Le 14/02/2011 10:12, David Tardon a écrit :
> On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 11:22:41AM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
>> I did "make dev-install" to try the result. No problem although I wonder
>> why this command did not install the bundled extensions.
>> Is there some option to add to do a complete
Hi
Thorsten Behrens wrote (09-02-11 08:25)
Cor Nouws wrote:
Quote:
" before the next plugfest it would be really useful if someone
from the LibreOffice community would set up a copy of LibreOffice
for Officeshots.org (ideally on multiple platforms and both a trunk
[...]
I did that in the pas
Hi Thorsten,
Thorsten Behrens wrote (09-02-11 08:21)
Cor Nouws wrote:
Bugzilla query returns "zarro boogs" so hence my question: is anyone
aware of the bug in base wrt tool bars for report building?
See users list
[...]
at least I'm not - so better file a bug for it. I'd rather have a
dupe,
Hi! Sorry for the long time gap between the two patch sets.
In the following two patches I continue the work on renaming "Default
Formatting" to "Clear Direct Formatting".
In the past patchset, Cédric reported problems applying patches to the
help files so I'm submitting this patch refreshe
On 01/05/2011 10:29 AM, NoOp wrote:
> On 01/05/2011 02:06 AM, Michael Meeks wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> On Fri, 2010-12-31 at 11:23 -0800, NoOp wrote:
>>> (soffice:22820): GStreamer-WARNING **: Failed to load plugin
>>> '/usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstffmpeg.so':
>>> /opt/libreoffice/program/../basis
On 14/02/2011 15:22, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
ODF 1.1 was approved more than four years ago, and 1.2 is
still not done - this is something that just won't fly. LibO uses
ODF as its native file format, so there's really no other way to
save new features.
Hi Thorsten and thank you for your detaile
Hi Jonas,
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 20:17 +0100, Jonas Finnemann Jensen wrote:
>
> I think it ought to be that easy... More documentation would speedup
> development and reduce bugs dramatically...
> (Maybe we should write a few doxygen comments for EditEngine, if we
> figure out how it work
Hi Thomas, Michael, all!
Thanks for the great discussion ... let me add a few thoughts :-)
Am Sonntag, den 13.02.2011, 19:09 +0100 schrieb Thomas Arnhold:
> Christoph thanks for the discussion link and the specs!
You're welcome. I'd love to play a more proactive role at the moment,
but referring
Hi,
pushed 7 more diffs.
Christina
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Le Mon, 14 Feb 2011 21:21:52 +,
Caolán McNamara a écrit :
> As an aside, if you're big into the sal unit tests there's probably
> quite a few of them potentially useful which haven't been tweaked to
> work again, or are behind SUBSEQUENT_TESTS but probably don't need to
> be inside that condi
On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 14:52 +0100, Sébastien Le Ray wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> Since the toString() method is mentioned in the O*StringBuffer
> documentation I thought it was a good idea to actually have it...
Yeah, especially handy because makeStringAndClear destroys the old
contents, which makes it
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 21:07 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> Can you confirm that this patch, and potential future ones, are
> submitted under our recommended LGPLv3+/MPL licence combo ?
Doh, sorry, saw that now in your follow up mail.
C.
___
LibreOffi
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 22:02 +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote:
> You're right with ww8toolbar.*
We need to make a list of the ones that belong to LibreOffice solely and
have no copyright attribution and nag the initial committer to stick a
correct header on top.
C.
On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 23:55 -0500, L P wrote:
> Consider this a trial balloon to make I'm sure that I'm doing this
> right and helping -- and not hindering -- the project.
Sure, looks good, pushed. Can you confirm that this patch, and potential
future ones, are submitted under our recommended LGPL
On 02/14/2011 09:32 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 19:45 +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I stumbled across some files w/o any copyright notice in
>> writerfilter/source/dmapper. So I grep'ed around and found are more or
>> less long list of files with copyright notice
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 19:45 +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I stumbled across some files w/o any copyright notice in
> writerfilter/source/dmapper. So I grep'ed around and found are more or
> less long list of files with copyright notice missing. I've attached it
> to the mail. I've only se
(reposting with [PATCH] keyword
although the fix for this issue will appear from dev300m98 onwards it
would be worth I think getting this into
a) libreoffice-3-3 ( one ack please )
and possibly
b) libreoffice-3.3.1 ( 3 acks please )
I only mention 3.3.1 because there is a request in the bug
Petr Mladek wrote:
> The first line fixes accessing aliased out buffer, see
> https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652562#c22
>
> The second line fixes broken if/if/else condition to do not bump the out
> pointer twice, see
> https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652562#c16
>
Ugh. Ye
hi Luke,
I should have known better than to think it was that easy. :)
I think it ought to be that easy... More documentation would speedup
development and reduce bugs dramatically...
