On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 09:18:14PM +0100, Xisco Faulí wrote:
> In a previous commit, OSL_ASSERT were changed into OSL_FAIL but 2 of them
> created the build fail.
No, these changes are correct. You are probably missing the definition
of OSL_FAIL (which I added over the weekend), in which case you
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 01:31:36PM +0100, Julien Nabet wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've got a compilation error in libs-gui/toolkit.
> Entering /home/maryline/compile-libreoffice/libo/toolkit/uiconfig/layout
>
> dmake: Warning: -- Found file corresponding to virtual target
> [message-box.xml].
> dmake:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34404
Andras Timar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||33701
--- Comment #7 from Andras Timar 2
On 28/02/11 21:51, Michael Meeks wrote:
>> Why the surprise? How long has Huffman been around - 30 years? 40? And
>> > you CANNOT do better than Huffman (there are other equally as good
>> > algorithms, though).
> Ho hum; glad to know Huffman compression is optimal ;-) (personally I'd
> go f
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 09:26:46PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 20:07 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
> > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> > 0x000801535510 in ?? ()
> > (gdb) bt
> > #0 0x000801535510 in ?? ()
> > #1 0x0008010b7db9 in __cxa_
Hi Fernand, all!
Am Freitag, den 25.02.2011, 16:01 +0100 schrieb Fernand Vanrie:
> Thomas ,
>
> No we are not placing video in odt, files, but our editors (while there
> are working in writer), needs to see some video content as a "source"
> for there work.
Wow, that seems to be a very special
Hi Daniel,
also from my side - thanks for having a look at the bug filing and the
results created so far. It's great to see somebody picking up stuff like
that to improve some "hidden" sides of LibreOffice ...
If anybody wants to continue with this topic, then please CC the Design
Team or me, so
ACCESSIBLE_EVENT_NOTIFICATION_ENABLED was never define. So the #ifdef #endif
"brackets" could go away.
---
.../extended/accessibleiconchoicectrlentry.hxx | 16
.../extended/accessibleiconchoicectrlentry.cxx | 15 ---
2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 31 de
Hi Wols,
On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 18:04 +, Wols Lists wrote:
> > So - personally, I find it amazing that ZIP is better than LZMA - ever,
> > it is such an older compression algorithm, and this flies in the face of
> > everything I've seen in practise with it [ eg. we use LZMA for our RPMs
> >
Le Mon, 28 Feb 2011 21:45:36 +,
Caolán McNamara a écrit :
> On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 04:27 -0500, Kevin Hunter wrote:
> Three possibilities I guess,
>
> 1) remove the "explicit", but I'm sure its there due to some other
> horribly implicit conversion horror
> 2) add a operator+(sal_Char), eith
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 04:27 -0500, Kevin Hunter wrote:
> Is that + operator expected to work with an O*String and a single character?
>
> From analysis with Sébastien Le Ray, it looks like what's happening is
> that the b OString is converted to sal_Char *, and the compiler uses
> int( '\n' ) (=
Hello,
pushed, thanks,
Maybe not forgetting the [patch] tag in subject will help not to miss
your submission.
best regards
On 02/27/2011 04:51 PM, Arnaud Versini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch remove some useless comments in msfilter.
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> Arnaud Versini
>
>
>
> ___
Guys I have something that I see a lot and do not know way someone will
use it:
//code
static WinSalMenuItem* ImplGetSalMenuItem( HMENU hMenu, UINT nPos, BOOL
bByPosition=TRUE )
{
DWORD err=0;
MENUITEMINFOW mi;
memset(&mi, 0, sizeof(mi));
mi.cbSize = sizeof( mi );
mi.fMask
On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 20:07 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> 0x000801535510 in ?? ()
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0x000801535510 in ?? ()
> #1 0x0008010b7db9 in __cxa_finalize (dso=0x0) at
> /usr/src/lib/libc/../libc/stdlib/atexit.c:178
> #2
Hi,
This message is FYI, to let you know what we're doing, since it's relevant
to LO.
Since today I am a full-time developer of the Unhosted project. The goal of
the Unhosted project is to promote a few decentralization tricks (see
http://www.unhosted.org/ for details) and help bring free softwar
Le 2011-02-28 07:48, Andreas Jaeger a écrit :
On Monday, February 28, 2011 11:46:03 Petr Mladek wrote:
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Jaeger píše v Po 28. 02. 2011 v 09:49 +0100:
The transition from OpenOffice.org to LibreOffice still has a few minor
documentation blips but more importantly, users should
Le 2011-02-28 14:09, Andrea Pescetti a écrit :
Marc Paré wrote:
If this is an official part of the OpenSuse project and if it is not
based on facts I would like to see a retraction on their part. I have no
idea from where they got their information.
I must say I've seen, in non-publicly archiv
Marc Paré wrote:
> If this is an official part of the OpenSuse project and if it is not
> based on facts I would like to see a retraction on their part. I have no
> idea from where they got their information.
