Not trying to hijack, but i'm still a novice developer still learning
the ways of development, but is there such a thing as over optimization?
On 1/12/11 7:36 PM, Noel Power wrote:
On 12/01/11 18:03, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Octavio Alvarez
wrote:
On Wed, 12
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 01:15:25AM +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I needed the attached patch to get a debug build of the sw module. Does
> it look sane and I can push it or do you have a better idea?
>
> The error message I get is included in the commit message.
>
> I put it to sw.mk afte
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 01:12:19PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 23:17 +0100, Julien Nabet wrote:
> > It's better with the attachments :-)
>
> Hum, it all looks good except for the operator=, I mean, it compiles but
> I don't think it *should* compile :-) it is changing the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31865
alex changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||32939
--- Comment #61 from alex 2011-01-12 19:05
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31865
tester8 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||32991
--- Comment #60 from tester8 2011-01-12
Hi,
I needed the attached patch to get a debug build of the sw module. Does
it look sane and I can push it or do you have a better idea?
The error message I get is included in the commit message.
I put it to sw.mk after getting about the third similar error. :)
Thanks.
From 2da823da67cf5b4a9591
Soeren Moeller wrote:
> Thank you very much for your review, I attached a new patch (the three
> patches together contain the old patch and the fixes), and below
> commented on some of your your remarks.
>
Hi Soeren,
cool, nice work - pushed as-is, just squashed into one commit.
Many thanks,
--
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31865
Bug 31865 depends on bug 32193, which changed state.
Bug 32193 Summary: Missing language packs, untranslated language/help packs
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32193
What|Old Value |New Value
--
Attending: Caolan, Norbert, Michael, Petr, David, Wols, Thorsten, Rene
Regrets: ChaoSun
+ FOSDEM - schedule ok, all good.
+ proposed licensing policy write-up (Wols)
+ standardized license header template,
AA: and COPYING files -> bootstrap (Wols)
AA:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31865
Bug 31865 depends on bug 32635, which changed state.
Bug 32635 Summary: BrOffice and Windows desktop integration
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32635
What|Old Value |New Value
--
On 12/01/11 18:03, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Octavio Alvarez
wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 03:18:01 -0800, Noel Power wrote:
Hi there
fix for fdo#32742#, its a simple fix ( but was a bugger to find ) imo is
riskless etc.
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffic
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Octavio Alvarez
wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 03:18:01 -0800, Noel Power wrote:
>
>> Hi there
>>
>> fix for fdo#32742#, its a simple fix ( but was a bugger to find ) imo is
>> riskless etc.
>>
>>
>> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/base/commit/?id=0afe22660
Le 12/01/2011 13:34, Christian Lohmaier a écrit :
Hi *,
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 2:06 AM, Julien Nabet wrote:
I used xargs instead of -exec to reduce chmod spawning.
Hope there's no mistake in it.
I don't see the point in using -i - since that in turn causes one
process per file, so y
Thorsten,
So I tried a build with lang=ALL on mac.
indeed it is a dog. it took 15h20.
conservatively at least 13 hours of it were in helcontent2, mostly I/O
bound creating temp files and copying things around over and over.
based on profiling while this was running... I did another attempt at
bu
(sigh, pressed enter too early)
Hi all,
we want to reduce regressions caused by LibO-3.3.0 fixes to a real
minimum. For this purpose, we created the branch "libreoffice-3-3-0"
from the tag "libreoffice-3.3.0.3". Please, follow the following rules:
+ any commit has to be reviewed by 3 per
Hi all,
we want to reduce regressions caused by LibO-3.3.0 fixes to a real
minimum. For this purpose, we created the branch "libreoffice-3-3-0" from the
tag "libreoffice-3.3.0.3". with
the following rules:
+ any commit has to be reviewed by 3 persons
+ preferably add only transla
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 03:18:01 -0800, Noel Power wrote:
Hi there
fix for fdo#32742#, its a simple fix ( but was a bugger to find ) imo is
riskless etc.
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/base/commit/?id=0afe2266016b03f6e11008463042c7daacead0e1
is ripe for signoff and cherrypicking, be g
Since for the time being I am packaging the multi installer manually,
from rc3 on.
Cheers
F.
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 16:57 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> Hi Friedrich,
>
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Fridrich Strba wrote:
> > OK, just for record, this is the new sensiblelangiso list:
Hi Friedrich,
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Fridrich Strba wrote:
> OK, just for record, this is the new sensiblelangiso list:
What means "new"? Since when is that list active? For next release or
is this already use for currently available DL?
Thanks a lot for clarifying,
ciao
Christian
__
Here's the change that triggered this...
Do you think we should just revert this bit, without it we get the
original scroll behaviour again.
but probably break some parts of the new accessibility stuff. Let's see
what od finds out.
-Max
___
Libr
OK, just for record, this is the new sensiblelangiso list:
en-US,ar,ast,be-BY,bg,bn,bo,br,ca,ca-XV,cs,da,de,dz,el,en-GB,es,et,eu,fi,fr,gl,gu,he,hi,hr,hu,is,it,ja,km,kn,ko,lt,lv,mr,nb,nl,oc,om,or,pl,pt,pt-BR,ru,sh,si,sk,sl,sr,sv,te,tr,ug,vi,zh-CN,zh-TW
Cheers
Fridich
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 13:00
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 14:01 +0100, Maximilian Odendahl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > max, do you remember the code in the postits that the attached patch
> > affects, can you remember what the problem was that needed fixing ?
>
> no, I don't remember why this is needed, but I don't think this is the
> ri
Hi Andras,
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 15:31 +0100, Andras Timar wrote:
> Is it allowed to push translation updates (lo-build-* stuff) to
> libreoffice-3-3-0 branch ?