(Maybe we should write a few doxygen comments for EditEngine, if we figure
out how it works).
I had a very bad s
Michael Meeks wrote:
> Incidentally, the problem with the wiki is spam (apparently). So - if
> you want an account best to ping Florian Effenberger or someone on the
> sysadmin team. I guess they just turned off account creation for that
> purpose.
>
> Of course, if we have a budding s
Thanks! Pushed it.
Thomas
On 02/14/2011 07:54 PM, Kevin Hunter wrote:
> Hullo List,
>
> One, likely final, cppcheck-found post- to pre-iterator patch.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Kevin
>
>
>
> ___
> LibreOffice mailing list
> LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
Hullo List,
One, likely final, cppcheck-found post- to pre-iterator patch.
Cheers,
Kevin
>From 8648528511581a0ac5cc7f08e9d2e83bd7fef4cd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kevin Hunter
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 13:48:49 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] cppcheck: post- to pre- *crement change
---
vcl/win/sourc
Hi,
I stumbled across some files w/o any copyright notice in
writerfilter/source/dmapper. So I grep'ed around and found are more or
less long list of files with copyright notice missing. I've attached it
to the mail. I've only searched for cxx and hxx files.
I filed a bug at OOo: http://qa.openof
On 14/02/11 17:12, Clio wrote:
Please, have a look at this patch. On my Linux system it seems to work
fine. Here is the issue it could fix:
http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=116920 - "Sometimes
RND returns 1 (one)" .
Here is how the code should look after the patch is applied:
Now I'm sure. It's unused. But the question is, if we want to use
GetListTable() in DomainMapper class to replace pImpl->GetListTable()
with GetListTable(). Could be the case, that this was prepared to. But
wouldn't make anything better ;) So I pushed it, thanks!
Thomas
On 02/14/2011 05:49 PM, Th
Hi Thomas,
Thanks for the correction.
Balint
2011/2/14 Thomas Arnhold
> Hi Balint,
>
> looks good. I've pushed the second one. I slightly changed your patch -
> removed the newlines for the empty methods and didn't remove the
> description in writerfilter/inc/doctok/WW8Document.hxx as this is
Please, have a look at this patch. On my Linux system it seems to work
fine. Here is the issue it could fix:
http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=116920 - "Sometimes RND
returns 1 (one)" .
Here is how the code should look after the patch is applied:
RTLFUNC(Rnd)
{
(void)pBasic;
Hi,
the attached patch fixes crashing oosplash and malformed picture.
The first line fixes accessing aliased out buffer, see
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652562#c22
The second line fixes broken if/if/else condition to do not bump the out
pointer twice, see
https://bugzilla.novell.
Hi Balint,
looks good. I've pushed the second one. I slightly changed your patch -
removed the newlines for the empty methods and didn't remove the
description in writerfilter/inc/doctok/WW8Document.hxx as this is some
kind of doxygen code.
For the first patch, which removes the method, I'm not f
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 16:12 +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote:
> I've updated the wiki.
Incidentally, the problem with the wiki is spam (apparently). So - if
you want an account best to ping Florian Effenberger or someone on the
sysadmin team. I guess they just turned off account creation for t
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 13:40 +, Alfonso Eusebio wrote:
> Thanks all for the input!
>
> For what I can see, the quoted comment was introduced by Kurt Zenker in
> Sep-2006.
>
> ROT13 and the other date management functions present in the calc/addin code
> seem to be part of the newer (UNO base
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 12:49:32PM +0100, Bálint Dózsa
wrote:
> -/**
> - An iterator for traversal of a set of properties.
> -
> - Sample code for use of iterator:
> -
> - \code
> - Return_t function(WW8PropertySet::tPointer pSet)
> - {
> - do_something;
> -
> - WW8PropertyS
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 08:27:53AM +0100, Fridrich Strba wrote:
> Taking mutex on this one will work on its integration today.
