Re: [Libreoffice] Patch for Bug 34786: [EasyHack]Editing: Sentence movement function broken

Hi Noel, Yes it is contributed under LGPLv3+/MPL. Sorry for the late response. I had a small problem with the subscription but it is now fixed. Jeffrey On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:34 PM, jeffrey chang wrote: > Sorry here is the patch. > > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:18 PM, jeffrey chang wrote: > >

Re: [Libreoffice] FYI: Latest Oracle move wrt to OpenOffice.org

I am not going to get into a debate about what is bad, good, and better with regard to different open-source licenses. It is my desire to give the recipients of my code all of the rights that I have, and have them know that they have those rights, subject to the requirement for attribution.

Re: [Libreoffice] [ANN] List for collaboration around user experience topics created

Hi Thorsten, *, Thorsten Behrens schrieb: > with the design team (and the UX people, as part of that), and the > hackers mostly working on separate lists, we thought it would be > helpful to provide a low-traffic, easy-to-post-to third list, where > interested parties of either side can meet - th

Re: [Libreoffice] FYI: Latest Oracle move wrt to OpenOffice.org

On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > I also notice that the Apache CLA is not a copyright assignment, it is > simply a non-exclusive license with the usual attestation that I have the > right to grant the license and it is my original work.  (Patch contributions > apparently

Re: [Libreoffice] FYI: Latest Oracle move wrt to OpenOffice.org

Hi Dennis, On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > PS: It is personally appealing to me that the Apache project proposes to use > the tools I already use for other projects (i.e., Subversion and JIRA).  I > don't have any plans to contribute anything, but it is heartening to k

Re: [Libreoffice] Encrypted password -- NEW ENCRYPTION BUG!

Once I was confident I had a reproducible bug, I wanted to provide a heads-up as quickly as possible. The bug report took more work, but it has everything to demonstrate and reproduce the bug. - Dennis -Original Message- From: libr

Re: [Libreoffice] FYI: Latest Oracle move wrt to OpenOffice.org

I also notice that the Apache CLA is not a copyright assignment, it is simply a non-exclusive license with the usual attestation that I have the right to grant the license and it is my original work. (Patch contributions apparently don't even require a CLA, but committers do.) One could make t

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [REVIEW] updated pt-BR dictionary

Hi Andras, On 2011-05-30 at 10:42 +0200, Andras Timar wrote: > > I need one review for 3-4. > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-extern-sys/commit/?id=f1c5626a27f72d5f7400f3e36fe0d4f2f3c5fe90 > > > This belongs to the commit above, makefile fixup. > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libre

Re: [Libreoffice] Encrypted password -- NEW ENCRYPTION BUG!

Hi Dennis, On 2011-05-31 at 12:59 -0700, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > There is a new problem around encryption (and, consequentially, > protection) in LO 3.4.0rc2 on x86 Windows. This may be related to the > non-operating "Change Password" feature. Thank you very much for the bug report - would

Re: [Libreoffice] FYI: Latest Oracle move wrt to OpenOffice.org

On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > PS: I notice that the proposal to create an Apache Incubator omits the risk > of their being a fork and divided developer community.  There is this > presumption: "Both Oracle and ASF agree that the OpenOffice.org development > community,

Re: [Libreoffice] FYI: Latest Oracle move wrt to OpenOffice.org

On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:23 PM, BRM wrote: > > > Just saying, there's more than one way to skin the cat (as the old saying > goes), > and there are multiple reason for choosing difference licensing methods, > many of which are very valid reasons - not all of which lead to GPL/LGPL. > To be clear

Re: [Libreoffice] FYI: Latest Oracle move wrt to OpenOffice.org

- Original Message > From: Norbert Thiebaud > To: BRM > Cc: libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org > Sent: Wed, June 1, 2011 4:07:23 PM > Subject: Re: [Libreoffice] FYI: Latest Oracle move wrt to OpenOffice.org > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:37 PM, BRM wrote: > > Original Message

[Libreoffice] Idea For Auto-Fill Integration in Calc

Upon using MS Office at work, I was given a large Spreadsheet of people I have to call. I was given user ID numbers but no Phone Numbers and only a few emails. I looked to see if I could find an easy way to have those user ID's somehow be the key for getting phone numbers from my Outlook contact

Re: [Libreoffice] FYI: Latest Oracle move wrt to OpenOffice.org

Hi Norbert, On 01/06/2011 23:07, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: [...] But that is _not_ the license, and with Apache License they would not have to make it available at ALL to anybody... just as is the case with their proprietary OO fork today. Hence the Enthusiastic blog campaign that flourished from

