Hi Caolán,
I have same problem.
gcc -print-file-name=libgcc_s.so.1
libgcc_s.so.1
locate libgcc_s.so.1
/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1
When I copy /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1 to unxlngi6.pro/lib it
solves the problem.
Can you please provide a patch for this issue?
Ubuntu 11.04B2/32 bit
On 04/22/2011 04:02 PM, Bernhard Dippold wrote:
> Tor Lillqvist schrieb:
>
> Ed Drinkwater wrote:
>>> What is that supposed to mean? It certainly doesn't sound like a
>>> coherent, constructive contribution to the issue!
>>
>> That is because I am basically an incoherent dribbling idiot, la la la
Hi Björn, Christoph, all
Bjoern Michaelsen schrieb:
Hi designers, Hi developers,
following the discussion on:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/756895
I created a short tutorial for designers on how to get setup to
contribute artwork directly to the project at witho
Tor Lillqvist schrieb:
Ed Drinkwater wrote:
What is that supposed to mean? It certainly doesn't sound like a
coherent, constructive contribution to the issue!
That is because I am basically an incoherent dribbling idiot, la la la, na na
splutgh xzbbpfft! Me wants more porridge!
Sometimes i
Christoph Noack wrote:
> Since, we already have a "Tools" page I've started at OOo, so ...
> * linked to the GitArtworkGuide from there and also added a link
> to the artwork repository (cgit)
> * moved Thorsten's description (icon workflow) to this page
> * linked to the
Hello Júlio,
Concerning your last message about missing headers, I haven't taken a
look for the moment.
I won't be available for 1 week from now. So I'll give it a try later.
Julien.
Le 22/04/2011 00:51, Júlio Hoffimann a écrit :
Hi Julien,
Just a guess, i think the relevant options you're
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Zack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||36301
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedes
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
--- Comment #31 from Zack 2011-04-22 11:56:13 PDT ---
Bug 36301
You can't ship a program that crashes on exit every time.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: -
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
--- Comment #30 from mhonline 2011-04-22 11:54:41 PDT ---
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32672
no chance to get DBF-files to work as dataexchange-format,
This bug: LO corruptes N0-field, which were used as counters, and will cause
d
Many thanks for the patch! I just pushed it. For the next patches it
would be great if you could use git format-patch to generate the
patches
from the commits in the git repos. That would save us quite some work
picking up the email and commit message.
Regards,
understood, thanks to review
Hi Lubos,
On Fri, 2011-04-22 at 15:36 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> Hello,
>
> could somebody review the attached patch for bnc#689116? When e.g. Writer is
> not installed (which can happen with split rpms) and one tries to open a text
> document, LO simply quits without saying anything. Guessin
Hey,
> Please review the attached stuffs. I would like to add it to master and
> libreoffice-3-4. Not affecting LibreOffice. It adds support to download
> extra stuffs.
Didn't you forget to actually attach something? :) ;)
B.
___
LibreOffice mailing li
Hi Markus,
On Fri, 2011-04-22 at 19:29 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
> Hello Kohei,
>
> yes you're right. This part was copied from another method and I
> didn't notice it. But I don't think that you must check for
> ScDocShell, because the whole class is build without any check for it.
Agreed.
Hello Kohei,
yes you're right. This part was copied from another method and I didn't
notice it. But I don't think that you must check for ScDocShell, because the
whole class is build without any check for it.
Should I send a reworked patch? There are just the two occurences of this
check. Only th
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
André Schnabel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||36496
--
Configure bugmail: https://bu
On 22/04/2011 18:45, Andras Timar wrote:
Hi Sophie,
2011/4/22 Sophie Gautier:
Just a short reminder that we will now need the KeyID build to check our
localization. Would it be possible Petr that you provide it in the next week
or so?
Only one en_US build is needed and the corresponding sdf.
Hi Sophie,
2011/4/22 Sophie Gautier :
> Just a short reminder that we will now need the KeyID build to check our
> localization. Would it be possible Petr that you provide it in the next week
> or so?
> Only one en_US build is needed and the corresponding sdf.
I tried to build a key ID build but
Hi all,
Just a short reminder that we will now need the KeyID build to check our
localization. Would it be possible Petr that you provide it in the next
week or so?
Only one en_US build is needed and the corresponding sdf.
Thanks in advance
Kind regards
Sophie
Hi,
Please review the attached stuffs. I would like to add it to master and
libreoffice-3-4. Not affecting LibreOffice. It adds support to download
extra stuffs.
Can anyone help me how can I unpack these files in extras module. Should I
create makefile.mk here? Should I unpack it to extras/source
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 22:34 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
> Hello,
>
> here a short patch that reworks the
> ScVbaWorksheet::getAutoFilterMode/setAutoFilterMode methods.