>
> On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 23:47 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
> > There's still work to do but the progress so far has been good. I'd like
> > to take advantage of this
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 09:44 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-02-13 at 17:35 +1100, Simon Cropper wrote:
> > The behaviour that I am talking about is...
> > 1. Insert value into A1, select the cell with the mouse so it is
> > highlighted then copy with Ctrl-C
> > 2. Select 3 or more othe
Hi Kevin,
Thanks for the patch. I've pushed it!
Thomas
On 02/14/2011 04:51 PM, Kevin Hunter wrote:
> Hullo List,
>
> Another mini patch, thanks to cppcheck.
>
> Kevin
>
>
>
> ___
> LibreOffice mailing list
> LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
> htt
Hullo List,
Another mini patch, thanks to cppcheck.
Kevin
0001-cppcheck-post-to-pre-crement-change.patch.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listi
I've updated the wiki.
On 02/14/2011 10:40 AM, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi Christina,
>
> On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 21:07 +0100, Christina Roßmanith wrote:
>> binfilter/bf_svtools/source/config/svt_menuoptions.cxx and
>> svtools/source/config/menuoptions.cxx
>
> So - as Tor says, binfilter is su
Gökçen Eraslan píše v Po 14. 02. 2011 v 15:29 +:
> Pazartesi 14 Şubat 2011 günü (saat 13:16:01) Petr Mladek şunları yazmıştı:
> > Gökçen Eraslan píše v Pá 11. 02. 2011 v 15:58 +:
> > > This patch makes ./download command in LibreOffice 3.3.1.0 work with
> > > --without-git option.
> >
> >
Thanks!
On 02/14/2011 02:01 PM, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> Thomas Arnhold wrote:
>> Didn't know that there are bug numbers like this #b449874#.
>>
> Those are from the old Sun-internal bugtracker (in contrast to the
> old StarDivision-internal bugtracker, which is w/o letter prefix) -
> and can be
On Sun, 2011-02-13 at 17:35 +1100, Simon Cropper wrote:
> Kohei,
>
> The behaviour that I am talking about is...
> 1. Insert value into A1, select the cell with the mouse so it is
> highlighted then copy with Ctrl-C
> 2. Select 3 or more other cells -- NOT in a continuous block (e.g. B2
> and C3
although the fix for this issue will appear from dev300m98 onwards it
would be worth I think getting this into
a) libreoffice-3-3 ( one ack please )
and possibly
b) libreoffice-3.3.1 ( 3 acks please )
I only mention 3.3.1 because there is a request in the bug to make
oracle office 3.3.1. The
Cesare Leonardi wrote:
> The question is: why using the extended version by default?
>
Hi Cesare,
well, because we'd otherwise need to stop developing new features
(which have somewhat of an 2/3rd probability of affecting the file
format). ODF 1.1 was approved more than four years ago, and 1.2 is
Hello,
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 11:05 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> > For me, saxparser crashes... I am debugging that but not really getting much
> I wonder if the stlport iterators were simply more robust against
> changes in the underlying structures. Is this a list it is iterating or
> a ha
Thanks all for the input!
For what I can see, the quoted comment was introduced by Kurt Zenker in
Sep-2006.
ROT13 and the other date management functions present in the calc/addin code
seem to be part of the newer (UNO based?) scadding functions.
I've tested ROT13 and a couple of the others suc
Pazartesi 14 Şubat 2011 günü (saat 13:16:01) Petr Mladek şunları yazmıştı:
> Gökçen Eraslan píše v Pá 11. 02. 2011 v 15:58 +:
> > This patch makes ./download command in LibreOffice 3.3.1.0 work with
> > --without-git option.
>
> Thanks a lot for the fix. I have pushed it into the libreoffice-3
(updated subject)
Cedric Bosdonnat píše v Po 14. 02. 2011 v 10:41 +0100:
> Hello Miklos,
>
> The patches looks ok to me. I'ld say ok for 3.3.1.
It was the 3rd approval, so I cherry picked it into the
libreoffice-3-3-1 branch as well.
Best Regards,
Petr
__
Cedric Bosdonnat píše v Po 14. 02. 2011 v 10:41 +0100:
> Hello Miklos,
>
> The patches looks ok to me. I'ld say ok for 3.3.1.