Yes.
> (After double checking for formatting errors, including the ones that
> Fridrich found yesterday in hr and te readme tra
Hi,
Is it allowed to push translation updates (lo-build-* stuff) to
libreoffice-3-3-0 branch? (After double checking for formatting errors,
including the ones that Fridrich found yesterday in hr and te readme
translations.) Many teams reached 100% in the last two days and others are
busy with upda
On 12/01/11 12:25, Michael Meeks wrote:
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 06:17 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
is available for cherrypick/signoff
It looks fine to me.
Merged to libreoffice-3-3 and libreoffice-3-3-0, and re-working in
master to suck less too ;-)
Thanks,
M
Christoph Herzog wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH] Translations of comments in writer/sw/inc
>
Looks all good, pushed.
Thanks a lot,
-- Thorsten
pgpXXEhy8Xx0H.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http:
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 13:12 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 23:17 +0100, Julien Nabet wrote:
> > It's better with the attachments :-)
>
> Hum, it all looks good except for the operator=, I mean, it compiles but
> I don't think it *should* compile :-) it is changing the state
On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 23:17 +0100, Julien Nabet wrote:
> It's better with the attachments :-)
Hum, it all looks good except for the operator=, I mean, it compiles but
I don't think it *should* compile :-) it is changing the state of
"this". Something odd here.
Pushed the rest of this however. Nee
Hi *,
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 2:06 AM, Julien Nabet wrote:
>
> I used xargs instead of -exec to reduce chmod spawning.
> Hope there's no mistake in it.
I don't see the point in using -i - since that in turn causes one
process per file, so you don't really gain anything, do you?
Furthermore -i is
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 06:17 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> > is available for cherrypick/signoff
> It looks fine to me.
Merged to libreoffice-3-3 and libreoffice-3-3-0, and re-working in
master to suck less too ;-)
Thanks,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@novell.co
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 5:51 AM, Noel Power wrote:
> I'd like to include this fix ( which fixes corruption of formfield checkbox
> related data in binary format on export ) in libreoffice-3-3
>
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/writer/commit/?id=af4d6062b7e676ed56dc84927fb99b79aa03a7b5
>
>
Hi Noel,
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 11:18 +, Noel Power wrote:
> fix for fdo#32742#, its a simple fix ( but was a bugger to find ) imo is
> riskless etc.
wow - that is a surprising code flow :-)
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/base/commit/?id=0afe2266016b03f6e11008463042c7daace
I'd like to include this fix ( which fixes corruption of formfield
checkbox related data in binary format on export ) in libreoffice-3-3
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/writer/commit/?id=af4d6062b7e676ed56dc84927fb99b79aa03a7b5
is available for cherrypick/signoff
thanks,
Noel
Hi there
fix for fdo#32742#, its a simple fix ( but was a bugger to find ) imo is
riskless etc.
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/base/commit/?id=0afe2266016b03f6e11008463042c7daacead0e1
is ripe for signoff and cherrypicking, be grateful if someone could help
with that
thanks,
Noel
On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 20:29 +0100, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
> I'ld like to get a crasher fix around the enhanced fields into
> libreoffice-3-3 branch...
..
> Could anyone review and cherry-pick this commit?
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/writer/commit/?id=0921bd5dc88dfd212fc5a332e0902347
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 10:05 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Committed and pushed to both libreoffice-3-3 and libreoffice-3-3-0 branches.
Great - it looks fine to me too.
Incidentally - we are in triple review mode for libreoffice-3-3-0 :-)
ATB,
Michael.
On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 20:32 +, Wols Lists wrote:
> (And English is the language spoken by the Saxons! :-)
Those evil Saxons ! ;-)
Michael (an Anglo Saxon ish. type)
--
michael.me...@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
___
From fcda1e5b7cd78b186dd4d6e8b86df8e3ea4d6833 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christoph Herzog
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 10:32:43 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Translations of comments in writer/sw/inc
---
sw/inc/docary.hxx | 17
sw/inc/docfac.hxx |2 +-
sw/inc/docsh.hxx| 72 +
2011/1/12 bruno gallart
> Occitan lengadocian's project LibreOffice
>
> Hi all,
>
> I don't know if it is here that I must ask about some problem on
> installation of dictionaries in LibreOffice so ... I try !!
>
> I wanted know who I have to contact to introduce the spellcheker's files
> for O
Le 12/01/2011 10:05, Rene Engelhard a écrit :
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 02:40:09AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>> diff --git a/sdext/source/presenter/makefile.mk
>> b/sdext/source/presenter/makefile.mk
>> index 696d0e5..9e25e34 100755
>> --- a/sdext/source/presenter/makefile.mk
>> +++ b/sdext/sou
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 02:40:09AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> diff --git a/sdext/source/presenter/makefile.mk
> b/sdext/source/presenter/makefile.mk
> index 696d0e5..9e25e34 100755
> --- a/sdext/source/presenter/makefile.mk
> +++ b/sdext/source/presenter/makefile.mk
> @@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ PHONY
Occitan lengadocian's project LibreOffice
Hi all,
I don't know if it is here that I must ask about some problem on
installation of dictionaries in LibreOffice so ... I try !!
I wanted know who I have to contact to introduce the spellcheker's
files for Occitan lengadocian (oc_Fr.dic and oc_
Occitan lengadocian's project LibreOffice
Hi all,
I don't know if it is here that I must ask about some problem on
installation of dictionaries in LibreOffice so ... I try !!
I wanted know who I have to contact to introduce the spellcheker's
files for Occitan lengadocian (oc_Fr.dic and oc_
43 matches
Mail list logo
