Re: [Libreoffice] BOOL conflict

2010-12-08 Thread Thomas Klausner
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 10:49:27AM +, Michael Meeks wrote: > Urk; another reason not to use BOOL I guess :-) > > What does your iodbcunix.h include ? I guess we might need to do some > hideous #define magic for the iodbcunix.h headers here: did you get a > solution ? Not yet. >

Re: [Libreoffice] High contrast issue

2010-12-08 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Kendy is this in regards to the high contrast issue I found? On 12/09/2010 02:13 AM, Jan Holesovsky wrote: Hi Andrew, On 2010-12-02 at 22:16 +, Andrew C. E. Dent wrote: I have made simple HC variants for the start center images here:http://people.bath.ac.uk/ea2aced/OOo/Backing_HC.zip Hop

Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1

2010-12-08 Thread Sophie Gautier
Hi, On 08/12/2010 21:20, Marc Paré wrote: Le 2010-12-08 04:20, Michael Meeks a écrit : Hi Alexander, On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 10:04 +0100, Alexander Thurgood wrote: In countries where power supplies are intermittent, or irregular, it matters a great deal. If your phone or electricity lines crap o

Re: [Libreoffice] help.libreoffice.org MediaWiki DB snapshot to play with?

2010-12-08 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:30 PM, wrote: > Hi, all. I read part of the thread "LibreOffice WikiHelp" and recognized > that there are a large body of MediaWiki Extensions that might help. > However, rather than ask to try it out on your systems, I'd like to try > them on my own, against the MediaWi

[Libreoffice] Fwd: Auto Reply: ... please un-subscribe this person

2010-12-08 Thread someone
Uh, can you un-subscribe/filter this person until he returns or asks to re-subscribe? I got this auto reply directly after posting my previous message to the list... :/ He says he won't be back until the 15th... Thanks. This must be getting sent to everyone who posts? Or maybe I'm special. --- Beg

[Libreoffice] help.libreoffice.org MediaWiki DB snapshot to play with?

2010-12-08 Thread someone
Hi, all. I read part of the thread "LibreOffice WikiHelp" and recognized that there are a large body of MediaWiki Extensions that might help. However, rather than ask to try it out on your systems, I'd like to try them on my own, against the MediaWiki database backing help.libreoffice.org. Wikiped

Re: [Libreoffice] High contrast issue

2010-12-08 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Andrew, On 2010-12-02 at 22:16 +, Andrew C. E. Dent wrote: > I have made simple HC variants for the start center images > here:http://people.bath.ac.uk/ea2aced/OOo/Backing_HC.zip > Hope that helps,Andrew Thank you, looks great! :-) I've committe

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice WikiHelp

2010-12-08 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Miklos, On 2010-12-08 at 18:59 +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote: > > Actually - if anyone volunteers to improve the Main_Page (eg. collect > > links to swriter/start, scalc/start, ...), I'll be happy to create the > > account for him to do that; or I can cut and paste any improvements sent > > to thi

Re: [Libreoffice] Different x86 ABI on BSDs and MaxOSX

2010-12-08 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Caolan, On 2010-12-08 at 16:49 +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > So attached is my proposed change that would allow the testtools tests > to run correctly during the build without being hacked out or disabled, > which is rather important because if those tests fail it implies that > the final Li

Re: [Libreoffice] Different x86 ABI on BSDs and MaxOSX

2010-12-08 Thread Michael Meeks
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 20:38 +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > I tested that testtools would build and pass its tests. That *should* be > sufficient to ensure that the uno bridge is 100%, but the testtools is > comprised of tests that got added when the last time it was thought that > all conditions

Re: [Libreoffice] Different x86 ABI on BSDs and MaxOSX

2010-12-08 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 18:52 +0100, Robert Nagy wrote: > Hey, > > Sweet! > > Should I do a full build with it on i386 or did you test it already > on the box? I tested that testtools would build and pass its tests. That *should* be sufficient to ensure that the uno bridge is 100%, but the testtoo

Re: [Libreoffice] LibO download size [was: Comments on RC1]

2010-12-08 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Bernard, On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 19:55 +0100, Bernhard Dippold wrote: > The multi-installer for people in need for one single package download > in their language We're working hard at shrinking this still. > The EN-installer and lang-pack for others with main focus on the > download

Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1

2010-12-08 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi there, On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 08:04 -0800, plino wrote: > No. LO is NOT working on it. That is quite comic; if you read my blog, you'll discover I've been working on it for two days, and with some success - and I've been doing few of the other urgent things in my life that need doing, i

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: SmNodeToTextVisitor Fixes

2010-12-08 Thread Jonas Finnemann Jensen
Hi Luke, > I realized it would be possible to just have brackets in the SmExpressionNode > Visitor. That's not all true... I added all the brackets initially because I had some problems with a few isolated things... Try writing binom a b + c in the command text field... Then enter visual editor a

Re: [Libreoffice] Easter eggs, was: Re: Comments on RC1

2010-12-08 Thread Andras Timar
2010/12/8 Sebastian Spaeth : >> Thanks Sebastian for the link. It helps. Saddly, I don't see references on >> easter eggs for Office 2003 and later. > > They could just not be found as the code is closed. In contrast to LibO > :-P > > Really, we are not talking virii. We are talking scrolling contr

Re: [Libreoffice] Easter eggs, was: Re: Comments on RC1

2010-12-08 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
> Thanks Sebastian for the link. It helps. Saddly, I don't see references on > easter eggs for Office 2003 and later. They could just not be found as the code is closed. In contrast to LibO :-P Really, we are not talking virii. We are talking scrolling contributor credits on some key presses and

Re: [Libreoffice] Easter eggs, was: Re: Comments on RC1

2010-12-08 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Alexander Thurgood wrote: > > Hi Norbert, > > Le 08/12/10 15:41, Norbert Thiebaud a écrit : > >> Seriously ? What kind of noise ? (I hate to imagine the kind of work >> environment where the mere existence of such eggs would be cause for >> any concern, or even - f

Re: [Libreoffice] Easter eggs, was: Re: Comments on RC1

2010-12-08 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Marc Paré wrote: > > > Le 2010-12-08 12:00, Olivier Hallot a écrit : > > The no >  ise I had to fight in a 120.000 desktop deployment I am managing, by the > IT security dept who almost made me write under oath that these stupidities > are > not a secu

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice-3.3-rc1 git tag and fixes reviewing

2010-12-08 Thread Petr Mladek
Thorsten Behrens píše v Pá 03. 12. 2010 v 21:50 +0100: > Petr Mladek wrote: > > libreoffice-3-3 git branch is still opened for fixes. Just please, send > > your patches for review to this mailing list before you commit. You > > might ask a particular person for review via CC or on the irc channel >

Re: [Libreoffice] Easter eggs, was: Re: Comments on RC1

2010-12-08 Thread Olivier Hallot
Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > > Your IT department should not allow the use of MS products then: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Easter_eggs_in_Microsoft_products > :) > Emacs is the worst. It even contains Tetris :-). > > Sebastian > Thanks Sebastian for the link. It helps. Saddly, I don't see re

Re: [Libreoffice] Easter eggs, was: Re: Comments on RC1

2010-12-08 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 11:09:33 -0700, "Tor Lillqvist" wrote: > Just in case anybody is counting votes, I am against removing Easter eggs. I > think we need more of them. And more rude comments in the source code. In obscure languages! Perhaps German? Ahh no wait... pgp1ntXNd0TLY.pgp Descripti

Re: [Libreoffice] Easter eggs, was: Re: Comments on RC1

2010-12-08 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
Your IT department should not allow the use of MS products then: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Easter_eggs_in_Microsoft_products :) Emacs is the worst. It even contains Tetris :-). Sebastian ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org

Re: [Libreoffice] Easter eggs, was: Re: Comments on RC1

2010-12-08 Thread Jesús Corrius
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Alexander Thurgood wrote: > > Hi Norbert, > > Le 08/12/10 15:41, Norbert Thiebaud a écrit : > >> Seriously ? What kind of noise ? (I hate to imagine the kind of work >> environment where the mere existence of such eggs would be cause for >> any concern, or even - fo

