Re: [Libreoffice] [Fwd: [PATCH] new De-Java-ised flat XML export]

2011-02-02 Thread David Tardon
Hi, Peter, > +/* > + * FLABridge provides some obscure attribute mangling to wordml2000 > import/export filters. > + * In the long run, you might want to replace this with an XSLT > extension function. > + */ > +class FLABridge : public WeakImplHelper1< DocumentHandlerAdapter

Re: [Libreoffice] Should the Thesaurus/mythes use a precomputed index (installer file size)

2011-02-02 Thread Steven Butler
Sorry Tor - forgot to reply-all and sent only to you previously... resending to the list. On 3 February 2011 10:35, Steven Butler wrote: > I will send an update tonight if all goes well. It seems to have failed building VCL - there is an error stating f268: Error: The image(s) could not be fo

Re: [Libreoffice] Should the Thesaurus/mythes use a precomputed index (installer file size)

2011-02-02 Thread Steven Butler
Hurray, I have finally got past bootstrap phase and I'm leaving it build in the background today while I'm at work. I had a number of small issues that I had to resolve, including being unable to execute some of the installers that were downloaded. A chmod 755 src/*.exe src/*.EXE seemed to resol

[Libreoffice] Portable LibreOffice OS X released

2011-02-02 Thread FreeSMGU
Thanks to yours previous support I've released Portable LibreOffice OS X. http://www.freesmug.org/portableapps:libreoffice It open LibreOffice with a shell script using -env:UserInstallation=file:///... wrapped in a application bundle. Just a little issue when first time I type some text JREpr

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Removed unused functions in calc 2

2011-02-02 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 21:49 +, Alfonso Eusebio wrote: > Hi, > > Please find attached second patch (made available under LGPLv3+/MPL) removing > unused functions in calc (based on call-catcher list). > Patch has been rebased with origin/master and compiled before submission. Thanks. Applied.

Re: [Libreoffice] [Fwd: [PATCH] new De-Java-ised flat XML export]

2011-02-02 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Peter, On 2011-02-02 at 22:08 +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > I hope you don't mind that I am forwarding your great work to the > mailing list - so that others can see what is going on :-) > > I am just integrating that, fixing few minor things there (we should not > do 'use namespace' in the

[Libreoffice] Recording changes: Deleted lines 'misbehaving'.

2011-02-02 Thread Andy Hearn
All, Here's another issue affecting collaborative authors. (FWIW: I'm on master branch, pulled today, around 1900GMT) SW: when an author deletes an existing body of text whilst 'Record Changes' is running, the strike-through'ed text soon disintegrates, leaving swathes of meaningless long line

[Libreoffice] Breaking in hunspell (Re: Missing vcl resource. This indicates that files vital to localization are missing. You might have a corrupt installation.)

2011-02-02 Thread David Dumaresq
Hi, I'm getting a failure in hunspell, so I ran the remedial steps following the option module clean There is a warning saying makefile is ignoring the datadir setting. Here's the whole nine metres: Argos:hunspell dfdumaresq$ rm -Rf /Users/dfdumaresq/git/libo/hunspell/unxmacxi.pro # optional

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] avoid ambiguous else

2011-02-02 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Thanks ;) On 02/02/2011 11:44 PM, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 23:27 +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote: >> Oh, I think this was a mistake o mine. I removed the brackets, didn't >> really thought, that the else statement could be associated with the >> inner if. I attached the patch to br

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] avoid ambiguous else

2011-02-02 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 23:27 +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote: > Oh, I think this was a mistake o mine. I removed the brackets, didn't > really thought, that the else statement could be associated with the > inner if. I attached the patch to bring the brackets back. No worries I'd already put the fix in

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] avoid ambiguous else

2011-02-02 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Oh, I think this was a mistake o mine. I removed the brackets, didn't really thought, that the else statement could be associated with the inner if. I attached the patch to bring the brackets back. -Thomas On 02/02/2011 08:38 PM, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 03:20 +0900, Takeshi A

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Removed unused functions in calc 2

2011-02-02 Thread Alfonso Eusebio
Hi, Please find attached second patch (made available under LGPLv3+/MPL) removing unused functions in calc (based on call-catcher list). Patch has been rebased with origin/master and compiled before submission. Regards, Alfonso From cb18b2e862d65c6d578c61b2a7c036f2102cae5c Mon Sep 17 00:

[Libreoffice] Move/hide old Word 6.0/95 "save as" support ...

