On Feb 27, 2011, at 1:56 PM, Rafael Dominguez wrote:
>
> <0001-Remove-deprecated-container-list-for-std-vector.patch>
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Feb 27, 2011, at 8:38 AM, Rafael Dominguez wrote:
> More list container cleaning.
> <0001-Remove-SvULongs-and-replace-it-with-std-ve.libs-core.patch><0001-Remove-deprecated-container-List-and-update.libs-gui.patch>
___
LibreOffice mailing list
Libre
Greetings,
We are having a special on a selection of custom imprinted pens below. My name is Joseph Taylor and I would like to talk to the person who handles the marketing. Please let me know if you would like to receive samples. I can also provide a virtual image showing your logo on any item
We just had this posted on the Marketing list. I am not sure if this is
true. Can anyone comment on this? Are there reports of loss of data?
I am not sure if this is the official news blog for OpenSuse.
=
http://news.opensuse.org/2011/02/26/opens
Hi,
Here's a patch who removes bogus comments. It's realeased under LGPLv3+ / MPL.
I also have a question: do we need to remove the lines "@author OD"?
Antoine
0001-Remove-bogus-comments.patch
Description: Binary data
___
LibreOffice mailing list
Lib
Better with files attached :)
2011/2/27 Guillaume Poussel :
> Hi,
>
> Please find attached 2 patches in base/ which clean useless comments up.
>
> Regards,
> Guillaume
>
> (still under LGPLv3+/MPL)
>
0001-Remove-date-comments-in-base.patch
Description: Binary data
0002-Remove-bogus-comments.pa
Hi,
Please find attached 2 patches in base/ which clean useless comments up.
Regards,
Guillaume
(still under LGPLv3+/MPL)
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
0001-Remove-deprecated-container-list-for-std-vector.patch
Description: Binary data
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
2011.02.19. 0:39 keltezéssel, Andras Timar írta:
> Hi,
>
> Can you please check this bug:
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33189
>
> If it is not easy to fix, I'll work-around it for 3.3.2.
> OOo also has this bug, reported at
> http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11599
2011.02.22. 14:59 keltezéssel, Jan Holesovsky írta:
> Hi Jean-Baptiste,
>
> On 2011-02-20 at 17:00 +0100, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
>
>> I fixed bug 34498 : Checkbox label truncated when translated in French
>> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34498
>>
>> My patch attached to the bug
This translates all remaining german code comments of
writer/sw/source/ui/dochdl to english.
This is contributed under the terms of the MPL 1.1 / GPLv3+ / LGPLv3+ triple
license.
---
sw/source/ui/dochdl/selglos.cxx |2 +-
sw/source/ui/dochdl/selglos.src |4 +-
sw/source/ui/dochdl/swdtfl
This translates all german code comments in gloshdl.cxx to english.
This is contributed under the terms of the MPL 1.1 / GPLv3+ / LGPLv3+ triple
license.
---
sw/source/ui/dochdl/gloshdl.cxx | 75 +++
1 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --
Hi,
This translates all german code comments in writer/sw/source/ui/dochdl to
english.
For reviewing, thanks in advance!
martin
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreo
In a previous commit, OSL_ASSERT were changed into OSL_FAIL but 2 of them
created the build fail.
From 6a1c81ffb1bfdb5361cf885a89d29b8fcb362e2d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Xisco Fauli
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 21:12:58 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Revert 2 OSL_FAIL
---
sfx2/source/doc/guisaveas.cxx |
Hi list,
Attached is a patch that improves Writer page as described in
fdo#31251[1]. After a quick poll on various LibreOffice user it appears
that a halo on the four borders is confusing so we have a smooth shadow
on two borders.
There are still some little glitches and book mode is not fully ha
Le 27/02/2011 07:59, Jean-Baptiste Faure a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I fixed bug 34647 : Load/Save General option : room for a FR string
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34647
>
> My patch is attached to the bug report and is under the LGPLv3+/MPL
> dual license.
Sorry, the link goes to the w
More list container cleaning.
0001-Remove-SvULongs-and-replace-it-with-std-ve.libs-core.patch
Description: Binary data
0001-Remove-deprecated-container-List-and-update.libs-gui.patch
Description: Binary data
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@li
More list cleaning for writer.
0001-Remove-deprecated-List-for-std-vector-String.writer.patch
Description: Binary data
0002-Change-deprecated-List-for-std-vector-Stri.libs-core.patch
Description: Binary data
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@li
Hello,
I've got a compilation error in libs-gui/toolkit.
Entering /home/maryline/compile-libreoffice/libo/toolkit/uiconfig/layout
dmake: Warning: -- Found file corresponding to virtual target
[message-box.xml].
dmake: Warning: -- Found file corresponding to virtual target
[tab-dialog.xml].
Hi,
This patch remove some useless comments in msfilter.
Thanks
--
Arnaud Versini
From b30f33d40c17417d6be0db69aaf285668f7d91c6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arnaud Versini
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 16:41:34 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Cleanup msfilter.
---
filter/source/msfilter/countryid.cxx
Greetings
From c5b8c6d29ebd8bebcb7f8ba8bfb3fefc1dabc1b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Xisco Fauli
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 15:07:02 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Remove Dead Code
---
sfx2/source/dialog/basedlgs.cxx | 10 -
sfx2/source/dialog/dinfdlg.cxx|3 +-
sfx2/source/dialog/d
Hullo List,
I hope this isn't a silly question, but I'm a little confused by a
current behavior of the O*String classes, and wondering if it's A)
known, and B) expected.
Please consider this code snippet:
-
using ::rtl::OString;
OString a( "My Test String: " );
OString b( "Gobble Wobble
Hi,
2011/2/25 Caolán McNamara :
> On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 20:37 +0100, Christina Roßmanith wrote:
> timar: po files can have translator-comments in them to help translators
> about ambiguous terms/words, while the .src/.sdf format doesn't though,
> right ? I recall a problem with trying to get the S
23 matches
Mail list logo