Re: [Libreoffice] Mac OS X Discussion of Using Xcode and SDK >= 10.6

2011-05-09 Thread Alexander Thurgood
Le 10/05/11 00:22, Peter Teeson a écrit : Hi Peter, > Out of curiosity how many Mac developers? > I wouldn't consider myself a Mac developer yet, more of a fiddler. I've only just started to learn C++ (or at least am trying), but I do like to do the builds, if only out of personal interest, es

[Libreoffice] Merging the 3.4 branch to master (calc only)

2011-05-09 Thread Kohei Yoshida
Hi there, Just FYI, I just merged the libreoffice-3-4 branch onto master and pushed it, but did so only with the calc repository. There were several files in conflicts during the merge. Most of them were pretty simple, but I wasn't sure if I merged CppunitTest_sc_ucalc.mk correctly. So if someo

Re: [Libreoffice] Libreoffice not builds

2011-05-09 Thread Гуляев Гоша
Hello! I do recommended steps (from error output) /usr/local/bin/bash cd /var/XXX/libreoffice-build-3.3.2.2/build/libreoffice source ./FreeBSDX86Env.Set.sh cd sfx2 build And below is result, is anybody knows how solve that problem? Entering /var/XXX/libreoffice-build-3.3.2.2/build/libreoffice/s

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] [REVIEW] fix for fdo#36933

2011-05-09 Thread Kohei Yoshida
Hi there, I'd like to have the attached patch committed for 3.4. It fixes https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36933 Per rule, I need to have one sign-off in order to commit this to the 3.4 branch. Review appreciated. Kohei -- Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc >From b49cc01b9

Re: [Libreoffice] Debugging crash in 3.3.2 on Mac OS X 10.6.6 - [SOLVED}

2011-05-09 Thread Peter Teeson
On 2011-05-09, at 7:57 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Peter Teeson wrote: > [...] > It was indeed!! > I compared the regular OS X 10.6 Fonts directory with the clean one andthey > were identical. > Then I looked at ~/libray/Fonts and lo and behold there was a FreeS

Re: [Libreoffice] Debugging crash in 3.3.2 on Mac OS X 10.6.6 - [SOLVED}

2011-05-09 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Peter Teeson wrote: [...] > It was indeed!! > I compared the regular OS X 10.6 Fonts directory with the clean one andthey > were identical. > Then I looked at ~/libray/Fonts and lo and behold there was a FreeSans.ttf > one on the regular system > and not on the cl

Re: [Libreoffice] Mac OS X Discussion of Using Xcode and SDK >= 10.6

2011-05-09 Thread Peter Teeson
Hi Christian: On 2011-05-09, at 4:02 PM, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > Hi Peter, *, > Oh, different build configurations is of course no problem, that would > just be adding a configure switch --with-macosx-sdkversion - but > maintaining the actual code for two different variants is. I just > don't

Re: [Libreoffice] Fwd: The results of your email commands

2011-05-09 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi the gmail users, Luuk píše v Po 09. 05. 2011 v 20:45 +0200: > What happened here? > Did Google bounce the mails send from @lists.freedesktop.org ? > > > On 09-05-2011 09:22, libreoffice-requ...@lists.freedesktop.org wrote: > > Your membership in the mailing list LibreOffice

[Libreoffice] Mac / font crash ... fdo#37035

2011-05-09 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi guys, On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 15:14 -0400, Peter Teeson wrote: > I am willing to try using gdb from the command line. > But after reading the Development/How to debug I am no wiser. Shame - I gave you the steps to paste into gdb, AFAIR - nevermind; I filed the bug here: https://

Re: [Libreoffice] Mac OS X Discussion of Using Xcode and SDK >= 10.6

2011-05-09 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Peter, *, On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 9:29 PM, Peter Teeson wrote: > Hi Christian, *,: > On 2011-05-09, at 12:56 PM, Christian Lohmaier wrote: >> Hi Peter, *, >> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Peter Teeson wrote: >>> On 2011-05-09, at 6:02 AM, Christian Lohmaier wrote: >>> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at

