-
| СХEМЫ ЗАКOННОЙ OПТИМИЗАЦИИ БИЗНЕCА: |
| OФФШОPЫ, OHШOРЫ И ЕBPОПЕЙСКИЕ KOМПАНИИ. |
| ПРAKТИЧЕСКИЕ CХЕМЫ И РЕKОМЕНДАЦИИ. |
| HОВОЕ B PAБOТЕ C НEРЕЗИДЕНТАМИ |
| COГЛAСНО ТPEБОВАНИЙ HAЛОГОВОГО KOДEКСА. |
---
Hi Bjoern,
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 09:19:30PM +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> On Sun, 29 May 2011 20:41:20 +0200
> Francois Tigeot wrote:
>
> > One of your links is about a change of API but there would be none.
> > The consensus seemed to be this DLL suffix stuff was absolutely
> > unused and
Le 2011-05-30 15:24, Cor Nouws a écrit :
Hi Marc,
Marc Paré wrote (30-05-11 12:23)
I am just working on the webpage for the release of 3.4 and on the
release notes wiki page for LibO 3.4[1] it says:
When the document is encrypted with a password, you can now change the
password while the docum
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 09:57:16AM +0200, Andor E wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm trying to debug an issue with bookmarks in the Writer import
> filter. Right now my biggest problem is, that I don't know how to get
> information from the UNO reference objects. The import filter uses
> cursors and text ranges
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Rainer Bielefeld changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||37179
--- Comment #130 from Rainer Bi
Hi,
Any idea about my experimental fix? i.e. remove the auto-style that switch
to the very same locale.
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 9:22 PM, Samphan Raruenrom wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We've been trying to fix this bug
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33092
>
> However, we don't know whether t
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Xisco Faulí wrote:
> Hello,
> I keep doing. I can't say anything specific because all i'm doing is that,
> converting the code. I'm working now on the files in ui/event/. it's taking
> me some time because it's a bit confused but i think It'd take me much
> longer
Hello,
this patch fixes bug fdo#37772. Using the plus Icon in the footer calls
different code paths than the normal menus so we need to check that the
document is editable separately.
I think this patch should be included in the 3-4 branch so I need one
review.
Regards,
Markus
0001-fix-for-fdo
Hi Noel,
On Mon, 30 May 2011 21:40:59 +0100, Noel Power wrote:
> On 30/05/11 15:39, Takeshi Abe wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> (thanks to Noel, for helpful comments on its initial version and
>> suggesting to post to this list).
> ahem, I seem to have gotten the wrong end of the stick about some of the
>
Untitled Document
Listeden Çıkmak için
b...@listedencikar.com adresine Çıkar başlıklı Boş bir e-posta
gönderiniz
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/list
Hello Albert,
just two quick comments.
We are trying to get away from using sal_Int16 for sheet numbers and use
SCTAB instead, so it would be nice if you could change this.
And I think we can't/shouldn't create a document without a sheet (but Kohei
may prove me wrong). And did you check that no n
Hi all,
Submitting a patch for Bug 33293 for review. Please let me know if
you want me to improve some parts of it.
Once you are happy with it you can commit the patch under the terms of
MPL 1.1 / GPLv3+ / LGPLv3+
triple license.
To implement this feature request I have:
1.) created a new config
Hello,
I keep doing. I can't say anything specific because all i'm doing is that,
converting the code. I'm working now on the files in ui/event/. it's taking
me some time because it's a bit confused but i think It'd take me much
longer. After I complete it, I'd like to create a git repository so
I tried this with LibreOffice 3.4.0rc2 (x86 on Windows Vista SP1 in VM hosted
on Windows 7).
Two things:
1. It doesn't work. There is a new button on the File | Properties ... |
General tab to the right of the file name that says "Change Password ..." but
it is always greyed out. This could
Fixes compile with Bison 2.5 and Gcc 4.5.3 for LibO 3.4 RC2.
libreoffice-libs-core-3.4.0.2 requires patch to compile with Bison 2.5 and Gcc
4.5.3.
Basically the compiler errors when it fails to convert a const sal_Char* to a
sal_Char *.