It was the 3rd approval, so I cherry picked it into the
libreoffice-3-3-1 branch as well.
Best Regards,
Petr
___
LibreOffice
Gökçen Eraslan píše v Pá 11. 02. 2011 v 15:58 +:
> This patch makes ./download command in LibreOffice 3.3.1.0 work with
> --without-git option.
Thanks a lot for the fix. I have pushed it into the libreoffice-3-3 and
libreoffice-3-3-1 branches.
Best Regards,
Petr
___
Thomas Arnhold wrote:
> Didn't know that there are bug numbers like this #b449874#.
>
Those are from the old Sun-internal bugtracker (in contrast to the
old StarDivision-internal bugtracker, which is w/o letter prefix) -
and can be elided as well.
Pushed a change that does that.
Cheers,
-- Thor
Cor Nouws wrote:
> Thorsten Behrens wrote (11-02-11 11:53)
> >The Document Foundation is happy to announce the release candidate of
> >LibreOffice 3.3.1. This release candidate is the first in a series of
>
> Thanks, but as written also by others, there are no debs for x86.
>
This was an unfortun
Nice fix again, thank you - it is pushed. :)
-- Thorsten
pgpbIcQ6EA0cH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Michael Meeks wrote:
> Patch looks fine to me too. Petr - if you review it too this'd be great
> to have in 3.3.1
>
Counting 3 ACKs already, pushed for 3.3.1
-- Thorsten
pgp3MZZppYvah.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
LibreOffice mailing list
L
Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32810
>
> If I understand correctly Takao font is used by several Linux distros as
> the default Japanese UI font, so getting that font recognized properly
> is pretty important. The change is pretty simple and IMO non-intrusive.
Hi Martin,
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 00:13 +0100, Martin Srebotnjak wrote:
> If LO dmg will grow to 350Mb or 400Mb (with help in all languages)
So - in fact, we can compress the per-language help content down to
around 1.5Mb of real content (with some lifting); That would still mean
another +
On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 20:22 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-gui/commit/?h=libreoffice-3-3&id=3b8c4baec540c851ebf97d933e11150192defa87
> > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32810
Patch looks fine to me too. Petr - if you review it t
Hy,
I have removed some dead code (0002-Remove-dead-code.patch), and one unused
method (0001-Remove-unused-method-GetListTable.patch).
Regards,
Balint Dozsa
From ade4725bd494c9c8bf01a94cb4b16b8b8baac282 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?B=C3=A1lint=20D=C3=B3zsa?=
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 12
Andras Timar wrote:
> Please decide if these patches should be integrated or deleted.
> Otherwise it will be hard to localize the strings in them.
>
I'll put mine in - the optional-outplace-ole prolly
conditionally-compiled, or as experimental feature.
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
pgpnr1zhSIjsy.pgp
Desc
Hi,
On 14 February 2011 21:05, Michael Meeks wrote:
> I wonder if the stlport iterators were simply more robust against
> changes in the underlying structures. Is this a list it is iterating or
> a hash ? If the latter then changes in the 'hash' had undefined (but
> non-crashy) behaviour
Hi there,
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 06:41 -0700, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> > And after a while of dismissing these, saxparser goes into an infinite loop.
>
> For me, saxparser crashes... I am debugging that but not really getting much
..
> iterator i is iterating so that i points to some bogus data and
Andrew Wafaa wrote:
> I'm trying to build LO on openSUSE 11.3, but get a failure with make.
> The steps I've taken are:
>
Hi Andrew,
um, looks like a bigger cock-up - can you re-do that, pipe all the
make output to a file, and make that available somewhere?
Or ideally, come to irc & let's work i
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32894
Bug 32894 depends on bug 33744, which changed state.
Bug 33744 Summary: BrOffice brand for LibreOffice not in Linux
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33744
What|Old Value |New Value
---
Petr Mladek píše v Pá 11. 02. 2011 v 22:54 +0100:
> Hi,
>
> the "BrOffice" name was not in sync with the used UI localization. The
> attached patch helped to solve it. See
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33744#c12 for more details.
>
> I need review from 2 more people to include it
Kevin Hunter wrote:
> The perhaps more direct question is, beyond you and me, would others
> *committing developers* appreciate having a commit message
> guideline? Something along the lines of what you have just proposed?