Re: [Libreoffice] Mac OS X Discussion of Using Xcode and SDK >= 10.6

2011-05-09 Thread Peter Teeson
Hi Christian, *,: On 2011-05-09, at 12:56 PM, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > Hi Peter, *, > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Peter Teeson wrote: >> On 2011-05-09, at 6:02 AM, Christian Lohmaier wrote: >> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 2:35 AM, Peter Teeson wrote: >> [...] >> regarding 10.6 SDK: Well, this su

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [WIP] Bug 33293 - [EasyHack] Make starting count of worksheets configurable

2011-05-09 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Sun, 2011-05-08 at 17:09 +0200, Albert Thuswaldner wrote: > Dear List, > As a first attempt to contribute some code to LO, I've started hacking > on his: > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33293 > > I think I have come quite far with implementing the changes to the > configuratio

Re: [Libreoffice] Mac OS X Discussion of Using Xcode and SDK >= 10.6

2011-05-09 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Peter, On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 11:42 -0400, Peter Teeson wrote: > I'm just musing here but it seems to me one might be able to use > the existing source tree, and even the make scripts, and do a Mac > build using Xcode and it's capabilities. Again - I have high hopes for gnumake :-) In p

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Petr Mladek changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||36907 --- Comment #92 from Petr Mladek 20

Re: [Libreoffice] [GSOC][Urgent] Build fails

2011-05-09 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 14:46 +0530, Anurag Jain wrote: > Thank you for replying. > > Yeah I've got the things working now. Thanks to shm_get in IRC , he > helped me out with it. :) Great. Sorry I wasn't able to give you a help on this. And Thanks Norbert and Michael for helping him out. Kohei

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Petr Mladek changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||37017 --- Comment #91 from Petr Mladek 20

Re: [Libreoffice] REMINDER: Release 3.4.0-beta5 from libreoffice-3-4 branch

2011-05-09 Thread Petr Mladek
Joop Kiefte píše v Po 09. 05. 2011 v 13:39 -0300: > hardly working > working hard, I suppose... I'm hardly working = I'm > doing almost nothing... Heh, "working hard" is what I wanted to say. We are still far from holidays ;-) Best Regards, Petr ___ Li

Re: [Libreoffice] Build failure: - start unit test #1 on library ../../../unxlngx6.pro/lib/libosl_Security.so

2011-05-09 Thread Miklos Vajna
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 11:11:24AM +0200, KAMI911 KAMI911 wrote: > until now I used general user to build, should use fakeroot or real root? No, normal user is correct, fakeroot is only useful to get files in tarballs owned by root without real root access. If it failed for you without fakeroo

Re: [Libreoffice] What is the exact system & switches used for the x86 linux build?

2011-05-09 Thread Andras Timar
Hi, 2011.05.02. 18:12 keltezéssel, Thorsten Behrens írta: > Independently, Fridrich, could you add your release build's > configure lines to the wiki? > > (http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/ReleaseBuilds) > Why don't you use simply ./autogen.sh --with-distro=LibreOfficeMacOSX etc.

Re: [Libreoffice] Mac OS X Discussion of Using Xcode and SDK >= 10.6

2011-05-09 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Peter, *, On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Peter Teeson wrote: > On 2011-05-09, at 6:02 AM, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 2:35 AM, Peter Teeson wrote: > [...] > regarding 10.6 SDK: Well, this surely will drop compatibility with > 10.4 and also 10.5, so why would anyone wan

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 André Schnabel changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||37024 -- Configure bugmail: https://bu

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Petr Mladek changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||33355 --- Comment #90 from Petr Mladek 20

Re: [Libreoffice] REMINDER: Release 3.4.0-beta5 from libreoffice-3-4 branch

2011-05-09 Thread Joop Kiefte
hardly working > working hard, I suppose... I'm hardly working = I'm doing almost nothing... 2011/5/9 Petr Mladek : > Hi, > > there were again some problems with localizations[*] in beta4, so we > decided to release beta5 instead of rc1 this week. The commit deadline > is today. > > Commit rules f

