>
> On 14 July 2011 00:41, Xisco Faulí wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I took a look to the problem related to the Adress Data Souce Wizard (
> it's
> > not loaded on master ) and it's not caused by the changes i've been
> working
> > on. I moved git to a commit before th
Hi Andre,
Andre Schnabel píše v Čt 14. 07. 2011 v 09:54 +0200:
> > Please let me know if this breaks some particularly useful use case; I
> > hope it does not. Somebody who wants to print the selection knows what
> > she wants to achieve, so she is ready to select the 'Selection' option;
> > thi
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:15:33PM -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'd like to update mdds to 0.5.3 for the -3-4 branch and preferably the
> -3-4-2 branch as well. The attached patches would make that happen.
>
> That should improve the performance issue raised in
>
> https://bugs.f
Hi,
http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118283 vs.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39194
Now, fight! :D
If there is a relation we try to avoid with OOo developers, then that's
fighting, I think.
I'm very sorry I said this now. It was suppose to be funny. I regret it.
B
Hi Kendy,
> Von: Jan Holesovsky
>
> Please let me know if this breaks some particularly useful use case; I
> hope it does not. Somebody who wants to print the selection knows what
> she wants to achieve, so she is ready to select the 'Selection' option;
> this is not true the other way around
36 matches
Mail list logo