I must say I've seen, in non-publicly archived Italian mailing lists,
reliable reports
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:56:56AM +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:11:46AM +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 09:30 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
> >
> With STAR_RESOURCEPATH set, gdb ends up in an eternal wait state, exactly
> like when I ran it fro
Hi Fridrich
Thanks a lot for your work setting up this !!!
I sincerrely hope it will be usefull and that other french public
institutions will join the process to give ressources to our wonderfull
libreOffice developpers
Laurent
___
LibreOffice mailin
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 03:33:57PM +0100, Axel Reimer wrote:
>Hello,
>
>
>
>I had a look at the debian packages of LibreOffice 3.3.1 and I recognized
>that all version numbers changed from 3.3.0-19 to 3.3.1-19.
Those are not the debian packages of LibreOffice 3.3.1. It's .deb fi
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 6:24 AM, Italo Vignoli
wrote:
> On 2/28/11 2:22 PM, Randolph Dohm wrote:
>
>
> P.S. - The fact that our email address is on the public website is not an
> implicit authorization to write. In addition, you have sent a second message
> before getting any answer to the first o
On 28/02/11 12:16, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi Kami,
>
> Wow - I'm so sorry, I missed your sexy mail for a week; that sucks -
> over-much merging on another branch :-) Tor has been on FTO, and
> Fridrich with his head down releasing 3.3.1 (and the Novell LibreOffice
> product) - which in part
Hi Jan,
On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 16:51 +0100, Jan Darmochwal wrote:
> This patch speeds up make_installer.pl by about 5% on linux
> (probably much less speedup on windows). The Patch is LGPLv3+/MPL.
Nice :-) not only faster, but smaller, cleaner and more readable - I
like it, pushed to maste
Le 2011-02-28 06:52, Andreas Jaeger a écrit :
On Monday, February 28, 2011 11:55:28 Michael Meeks wrote:
Hi Marc / AJ,
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 21:56 -0500, Marc Paré wrote:
We just had this posted on the Marketing list. I am not sure if this is
true. Can anyone comment on this? Are there reports
Hi Christina,
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Christina Roßmanith
wrote:
>
> I admit, I can't follow the discussion. But during translation: are the '~'
> important?
~ specifies the mnemonic in the menu (the underlined letter in the
menu, used for keyboard-access)
ciao
Christian
__
I pushed both of the patches. Thank you for the custom action. Now, the
thing would be to teach the installer to execute it and try how costly
it is on install time.
Thanks again
F.
On 19/02/11 15:32, Steven Butler wrote:
Hi Again,
I forgot to add this change to have it build the custom act
2011/2/28 Christina Roßmanith :
> Hi,
>
> I admit, I can't follow the discussion. But during translation: are the '~'
> important?
>
> Some lines of a diff for translation of comments:
>
> - /* ### ACHTUNG: Neuer Text in Resource? Grafik ~kopieren :
> ~Grafik kopieren */
> - /
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34404
--- Comment #6 from sasha.libreoff...@gmail.com 2011-02-28 07:29:40 PST ---
I am sorry about incorrect previous bug. bug 34834 instead
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
Hi Norbert, *,
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> the Mac daily build has been failing for the last 2 iteration:
>
> http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/MacOS/master/2011-02-28-09.00.54/master~2011-02-28-09.00.54.failed.log.bz2
line 114112 ff.
(see also
http://tinde
Hi,
I admit, I can't follow the discussion. But during translation: are the
'~' important?
Some lines of a diff for translation of comments:
-/* ### ACHTUNG: Neuer Text in Resource? Grafik ~kopieren : ~Grafik
kopieren */
-/* ### ACHTUNG: Neuer Text in Resource? Grafik
At 10:14am -0500 Mon, 28 Feb 2011, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
So, the idea behind this easy hack task is *not* to convert
rtl::OUString to OUString by using "using ::rtl::OUString" per se. The
idea behind it is to remove using namespace rtl, and if that causes
build breakage because of the use of non-
On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 01:45 -0500, Kevin Hunter wrote:
> Hullo List,
>
> A simpleton patch to convert the more sane using ::rtl::* syntax.
Hi Kevin,
So, the idea behind this easy hack task is *not* to convert
rtl::OUString to OUString by using "using ::rtl::OUString" per se. The
idea behind it
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34404
Cédric Bosdonnat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|34821 |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34404
sasha.libreoff...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||34821
--
Configure bugmail
This translates the rest of the german comments in writer/sw/source/ui/docvw
to english.
This is contributed under the terms of the MPL 1.1 / GPLv3+ / LGPLv3+ triple
license.
---
sw/source/ui/docvw/SidebarWin.cxx |2 +-
sw/source/ui/docvw/romenu.cxx | 13 +++---
sw/source/ui/docvw/srced
This translates the german code comments in edtwin.cxx to english.
This is contributed under the terms of the MPL 1.1 / GPLv3+ / LGPLv3+ triple
license.
---
sw/source/ui/docvw/edtwin.cxx | 322 -
1 files changed, 154 insertions(+), 168 deletions(-)
diff -
This translates the german code comments of edtwin2.cxx and edtwin3.cxx to
english.
