+1 from me.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hi Caoln,
Thanks for the ideas! The preferred goal is for option b, to make it able to
run automatically without manual intervention. As an ideal result, we can have
machines persistently check out the latest build and give back the testing
results automatically.
One question is I saw the smokete
Hi there,
I'd like to update mdds to 0.5.3 for the -3-4 branch and preferably the
-3-4-2 branch as well. The attached patches would make that happen.
That should improve the performance issue raised in
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38028
but since this affects the general perfor
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 21:17 +0100, Noel Power wrote:
> On 13/07/11 18:24, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
> > Hi Michael,
> >
> > Michael Meeks píše v St 13. 07. 2011 v 11:00 +0100:
> >
> >>A very trivial no-brainer; review/cherry-picking much appreciated.
> > Reviewed, pushed to libreoffice-3-4, thank y
Hi Xisco,
On 14 July 2011 00:41, Xisco Faulí wrote:
> Hello,
> I took a look to the problem related to the Adress Data Souce Wizard ( it's
> not loaded on master ) and it's not caused by the changes i've been working
> on. I moved git to a commit before the one I merged the feature branch into
>
Hello,
I took a look to the problem related to the Adress Data Souce Wizard ( it's
not loaded on master ) and it's not caused by the changes i've been working
on. I moved git to a commit before the one I merged the feature branch into
master and it still fails.
The code fails here :
http://opengr
On 13 July 2011 21:00, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 04:54:32PM +0200, Knut Olav B?hmer
> wrote:
>> http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118283 vs.
>> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39194
>>
>> Now, fight! :D
>
> If there is a relation we try to avoid with
On 13 July 2011 19:57, Luuk wrote:
> On 13-07-2011 16:54, Knut Olav Bøhmer wrote:
>> http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118283 vs.
>> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39194
>>
>> Now, fight! :D
>>
>>
>> 2011/7/13 Knut Olav Bøhmer :
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I posted a bug-report at O
Hi there,
Be aware that in master regarding the import of controls ( ole/ocx
controls and userform controls ) , please be on the look out for any
regressions in this area and let me know. Note: the import of older form
controls is still handled in the escher import in filters, the hasn't
chan
On 13/07/11 19:26, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
Hi,
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36816
The attached patch fixes that - in the original code we were
incrementing the number of paragraphs as the first thing, so I have just
moved the ++rStart.nPara to the original location.
Would be grea
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 19:24 +0200, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
> 2 more reviews needed for 3.4.2...
Yes. The patch makes sense & should be good for 3.4.2. You have my
sign-off.
One more review needed for 3.4.2.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc
___
On 13/07/11 18:24, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
Hi Michael,
Michael Meeks píše v St 13. 07. 2011 v 11:00 +0100:
A very trivial no-brainer; review/cherry-picking much appreciated.
Reviewed, pushed to libreoffice-3-4, thank you! :-)
2 more reviews needed for 3.4.2...
given the difficulty I h
Hi Michael,
Michael Meeks píše v St 13. 07. 2011 v 11:00 +0100:
> A very trivial no-brainer; review/cherry-picking much appreciated.
Reviewed, pushed to libreoffice-3-4, thank you! :-)
2 more reviews needed for 3.4.2...
Regards,
Kendy
___
Libr
Hi,
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36816
The attached patch fixes that - in the original code we were
incrementing the number of paragraphs as the first thing, so I have just
moved the ++rStart.nPara to the original location.
Would be great to get 3 reviews to get it to 3.4.2 :-)
2011/7/13 Michael Meeks :
> Hi Knut,
>
> On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 16:54 +0200, Knut Olav Bøhmer wrote:
>> Now, fight! :D
>
> This is a developers forum, not a place for sending E-mails about
> reported bugs :-) It is only on-topic if you have a patch, or you want
> advice and code pointers to h
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 04:54:32PM +0200, Knut Olav B?hmer
wrote:
> http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118283 vs.