[Libreoffice] REMINDER: Release 3.4.0-beta5 from libreoffice-3-4 branch

2011-05-09 Thread Petr Mladek
Hi, there were again some problems with localizations[*] in beta4, so we decided to release beta5 instead of rc1 this week. The commit deadline is today. Commit rules for libreoffice-3-4 branch after May 9, 2011: + all commits need one review, ask on irc or libreoffice@lists.fr

Re: [Libreoffice] Mac OS X Discussion of Using Xcode and SDK >= 10.6

2011-05-09 Thread Peter Teeson
Hi Christian: On 2011-05-09, at 6:02 AM, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 2:35 AM, Peter Teeson wrote: >> Hi Michael & *: >> What discussions have there been of the idea of using Xcode, SDK 10.6 > > What context are you talking about? > > regarding 10.6 SDK: Well, this surely w

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Alex Thurgood changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||37008 --- Comment #89 from Alex Thurgood

[Libreoffice] ANNOUNCE: Blockers vs. most annoying bugs

2011-05-09 Thread Petr Mladek
Hi, I have just updated http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Release_Criteria to fit the time based release. The main difference is that X.Y.0 release need not be perfect. It is intended for enthusiasts that would like to use new features. More conservative users should wait for later bug fix relea

Re: [Libreoffice] Debugging crash in 3.3.2 on Mac OS X 10.6.6 - [SOLVED}

2011-05-09 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Peter, On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 11:25 -0400, Peter Teeson wrote: > It was indeed!! :-) > Removing that font made everything work correctly! Sure - but LibreOffice should never crash; so we still have to fix the problem. > All of this done without having to go through the tortur

Re: [Libreoffice] Mac OS X Discussion of Using Xcode and SDK >= 10.6

2011-05-09 Thread Peter Teeson
Hi Tor: On 2011-05-09, at 3:43 AM, Tor Lillqvist wrote: >> What discussions have there been of the idea of using Xcode, > > You mean, as in building all (?) of LibreOffice in the Xcode IDE (or some > other IDE), in such a way that the IDE actually would have parsed the source > code etc and thu

Re: [Libreoffice] [Patch][Pushed] make the OOXML import filter use sheet local db data

2011-05-09 Thread Muthu Subramanian K
Just to mark this read: We discussed over irc early morning today. We would be looking at the 15.2.12.1 issue separately. On 05/09/2011 02:20 AM, Markus Mohrhard wrote: > Hello Muthu, > > I pushed this patch to master > > I tried to generate a document with the current master and validate it > w

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 --- Comment #88 from Cor Nouws 2011-05-09 08:27:33 PDT --- nominate #37017: Bullets in presentation not saved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You ar

Re: [Libreoffice] [GSOC][Urgent] Build fails

2011-05-09 Thread Rafael Dominguez
Looking at your log it seems your tree is corrupted, try doing a make clean and make. On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Anurag Jain wrote: > Hello there > > I tried to update my Lo clone and ended up with failed build for vcl > and odx modules. Here are the partial build outputs. > > http://pasteb

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Alex Thurgood changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||37015 -- Configure bugmail: https://bug

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 --- Comment #87 from Alex Thurgood 2011-05-09 07:43:23 PDT --- Now nominating 37015, scripting other than Basic unavailable on Mac, regression compared to 3.3.2. Alex -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [WIP] Bug 33293 - [EasyHack] Make starting count of worksheets configurable

2011-05-09 Thread Albert Thuswaldner
Hi again, In case my original email got stuck in peoples spam filter (I accidentally managed to send it as a HTML mail) here it is again. If it still went through, sorry for spamming the list. Regards, /Albert On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 17:09, Albert Thuswaldner wrote: > Dear List, > As a first attem

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Alex Thurgood changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|34699 | --- Comment #86 from Alex Thurgood 201