2011-02-02 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Bryan / all, On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 00:06 -0500, Bryan Quigley wrote: > I'd like to get opinions (and preferably consensus) on removing old > Microsoft formats "save as" support, specifically: It seems that the consensus (or at least, this is what I propose), is that this is indeed a go

[Libreoffice] [Bug 32894] [Task] LibreOffice 3.3.1 release blockers / stoppers

2011-02-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32894 Michael Meeks changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||33785 -- Configure bugmail: https://bug

[Libreoffice] minutes of tech steering call ...

2011-02-02 Thread Michael Meeks
Attending: Andras, Thorsten, Norbert, Kendy, Caolan, Kohei, Petr, Bjorn + Bjorn introduction & welcome + 3.3.0 round-up / post-mortem + overall release went very well + positive surprise by lack of issues + no overly

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] remove unused declaration - an unlikely fix for armel segfault in regcomp

2011-02-02 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 3:31pm -0500 Wed, 02 Feb 2011, Michael Meeks wrote: On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 13:44 +, Wols Lists wrote: Not quite sure what you mean by "legacy Intel", but if you're referring to all single-processor CPUs, they still power most of the budget brand new laptops! Surely those guys are hyper-t

Re: [Libreoffice] Remove old Word 6.0/95 "save as" support

2011-02-02 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 13:00 -0500, Kevin Hunter wrote: > Perhaps tangentially (or not at all related), does anyone know if any of > the plugins rely on particular file format export capabilities? > Specifically, I just read this from three days ago, and noted a > reference to the StarBasic engin

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Convert tools/list.hxx usage to std::list

2011-02-02 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 13:57 -0500, Jonathan Callen wrote: > The attached patch replaces usage of LinkList (declared as > DECLARE_LIST(LinkList, Link*) with std::list. > > I used list instead of list because 1) the elements of the > list were only ever used from within the .cxx file declaring the l

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] remove unused declaration - an unlikely fix for armel segfault in regcomp

2011-02-02 Thread Michael Meeks
On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 13:44 +, Wols Lists wrote: > Not quite sure what you mean by "legacy Intel", but if you're referring > to all single-processor CPUs, they still power most of the budget brand > new laptops! Surely those guys are hyper-threaded by now ? at least the Atom (which is

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [PATCH] Use generic base64 encoder

2011-02-02 Thread Thorsten Behrens
KUROSAWA, Takeshi wrote: > SVG export filter has own Base64 encoder in FastString class. > But we have several more generic Base64 encoders in the code tree. e.g. > > [snip] > Brilliant, excellent work - pushed! -- Thorsten pgp2VEyJ5lIGA.pgp Description: PGP signature __

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] avoid ambiguous else

2011-02-02 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 03:20 +0900, Takeshi Abe wrote: > Hi, > > On building calc, I found a warning suggesting an ambiguous "else". > The attached patch is under LGPLv3+/MPL. Hmm... But your patch may change the intention of that code block based on how the lines are indented. Here is the code w

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] avoid ambiguous else

2011-02-02 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 03:20 +0900, Takeshi Abe wrote: > Hi, > > On building calc, I found a warning suggesting an ambiguous "else". > The attached patch is under LGPLv3+/MPL. Hmm... But your patch may change the intention of that code block based on how the lines are indented. Here is the code w

Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice-l10n] Re: Utility to scan for some faults in Thesaurus files

2011-02-02 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Andras Timar wrote: > > The l10n guys said they needed this utility in git as their list does > > not allow attachments. I will leave it up to your wisdom as to where > > to put it. > > > > Pushed, many thanks. > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-extern-sys/commit/?id=89fc507a0e278381

Re: [Libreoffice] Remove old Word 6.0/95 "save as" support

2011-02-02 Thread plino
I think jonathon-4's suggestion is brilliant! Keep the currently used formats in the Save As (sorted please!) dialog and old cryptic formats in a Export to option. This way no formats are lost but functionality is increased. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Add support for DragonFly in configure.in