The patch changes the prototype of the error printing func
Hi,
I have started a non parallel build and now find, that the error is
likely already in xml2cmp. Log is in http://pastebin.com/7cvzwtWm
Any idea what is wrong? Shouldn't it be possible to build from tar
sources? That worked for OOo.
Kind regards
Regina
Regina Henschel schrieb:
Hi,
I h
On Mon, 30 May 2011 22:54:54 +0200
Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> Hi Hanno, *,
Hi Christian,
> What build tools need python? The build system is perl, not python.
Translate-Toolkit is python.
http://translate.sourceforge.net/wiki/toolkit/index
Regards,
Hanno
Hi Hanno, *,
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 10:23 PM, Hanno Meyer-Thurow wrote:
>
> I added '--disable-python' because not everyone needs python uno api.
> Since python-2 is necessary for build tools,
What build tools need python? The build system is perl, not python.
ciao
Christian
__
Hi all,
I understand the rationale for removing binfilter. I think that
everybody agree with the decision to make the documents in old formats
read-only. In fact that should have been done several years ago.
But the removing of the import of old formats is another story. I am
already hearing end-
Hi,
On Mon, 30 May 2011 13:42:19 -0500
Norbert Thiebaud
wrote:
> after that, cherry pick, and never ever merge one way or the other.
> (iow the 3.X branch diverge from that point on)
What could still be done though is to do throw-away-merges: Merge them
without pushing, just to see that nothing
Hi
On 30/05/11 15:39, Takeshi Abe wrote:
Hi all,
(thanks to Noel, for helpful comments on its initial version and
suggesting to post to this list).
ahem, I seem to have gotten the wrong end of the stick about some of the
patch ( or at least looking at it again I see that )
It seems to work well
On Mon, 30 May 2011 14:08:41 -0600
"Tor Lillqvist" wrote:
> Browsing configure.in, I see three different binary options for various
> aspects of Pyhon "support":
>
> --disable-python. "Disable build of Python 2.x UNO API"
> --enable-ext-scripting-python. "Enables support for scripts in Python"
Browsing configure.in, I see three different binary options for various aspects
of Pyhon "support":
--disable-python. "Disable build of Python 2.x UNO API"
--enable-ext-scripting-python. "Enables support for scripts in Python"
--with-system-python. "Use Python already on system"
Now, I am sure t
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
vitriol changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||37763
--- Comment #129 from vitriol 2011-05-3
On 27/05/11 14:17, Noel Power wrote:
I'd like to get the following patch into 3.4 so 1 review needed
bug: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37590
patch:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-core/commit/?id=ecbd796ee8157047b1738ac12c98a6ef4d3c18ff
Petr and I chatted briefly o
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Michael Meeks wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 19:13 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
>> Also: 3.3.3 codefreezed today with another ~35 most likely rather
>> important commits. Are those merged back to master (or manually
>
> I would hope these are all cherry
Hi Korrawit,
On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 00:18 +0700, Korrawit Pruegsanusak wrote:
> Attached patch is a bit more code cleanup in filters.
> Please feel free to comment.
Thanks it looks lovely :-) can you confirm it & all that follow are
MPL/LGPLv3+ licensed ?
Nice stuff,
Cedric Bosdonnat píše v Pá 27. 05. 2011 v 16:03 +0200:
> Hello Markus,
>
> On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 14:02 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
> > yes there might still be some problems, I only tried to fix that
> > during pasting to calc all borders are drawn. I'm not familiar with
> > the RTF spec and the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Rainer Bielefeld changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||34805
--- Comment #128 from Rainer Bi
On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 19:13 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> Also: 3.3.3 codefreezed today with another ~35 most likely rather
> important commits. Are those merged back to master (or manually
I would hope these are all cherry-picked back from a more recent branch
(personally).
Markus Mohrhard píše v Čt 26. 05. 2011 v 21:58 +0200:
> You've my sign-off. I'll push it to 3-4.
I see it there => updating subject to safe others time.
