On 1/24/11 5:57 PM, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
Hi all,
Are there any moves afoot to support Wayland, the potential replacement
for X on Linux ?
Alex
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/l
Hello,
> Wonderful :-) do you want help with this ? we could add an easy hack,
> and ask people to contact you, for impress / calc etc.
>
Thanks for this point. I will think if this is easily feasible. But I am
still myself on the (intensive) learning part, so I currently do not
feel me yet
On 1/24/11 5:57 PM, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
Hi all,
Are there any moves afoot to support Wayland, the potential replacement
for X on Linux ?
Alex
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/l
Hello,
On 01/24/2011 03:43 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
>
> You also needed to adjust the smoketest "make check" because that has a
> save as staroffice binary file format test in it. I noticed this failed
> this morning and bodged it up to work again.
Oops, sorry, I was not aware of it. Could you
On 1/25/11 6:47 AM, surensp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Dave,
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:42 AM, David Dumaresq wrote:
I suggest you take a look at the advice under The Build Failed... What can I
do? here, http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Native_Build
Dave
I already did that and h
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Albert Thuswaldner
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:08, Michael Meeks wrote:
>> Hi Albert,
>>
>> First - thanks for helping out with this ! as you can see we have big
>> German comment problems, and it is simply great to have help improving
>> the situat
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:26:47PM +0100, Christoph Herzog wrote:
> From 5d52db1773557702eace21fab78fce4c6fe39f3c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Christoph Herzog
> Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 22:18:42 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] Translations of comments is sw/inc.
>
> patch (as always) under the LGPLv2
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 18:32 +0100, Soeren Moeller wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Thanks for pushing 0002 and 0004.
>>
>> In the doxygen documentation on
>> http://www.stack.nl/~dimitri/doxygen/docblocks.html in the section
>> "Putting documentation after
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 05:05:43AM +0900, Takeshi Abe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> They were in impress.
>
> Cheers,
> -- Takeshi Abe
Pushed, thanks!
D.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/l
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 06:51:55PM +0100, Christoph Herzog wrote:
> From ac1f5f1b8160c32dffb7d05b93d8b4b4f72ffe47 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Christoph Herzog
> Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 18:48:46 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] Translations of comments in writer/sw/inc
>
Excellent! Just keep it comin
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 12:40:11PM +0200, Aurimas Fišeras wrote:
> Affected folders:
> offapi/com/sun/star/accessibility - offapi/com/sun/star/embed
>
> Fixes many spelling errors (checked with en_US spell checker).
> Unifies spelling of some common words.
> Replaces single quotes ('') with double
Hi Dave,
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:42 AM, David Dumaresq wrote:
>
>
> I suggest you take a look at the advice under The Build Failed... What can I
> do? here, http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Native_Build
>
> Dave
>
I already did that and have pasted the output of the individual
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:23 PM, David Dumaresq wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> After building automake-1.11.1 following the macosx dependencies page, I'm
> seeing warnings about AC_LANG_CONFTEST (below) when I run autogen. From
> various threads, it seems to be an issue introduced with the 1.11.1 rele
Greetings,
After building automake-1.11.1 following the macosx dependencies page, I'm
seeing warnings about AC_LANG_CONFTEST (below) when I run autogen. From various
threads, it seems to be an issue introduced with the 1.11.1 release of
automake. I wonder if anyone else has seen this and/or ha
On 2011-01-24, at 8:26 PM, surensp...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am building LO after some time now. Did the usual ./g pull -r , make
> clean and then make. The build was breaking for me at cppu.
>
> '''
> build -- version: 275224
>
> =
> Building module cppu
> =
> En
On 2011-01-24, at 8:30 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:16 PM, David Dumaresq wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I'm building my first LibreOffice development system, following this link,
>> and ran ./autogen.sh which passed with warnings (see below). I'm wondering
>> if it's okay to go
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:16 PM, David Dumaresq wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm building my first LibreOffice development system, following this link,
> and ran ./autogen.sh which passed with warnings (see below). I'm wondering
> if it's okay to go ahead with python2.6 instead of python2.3, which is no
>
Hi,
I am building LO after some time now. Did the usual ./g pull -r , make
clean and then make. The build was breaking for me at cppu.