2011-02-02 Thread Wols Lists
On 02/02/11 19:07, Wols Lists wrote: > It also says the project is using a dual LGPL/MPL licence, so all the > code we have added is dual-licenced. Oops - hit send and then realise Michael had already corrected it :-( Cheers, Wol ___ LibreOffice mailing

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Add support for DragonFly in configure.in

2011-02-02 Thread Wols Lists
On 31/01/11 11:46, Francois Tigeot wrote: > Sure. > > http://www.libreoffice.org/get-involved/developers/ says LO is licensed > under both LGPLv3 and GPL. Shouldn't it be LGPLv3 and MPL ? > Where? I've just taken a look (since I wrote a fair chunk of that). It says LibreOffice is LGPL3. It has t

Re: [Libreoffice] Remove old Word 6.0/95 "save as" support

2011-02-02 Thread toki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/02/2011 05:06 AM, Bryan Quigley wrote: > I'd like to get opinions (and preferably consensus) on removing old > Microsoft formats "save as" support, specifically: > Word 6.0 > Word 95 > Excel 5.0 > Excel 95 One of the virtues of OOo, and LibO, w

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Reworking build.pl: What to do with the "--html" and "--interactive" parameters

2011-02-02 Thread Michael Koch
Sorry, I noticed a mistake in my last patch. Here is the amended version. Michael On 02.02.2011 19:23, Michael Koch wrote: On 28.01.2011 22:53, Christian Lohmaier wrote: Hi Michael, *, On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 15:29 +0100, Christian Lohmaie

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Reworking build.pl: What to do with the "--html" and "--interactive" parameters

2011-02-02 Thread Michael Koch
On 28.01.2011 22:53, Christian Lohmaier wrote: Hi Michael, *, On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 15:29 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: No, please don't --html in combination with --dontgraboutput is usefull for parallel builds to have the output not

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] avoid ambiguous else

2011-02-02 Thread Takeshi Abe
Hi, On building calc, I found a warning suggesting an ambiguous "else". The attached patch is under LGPLv3+/MPL. Cheers, -- Takeshi Abe >From 5f9df0274b47fbf81bf2dc3789dd5e8719360549 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Takeshi Abe Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 03:13:53 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] avoid ambiguous

Re: [Libreoffice] Remove old Word 6.0/95 "save as" support

2011-02-02 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 12:06am -0500 Wed, 02 Feb 2011, Bryan Quigley wrote: I believe the old binary StarOffice file "save as" support is going away soon as well. Perhaps tangentially (or not at all related), does anyone know if any of the plugins rely on particular file format export capabilities? Specifically,

Re: [Libreoffice] development summary: year 2011, week 4

2011-02-02 Thread Petr Mladek
Petr Mladek píše v Po 31. 01. 2011 v 19:41 +0100: > Hi, > > this time a brief summary of what happened during the 4th week in 2011 > on LibreOffice repositories and the living branches: > > + master:hot LO-3.4 development > + libreoffice-3-3: fixes for next LO-3.3.x bug

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [REVIEW] remove old icon themes ...

2011-02-02 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Michael Meeks wrote: > It works out ok. > Pushed to -3-3 then. -- Thorsten pgpFuKCCtySwD.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] leak per frame, mac input request.

2011-02-02 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 10:59 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > Yes there is somethng special on Mac: > there is one menu bar only and it is at the top of the display. > it has a little apple icon as first menu, then a menu that is named > with the name of the application. in that later menu you shoul

Re: [Libreoffice] Remove old Word 6.0/95 "save as" support

2011-02-02 Thread Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai
Hi, My question is what we will win if we remove. Personally I prefer to keep support for such formats. KAMI 2011-02-02 10:18 keltezéssel, Cedric Bosdonnat írta: > Hi Bryan, > > On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 00:06 -0500, Bryan Quigley wrote: >> I'd like to get opinions (and preferably consensus) on rem

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Utility to scan for some faults in Thesaurus files

2011-02-02 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Steve Butler wrote: > The l10n guys said they needed this utility in git as their list does > not allow attachments. I will leave it up to your wisdom as to where > to put it. > Hi Steve, nice, good work here - put that into solenv/bin/th_check.pl (inside the bootstrap repo). Cheers, -- Thorst