This is contributed under the terms of the MPL 1.1 / GPLv3+ / LGPLv3+ triple
license.
---
sw/source/ui/docvw/edtwin2.cxx | 18 +-
sw/source/ui/docvw/edtwin3.cxx | 26 +-
This translates the german code comments of docvw.hrc, docvw.src and edtdd.cxx
to english.
This is contributed under the terms of the MPL 1.1 / GPLv3+ / LGPLv3+ triple
license.
---
sw/source/ui/docvw/docvw.hrc |2 +-
sw/source/ui/docvw/docvw.src |6 +++---
sw/source/ui/docvw/edtdd.cxx |
Hi,
This translates the german code comments of writer/sw/source/ui/docvw to
english.
Thanks!
martin
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
the Mac daily build has been failing for the last 2 iteration:
after bisection, this seems due to binfilter which is broken starting
filter:49a4e7c852493cad34b97d212be6dc55fcf23cad
the failed build.log can be found at:
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/MacOS/master/2011-02-28-09.00.54/maste
Hello,
I had a look at the debian packages of LibreOffice 3.3.1 and I recognized that
all version numbers changed from 3.3.0-19 to 3.3.1-19.
But there is one package libreoffice3-ure which had the version number 1.7.0-19
in LO 3.3.0 and still has the number 1.7.0-19 in LO 3.3.1. But: the MD5SUM
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34404
Cédric Bosdonnat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|34757 |
--- Comment #5 from Cédric Bosdonnat
On 2/28/11 2:22 PM, Randolph Dohm wrote:
Please send me your Key and we can chat there about the options of a
bundle or integration or gui style branding/adjustment.
Hi Randolph, we are supposed to be the media spokespersons and not the
official representatives of The Document Foundation.
W
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34404
Cédric Bosdonnat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|34821 |
--- Comment #4 from Cédric Bosdonnat
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34404
sasha.libreoff...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||33361, 34821, 34757
--- Com
Dear Florian, Olivier, Charles, Italo,
and all
I want to suggest that libreoffice gets an open source and serverless
(maintainance free) Instant Messenger - or even more than that, a
secure communication platform,
which allows users in the office to communicate secure. This is done
over 0.5.1.a Re
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34404
Alex Thurgood changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||33904
--
Configure bugmail: https://bug
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Jaeger píše v Po 28. 02. 2011 v 09:49 +0100:
> The transition from OpenOffice.org to LibreOffice still has a few minor
> documentation blips but more importantly, users should be cautious. The raft
> of new functionality has created a few specific issues, such as loss of dat
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32894
Alex Thurgood changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|33904 |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.fre
Hi Marc / AJ,
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 21:56 -0500, Marc Paré wrote:
> We just had this posted on the Marketing list. I am not sure if this is
> true. Can anyone comment on this? Are there reports of loss of data?
This is news to me too; AJ - where did this block come from:
> raft of new f
Hi,
Finally, finished the first time full build of LO on windows with the help from
some really kind guys here, thank you all, Cheers!
I, as a kind one also, am a chinese with few years of java and C/C++ experience.
Have just convinced my boss to use LO, take over MSOffice and OOo.
Honestly spea
Hi,
reviewed and pushed. Changed your translation of "Textbaustein" = "text
block" to "auto text" because I think that is what LibreOffice uses as term.
Christina
Am 27.02.2011 21:21, schrieb Martin Kepplinger:
Hi,
This translates all german code comments in writer/sw/source/ui/dochdl to
en
On Monday, February 28, 2011 11:46:03 Petr Mladek wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> Andreas Jaeger píše v Po 28. 02. 2011 v 09:49 +0100:
> > The transition from OpenOffice.org to LibreOffice still has a few minor
> > documentation blips but more importantly, users should be cautious. The
> > raft of new fu
Sorry - I accidentally pushed that patch while I pushed some translation
patches. So if there are any objections please explain, how I can undo
this...
Christina Rossmanith
Am 25.02.2011 21:52, schrieb Christina Roßmanith:
Hi,
the "Textbaustein" (German) feature is "auto text" in LibreOffic
On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 21:52 +0100, Christina Roßmanith wrote:
> the "Textbaustein" (German) feature is "auto text" in LibreOffice. I
> renamed the constant accordingly. Build of sw was successful.
Lovely; please do commit it :-) with this stuff, if you don't have to
change a .idl file, an
Hi Kami,
Wow - I'm so sorry, I missed your sexy mail for a week; that sucks -
over-much merging on another branch :-) Tor has been on FTO, and
Fridrich with his head down releasing 3.3.1 (and the Novell LibreOffice
product) - which in part explains the lack of response to you (and
Steven)
On Monday, February 28, 2011 11:55:28 Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi Marc / AJ,
>
> On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 21:56 -0500, Marc Paré wrote:
> > We just had this posted on the Marketing list. I am not sure if this is
> > true. Can anyone comment on this? Are there reports of loss of data?
>
> This is
58 matches
Mail list logo