'''
build -- version: 275224
=
Building module cppu
=
Entering /home/suren/libreoffice/libo/cppu/inc
Entering /home/suren/libreoffice/li
Hi all,
I'm building my first LibreOffice development system, following this link, and
ran ./autogen.sh which passed with warnings (see below). I'm wondering if it's
okay to go ahead with python2.6 instead of python2.3, which is no longer on my
system
./autogen.sh --with-num-cpus=2 --with-max-
On 2011-01-24, at 4:26 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
>>>
>>> ./autogen.sh
>> ./autogen.sh: /usr/local/bin/aclocal: /opt/local/bin/perl: bad interpreter:
>> No such file or directory
>>
>> I'm not sure what believes perl is in /opt/local/bin? On my system (osx
>> 10.6.6), perl is in /usr/bin
>>
On 2011-01-24, at 4:26 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 6:05 PM, David Dumaresq wrote:
>> Hi Christian, et al,
>>
>> On 2011-01-24, at 7:00 AM, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
>>
>>> Hi David, *,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 2:26 AM, David Dumaresq
>>> wrote:
On 2011-
Hi,
On 2011-01-21 at 18:33 +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
> I have uploaded the wikihelp translations to
> http://help.libreoffice.org , so far for the following languages:
[...]
> The logic to show the page in the right language immediately after you
> issue help is not implemented yet, I hope to
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 6:05 PM, David Dumaresq wrote:
> Hi Christian, et al,
>
> On 2011-01-24, at 7:00 AM, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
>
>> Hi David, *,
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 2:26 AM, David Dumaresq wrote:
>>> On 2011-01-23, at 7:28 AM, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011
Hi Christian, et al,
On 2011-01-24, at 7:00 AM, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> Hi David, *,
>
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 2:26 AM, David Dumaresq wrote:
>> On 2011-01-23, at 7:28 AM, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Jonathan Aquilina
>>> wrote:
>>> […]
>>> [1] You don'
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 02:24:55PM -0500, Kohei Yoshida
wrote:
> I personally don't care that much about how the documentation is
> presented in detail, as long as it's presented. So, I'll defer the
> decision to someone who is more knowledgeable about doxygen. Thorsten?
> Miklos? Do you guys
From 5d52db1773557702eace21fab78fce4c6fe39f3c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christoph Herzog
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 22:18:42 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Translations of comments is sw/inc.
patch (as always) under the LGPLv2+/MPL
>From 5d52db1773557702eace21fab78fce4c6fe39f3c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:08, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi Albert,
>
> First - thanks for helping out with this ! as you can see we have big
> German comment problems, and it is simply great to have help improving
> the situation: much appreciated :-)
>
> On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 16:54 -0700, To
Hi,
Just out of curiousity, but I wonder why both IMPRESS_FACTORY_ID and
DRAW_FACTORY_ID share the same value 1 in impress/sd/inc/FactoryIds.hxx:
---
enum ViewShellFactoryIds
{
IMPRESS_FACTORY_ID = 1,
DRAW_FACTORY_ID = 1,
SLIDE_SORTER_FACTORY_ID = 2,
OUTLINE_FACTORY_ID = 3,
PRE
Hi,
They were in impress.
Cheers,
-- Takeshi Abe
>From d2d7c9a3dc2a1546857e3f2044df61c1836cd5a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Takeshi Abe
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 05:02:59 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] Removed unused codes and fix some typos
---
animations/source/animcore/animcore.cxx|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31865
--- Comment #72 from clio 2011-01-24 11:36:14 PST ---
bug 33355 consider to be a blocker
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 18:32 +0100, Soeren Moeller wrote:
> Hi
>
> Thanks for pushing 0002 and 0004.
>
> In the doxygen documentation on
> http://www.stack.nl/~dimitri/doxygen/docblocks.html in the section
> "Putting documentation after members" I understand it as if the "<" is
> necessary to tell
Hi,
I have just made a patch to fix some glitch with GTK+:
(see this bug: https://bugs.freedesktop.org//show_bug.cgi?id=32186)
- Fix menubar root items (they was disabled, but they work well :) )
- Don't draw anything when a disabled menu is hovered:
They was drawn using the native GUI en
Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai píše v So 22. 01. 2011 v 17:30 +0100:
> Hi!