Re: [Libreoffice] FYI: Latest Oracle move wrt to OpenOffice.org

I think this is about licenses. Under the Apache 2.0 license, I expect we will see contributions from IBM and others for whom reciprocal licenses are toxic. I recently noticed that the ODF Toolkit Java bits are Apache licensed already, so that is also helpful. With regard to community, do

Re: [Libreoffice] FYI: Latest Oracle move wrt to OpenOffice.org

On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:37 PM, BRM wrote: > Original Message > >> From: Norbert Thiebaud >> Oracle  announce: >> >>http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/statements-on-openofficeorg-contribution-to-apache-nasdaq-orcl-1521400.htm >>m >> >> IBM  is very happy to be able to continue Symp

Re: [Libreoffice] FYI: Latest Oracle move wrt to OpenOffice.org

Hi Ben, On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 12:37 -0700, BRM wrote: > FYI - LGPL/GPL does not _require_ that code be contributed back to the > _community_. Projects work best when that happens, but that is not a > requirement. True - on the other hand, if millions of people have the right to get the

Re: [Libreoffice] FYI: Latest Oracle move wrt to OpenOffice.org

Original Message > From: Norbert Thiebaud > Oracle announce: > >http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/statements-on-openofficeorg-contribution-to-apache-nasdaq-orcl-1521400.htm >m > > IBM is very happy to be able to continue Symphony without having to > give code back... (they se

Re: [Libreoffice] build problems with cppunit

On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 19:24 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote: > It is the way I'm used to do in OOo. For OOo I would have to install > something like TortoiseSVN, which slows down my computer noticeable. Ah - that's a pain; I guess git under cygwin would take up some space, but not provide a

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Unify DLLPOSTFIX values

On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 07:00:56PM +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote: > > To the committers: please do not push this patch. I'll get around to do it > when I'm sure it's okay. New and improved version available here: http://dl.wolfpond.org/0001-Unify-DLLPOSTFIX-value-on-all-platforms.v2.patch -- Fra

[Libreoffice] OpenOffice.org Apache Incubator Proposal

See the thread titled "OpenOffice.org Apache Incubator Proposal" post on June 1 by Luke Kowalski of Oracle http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/threa d ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.or

Re: [Libreoffice] build problems with cppunit

> after a second run, because the file Microsoft.VC80.CRT.manifest was > missing, building was successful. So it seems, that the error only > occurs in a non-pro build. Is such a non-pro build possible for you? Do > you us non-pro builds? I tried once (on Windows) and I failed miserably to make

Re: [Libreoffice] FYI: Latest Oracle move wrt to OpenOffice.org

It's like throwing out the baby with the bath water - they're just throwing away so much experience. I certainly wouldn't want to be facing something the size of LO/OOo without a team who've had to deal with it before :) I'm fairly new to LibreOffice and contributing to FOSS but the community have

[Libreoffice] Report [GSoC] [helpfiles]

Hello everybody, this is what I have done since the last report: - Used HTML Help Compiler (HHC) to create a CHM-file. - Implemented a bash script that installs HHC with wine. With this script the HH-Compiler is platform independent. Bash and wine binaries exist for many platforms. These are the

[Libreoffice] FYI: Latest Oracle move wrt to OpenOffice.org

Oracle announce: http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/statements-on-openofficeorg-contribution-to-apache-nasdaq-orcl-1521400.htm IBM is very happy to be able to continue Symphony without having to give code back... (they seems to rejoyce at being able to do selective GPL: i.e what is yours is

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Unify DLLPOSTFIX values

Hi Bjoern, On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 11:46:01AM +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > > On Wed, 1 Jun 2011 08:59:04 +0200 > Francois Tigeot wrote: > > > The attached patch gets rid of many definitions of DLLPOSTFIX. With > > this change, shared library file names will be the same on all > > platforms

Re: [Libreoffice] gdk-pixbuf compile error

On Jun 1, 2011, at 8:19 AM, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > Hi *, > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Joseph Powers wrote: >> [problem with gdk-pixbuf on Mac] > > Sure that it isn't just a problem with mixing linking against SDK and > linking against the system? > > The modules that librsvg did no

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH][PUSHED] fix for fdo#36519 (was: about bug fdo 36519 ...)

