Le 2011-05-29 17:28, Cor Nouws a écrit :
Hi Marc, all,
[ ooops what a terrible cross post, four lists ;-)
I skipp the project and website list for the moment
and IMO follow ups for my subject (see below)
should be at marketing preferably
devs with an relevant opinion can either join or
hire a gohst writer ;-)
]
Marc Paré wrote (27-05-11 16:57)
It's time that we get on with creating the page on the main site. So
unless anyone is going to offer to create/design the page, I'll take
care of it. I have not had a lot of practice at Silverstripe, so you
will have to be patient with me.
We have worked on the screenshot protocols which have now been put on
the website wiki pages[1] (thanks to Klaus! and all other for their
comments). BTW ... .png's will be the format to use. We will have to
point this out to the translation teams for when they take their
screenshots.
* I will follow the same format as on the "New Features and Fixes" web
pages[2]. If I understand it correctly, we are to have a 3.4 webpage and
a 3.3.2 webpage (essentially what we have now on the "New Features and
Fixes webpage). These pages will be used by website visitors to compare
the features between both versions of LibreOffice. We are not comparing
to MSO nor OOo. So, IMO, both pages should have the same page format so
that our visitors feel comfortable moving from one page to the other.
Any comments before I jump in? Any comments?
What I want to stress, is that we need to explain, and show
- the release rationale:
point zero release is only for ..., and not for ...
- plus that IMO we must at least for point zero releases
the knows nasty bugs
On the current release notes page those are not visible. I propose to
change that.
Kind regards,
Cor
No problem. Could you modify the wiki page? Let us know when it is done
and we'll take a look at it.
Thanks for the help.
Cheers
Marc
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