>
I'd personally like to have one, at some prominent place in the
wiki, to g
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 10:13 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi Alfonso,
>
> On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 09:19 +, Alfonso Eusebio wrote:
> > /* #i54546# The code belonging to this resource file is sample code for the
> > * legacy AddIn interface. The interface is still supported, but deprecated.
> > *
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> could someone please help me to understand what that registry is
> all about ? The term reminds me to the Windows registry, which
> essentially is a poor-man's ldap (w/o schemata) and nothing a
> simple filesystem can't do ;-o
>
Yes. And with a lot of subtleties, and possi
Hi Alfonso,
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 09:19 +, Alfonso Eusebio wrote:
> /* #i54546# The code belonging to this resource file is sample code for the
> * legacy AddIn interface. The interface is still supported, but deprecated.
> * The strings here were displayed in the function wizard.
We
Hi Enrico,
On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 15:36 +0100, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> > Well, I intend to create a DBus service, as long as I get to that point
> > I'll see how it behaves (the g_idle_add was just a test to check if the
> > glib mainloop was usable).
>
> What exactly do you want that utterly co
Hi Enrico,
On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 16:49 +0100, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
>
..
> could someone please help me to understand what that registry is
> all about ? The term reminds me to the Windows registry
Haha ;-) perhaps the comparison is apt. the registry code stores
information about types (
KUROSAWA, Takeshi wrote:
> Here are some tiny patches to fix bugs in SVG import.
>
Excellent, all pushed - thanks for your great work!!
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
pgpnf2Uedt0MB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.fr
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 11:40:17PM +, Rafael Dominguez wrote:
> Well the patch is related to sw, tab entries in Insert->Indexes and Tables
> -> Indexes and Tables.
Looks good on a glance, but lifetime of the ptrs seem to be bound to
that of the container, so I suggest using boost::ptr_vector i
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 08:17 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
> /bootstrap/clone/impress/sd/qa/unit/../../unxdflyx3.pro/misc/qa_unit"
> :
> [1] + 21339 suspended (tty output) time gmake
>
> I have to type fg by hand in the shell to let the process continue.
That's a nuisance, doesn't happen on Linu
KUROSAWA, Takeshi wrote:
> I found the way to reproduce the stepping gradients with native gradients.
> # Simply adding gradient stops as needed.
> So 0002 patch uses native gradients for both smooth and non-smooth gradients.
>
Hi Takeshi,
wow, brilliant - lovely work, pushed.
With all your work
Hi Christina,
On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 21:07 +0100, Christina Roßmanith wrote:
> binfilter/bf_svtools/source/config/svt_menuoptions.cxx and
> svtools/source/config/menuoptions.cxx
So - as Tor says, binfilter is substantially duplicate code, and code
that is dying fast - we have a hero removi
Hello Miklos,
The patches looks ok to me. I'ld say ok for 3.3.1.
--
Cedric
On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 17:35 +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This commit in master:
>
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/writer/commit/?id=a37fae128b4badc8f9f2201e28dca3e08948ddec
>
> Fixes:
>
> https://bug
Hi Andras,
On Sun, 2011-02-13 at 20:37 +0100, Andras Timar wrote:
> There are still a few patches in build/patches/dev300 which contain
> localizable text. When we move to new l10n framework on master this will
> become a problem
..
> Please decide if these patches should be integrated or deleted.
Hi Christoph,
On Sun, 2011-02-13 at 21:45 +0100, Christoph Herzog wrote:
> I'm busy with this easy hack, i.e. filling
> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Code_Overview.
Wonderful :-)
> It is proposed to copy and paste text from
> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/index.
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 09:26:47PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> caolanm->dtardon: Which reminds me, when i did this I didn't seem to get
> the python, beanshell, rhino scripting extensions (not that I really
> want the beanshell, rhino ones, but I did want the python one)
I probably forgot to a
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 11:22:41AM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
> I did "make dev-install" to try the result. No problem although I wonder
> why this command did not install the bundled extensions.
> Is there some option to add to do a complete installation ?
You can always "install" them by
I try to open OS X LibreOffice 3.3.0 from my USB thumb but I get this error:
14/02/11 09.06.07 com.apple.launchd.peruser.502[230]
([0x0-0x161161].org.libreoffice.script[4389]) Exited with exit code: 77
This also mean that OS X Portable LO can't work. Is there a way to solve it?
Thank
79 matches
Mail list logo