Re: [Libreoffice] Easter eggs, was: Re: Comments on RC1

2010-12-08 Thread Marc Paré
Le 2010-12-08 12:00, Olivier Hallot a écrit : The no ise I had to fight in a 120.000 desktop deployment I am managing, by the IT security dept who almost made me write under oath that these stupidities are not a security threat. Sorry, but I had pretty tought times dealing with

Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1

2010-12-08 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 08:04:30 -0800 (PST), plino wrote: > No. LO is NOT working on it. This has been discussed on other topics since > late Nov (Beta1 or 2) Yes, they are. Michael Meeks disected the Windows installer and posted information about it just recently. Stop pretending you know what peopl

Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1

2010-12-08 Thread Marc Paré
Le 2010-12-08 04:20, Michael Meeks a écrit : Hi Alexander, On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 10:04 +0100, Alexander Thurgood wrote: In countries where power supplies are intermittent, or irregular, it matters a great deal. If your phone or electricity lines crap out part way through the download, and you w

Re: [Libreoffice] Easter eggs, was: Re: Comments on RC1

2010-12-08 Thread Alexander Thurgood
Hi Norbert, Le 08/12/10 15:41, Norbert Thiebaud a écrit : > Seriously ? What kind of noise ? (I hate to imagine the kind of work > environment where the mere existence of such eggs would be cause for > any concern, or even - for that matter - cause for any attention at > all... at least nothing

Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1

2010-12-08 Thread Alexander Thurgood
Le 08/12/10 10:20, Michael Meeks a écrit : Hi Michael, > Would you download a copy of that proprietary suite instead ? or would > you get it on CD ? Ultimately, I'd love to see some Ubuntu style ship-it > service to provide CDs to serve the 3rd world cheaply. As/when we have a > foundation

Re: [Libreoffice] Easter eggs, was: Re: Comments on RC1

2010-12-08 Thread Tor Lillqvist
Just in case anybody is counting votes, I am against removing Easter eggs. I think we need more of them. And more rude comments in the source code. --tml ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mail

Re: [Libreoffice] README translation for 3.3

2010-12-08 Thread Andras Timar
2010/12/8 Kohei Yoshida : > Hi there, > > I need some help with figuring out how the readme is built during the > build process. > > As I've noticed, the master copy of the readme has been updated; lots of > new paragraphs added and some removed.  The problem is that, where the > paragraphs were re

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice WikiHelp

2010-12-08 Thread Miklos Vajna
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 02:48:16PM +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > > Did I miss the point? :) > > You did ;-) The point is not to browse the help per se (even though it > can of course evolve into that), but the real usage is to hit F1 in > LibreOffice without a help installed, and you'll get _di

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice WikiHelp

2010-12-08 Thread Alexander Thurgood
Le 08/12/10 15:22, Jan Holesovsky a écrit : > We have these, eg. when you hit F1 in a freshly opened Writer, you get > to: > > http://help.libreoffice.org/Swriter/start > When I hit F1 on my Macbook, my screen brightness diminishes... When I hit Fn-F1 together, the inline help is displayed. I'

Re: [Libreoffice] Different x86 ABI on BSDs and MaxOSX

2010-12-08 Thread Robert Nagy
Hey, Sweet! Should I do a full build with it on i386 or did you test it already on the box? On (2010-12-08 16:49), Caolán McNamara wrote: > So, checking this out on Robert's OpenBSD box and digging into MacOSX > land it appears that Linux has different x86 struct returning rules than > MacOSX an

[Libreoffice] [Bug 31865] [Task]: LibreOffice 3.3 release blockers / stoppers

2010-12-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31865 Petr Mladek changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||32185 --- Comment #28 from Petr Mladek 20

Re: [Libreoffice] fighting with debug macros...

