Hi Peter, *, On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Peter Teeson <peter.tee...@bell.net> wrote: > On 2011-05-09, at 6:02 AM, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 2:35 AM, Peter Teeson <peter.tee...@bell.net> wrote: > [...] > regarding 10.6 SDK: Well, this surely will drop compatibility with > 10.4 and also 10.5, so why would anyone want that? > > I don't understand why you think it would drop 10.4 compatibility? > Please explain if I'm wrong but wouldn't It simply be an option?
I explained that in the thread I linked to. > Active Target is 10.4 or 10.6? You build what you want. > My wife still uses my old G4 867Mhz and Tiger (10.4). > So I think having a Tiger version is fine. Bottom line is: I don't see there is enough people to support both versions, especially as the people who can contribute are using the newer versions themselves. > Perhaps newer capabilites would not be able to be implemented for Tiger. > But moving forward need not be constrained to Tiger. We can have both. This is what I doubt. ciao Christian _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