>
> I would like to introduce technical.dic in libreoffice-3-3 branch. If
> it is possible also to libreoffice-3-3-0. So please review it and
> sign-off if possible.
I just added (fdo#31798) into the commit message and pushed.
Than
From ac1f5f1b8160c32dffb7d05b93d8b4b4f72ffe47 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christoph Herzog
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 18:48:46 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Translations of comments in writer/sw/inc
>From ac1f5f1b8160c32dffb7d05b93d8b4b4f72ffe47 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christoph Herzog
Date: Mon
On 01/24/2011 06:32 PM, Soeren Moeller wrote:
description type, do we use in Libre Office? (Maybe we should figure
out and announce an offical convention how (and with which parameters)
to use doxygen in LibO and put it on the wiki.)
That would help me too. Sometimes, when translating, doxygen
Hi
Thanks for pushing 0002 and 0004.
In the doxygen documentation on
http://www.stack.nl/~dimitri/doxygen/docblocks.html in the section
"Putting documentation after members" I understand it as if the "<" is
necessary to tell doxygen that the comment relates to the statement
before (i.e. to the le
Hi all,
Are there any moves afoot to support Wayland, the potential replacement
for X on Linux ?
Alex
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hi Ged,
So - thank you for your nice ideas :-) we can setup a list for this
discussion: crack-smoking-re-write-everyhing-in-javascr...@tdf.org or
somesuch ? :-)
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 17:17 +0100, Ged Wed wrote:
> well you gotta start sometime and technology is on our side.
Techno
Hi all,
Florian quite rightly posted a bug report about the Langpack installer
for the Mac, which doesn't obtain the focus if other windows are already
displayed on the desktop, rather the app icon blinks in the dock and
requires the user to click on it to bring the installation window to the
fron
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 15:56 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Michael Meeks
> > [libIDL is obsolete]
> >I'm also somewhat curious as to why glib2 is used there too,
>
> mozilla/seamnkey requires libIDL, that in turn requires glib2 and that
> in turn gett
On 24 January 2011 16:03, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi Ged,
>
> On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 15:06 +0100, Ged Wed wrote:
>> whats the support for doing a web based open office ?
>> Ajax based with a restful JSON or XML model.
>
> Well, it is not an impossibly bad idea :-)
>
>> I am asking because thi
Hi Soeren,
On Sun, 2011-01-23 at 21:01 +0100, Soeren Moeller wrote:
> Hi
>
> Attached four patches:
> 0001: adding comments to ScFunctionMgr and ScFunctionList in
> sc/inc/funcdesc.hxx
- e.g. functions used in formulas in calc
+ e.g.\ functions used in formulas in calc
I personally find this
Hi there,
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 14:23 +0100, Bálint Szigeti wrote:
> It would be very usefull that the Calc able to filter color as MS
> Office 2007 and latest.
Welcome to the developers list :-)
You need to poke at the code in:
sc/source/ui/src/filter.src
and sc/sou
Hi Ged,
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 15:06 +0100, Ged Wed wrote:
> whats the support for doing a web based open office ?
> Ajax based with a restful JSON or XML model.
Well, it is not an impossibly bad idea :-)
> I am asking because this seems like such a good move.
> Libre Office would then ha
Hi David, *,
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 2:26 AM, David Dumaresq wrote:
> On 2011-01-23, at 7:28 AM, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Jonathan Aquilina
>> wrote:
>> […]
>> [1] You don't need /any/ external dependency unless you want to
>> compile mozilla/seamonkey from s
Hi Michael, *,
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Michael Meeks
wrote:
> [libIDL is obsolete]
> I'm also somewhat curious as to why glib2 is used there too,
mozilla/seamnkey requires libIDL, that in turn requires glib2 and that
in turn gettext...
> I would
> hope that (with some work), th
Hello:
I read the following note in the OOdev300m98 release notes..