Re: [Libreoffice] Remove old Word 6.0/95 "save as" support

2011-02-02 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 09:14 -0500, Kevin Hunter wrote: > Instead -- and I don't know how possible this currently is -- I think we > should introspect the document and compare against the chosen file > format's capabilities to list specific features that will be lost. Hard to do, there *is* some

[Libreoffice] [Bug 32894] [Task] LibreOffice 3.3.1 release blockers / stoppers

2011-02-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32894 --- Comment #15 from Jesus Corrius 2011-02-02 06:34:01 PST --- I'd like to nominate bug 33785 as a blocker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are

Re: [Libreoffice] Remove old Word 6.0/95 "save as" support

2011-02-02 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 12:06am -0500 Wed, 02 Feb 2011, Bryan Quigley wrote: [ Should we remove export capabilities to old file formats? ] The usability problem I've seen is that users: * want to save in MS Word format, but don't know what version to use * the pick 6.0 or 95 thinking many different things (low

Re: [Libreoffice] [Patch] SVG export filter improvements

2011-02-02 Thread Thorsten Behrens
KUROSAWA, Takeshi wrote: > Here are some patches to improve SVG export filter. > Hi Takeshi, wow, this is great work! I have only one comment (and a suggestion, see below): > 0003: Make filter export linear and axial gradients as SVG s. > Use SVG's native gradient instead of polygon fallback. >

[Libreoffice] [Bug 32894] [Task] LibreOffice 3.3.1 release blockers / stoppers

2011-02-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32894 Bug 32894 depends on bug 33258, which changed state. Bug 33258 Summary: regardless of UI language always en wikihelp is launched https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33258 What|Old Value |New Value --

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] remove unused declaration - an unlikely fix for armel segfault in regcomp

2011-02-02 Thread Wols Lists
On 28/01/11 15:19, Michael Meeks wrote: > Perhaps I'll gather enough courage to annoy all the legacy > uni-processor Intel guys in a bit, and put that in-line in a header for > the GCC cases [ if this works out nicely on OSX that is ] Not quite sure what you mean by "legacy Intel", but if you're r

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Review needed - wikihelp always English

2011-02-02 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Jan Holesovsky wrote: > Can you please review the patch in the following bug, and push to > libreoffice-3-3? > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33258 > > It fixes a 3.3.1 blocker. > Looks good, done. -- Thorsten pgpvbkeMtvk3e.pgp Description: PGP signature __

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: unit tests and DT_RPATH/DT_RUNPATH ?

2011-02-02 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 16:52 +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > That's not quite what we want. So, the attached sets DT_RUNPATH which > does what we want, i.e. LD_LIBRARY_PATH override the rpath in that case. > > Anyone see anything that could go wrong with doing this :-) ? Re-read "How to Write Shar

Re: [Libreoffice] Should the Thesaurus/mythes use a precomputed index (installer file size)

2011-02-02 Thread Tor Lillqvist
> No chance it's used to support writing some of the binary file formats > out uniformly across different endians? Nope. OOo/LibreOffice has its own stuff for all such things, since very long times. The configure script is a relatively late addition to OOo/LibreOffice. Anyway, I noticed that SIZ

Re: [Libreoffice] Remove old Word 6.0/95 "save as" support

2011-02-02 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 06:30 +0100, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: > > > > So, Does anyone still need to save in an extremely old version of Word > > or Excel? Or can we get rid of it? > I agree : for very old closed formats, LibO should have only import filters. Removing save support for MSWord 6/'9

Re: [Libreoffice] Should the Thesaurus/mythes use a precomputed index (installer file size)

2011-02-02 Thread Tor Lillqvist
>>> On 2011-02-02 at 13:56, wrote: >> checking size of long... 0!! Equally fun is the one that follows immediately: checking whether byte ordering is bigendian... yes The result of that test must not be really used anywhere either. I will remove it, too. --tml _

Re: [Libreoffice] Should the Thesaurus/mythes use a precomputed index (installer file size)

2011-02-02 Thread Tor Lillqvist
> checking size of long... 0!! Yeah, that has been there for a while, it doesn't really matter, the configured SIZEOF_LONG isn't used in LibreOffice itself for anything. The explanation to this mysterious thing is that it runs that size check using the MSVC compiler, because it