Hi Markus,
Just a minor thing. In ScVbaWorksheet::setAutoFilterMode(), you do
+if (bAutoFilterMode && pDoc)
but you
On Friday 22 of April 2011, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
> Hi Lubos,
>
> On 2011-04-21 at 17:12 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > > Then, there's sal-disable-backtrace.diff,
> > > which I can happily merge - just set DISABLE_SAL_BACKTRACE then.
> >
> > Again, it's more about the default being wrong, as in th
Hi,
> These are the left arrow comments // <-- if you want to remove them all.
> :-)
>
> ~1500 lines discarded.
>
> The big one is in bugzilla:
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=45945
Thanks, pushed all of the above (from the previous two messages + the big one
from bugzilla).
K
Hello,
could somebody review the attached patch for bnc#689116? When e.g. Writer is
not installed (which can happen with split rpms) and one tries to open a text
document, LO simply quits without saying anything. Guessing from the
surrounding code it's correct, but I'd prefer it to be checke
Present:
Thorten, Norbert, Kendy, Bjoern, Petr,
Michael, Andras, Kohei, Mitch
* AA completed:
+ Thorsten to fix last vmethod warnings (done)
+ update release plan page based on minutes
+ get some graphite2 screenshot / feature foo (done)
+ add Unity
Hello,
Following a discussion on IRC with Llunak, here is a problem.
In the main function of libs-core/desktop/source/app/app.cxx Line 1599,
there's a declaration+init variable :
int nAcquireCount( 0 );
then nothing until this line 1880 :
if (nAcquireCount)
Application::AcquireSolarMutex(
Hi Lubos,
On 2011-04-21 at 17:12 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > Then, there's sal-disable-backtrace.diff,
> > which I can happily merge - just set DISABLE_SAL_BACKTRACE then.
>
> Again, it's more about the default being wrong, as in the usual case the
> current default is about spamming the ou
Am 22.04.2011 09:16, schrieb Korrawit Pruegsanusak:
> Hello Martin,
>
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 03:00, Martin Kepplinger
> wrote:
>> diff --git a/sw/source/ui/inc/frmmgr.hxx b/sw/source/ui/inc/frmmgr.hxx
>> -SW_DLLPRIVATE void _UpdateFlyFrm();//Nacharbeit nach Einfuegen
>> oder Updat
Hi Julien,
I'm too busy right now, but i tried to see what is happening. Look the error
message, it refers to
/libo/clone/testing/test/source/cpp/officeconnection.cxx with this
assertion:
CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL(
osl_Process_E_TimedOut,
osl_joinProcessWith
Hello,
I've runned a cppcheck last git version on libs-core (master branch
updated today) and found this oddity :
[basic/source/app/mybasic.cxx:265] ->
[basic/source/app/mybasic.cxx:260]: (style) Found duplicate branches for
if and else.
[embeddedobj/source/msole/olepersist.cxx:1835] ->
[embe
Hi Pablo,
On 2011-04-21 at 15:17 -0400, Pablo Duboue wrote:
> I somehow feel the current LibO build scripts are doing things in two
> places. The parameters to the configure script plus the set_soenv
> script. From a conceptual perspective, it bothers me but if I'm the
> only one feeling like tha
Hi Cédric,
These are the left arrow comments // <-- if you want to remove them all. :-)
~1500 lines discarded.
The big one is in bugzilla:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=45945
Under the LGPLv3+ / MPL license.
Regards,
Júlio.
From 34155f656ff5bab268f65f92e2d2ba1f76868bc5 Mon Sep
I made the attached patches to get rid of the 'ooo-services.rdb' file
and fix the disabled-python build. Though, now I get a general
configuration error. stderr shows following message:
Error: File
/mnt/data/tmp/portage/app-office/libreoffice-3.3.99.1/work/libreoffice-bootstrap-3.3.99.1/d
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Allen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unspecified |LibO 3.4 Beta2
--
Configure bugmail: https://bu
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Rainer Bielefeld changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||36451
--
Configure bugmail: https://
> What is that supposed to mean? It certainly doesn't sound like a
> coherent, constructive contribution to the issue!
That is because I am basically an incoherent dribbling idiot, la la la, na na
splutgh xzbbpfft! Me wants more porridge!
--tml
___
What is that supposed to mean? It certainly doesn't sound like a
coherent, constructive contribution to the issue!
What "help" do you need? I am not the one who compiles that packages,
so I am not in a position to change settings that have to be changed
while compiling.
When the code for L
PS: Ed: this is a list where developers discuss developer issues.