Best Regards,
Petr
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.fr
Hi,
I need one review for 3-4
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/artwork/commit/?id=3f7ffa8409ba7fc1ce5f70dbae06a44a42c9947f
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/artwork/commit/?id=6fb432551320ea3d6eb1648f78abda6569705795
I think I fixed all outstanding issues listed on fdo#33229. There a
(2)
xDrawPages->getByIndex( nDefaultPage ) >>= mxDefaultPage;
if( mxDefaultPage.is() )
{
SvxDrawPage* pSvxDrawPage = SvxDrawPage::getImplementation(
mxDefaultPage );
if( pSvxDrawPage )
{
mpDefaultSdrPage = pSvxDrawPage->GetSdrPage();
mpSdrModel = mpDefault
Hello all,
Attached patch is a bit more code cleanup in filters.
Please feel free to comment.
Anyway, I've found some comments are unreadable, eg. in
/hwpfilter/source/hwpreader.cxx line ~4440. Should we also remove
them? or are they my encoding faults?
Best Regards,
--
Korrawit Pruegsanusak
From
Kohei Yoshida píše v Út 24. 05. 2011 v 13:05 -0400:
> On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 17:50 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
> > Hello Katarina,
> >
> > the idea is good, but I think we should move this code to
> > ScDocument::GetFilterDBAtTable because I'm not quite sure if there are
> > not some cases where
Hi Kendy,
On Mon, 30 May 2011 18:07:34 +0200
Jan Holesovsky wrote:
> So - as long as you don't force people to do this [ie. don't force
> this as a rule, but instead let them decide if they are willing to
> wait for the merge of the branch into the master (working mostly on
> the branch before t
Hi Bjoern,
On 2011-05-30 at 11:19 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> > Personally, I think I'd still recommend working on master if possible
> > and make changes against that rather than compound the complications.
>
> /me too. But I think I made that point sufficiently clear already in
> the ESC
Hi,
this time a brief summary of what happened during the 21th week in 2011
on LibreOffice repositories and the living branches:
+ master:LO-3.5 development
+ libreoffice-3-3: fixes for LO-3.3.3 bug fix release
+ libreoffice-3-4: fixes for LO-3.4.1 bug fix
Dear students and mentors,
I'ld like to remind you that your projects will be merged twice into
master and enabled as an experimental feature. Some builds will be
provided for everybody to test your work and give you some feedback. We
don't require you to have 100% of your project done at that tim
On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 21:24 +0200, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
> I have just pushed the merge of dev300-m106 into master; it also
> contains part of libreoffice-3-4 branch, because we started the
> dev300-m106 merge against libreoffice-3-4, not against master.
Whoot ! - nice work - thanks so mu
Hi John,
On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 22:12 -0700, John LeMoyne Castle wrote:
> I think your Java->Python porting project is awesome. ...
Wow - and your feedback is brilliant :-) it would be wonderful to have
you working with Xisco on this, and/or helping to mentor if Bjoern is up
for that :-)
On Sun, 2011-05-29 at 18:56 +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:26:30AM +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> > Different DLLPOSTFIX files suggest that at some stage or other it was
> > desirable to be able to have the .sos from different architecture
> > side-by-side in the same d
Hi Matus,
On Sun, 2011-05-29 at 23:39 +0200, Matúš Kukan wrote:
> It's hard for me write something now because I've been working on my
> thesis last week and it's still not finished yet. Deadline for it is
> 3.6. but I hope it will be finished sooner and I will be working on
> KCachegrind.
Hi all,
For fdo#32263 - Config file location, I made a patch as attached
(thanks to Noel, for helpful comments on its initial version and
suggesting to post to this list).
It seems to work well with master, but has one concern; the change
against common_brand.scp leads the path "$HOME/libreoffice
On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 10:18 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> Yes, as long as you are only talking about the li, lx, ss, si type
> postfixes of applications and indeed no UNO library accidentally uses
> those prefixes too. The gcc3-style postfixes certainly are used for UNO
> libs.
So it
On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 13:09 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote:
> Unfortunately not. I have no knowledge in Perl.
Heh - I committed something to autogen.sh that (hopefully) will make
this at least a tad more intuitive (while no doubt breaking a number of
platforms ;-).
Thanks !
On 30/05/11 13:35, Katarina Machalkova wrote:
Hey there,
can some1 please review& cherry-pick for 3.4 the following patch:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/filters/commit/?id=6603c30f910b1fb5674a28988304dfcd14c11ecb
Seems that it somehow fell through the cracks and never made it to 3.4
Be glad that you even got as far as smoketest; master is currently in a state
of flux after the merge of m106 on Friday. It will take a few days at least
before it is as buildable as it used to be.