2010-12-08 Thread Miklos Vajna
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 03:34:50PM +0100, Pierre-André Jacquod wrote: > include /ure/sal/inc/osl/diagnose.h in file, and use only OSL_Debug > macros loosing all messages? Is it possible to add an additional > OSL_ASSERT(condition, message) macro? Or not wanted? We already have OSL_ENSURE() for t

Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1

2010-12-08 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Kevin, *, On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 4:28 PM, Kevin Hunter wrote: > > Would this be a suitable reason to offer the download as a torrent? Torrents have been available from the very beginning (and still are available of course). But unfortunately you're not always allowed or able to download usin

Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1

2010-12-08 Thread Marc Paré
Le 2010-12-08 10:38, Michael Meeks a écrit : Hi Marc, On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 10:10 -0500, Marc Paré wrote: Le 2010-12-08 04:20, Michael Meeks a écrit : Right - a properly formed bug report for this in the bug tracker with details of language etc. would be much appreciated. .. I put th

Re: [Libreoffice] Easter eggs, was: Re: Comments on RC1

2010-12-08 Thread Olivier Hallot
Title: Escritorio Virtual Scinergy Re: [Libreoffice] Easter eggs, was: Re: Comments on RC1 Mensagem  Remetente: Olivier Hallot   Mensagem: Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Olivier Hallot> wrote:> > Wh

Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1

2010-12-08 Thread plino
Is that the final bug tracker? Does it include all open bugs reported for Openoffice as well? Otherwise I could just be reporting a bug for LO which is already known for OOo... Unless that is the idea? In any case I assumed from previous discussions on this mailing list that a simple validation

[Libreoffice] Different x86 ABI on BSDs and MaxOSX

2010-12-08 Thread Caolán McNamara
So, checking this out on Robert's OpenBSD box and digging into MacOSX land it appears that Linux has different x86 struct returning rules than MacOSX and OpenBSD and I therefore assume all BSD derived OSes on x86 follow the same rules, especially as Robert says that FreeBSD have just hacked out the

Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1

2010-12-08 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 11:04am -0500 Wed, 08 Dec 2010, Plino wrote: I'm willing to report the bugs I find when a proper bug tracker is set up. Do you mean something other than what is currently available through bugs.freedesktop.org? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=__open__&product=LibreOffi

Re: [Libreoffice] Easter eggs, was: Re: Comments on RC1

2010-12-08 Thread Olivier Hallot
Title: Escritorio Virtual Scinergy Re: [Libreoffice] Easter eggs, was: Re: Comments on RC1 Mensagem  Remetente: Olivier Hallot   Mensagem: michael.me...@novell.com wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 10:56 +, Caolán McNamara

Re: [Libreoffice] [LibreOffice] [Patch] Fix for i#108228: Bool has negative sign when used in Writer formula expression

2010-12-08 Thread Noel Power
Hi Mattias/Michael On 08/12/10 11:20, Michael Meeks wrote: Having said that, this really doesn't seem ideal. I wonder what the compatibility impact of changing it would be [ a chestnut for Noel to consider I suspect ]. From the basic point of view as Mattias says ( and afaics ) this does

Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1

2010-12-08 Thread plino
>Wait - you also complained about RC1's size ? and then again here with >a link ? :-) and Charles told you're we're working on fixing it, which >is what we are doing ... No. LO is NOT working on it. This has been discussed on other topics since late Nov (Beta1 or 2) http://nabble.document

[Libreoffice] [Bug 31865] [Task]: LibreOffice 3.3 release blockers / stoppers

2010-12-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31865 Bug 31865 depends on bug 31585, which changed state. Bug 31585 Summary: Writer crashes on mail merge https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31585 What|Old Value |New Value --

Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1

2010-12-08 Thread Marc Paré
Le 2010-12-08 04:20, Michael Meeks a écrit : On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 14:33 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: Marc you mentioned a lack of a spell checker. what bout on any OS using another dictionary like Aspell or something of the sort? Right - a properly formed bug report for this in the

[Libreoffice] README translation for 3.3

2010-12-08 Thread Kohei Yoshida
Hi there, I need some help with figuring out how the readme is built during the build process. As I've noticed, the master copy of the readme has been updated; lots of new paragraphs added and some removed. The problem is that, where the paragraphs were removed I see some bogus paragraphs from a

Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1

2010-12-08 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi there, On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 06:53 -0800, plino wrote: > >On the other hand - now is not a wonderful time to be discovering > >this :-) The outline of what was suggested wrt. multi-language installs > >has been on the table for several months, and was there in Beta3; RC1 is > >not an id

Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1

2010-12-08 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Marc, On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 10:10 -0500, Marc Paré wrote: > Le 2010-12-08 04:20, Michael Meeks a écrit : > > Right - a properly formed bug report for this in the bug tracker with > > details of language etc. would be much appreciated. .. > I put this on the user list recently and here is th

Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1

2010-12-08 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 4:20am -0500 Wed, 08 Dec 2010, Michael Meeks wrote: On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 10:04 +0100, Alexander Thurgood wrote: In countries where power supplies are intermittent, or irregular, it matters a great deal. If your phone or electricity lines crap out part way through the download, and you were o

Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1

2010-12-08 Thread plino
Regarding this comment >On the other hand - now is not a wonderful time to be discovering >this :-) The outline of what was suggested wrt. multi-language installs >has been on the table for several months, and was there in Beta3; RC1 is >not an ideal time to notice these issues. It is in

Re: [Libreoffice] Easter eggs, was: Re: Comments on RC1

2010-12-08 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 11:09 +, Michael Meeks wrote: > the embedded > games were -so- bad, I can't imagine anyone getting that addicted :-) Not unless we embedd Tetris in Calc Kohei -- Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc ___ LibreOffice

Re: [Libreoffice] Easter eggs, was: Re: Comments on RC1

2010-12-08 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Olivier Hallot wrote: > While we are here, I am happy to know we will one day remove our LO easter > eggs. Are 'we' ? > > No matter how inocuous they are (and they are), it is too often a source of > noise in enterprise environments. Seriously ? What kind of nois

[Libreoffice] fighting with debug macros...

2010-12-08 Thread Pierre-André Jacquod
Hello, still trying to learn a bit the code. Compiling without DEBUG on gives some new warnings:- ) This lead me to look at some code construct. Here is in pseudo-code a typical construct I am crossing: var y = ; var x = ; code if ( y > MAXVALUE) { ASSERT(x, "out of range"); // only u

[Libreoffice] [Bug 31865] [Task]: LibreOffice 3.3 release blockers / stoppers

2010-12-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31865 Bug 31865 depends on bug 32196, which changed state. Bug 32196 Summary: Data Form shows corrupted string. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32196 What|Old Value |New Value -

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice WikiHelp

2010-12-08 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Muthu, On 2010-12-08 at 19:40 +0530, Muthu Subramanian K wrote: > I guess we should tie the 'help-welcome' (the page that opens when the > user clicks Help->Help from menu) pages to the wiki/Main_Page or > probably create a LibreOffice welcome help page (to point to the Writer, > Calc, and oth

Re: [Libreoffice] [RESOLVED] Patch for Bug 32209 awaiting peer-review

2010-12-08 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 09:10 +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 23:24 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > > I have another patch awaiting peer-review, to go into the 3.3 branch. > > > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32209 > > > > This one makes one hard-coded English st

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice WikiHelp

2010-12-08 Thread Muthu Subramanian K
Kendy, I guess we should tie the 'help-welcome' (the page that opens when the user clicks Help->Help from menu) pages to the wiki/Main_Page or probably create a LibreOffice welcome help page (to point to the Writer, Calc, and other applications help-start pages)... I too felt it odd for it not to

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice WikiHelp

2010-12-08 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 14:40 +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > Hi Kohei, > > On 2010-12-07 at 11:05 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > > > > > http://help.libreoffice.org is now up and running. > > > > > > Can someone post the IP address of that site? For me, that leads to the > > > old go-ooo source c

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice WikiHelp

2010-12-08 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Miklos, On 2010-12-07 at 22:21 +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote: > > http://help.libreoffice.org is now up and running. As explained above, > > it is not open for public editing yet. > > I must miss something really trivial, but I do not see where to start > reading. :) The only way to find pages f

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice WikiHelp

2010-12-08 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Kohei, On 2010-12-07 at 11:05 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > > > http://help.libreoffice.org is now up and running. > > > > Can someone post the IP address of that site? For me, that leads to the > > old go-ooo source code documentation by doxygen. It could be a DNS > > caching issue if we

Re: [Libreoffice] Bundled fonts

2010-12-08 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 13:05:16 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Is not sufficient afaik, writer uses opens___.ttf, too afaik. opens___.ttf is universally installed, independt of what configure options you use. Sebastian pgpGCv6hekX7Q.pgp Description: PGP signature __

Re: [Libreoffice] Bundled fonts

2010-12-08 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 12:30:00 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > > Not quibbling about the option naming here (--with vs --enable etc), do > > we really need to bundle those fonts by default? > IMHO: Yes. ... > But not the Graphite variants. And that matters in developer installs how? :-) Distros a

Re: [Libreoffice] FOSDEM foo ...