It is not intended for people to bring up ideas/wishes .. You may do so,
but (part of) the answer always is: can you help ;-)
Cor
Tor Lillqvist wrote (22-04-11 12:21)
set when compiling the product. I'm not sure [...] why any
Hi Martin,
Sorry for my bad interpretation. :-)
Regards,
Júlio.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
> set when compiling the product. I'm not sure [...] why any help is needed.
Yeah. Maybe if you just wish hard enough your dream will come true.
--tml
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman
Not sure how I could help. I'm not a programmer, but as I understand it
settings like where to install and whether to replace other packages are
set when compiling the product. I'm not sure how anyone other than the
person compiling the packages can help, or indeed why any help is needed.
To
> Can you please make sure that future developer builds are compiled to
> install in a separate folder and do not disturb previously installed
> stable versions.
Anything is possible. It is just a small matter of programming. Maybe you could
help?
--tml
__
forgotten PUSHED flag again
On Fri, 2011-04-22 at 11:38 +0200, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
> Hello Anthony,
>
> Many thanks for your patch. I just pushed it in the master branch. Keep
> providing good patches like this!
>
> Regards,
>
> On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 15:27 +0300, Anthony Durity wrote:
> > H
Hello Maxime,
Many thanks for your patch. I haven't tried it yet, but I pushed it. If
anyone complains we'll see it quickly, but it looked good to me.
Regards,
On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 22:11 -0400, Maxime Côté wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is my first easy hack. I made change in the function
> check_a
Hi KAMI,
I just pushed your patch in the repos. Thanks for it.
Regards,
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 10:06 +0200, KAMI911 KAMI911 wrote:
>
> Hi Andras,
>
> I tried to use internal toolkit:
> "
> checking which translate-toolkit to use... internal
> "
> But when I try to build translations I got this
Hello Anthony,
Many thanks for your patch. I just pushed it in the master branch. Keep
providing good patches like this!
Regards,
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 15:27 +0300, Anthony Durity wrote:
> Hello good people,
>
>
> If someone related to this area could give this patch the once over.
> Please fi
Forgot to add the PUSHED flag.
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 16:23 -0300, Kayo Hamid wrote:
> From cppcheck: Using .empty() instead of .size() can be faster.
> .size() can take linear time but .empty() is guaranteed to take
> constant time
>
> Sending for review.
>
> revol_
> _
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 16:23 -0300, Kayo Hamid wrote:
> From cppcheck: Using .empty() instead of .size() can be faster.
> .size() can take linear time but .empty() is guaranteed to take
> constant time
Many thanks for that other patch. I just pushed it too!
--
Cédric Bosdonnat
I downloaded 3.4 Beta 1 and 3.4 Bata 2 under Windows 7, and in both
cases installing the beta version overwrote the stable version I already
had installed, and even if I set it to install in a different folder the
installer still removed the stable version. Similarly installing the
DEB package
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 14:40 -0300, Kayo Hamid wrote:
> cppcheck variableScope
Many thanks for the patch! I just pushed it. For the next patches it
would be great if you could use git format-patch to generate the patches
from the commits in the git repos. That would save us quite some work
picking
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Bug 35673 depends on bug 36262, which changed state.
Bug 36262 Summary: Undo BrOffice, return to LibreOffice
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36262
What|Old Value |New Value
--
Hello Júlio,
Thanks for your response. I tried your advice with a "rm -rf unxlng*"
before and the compilation goes further.
Now I've got this :
/home/maryline/compile-libreoffice/libo/solver/300/unxlngi6/installation/opt/program/../basis-link/program/libsofficeapp.so(+0x25891)[0xb76cc891]
/home
Hi,
I have updated the tinbuild script a bit so that more instances can
co-exist conveniently on platforms where 'flock' is available. This
way, you can tinderbox both eg. master and libreoffice-3-4, and do not
have to worry that they would eat all the resources.
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libr
Hm, I should have read the whole thread first...sorry for the noise.
Christina
Am 22.04.2011 09:27, schrieb Chr. Rossmanith:
Am 21.04.2011 22:13, schrieb Júlio Hoffimann:
Nice patches Martin! :-)
Next time you could attach the files, instead of put them in the mail
body. So, the developers j
Am 21.04.2011 22:13, schrieb Júlio Hoffimann:
Nice patches Martin! :-)
Next time you could attach the files, instead of put them in the mail
body. So, the developers just download and apply your changes. ;-)
Martin has already pushed them. He just posted them for reviewing.
Christina
Hello Martin,
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 03:00, Martin Kepplinger
wrote:
> diff --git a/sw/source/ui/inc/frmmgr.hxx b/sw/source/ui/inc/frmmgr.hxx
> - SW_DLLPRIVATE void _UpdateFlyFrm(); //Nacharbeit nach Einfuegen
> oder Update
> + SW_DLLPRIVATE void _UpdateFlyFrm(); // post-tre
55 matches
Mail list logo