--tml
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists
I started this morning with make clean and './g pull -r'.
./autogen.sh --with-num-cpus=6 --with-max-jobs=6
--with-jdk-home="/usr/java/jdk1.6.0_23/jdk" --enable-debug resulted in
an error 65280, telling me that there was an error in librsvg.
After disabling usage of librsvg everything compiled fine
Hey there,
can some1 please review & cherry-pick for 3.4 the following patch:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/filters/commit/?id=6603c30f910b1fb5674a28988304dfcd14c11ecb
Seems that it somehow fell through the cracks and never made it to 3.4 branch
:-( Sadly, saving spreadsheet docs wi
On 28/05/11 19:47, Korrawit Pruegsanusak wrote:
Hello all,
Although the diff may look frustrated, I've explained what I've done
in log message.
Please feel free to comment :-)
Nice patch, thanks again, I took the comment 'Clean background first
because of plugins. ' from Christina, not sure if
On 30/05/11 11:55, Noel Power wrote:
On 28/05/11 19:40, Rob Snelders wrote:
Hi,
Here is a really small patch to solve fdo#34872.
This patch is submitted under LGPLv3+/MPL-Licence.
looks good ( I suppose some risk that this might have some side
affects for other fields that use this Expression
Hi Michael, John,
On 2011-05-30 at 11:35 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> > The fixes in this area seem to be done and applied only in 3.4 rc2. From
> > looking in other areas of work on rc2, I think I am seeing the same patching
> > pattern where the rc is ahead of master.
>
> Yes - this is
On 29/05/11 05:42, Korrawit Pruegsanusak wrote:
Hello all,
The attached patch is to remove warning about "inefficient checking
for emptiness" from cppcheck.
thanks again for the nice patch,
pushed to master
Noel
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffi
Hi Michael,
Michael Meeks schrieb:
[..]
Is that something you could help out with ? - I know perl is not
entirely intuitive but ... ;-)
Unfortunately not. I have no knowledge in Perl.
Kind regards
Regina
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOff
On 29/05/11 05:23, Korrawit Pruegsanusak wrote:
Hello all,
The attached patch is to cleanup the code in calc.
Please feel free to comment.
thanks for the patch, nice job, pushed to master now
regards,
Noel
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lis
Hi,
Here is the log for the failing building in LO: http://pastebin.com/pTq671As
and here for the successful build in OOo: http://pastebin.com/M40F5Bmq
I notice, that LO has additional patches (around line 17):
patching file cppunit-1.12.1/config/config.guess
patching file cppunit-1.12.1/include
Hi Regina,
On Sun, 2011-05-29 at 19:01 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote:
> >> checking whether to enable fontconfig support... ./configure: line 7229:
> >> syntax error near unexpected token `FONTCONFIG,'
> >> ./configure: line 7229: ` PKG_CHECK_MODULES(FONTCONFIG, fontconfig>=
Oooh - that
On 28/05/11 19:40, Rob Snelders wrote:
Hi,
Here is a really small patch to solve fdo#34872.
This patch is submitted under LGPLv3+/MPL-Licence.
looks good ( I suppose some risk that this might have some side affects
for other fields that use this Expression field type, but ok, master is
the pl
Hi John,
On Sun, 2011-05-29 at 11:09 -0700, John LeMoyne Castle wrote:
> The fixes in this area seem to be done and applied only in 3.4 rc2. From
> looking in other areas of work on rc2, I think I am seeing the same patching
> pattern where the rc is ahead of master.
Yes - this is a dist
I am just working on the webpage for the release of 3.4 and on the
release notes wiki page for LibO 3.4[1] it says:
When the document is encrypted with a password, you can now change the
password while the document is open, from
File->Properties->General->Change Password. The button is enabled
Le 2011-05-30 06:04, Marc Paré a écrit :
What I want to stress, is that we need to explain, and show
- the release rationale:
point zero release is only for ..., and not for ...
