> That is a reason why I suggest to leave the user make its own choice
> among the available dictionaries (only one, all, whatever he want).

Which is exactly what the user can do in a "custom" installation.

> So I restate one of my questions : what is the tool used to code the
> installer ?

A bunch of source data files in scp2 (used on all platforms), a pile of Perl 
run from solenv/bin/make_installer.pl, a number of template .idt files for 
Windows Installer, which are then mangled by the Perl code and produces stuff 
fed to Windows Installer tools like msidb,  ending up with a .msi file, one or 
several .cab files, and optionally a number of .mst files.

Then there is a setup.exe which is plain C++ code which is a small program that 
just runs msiexec on the .msi file, telling it which installer UI localisation 
to use.

And finally all this can optionally be wrapped by NSIS into a single executable 
file installer like the ones that we offer.

--tml


_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Reply via email to