On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Jan Darmochwal wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I found this on the easy hacks page:
> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Easy_Hacks
>
> The attached patch makes make_installer.pl save up to 25% time on my
> linux machine.
Whoa, that is impressive. How did you measure
Hi all,
I have an error when build (master repo) on windows. Anyone have any idea
how to fix this.
lingucomponent deliver
Module 'lingucomponent' delivered successfully. 0 files copied, 20 files
unchanged
Compiling: connectivity/source/drivers/odbcbase/OTools.cxx
Compiling:
connectivity/source/dr
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Julien Nabet wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I made a make clean yesterday evening.
> I "git updated" even today followed with an autogen.sh and the compilation
> fails with this :
> build -- version: 275224
>
>
> =
> Building module libwpd
> =
> Enter
I downloaded the libreoffice-build-3.3.0.4 tarball and attempted to build LO
3.3.0 from source. I passed the following options to the configure script:
--with-distro=Slackware and --without-git.
The source tarballs downloaded successfully and were unpacked successfully.
Some of the patches were ap
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 23:59 +0100, Soeren Moeller wrote:
> Thanks for the answer. I now used gdb to locate the segfault, and
> found it to happen when ScViewFunc called ScRangeList.front() with an
> empty range list, which resulted in a segfault while trying to
> retrieve the first element of the l
Hi!
I found this on the easy hacks page:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Easy_Hacks
The attached patch makes make_installer.pl save up to 25% time on my
linux machine.
I'm going to do some more patching on make_installer.pl. Is it okay
to post my patches on this mailing list?
>Fr
Thanks for the answer. I now used gdb to locate the segfault, and
found it to happen when ScViewFunc called ScRangeList.front() with an
empty range list, which resulted in a segfault while trying to
retrieve the first element of the list. I have prepared the attached
patch, adding a check for empty
On 1/26/11 10:24 PM, Julien Nabet wrote:
Hello,
Here is a patch for some cppcheck cleaning in basctl
Compiling was ok
My git account is now created but I don't know what to do next to push
my commit.
If someone could help me, ideally i need a quick tutorial step by step.
I do this :
ssh serva
On Jan 26, 2011 10:07pm, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 23:17 +0100, Albert Thuswaldner wrote:
> Part 2
So, a load of work there, finally went through it and pushed the vast
majority of it. Thanks for this :-), now pushed
That is great to hear!
Just to make sure, wh
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32894
--- Comment #12 from clio 2011-01-26 13:47:48 PST ---
I just filed the bug 33552 - Standard panel is broken in Basic IDE. IMHO, a fix
wouldn't be risky, because the same commands work properly in the menu.
Undo/Redo worked fine in 3.1.1, Cut/Copy
Hello,
Here is a patch for some cppcheck cleaning in basctl
Compiling was ok
My git account is now created but I don't know what to do next to push
my commit.
If someone could help me, ideally i need a quick tutorial step by step.
I do this :
ssh serval2...@git.freedesktop.org
but I don't know
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 20:43 +0100, Kenneth Venken wrote:
> Fixes two memleaks.
Pushed the first second one, looks good, thanks for these.
Lubos: could you look at the first patch there about pTokens in the kde
fpicker. That is a leak right ?
C.
___
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 23:17 +0100, Albert Thuswaldner wrote:
> Part 2
So, a load of work there, finally went through it and pushed the vast
majority of it. Thanks for this :-), now pushed
What I left out was...
There is one place where we have...
nFormat = SotExchange::RegisterFormatName(
On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 18:45 +0100, Kenneth Venken wrote:
> Hi,
>
> these patches solve some of the 'redundant assignment to self'
> warnings.
Looks good. Thanks for these, all pushed.
re: 0001-Cpp-cleanliness-redundant-assignment-to-s.components.patch, I
suppose we could catch those exceptions b
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 16:57 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 17:50 +0100, Kenneth Venken wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > released under LGPLv3
>
> These all look good. Though would you agree that these are submitted
> under the "LGPLv3+ or MPL" combo that we recommend ?
off-list: "ye
Fixes two memleaks.
-- Kenneth
From 4cd88904ea50619dbc0965ea2683ea270a74013b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kenneth Venken
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 19:39:13 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] cpp cleanliness: fixed some memleaks
---
fpicker/source/unx/kde/kdecommandthread.cxx |1 +
1 files changed, 1 ins
On 20/01/11 17:06, Michael Meeks wrote:
>> I've fixed renaming all the functions I could find, but I'm now getting
>> > C++ compile errors that are beyond my current C++-fu - I'm a C programmer.
> ..
>> > All help welcomed - please stick sqlite in the subject line of any mails
>> > to the list so's
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32894
--- Comment #11 from Noel Power 2011-01-26 09:22:30 PST ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Please, consider bug 32575 (specific LibO bug) and
> http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=108689 (and the bugs
> referenced
> there) - the Standar
Alexander Thurgood wrote:
> I found that the error lies in the script not activating the window
> dialog. I changed the script by adding one word "activate" in front of
> the dialog initialisation. This now brings the installation window to
> the foreground. I enclosed a modified script file with t
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 11:22 +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
> Anybody here with ideas what we can do so that the patch helps Khaled,
> and is as safe as possible? - so that we can commit it, and fix the
> consequences later if anything happens?