forgot to update the subject On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 15:22 +0200, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote: > Hi Jean-Baptiste, > > On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 13:30 +0200, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: > > Well, after having discussed with Cédric, it is not so ugly. > > Here is the patch: it adds the break statement and rem

Re: [Libreoffice] gdk-pixbuf compile error

Le 01/06/11 17:19, Christian Lohmaier a écrit : Hi *, > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Joseph Powers wrote: >> [problem with gdk-pixbuf on Mac] > > Sure that it isn't just a problem with mixing linking against SDK and > linking against the system? > > The modules that librsvg did now "pull

Re: [Libreoffice] build problems with cppunit

Hi Michael, Regina Henschel schrieb: [..] I have some further observation: I had tried a non-pro build. Today I have deleted the --enable-dbgutil switch and started a new build. Now it compiles xml2cmp without problems. Currently it is in hwpfilter. I can tell you tomorrow, whether building was

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: Update: Brazilian portuguese spelling dictionary & hyphenation

On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 14:56 -0300, Olivier Hallot wrote: > Hi > I have updated the spelling dictionary for Brazilian Portuguese > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37671 > > Thanks for pushing it > > Credits to Raimundo Moura raimundo dot smoura at gmail dot com I see timar pushed

Re: [Libreoffice] gdk-pixbuf compile error

Hi *, On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Joseph Powers wrote: > [problem with gdk-pixbuf on Mac] Sure that it isn't just a problem with mixing linking against SDK and linking against the system? The modules that librsvg did now "pull in" to the build don't properly link against the SDK, so while i

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Rainer Bielefeld changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||37799 --- Comment #131 from Rainer Bi

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] restore Korean comments in hwpfilter (were corrupted to just "????" instead of being translated)

Hello Christian, all, Many thanks for your explanation! Best Regards, -- Korrawit Pruegsanusak ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Bug 33293 - [EasyHack] Make starting count of worksheets configurable

Sorry I forgot to snip a large part of it. Don't copy this behavior of mine... It's something to be used as a counter-example of good behavior. ;-) Kohei ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailma

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [PATCH] restore Korean comments in hwpfilter (were corrupted to just "????" instead of being translated)

On 01/06/11 13:55, Christian Lohmaier wrote Sure - I attached the patch for that as well :-) (one time to have a list of strings that can be passed on to possible translators, and of course for having it reviewed, in terms of does it cause problems with compilers? Do all compilers deal with non-a

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Bug 33293 - [EasyHack] Make starting count of worksheets configurable

Hi Albert, On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 15:29 +0200, Albert Thuswaldner wrote: > Hi Kohei and Marcus, > Thanks for your input. > > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 01:38, Markus Mohrhard > wrote: > > Hello Albert, > > > > just two quick comments. > > > > We are trying to get away from using sal_Int16 for sheet

Re: [Libreoffice] [ANN] List for collaboration around user experience topics created

On Wed, 1 Jun 2011 15:04:31 +0200 Thorsten Behrens wrote: > The list address is: > libreoffice-ux-adv...@lists.freedesktop.org > > (see also > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise) Great! Can we get that to gmane too? Or does that happen automagically? Best, Bjo

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Bug 35673 depends on bug 36519, which changed state. Bug 36519 Summary: For default saving options, ODF format is replaced by the filter names (writer8, calc8, etc.) https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36519 What|Old Val

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Bug 33293 - [EasyHack] Make starting count of worksheets configurable

Hi Kohei and Marcus, Thanks for your input. On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 01:38, Markus Mohrhard wrote: > Hello Albert, > > just two quick comments. > > We are trying to get away from using sal_Int16 for sheet numbers and use > SCTAB instead, so it would be nice if you could change this. Ok, I 'll cha

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] fix for fdo#36519 (was: about bug fdo 36519 ...)

Hi Jean-Baptiste, On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 13:30 +0200, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: > Well, after having discussed with Cédric, it is not so ugly. > Here is the patch: it adds the break statement and removes the third > case "Flags" which has nothing to do with the aim of the function "find > the huma

[Libreoffice] [ANN] List for collaboration around user experience topics created

Hi folks, with the design team (and the UX people, as part of that), and the hackers mostly working on separate lists, we thought it would be helpful to provide a low-traffic, easy-to-post-to third list, where interested parties of either side can meet - the list * is unmoderated, i.e. you can

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] restore Korean comments in hwpfilter (were corrupted to just "????" instead of being translated)