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Olivier Hallot changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||37014 --- Comment #85 from Olivier Hall

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 --- Comment #84 from Alex Thurgood 2011-05-09 07:16:26 PDT --- Nominating bug 34699, regression compared to 3.3.2. I might add that all of the other scripts apart from Basic appear to be unavailable or non-functional / executable. Alex -- Con

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Alex Thurgood changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||34699 -- Configure bugmail: https://bug

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 vitriol changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||37013 --- Comment #83 from vitriol 2011-05-09

Re: [Libreoffice] testDataPilot unit test breaks in sc

2011-05-09 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 14:27 +0200, Fridrich Strba wrote: > On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 18:55 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > > so, finally got to the bottom of this - patches attached. I feel > > *slightly* worried about pushing > > 0001-Fix-non-changeability-of-UI-locale.patch to -3-4 - the second > >

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [LibreOffice][PATCH]EasyHack: Replace DBG_ macros with OSL_ equivalents

2011-05-09 Thread Fridrich Strba
Pushed to master. Thanks for your contribution. F. On Sun, 2011-05-08 at 23:27 +0200, Jacek Wolszczak wrote: > Hi, > > Attached hereto are two patches. The first one replaces DBG_WARNING, > DBG_ASSERT, etc. with OSL_ASSERT and OSL_FAIL in writer/sw directory. > > I have also removed writer/sw/

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATH] Resolving fdo#36931

2011-05-09 Thread Fridrich Strba
Pushed to both master and libreoffice-3-4 branch. Thanks F. On Sun, 2011-05-08 at 15:24 +0200, Arnaud Versini wrote: > Hi, > > This patch resolve issue 36931. > > Thanks for pushing. > > -- > Arnaud Versini > ___ > LibreOffice mailing list > Li

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] Fix osl_Security::getHomeDir test under fakeroot

2011-05-09 Thread Fridrich Strba
Done! F. On Sun, 2011-05-08 at 14:23 +0200, Miklos Vajna wrote: > Hi, > > See the attached patch, I needed it to build 3.4beta4 under fakeroot > (for some reason I did not have this issue with beta3). > > Can someone sign it off and push to -3-4, please? > > Thanks. >

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Petr Mladek changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||36816 --- Comment #82 from Petr Mladek 20

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH]EasyHack: Replace DBG_ macros with OSL_ equivalents

2011-05-09 Thread Jacek Wolszczak
2011/5/9 Christian Lohmaier > HI * - > > your mail has been flagged as spam by gmail, so I reply to unhide it > for other gmail users/ping them to look in the spam folder to recover > it :-) > > Thanks :) > Thanks for the patches! :-) > > On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 11:27 PM, Jacek Wolszczak > wrot

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 --- Comment #81 from Petr Mladek 2011-05-09 05:29:59 PDT --- (In reply to comment #77) > I should like to nominate Bug 35798 to be added to this list. This > bug/improvement is regarding Suppression of Blank Lines (fields) in Addresses > when me

Re: [Libreoffice] testDataPilot unit test breaks in sc

2011-05-09 Thread Fridrich Strba
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 18:55 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > so, finally got to the bottom of this - patches attached. I feel > *slightly* worried about pushing > 0001-Fix-non-changeability-of-UI-locale.patch to -3-4 - the second > hunk has some potential to cause loops, so review appreciated. >

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Unify Display Grid/ Grid Visible and other menu items

2011-05-09 Thread Fridrich Strba
I would like to integrate this patch. Is it the final version and are all parties happy with it? F. On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 16:43 +, Christian Dywan wrote: > Am 06.05.2011 18:39:40 schrieb Regina Henschel: > > Hi Christian, > > part > >--- a/sd/source/ui/dlg/tpoption.src > >+++ b/sd

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Petr Mladek changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||36915 --- Comment #80 from Petr Mladek 20

