On Wednesday 13 of July 2011, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 10:35 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote: > > On Monday 11 of July 2011, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > > I reckon we probably have to bite the bullet and drop -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG > > > from solenv ? > > > > I think we could simply force --without-system-libs (or at least for C++ > > libs) when --enable-debug is used and that could do. I don't how much is > > _GLIBCXX_DEBUG is worth, but --without-system-libs doesn't look like that > > big price to pay. > > I don't know if it's worth it.
Then I guess we can ask David, who was the one to add it :). > I mean even if we forced on > --without-system-libs for --enable-debug we would still probably need to > run around adding the moral equivalent of EXTRA_CFLAGS += > -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG to all the other external c++ modules we have to be > sure we don't mix stl versions. That shouldn't be a lot of work. I wouldn't be that happy to build all the C++ deps just because of this, but it probably won't matter much given the size of the LO codebase. -- Lubos Lunak l.lu...@suse.cz _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