Hi Korrawit, *, On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Korrawit Pruegsanusak wrote: > 2011/6/1 Christian Lohmaier : >> Hi *, >> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Korrawit Pruegsanusak >> wrote: >>> Except we have some contributors who know Korean. (not me, of course!) :-) >> As there was an offer to han

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] restore Korean comments in hwpfilter (were corrupted to just "????" instead of being translated)

Hello Christian, all, 2011/6/1 Christian Lohmaier : > Hi *, > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Korrawit Pruegsanusak > wrote: >> Except we have some contributors who know Korean. (not me, of course!) :-) > As there was an offer to hand it over to someone who knows Korean by > PM (probably because

Re: [Libreoffice] Build Dependencies

On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 08:30:24PM +0100, Nigel Hawkins wrote: > sudo apt-get build-dep libreoffice > > as suggested on the wiki pulls in (amongst other stuff) all of the mono > libraries. Does the build really depend on these? apt-get build-dep does no magic except that it just installs what

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Patch for Bug 34786: [EasyHack]Editing: Sentence movement function broken

On 01/06/11 12:05, Noel Power wrote: On 01/06/11 06:34, jeffrey chang wrote: [...] Sorry here is the patch.k, patch looks fine to me and works as expected, pushed to 3.4 branch. look forward to your next patch thanks alot oh and can you please confirm the patch is contributed under LGPLv3+/

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] fix for fdo#36519 (was: about bug fdo 36519 ...)

Le 30/05/2011 09:23, Cedric Bosdonnat a écrit : > On Sun, 2011-05-29 at 11:40 +0200, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: >> It works if I add a break statement when UIName is found : >> >> for(int nProp = 0; nProp < rProperties.getLength(); nProp++) >> { >> if(!pProperties[nProp].Name.compar

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Patch for Bug 34786: [EasyHack]Editing: Sentence movement function broken

On 01/06/11 06:34, jeffrey chang wrote: Sorry here is the patch. On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:18 PM, jeffrey chang > wrote: Hi, I am new to the LibreOffice community. I know that 34786 has been posted for awhile, but no one seems to have claimed the bug an

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] fix for fdo#37761: Keyboard navigation broken in tools - options

On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 19:03 +0200, André Schnabel wrote: > we came across a minor accessability issue at the German discuss list. > But the fix is so easy that even I could do it. Whoot ! :-) you rock ... Thanks !, Michael. -- michael.me...@novell.com <><, Ps

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Duplicate code: join ImportFrom and InsertFrom

Yesterday everything built fine. Then I did a "./g pull -r" which caused the build to fail. As soon as I have a successfull build again I'll push everything which has queued up until now :-) Christina Original-Nachricht > Datum: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 10:16:54 +0100 > Von: Noel Pow

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Unify DLLPOSTFIX values

Hi Francois, On Wed, 1 Jun 2011 08:59:04 +0200 Francois Tigeot wrote: > The attached patch gets rid of many definitions of DLLPOSTFIX. With > this change, shared library file names will be the same on all > platforms. Is the patch complete? It ends (fetched via gmane) with: CSC*=$(FLIPCMD) csc

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED[ [PATCH] fix for fdo#37761: Keyboard navigation broken in tools - options

On 31/05/11 18:03, André Schnabel wrote: Hi, we came across a minor accessability issue at the German discuss list. But the fix is so easy that even I could do it. It's just to remove one line that breaks the keyboard navigation in the options dialog and has no sense at all. Christoph Noack

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Duplicate code: join ImportFrom and InsertFrom

On 31/05/11 13:03, Chr. Rossmanith wrote: Hi, more duplicate code cleanup. Class SfxObjectShell has two nearly identical methods: ImportFrom and InsertFrom. The latter has a few lines of code more, so I've removed InsertFrom (which was added to the code base later than ImportFrom), added a b

[Libreoffice] Nouvelles astuces de la semaine 21 et voulez vous un forum ?

Astuces Pratiques Cet email est promotionnel, il regroupe les titres de la semaine dernière pour les recevoir dans votre boite email cliquez sur s'inscrire et envoyer l'email d'inscription à webmaster.netpratique-subscr...@domeus.fr sans rien n'y ajouter. N'oubliez pas de valider l'email de conf

Re: [Libreoffice] Platform-specific DLL suffix usefulness

Hi Francois, On Tue, 31 May 2011 23:33:06 +0200 Francois Tigeot wrote: > What you said about the gbuild migration makes sense, but I have the > impression you were thinking about removing completely the suffix. > [...] > The final library name would be the same, it would not be problematic > to