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Petr Mladek changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||35805 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 --- Comment #79 from Petr Mladek 2011-05-09 04:52:11 PDT --- Add bug 35805: table DOC export looks completely broken -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Libreoffice] [LibreOffice][GSoC 2011][svgexport] GSoC status reports

2011-05-09 Thread Marco
Hi all, indeed I'm mostly busy with studies, however I found the time to get more familiar with git, with a bit of patience I have been able to set up a bare local git repository where I'll backup my feature branch. I also got to make the backup process enough automatic by using the post-commit h

Re: [Libreoffice] Duplicate code: SwDoc::SplitDoc

2011-05-09 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Christina, On Sun, 2011-05-08 at 23:08 +0200, Chr. Rossmanith wrote: > there are two slightly different implementations of SwDoc::SplitDoc(), Wow - that is -horrible- :-) sw/source/core/doc/docglbl.cxx takes quite some reading. Anyone cutting and pasting code like that deserves a near

Re: [Libreoffice] [GSOC] Progress Report

2011-05-09 Thread Andras Timar
Hi, 2011/5/8 Xisco Faulí : > My task during the GSOC period is going to be the conversion of the Wizard > menus into python. > I met Björn Michäelsen last monday and we decided, on broad lines, the > course to follow. First I'll create a basic fax design using pyuno, then > I'll make it customized

Re: [Libreoffice] [LibreOffice][PATCH]EasyHack: Replace DBG_ macros with OSL_ equivalents

2011-05-09 Thread Christian Lohmaier
HI * - your mail has been flagged as spam by gmail, so I reply to unhide it for other gmail users/ping them to look in the spam folder to recover it :-) Thanks for the patches! :-) On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 11:27 PM, Jacek Wolszczak wrote: > > Attached hereto are two patches. The first one replace

Re: [Libreoffice] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-3.3.99.4 tag created (3.4.0-beta4)

2011-05-09 Thread plino
> Go for it ! :-) if you need help setting up or connecting your > build > hardware - do get in touch. [ the context for this is - that there is > -no- shortage of good ideas for consuming developer resource - only a > shortage of developer resource ;-]. > > I'm aware of that. I don't prete

Re: [Libreoffice] Mac OS X Discussion of Using Xcode and SDK >= 10.6

2011-05-09 Thread Christian Lohmaier
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 2:35 AM, Peter Teeson wrote: > Hi Michael & *: > What discussions have there been of the idea of using Xcode, SDK 10.6 What context are you talking about? regarding 10.6 SDK: Well, this surely will drop compatibility with 10.4 and also 10.5, so why would anyone want that?

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] new color picker dialog for all applications

2011-05-09 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Bernhard, On 2011-05-06 at 23:24 +0200, Bernhard Dippold wrote: > When clicking on the round button at the side of the RGB and HSB values > (do you want to add this for CMYK too?) it seems that this keeps the > entry constant during selection of any point in the large color field. > > When

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix for bug 33781 => No anti-aliasing in metafiles when anchor is "as char"

2011-05-09 Thread roland65
Hi there, here is a patch of the writer module that fixes bug 33781 (No anti-aliasing in metafiles when anchor is "as char"). The patch is against LibreOffice 3.4.0 DEV300m103 (Build:1), as it is said in the About dialog. Since I'm not familiar with git, I provide the patch as a simple diff

Re: [Libreoffice] [GSOC][Urgent] Build fails

2011-05-09 Thread Anurag Jain
Thank you for replying. Yeah I've got the things working now. Thanks to shm_get in IRC , he helped me out with it. :) Regards On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: > Hi there, > > On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 07:19 +0530, Anurag Jain wrote: >> I tried to update my Lo clone and ended up

Re: [Libreoffice] Moving duplicate code into methods

2011-05-09 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Christina, On Sat, 2011-05-07 at 22:54 +0200, Chr. Rossmanith wrote: > I've used the method names Thorsten suggested, prefixed them with lcl_ > made them static and end up with two commits for the whole clean up > (stage 1 posted on the list, stage 2 improvements). Is that ok for > pushing o