2010-12-08 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Suren, On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 17:55 +0530, surensp...@gmail.com wrote: > I have made my proposal now :) Hope its alright :) Thanks for the > encouraging words :D Looks lovely :-) Still missing talk proposals from others though: surely we have some brave people hereabouts that w

Re: [Libreoffice] Bundled fonts

2010-12-08 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 01:14:58PM +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 12:30:00PM +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > >> So please not disable it. If you want ship the opensymbol one with > >> math, and only leave the

Re: [Libreoffice] Bundled fonts

2010-12-08 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Rene, *; On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Rene Engelhard wrote: > On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 12:30:00PM +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: >> So please not disable it. If you want ship the opensymbol one with >> math, and only leave the others in the fonts package, but keep them > > Is not sufficien

Re: [Libreoffice] Bundled fonts

2010-12-08 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 12:30:00PM +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > So please not disable it. If you want ship the opensymbol one with > math, and only leave the others in the fonts package, but keep them Is not sufficient afaik, writer uses opens___.ttf, too afaik. Grüße/Regards, René --

Re: [Libreoffice] binfilter and features...

2010-12-08 Thread Pierre-André Jacquod
Hi, > There is alright, a phonecon typically once a week or so. maybe we can > put this topic on the agenda would be great > and you could dial in if its at a suitable time. doing this during free time, I may really depend if the possibility arise or not. But basically, we could think of a kind

[Libreoffice] HC2 l10n process

2010-12-08 Thread Sophie Gautier
Hi Kendy, all, So, some inputs from the localizer point of view concerning the help files. Currently, it's not available else than on line and in English, which is very problematic, and more for some of us who received support to make it available, plus it let think that it is not translated at

Re: [Libreoffice] Bundled fonts

2010-12-08 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Sebastian, *; On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > > Not quibbling about the option naming here (--with vs --enable etc), do > we really need to bundle those fonts by default? IMHO: Yes. > (DejaVu, Libertine, and > Gentium are already quite common on Linux boxes at leas

Re: [Libreoffice] Bundled fonts

2010-12-08 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
> Sounds good to me; go for it ! :-) OK to push this patch? USer visible changes are: Rename --with-fonts to --enable-fonts and --enable-extra-font to --enable-extra-fonts to make them consistent. Improve help texts. Make it so that --enable-extra-fonts implies --enable-fonts. Both options

Re: [Libreoffice] [LibreOffice] [Patch] Fix for i#108228: Bool has negative sign when used in Writer formula expression

2010-12-08 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Mattias, On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 21:35 +1100, Mattias Johnsson wrote: > Fix for http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=108228. Wow - this is an excellent analysis :-) though I'm hoping someone else will review the patch. > // The numeric values of TRUE and FALSE > enum SbxBOOL

Re: [Libreoffice] Easter eggs, was: Re: Comments on RC1

2010-12-08 Thread Michael Meeks
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 10:56 +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 07:51 -0200, Olivier Hallot wrote: > > While we are here, I am happy to know we will one day remove our LO > > easter eggs. > > Kill-joy. :-) agreed. The main problem, that I've seen with "easter eggs" is

Re: [Libreoffice] Easter eggs, was: Re: Comments on RC1

2010-12-08 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 07:51 -0200, Olivier Hallot wrote: > While we are here, I am happy to know we will one day remove our LO > easter eggs. Kill-joy. > No matter how inocuous they are (and they are), it is too often a source > of noise in enterprise environments. I think the fun ones are alr

Re: [Libreoffice] Bundled fonts

2010-12-08 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 10:53 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > That would be 20MB saved on each make dev-install and I wouldnt run > danger to pick up the wrong version of the DejaVu fonts. On this final point, we have this bug where if the old opensymbol font is installed in the Linux system-wide f