Since the Mozilla product has long been superseded by the SeaMonkey
> > suite, and the profile formats of both changed incompatibly, the
> > Mozilla Address Book support in OpenOffice.org has been removed, in
> > favor
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 07:26 +0100, Pierre-André Jacquod wrote:
> Hello,
> from now I have started to delete within binfilter the code allowing to
> *save* using the StarOffice file format. The import (read) is
> still possible and will remain. Bye bye saving sdw, sxw
>
> This will of course n
Hi Pierre,
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 07:26 +0100, Pierre-André Jacquod wrote:
> from now I have started to delete within binfilter the code allowing to
> *save* using the StarOffice file format. The import (read) is
> still possible and will remain. Bye bye saving sdw, sxw
Wonderful :-)
Hey all,
whats the support for doing a web based open office ?
Ajax based with a restful JSON or XML model.
I am asking because this seems like such a good move.
Libre Office would then have a very compelling solution that neither
google Docs or MS Office can really compete against.
It also allo
Can you get rid of those 120 zero byte files or are these needed?
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/RC4-Windows-size-analysis-tp2302919p2319901.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
LibreOffi
Hi all,
It would be very usefull that the Calc able to filter color as MS Office
2007 and latest.
--
Szigeti Bálint
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 20:31 +0100, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I want to apply the attached bootstrap patch. It disables the very
> interesting feature of creating unusable binaries when one gets unlucky.
> From 'man ld':
>
> --noinhibit-exec
> Retain the executable output file whenever i
On Sun, 2011-01-23 at 17:38 +0100, Borivoje Petrovic wrote:
> Yesterday I noticed a rather annoying behaviour of LibreOffice Writer.
> Namely, when the pointer focus is on a comment, the document is unable
> to scroll.
Yeah, this problem is shared with OpenOffice.org, a fix is checked in as
092e1
On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 02:31 +0100, Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai wrote:
> Hi!
>
> It seems we ship makefile.mk
> in
> libreoffice/basis3.3/share/template/layout
>
> That is not necessary.
71c5b530111a2150a42439d2c3f67cf1ad943c91
extras/source/templates/layout/makefile.mk
added an exclude for makefile.* s
Hi there,
On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 02:31 +0100, Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai wrote:
> It seems we ship makefile.mk in
> libreoffice/basis3.3/share/template/layout
Odd; I don't see that on windows - in my file list.
On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 02:16 +0100, Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai wrote:
> idxexample*.odt: Wr
On 01/24/2011 11:39 AM, Michael Meeks wrote:
On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 10:55 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
Of course, help dunging out the sillies that still lurk in there - eg.
'soffice.exe' and 'soffice.bin', bundled testtool, and so on much
appreciated.
..
Out of curiosity Michael are
On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 10:55 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> > Of course, help dunging out the sillies that still lurk in there - eg.
> > 'soffice.exe' and 'soffice.bin', bundled testtool, and so on much
> > appreciated.
..
> Out of curiosity Michael are we also packaging with the installers
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 23:23 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> > I'm getting make errors about halfway through the Install LibIDL step:
> > Install libIDL (Index of /pub/gnome/sources/libIDL/0.8)
Wow - this makes me wonder: wtf. is a highly obsolete library, I used
to maintain, of use only
On Sun, 2011-01-23 at 20:55 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> Attached please find my patch for the removal of 2 extra lines which i
> forgot to remove with my first patch which i submitted.
Thanks, pushed.
Michael.
--
michael.me...@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, i
On Sun, 2011-01-23 at 21:48 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> Attached find a patch to remove extra lines in IDocumentFieldsAccess.hxx
Same issue here; cf. my previous mail.
Thanks,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
Hi Jonathan,
On Sun, 2011-01-23 at 22:05 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> Attached please find the patch for attributeoutputbase.hxx to remove
> extra lines :)
Sooo this file looks fine to me; there is no problem in having
some lines of vertical space to help readability.
Here are some patches removing unused variables found by cppcheck
Andy >From f4907a0cda8c414fe27c42c24a262c0a761daf2e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andy Holder
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 23:44:23 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] cppcheck: Variables not used
---
binfilter/bf_sw/source/filter/w4w/sw_w4wpa
63 matches
Mail list logo