Re: [Libreoffice] Build failure: - start unit test #1 on library ../../../unxlngx6.pro/lib/libosl_Security.so

2011-05-09 Thread Miklos Vajna
On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 05:43:54PM +0200, KAMI911 KAMI911 wrote: > Failures !!! > Run: 10 Failure total: 1 Failures: 1 Errors: 0 > dmake: Error code 1, while making 'test1' > ---* tg_merge.mk *--- > > Hov can I fix it? Are you under fakeroot? I posted a patch here: http://thread.gmane.o

Re: [Libreoffice] Debugging crash in 3.3.2 on Mac OS X 10.6.6

2011-05-09 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Peter, On Sat, 2011-05-07 at 16:14 -0400, Peter Teeson wrote: > Cool ! :-) welcome to the small, and elite band of those with enough tenacity to actually get a build on anything != Linux :-) hopefully the more such heros we have, the easier it gets to do[1]. > OK Now I have a success

Re: [Libreoffice] [GSOC] Progress Report

2011-05-09 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Xisco, On Sun, 2011-05-08 at 23:02 +0200, Xisco Faulí wrote: > My task during the GSOC period is going to be the conversion of the > Wizard menus into python. Nice :-) > I met Björn Michäelsen last monday and we decided, on broad lines, the > course to follow. First I'll create a basi

Re: [Libreoffice] [GSOC][Urgent] Build fails

2011-05-09 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi there, On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 07:19 +0530, Anurag Jain wrote: > I tried to update my Lo clone and ended up with failed build for vcl > and odx modules. Here are the partial build outputs. Thanks for the great log output; this means: ./unxlngi6.pro/slo/abstdlg.o: file not recognized: Fi

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Re: When downloading extensions to src, cut is provided with wrong option switches

2011-05-09 Thread Alexander Thurgood
Le 08/05/11 19:34, KAMI911 KAMI911 a écrit : Hi Kami, > I think my patch has caused problem for you. I used long switches for > cut and your (Windows??) box does not adore about it. > No, it was on Mac OSX. For the moment, I haven't had time to attempt a rebuild / debug, just keep pulling from

Re: [Libreoffice] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-3.3.99.4 tag created (3.4.0-beta4)

2011-05-09 Thread Michael Meeks
On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 07:27 +0200, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > I have the computing power on my desktop to help at least create debian > packages if anyone would like me to do so. Go for it. The script you need to run the tinderbox builds is at: git clone git://anongit.freedeskto

Re: [Libreoffice] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-3.3.99.4 tag created (3.4.0-beta4)

2011-05-09 Thread Michael Meeks
On Sun, 2011-05-08 at 15:46 -0700, plino wrote: > Now that 3.4 Beta 4 is out, is there any chance that someone > could automate Go for it ! :-) if you need help setting up or connecting your build hardware - do get in touch. [ the context for this is - that there is -no- shortage of good

[Libreoffice] checking for un-used methods ...

2011-05-09 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Francois, On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 08:25 +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote: > > The cleanup is great of course. It is well worth checking, before each > > piece of fixing inside tools/ itself, whether we can save more time by > > re-writing the (sometimes rather few) call-sites, to use sal/ classes

Re: [Libreoffice] [GSOC] Progress Report

2011-05-09 Thread Cedric Bosdonnat
Hi Xisco, On Sun, 2011-05-08 at 23:02 +0200, Xisco Faulí wrote: > This week I've been studying the java code in order to see what things > do and playing around a bit with Pyuno and the GUI. I've tried to > create some text components and some GUI dialogs. So far it's going > good although I've ha

Re: [Libreoffice] Mac OS X Discussion of Using Xcode and SDK >= 10.6

2011-05-09 Thread Tor Lillqvist
> What discussions have there been of the idea of using Xcode, You mean, as in building all (?) of LibreOffice in the Xcode IDE (or some other IDE), in such a way that the IDE actually would have parsed the source code etc and thus know about the classes and members, be able to provide "hints"