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39194
>
> Now, fight! :D
If there is a relation we try to avoid with OOo developers, then that's
fighting, I think.
pgpA
Hi Knut,
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 16:54 +0200, Knut Olav Bøhmer wrote:
> Now, fight! :D
This is a developers forum, not a place for sending E-mails about
reported bugs :-) It is only on-topic if you have a patch, or you want
advice and code pointers to help chase the issue down.
It'
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 09:16:33AM -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> Do we really want to have those access() checks there?
>
> I am not evil enough to think of a way to abuse that code (insert maniacal
> laughter), but in general, isn't that exactly the kind of coding that could
> be a security vul
On 13-07-2011 16:54, Knut Olav Bøhmer wrote:
> http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118283 vs.
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39194
>
> Now, fight! :D
>
>
> 2011/7/13 Knut Olav Bøhmer :
>> Hi,
>>
>> I posted a bug-report at OpenOffice.org
>> http://openoffice.org/bugzil
Do we really want to have those access() checks there?
I am not evil enough to think of a way to abuse that code (insert maniacal
laughter), but in general, isn't that exactly the kind of coding that could be
a security vulnerability? (TOCTTOU seems to be the technical term,
http://en.wikipedia
http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118283 vs.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39194
Now, fight! :D
2011/7/13 Knut Olav Bøhmer :
> Hi,
>
> I posted a bug-report at OpenOffice.org
> http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118283
>
> Do I need to create the bug-repor
Hi,
Second patch for bug. Now the undo statement for "Insert Horizontal Rule"
replaces "Insert horizontal ruler".
--
--Jeffrey Chang
From 4437a23af30f4b04835911534cb81fd1e6e2a7ec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: jeffrey Chang
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 09:11:27 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] Changed undo ins
Hi Jeffrey,
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 14:17 +0800, jeffrey chang wrote:
> Yes I am submitting under the LGPLv3+/MPL 1.1 license.
Thanks. I'm forwarding this to the list as we need this on public
record.
Regards,
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 21:18 +0200, Chr. Rossmanith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> next problem: there is no IsNumericAscii() for O(U)String but for
> ByteString. Should O(U)String get this method as well?
Don't know if its really widely used enough to warrant expanding the
O[U]String API ? You could perhaps r
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 10:35 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> On Monday 11 of July 2011, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> > I reckon we probably have to bite the bullet and drop -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG
> > from solenv ?
>
> I think we could simply force --without-system-libs (or at least for C++
> libs) when --enabl
Hi,
Here is the finish touch for the "Ruler" bug pushed last week. Now the undo
step will also display "Insert Horizontal Rule" instead of "Ruler"
--
--Jeffrey Chang
From 4437a23af30f4b04835911534cb81fd1e6e2a7ec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: jeffrey Chang
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 09:11:27 +0800
Hi guys,
A very trivial no-brainer; review/cherry-picking much appreciated.
Thanks,
Michael.
>From 22f82035331956cbb95e6e735c4549d8ace2bc23 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Meeks
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 10:56:59 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] null the display point
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 00:31 +0200, Maciej Rumianowski wrote:
> But I wasn't successful using ScImportExport::ImportStream and
> ScImportExport::ExportStream, which use Sylk2Doc.
Hmm, well I've now added a sylk import unit test to sc, i.e.
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/calc/commit/?id=8ac
Hi,
I posted a bug-report at OpenOffice.org
http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118283
Do I need to create the bug-report at libreoffice as well? The bug is
also there.
--
Knut Olav Bøhmer
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.fre
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Bug 35673 depends on bug 37488, which changed state.
Bug 37488 Summary: PRINTING table borders in Writer not printed if there are
also images in the document, DRAW object printed crippled
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37488
Patch attached, and discussed with Caolán.
I've detected a bit of duplicate code in different files, I'll try to make
them use this function in the future.
--
Francois Tigeot
>From 0f396782dee612dabea9ee9830f564d7815e464f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Francois Tigeot
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 11:
31 matches
Mail list logo