- plus that IMO we must at least for point zero releases
the knows nasty bugs
On the current release notes page thos
Le 2011-05-29 17:28, Cor Nouws a écrit :
Hi Marc, all,
[ ooops what a terrible cross post, four lists ;-)
I skipp the project and website list for the moment
and IMO follow ups for my subject (see below)
should be at marketing preferably
devs with an relevant opinion can either join or
hire a go
A git repository has been set up for the Visio project and I've gotten
access rights to it - so for those of you wondering what the libvisio
folder is, it's this project.
We've gone with a heavily stream-based approach. Internal VSD streams
are decompressed and are seekable and readable. For this,
Cherry-picked to 3-4 and 3-3.
--tml
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
> I need one review for 3-4 (and possibly for 3-3).
Cherry-picked to libreoffice-3-4 and libreoffice-3-3 , thanks.
--tml
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Banned this source of amusement ...
-- Thorsten
pgpJnvb5sURFN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Mon, 30 May 2011 09:55:37 +0100
Caolán McNamara wrote:
> Personally, I think I'd still recommend working on master if possible
> and make changes against that rather than compound the complications.
/me too. But I think I made that point sufficiently clear already in
the ESC call.
Best,
Bjo
On Sun, 2011-05-29 at 11:09 -0700, John LeMoyne Castle wrote:
> The fixes in this area seem to be done and applied only in 3.4 rc2. From
> looking in other areas of work on rc2, I think I am seeing the same patching
> pattern where the rc is ahead of master. And AFAIK they are all about to
> roll
The IDIOTS on the Office Libre Committee, decide to fuck it all up - by
making the HELP files as a separate download...
"Yeah leave the life boats in South Hampton, so when if the ship sinks they
can always come back and ask for them"
YOU DUMB CUNTS.
Yeah by building in the make it 3 x as ha
2011.05.30. 9:15 keltezéssel, Andras Timar írta:
> Hi,
>
> I need one review for 3-4.
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-extern-sys/commit/?id=f1c5626a27f72d5f7400f3e36fe0d4f2f3c5fe90
>
> Thanks,
> Andras
>
This belongs to the commit above, makefile fixup.
http://cgit.freedesktop.org
Hi Francois,
On Mon, 30 May 2011 09:40:27 +0200
Francois Tigeot wrote:
> 1. Unify DLLPOSTFIX values. Set it in one common .mk if possible
>
> This can be done now
Yes, as long as you are only talking about the li, lx, ss, si type
postfixes of applications and indeed no UNO library accidental
Hello,
I'm trying to debug an issue with bookmarks in the Writer import
filter. Right now my biggest problem is, that I don't know how to get
information from the UNO reference objects. The import filter uses
cursors and text ranges to insert the bookmarks into the document. I'm
pretty sure, that t
Hi Marco,
great you're making progress -
you asked:
> (1)
> is "api.openoffice.org" the right place where to look for API
> documentation ?
>
Yep.
> (2)
> what is the difference between: XShape, SdrObject (and derived classes)
> and Graphic ? Which are their roles ?
>
XShape is an interface, S
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 12:32:48AM -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> So if we keep DLLPOSTFIX, just unify its value on all platforms, that doesn't
> really affect the complexity of the makefiles at all. We just lose one
> non-conditional simple assignment line from each platform-specific .mk file.
>
On Sun, 2011-05-29 at 11:40 +0200, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
> It works if I add a break statement when UIName is found :
>
> for(int nProp = 0; nProp < rProperties.getLength(); nProp++)
> {
> if(!pProperties[nProp].Name.compareToAscii("UIName"))
> {
> pPropert
OK, LibreOffice is a voluntary driven project. Whosoever is able to
implement a feature, provide mirror space, improve translation, ... is
sincerely welcome.
Those that are having as their only skill complaining in e-mail are
forwarded to /dev/null.
Howgh
F.
On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 01:50 -0500,
Hi,
I need one review for 3-4.
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-extern-sys/commit/?id=f1c5626a27f72d5f7400f3e36fe0d4f2f3c5fe90
Thanks,
Andras
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman
Hi,
I have still problems building from tar source. Actual situation:
All modules folders are put into one root folder.
Configure finished.
Make starts compiling and stops with error in cppunit:
TypeInfoHelper.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol
__imp___invalid_parameter_noinfo
an
79 matches
Mail list logo