Re: [Libreoffice] Should the Thesaurus/mythes use a precomputed index (installer file size)

2011-02-02 Thread Steven Butler
in moz\zipped I found some info on the openoffice.org wiki. The next hurdle seems to be getting the MS SDK. I'm d/l the win7 version as its smaller and hopefully okay but it is looking like it will take all night. I might have this working in a couple of weeks at this rate. Also, I noticed some

Re: [Libreoffice] solenv/inc/settings.mk overwrites CDEFS

2011-02-02 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Thanks, didn't see that. I fixed it that way. -Thomas On 02/02/2011 12:48 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Thomas Arnhold wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I just found out, that settings.mk resets all CDEFS which were defined >> in some makefiles. For example: >> >> sc/source/ui/

Re: [Libreoffice] over-long extensions manager list ...

2011-02-02 Thread plino
Jesús, obviously a CD/DVD installer should include everything. This is a suggestion for a downloadable installer where size matters :) -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/MS-Windows-about-dictionaries-installation-tp2382566p2404670.html Sent from the Dev mailin

Re: [Libreoffice] over-long extensions manager list ...

2011-02-02 Thread Wols Lists
On 02/02/11 11:22, Jesús Corrius wrote: >> Finally the cherry on the top of the cake: in addition to the included >> > dictionaries (English is included as default but others can probably be >> > added) you have an option to download other dictionaries during >> > installation >> > (although you

Re: [Libreoffice] over-long extensions manager list ...

2011-02-02 Thread Jesús Corrius
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 12:10 PM, plino wrote: > > If I may contribute with my 2cents why not use the best ideas already on the > field? > > The perfect installer IMHO should start with a simple box to select the > language used by the installer itself (where the detected locale is > suggested) > >

Re: [Libreoffice] over-long extensions manager list ...

2011-02-02 Thread plino
If I may contribute with my 2cents why not use the best ideas already on the field? The perfect installer IMHO should start with a simple box to select the language used by the installer itself (where the detected locale is suggested) An example is the first screen for the FLOSS Abiword http://w

Re: [Libreoffice] over-long extensions manager list ...

2011-02-02 Thread Tor Lillqvist
> That is a reason why I suggest to leave the user make its own choice > among the available dictionaries (only one, all, whatever he want). Which is exactly what the user can do in a "custom" installation. > So I restate one of my questions : what is the tool used to code the > installer ? A bu

Re: [Libreoffice] over-long extensions manager list ...

2011-02-02 Thread Jean-Baptiste Faure
Le 02/02/2011 10:53, Wols Lists a écrit : > On 01/02/11 22:15, Tor Lillqvist wrote: >> I am sure some people could be annoyed also by being reminded that there are >> languages spoken in their country that they perhaps consider leftovers from >> invaders and not real language of their country. Or

Re: [Libreoffice] Remove old Word 6.0/95 "save as" support

2011-02-02 Thread Andras Timar
2011/2/2 Cedric Bosdonnat : > Hi Bryan, > > On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 00:06 -0500, Bryan Quigley wrote: >> I'd like to get opinions (and preferably consensus) on removing old >> Microsoft formats "save as" support, specifically: >> Word 6.0 >> Word 95 >> Excel 5.0 >> Excel 95 > > I would be all for it

Re: [Libreoffice] over-long extensions manager list ...

2011-02-02 Thread Wols Lists
On 01/02/11 22:15, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > I am sure some people could be annoyed also by being reminded that there are > languages spoken in their country that they perhaps consider leftovers from > invaders and not real language of their country. Or the other way around, > people feeling they b

Re: [Libreoffice] Remove old Word 6.0/95 "save as" support

2011-02-02 Thread Cedric Bosdonnat
Hi Bryan, On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 00:06 -0500, Bryan Quigley wrote: > I'd like to get opinions (and preferably consensus) on removing old > Microsoft formats "save as" support, specifically: > Word 6.0 > Word 95 > Excel 5.0 > Excel 95 I would be all for it too... it's even an easy hack you could ac

[Libreoffice] Review needed - wikihelp always English

2011-02-02 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi, Can you please review the patch in the following bug, and push to libreoffice-3-3? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33258 It fixes a 3.3.1 blocker. Thank you, Kendy ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http:/