Where things are most likely to go wrong are with e.g. I
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32894
--- Comment #10 from clio 2011-01-26 09:01:36 PST ---
Please, consider bug 32575 (specific LibO bug) and
http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=108689 (and the bugs referenced
there) - the Standard panel in the Basic IDE is broken - butt
On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 17:50 +0100, Kenneth Venken wrote:
> Hi,
>
> released under LGPLv3
These all look good. Though would you agree that these are submitted
under the "LGPLv3+ or MPL" combo that we recommend ?
C.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOff
So, I added a unit test for fdo#31271 and I see a little wrinkle with
out rpath stuff.
We set LD_LIBRARY_PATH to something like
../unxlngx.pro/lib:/path/to/solver/lib
to try and pick up the just-built library for testing purposes.
But when testing a uno component like i18npool.uno.so we dlopen it
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 11:51 +0530, Surendran Mahendran wrote:
> All these were the changes in the ure folder which had cppu. Reckon any
> one of this could have fixed my issue ?
I wouldn't *think* so, would have to check again without
--enable-symbols to see if the failure comes back :-)
C.
___
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 16:04 +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > Could somebody please ACK these two commits for backport? Thanks.
> >
> Cherry-picked for -3-3.
What linker command line to gcc does this end up giving for the enable
kde case ?
There was a bug previously where
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 16:20 +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> > I use Debian. A self-compiled libreoffice refuses to use my GNU Java
> > (gij), saying the directory does not contain a JRE. The Debian package
> > of libreoffice actually autodetects it and happily uses it,
Hi,
this is for libreoffice-3-3 - I have a local fix in place to be able
to build in the first place, on OSX 10.6 with latest XCode.
I cannot see a reason why to clobber CC/CXX, FWIW, in master, this
code is gone for good anyway - Michael, do you recall?
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
From 528c110931e9c51
Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> I use Debian. A self-compiled libreoffice refuses to use my GNU Java
> (gij), saying the directory does not contain a JRE. The Debian package
> of libreoffice actually autodetects it and happily uses it, but I have
> not easily identified the Debian patch that is respons
Lubos Lunak wrote:
> Could somebody please ACK these two commits for backport? Thanks.
>
Cherry-picked for -3-3.
-- Thorsten
pgpizIlzQBr4R.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.free
Michael Koch wrote:
> The script recursively searches directories for consecutive "empty line(s) -
> code line" groups. (discussed with mmeeks)
>
Hi Michael,
cool, nice script - pushed! What would you be interested in next?
Thanks,
-- Thorsten
pgpXeeRfOZ4y7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 13:56 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> Actually I think that warning might be bogus.
Digging back into gcc PR26905 I see they specifically don't regress test
for this bug on Darwin. Following that logic I've moved the test for us
too.
C.
_
On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 16:33 -0800, David Dumaresq wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm running on Mac OSX 10.6.6 and getting this warning with ./autogen.sh
> --with-num-cpus=2 --with-max-jobs=2 --disable-mozilla --disable-systray
> 'CC=ccache gcc-4.0' 'CXX=ccache g++-4.0'
>
> ...
> checking if STL headers a
Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> for info:
>
> http://hg.services.openoffice.org/cws/dba34a/rev/d5b3bb5ca529
>
Cherry-picked on master.
-- Thorsten
pgpWAroYOTVbj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
h
Hi,
this time a brief summary of what happened during the 3nd week in 2011
on LibreOffice repositories and the living branches:
+ master:hot LO-3.4 development
+ libreoffice-3-3: fixes for next LO-3.3.x bug fix release
+ libreoffice-3-3-0: final stabilization
Hi Khaled,
On 2011-01-11 at 18:57 +0200, Khaled Hosny wrote:
> > It should be tested with some CTL scripts including reordering and
> > lots of diacritics to check the edge cases are covered. The width
> > will also affect font fallback (calls from MultiSalLayout), so that
> > needs to be tested
I problem have been solved by rebuilding the berkeleydb.
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Tantai Tanakanok wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The error occur while I was building LibreOffice on windows. It's on master
> branch.
>
> /MAP /OPT:NOREF -safeseh -nxcompat -dynamicbase -NODEFAULTLIB -RELEASE
> -DEBUG
From 9e0f8f0b3d1678862b3f261eed398c9825acaadd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christoph Herzog
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:38:06 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Translation of comments (minor, 6 files) in sw/inc
(LGPLv3+ / MPL)
>From 9e0f8f0b3d1678862b3f261eed398c9825acaadd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From:
Hi all,
The error occur while I was building LibreOffice on windows. It's on master
branch.
/MAP /OPT:NOREF -safeseh -nxcompat -dynamicbase -NODEFAULTLIB -RELEASE
-DEBUG -INCREMENTAL:NO /SUBSYSTEM:CONSOLE /DLL -out:../../
wntmsci12.pro/bin/helplinkermi.dll -map:../../
wntmsci12.pro/misc/helplinke
Hi @all,
the User Interface hase a lot of little problems, where some things are not
in place. This could be an button not aligned, 2px to far on the right.
Find things where the developer didn't do the programming right. Little
things that even a Beginner in Programming could correct.
So I'm
On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 15:41 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> Not quite, ww8 is "WinWord8", but handles the Microsoft Word 6, 7 and
> 8+ binary formats. To complicate matters it handles Word for Windows 2
> file format as well, and some in-betweeny versions.
>
> ww1 is "Word for Windows 1" IIRC and
Yes I had done a ./g pull -r on the libo main directory.
Julien.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Good day.
Will ever LibreOffice available for operating system OpenIndiana_x86 or
OpenSolaris_x86?
Thank you for your reply. Komarek.
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LibreOffice-for-OI-or-OSOL-tp2352396p2352396.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at
42 matches
Mail list logo