Re: [Libreoffice] BOOL conflict

2010-12-08 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Thomas, On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 10:26 +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote: > I'm building with external iodbc (3.52.7) and it fails with: > /usr/pkg/include/iodbcunix.h:136: error: conflicting declaration 'typedef int > BOOL' > .../libreoffice/solver/330/unxbsdx3.pro/inc/tools/solar.h:58: error: 'BOOL'

Re: [Libreoffice] Bundled fonts

2010-12-08 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Sebastian, On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 10:53 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > By default, we bundle 20MB of TTF fonts that I mostly have installed as > system fonts already. Ah - true. > --without-fonts (--with-fonts is the default) and > --enable-extra-font (not enabled by default, puttin

[Libreoffice] [LibreOffice] [Patch] Fix for i#108228: Bool has negative sign when used in Writer formula expression

2010-12-08 Thread Mattias Johnsson
Fix for http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=108228. The problem behaviour occurs because the boolean expression "true" evaluates to -1 rather than +1 in formulas in Writer. So if, for example, you create a table formula in Writer, (Table->Formula) and enter something like 1+(2==2), it

Re: [Libreoffice] Release tag convention

2010-12-08 Thread Petr Mladek
Norbert Thiebaud píše v Út 07. 12. 2010 v 11:22 -0600: > On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Petr Mladek wrote: > > Hi, > > > > there is a proposal to use the tag "libreoffice-3.3.0.1" instead of > > "LIBREOFFICE_3_3_0_1" and mention it in the LibreOffice/About dialog as > > is. It is more clear and u

Re: [Libreoffice] RC1 / size redux ...

2010-12-08 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 09:29:03 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > dat 24 Mb As I said, I built without language support, and still got an English AND a french thesaurus installed. The french one is 4.6MB of uncompressed text. I don't know french. Any chance to only install language files if we build

Re: [Libreoffice] libreoffice -quickstart

2010-12-08 Thread Michael Meeks
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 08:49 +0100, David Tardon wrote: > On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 02:19:02AM +0100, Miguel (ON) wrote: > > I've noticed that a process is added at the startup when LibreOffice is > > installed. The process is .. > Yes, it is known and should be fixed in RC1: > http://lists.freedeskt

[Libreoffice] Easter eggs, was: Re: Comments on RC1

2010-12-08 Thread Olivier Hallot
While we are here, I am happy to know we will one day remove our LO easter eggs. No matter how inocuous they are (and they are), it is too often a source of noise in enterprise environments. Just an entry in our to-do list. Em 08-12-2010 07:20, Michael Meeks escreveu: One way (but not the

Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1

2010-12-08 Thread Tor Lillqvist
> In countries where power supplies are intermittent, or irregular, it > matters a great deal. OK, I will stop arguing then. --tml ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffic

Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1 spell checking

2010-12-08 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 09:46 +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 10:37 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > > What about mac and windows users? Is Hunspell available for them as well? > > This was about using spelling dictionaries that are already available on > the target platform.

[Libreoffice] Bundled fonts

2010-12-08 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
By default, we bundle 20MB of TTF fonts that I mostly have installed as system fonts already. We have 2 badly documented configure options: --without-fonts (--with-fonts is the default) and --enable-extra-font (not enabled by default, putting more .ttfs on your disk). Not quibbling about the op

Re: [Libreoffice] RC1 / size redux ...

2010-12-08 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Marc, On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 13:36 -0500, Marc Paré wrote: > That does help in describing the situation. Was this also examined by > other devs? I am saying this as sometimes, other pair of eyes will see > other places/ways of reducing the size. This is why I post it to the list (FWIW

Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1 spell checking

2010-12-08 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 10:37 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > What about mac and windows users? Is Hunspell available for them as well? This was about using spelling dictionaries that are already available on the target platform. And Mac and Windows don't typically have hunspell as their default s

Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1 spell checking

2010-12-08 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
What about mac and windows users? Is Hunspell available for them as well? On 12/8/10 10:34 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 09:20 +, Michael Meeks wrote: On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 14:33 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: Marc you mentioned a lack of a spell checker. what bout on a

Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1 spell checking

2010-12-08 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 09:20 +, Michael Meeks wrote: > On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 14:33 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > > Marc you mentioned a lack of a spell checker. what bout on any OS using > > another dictionary like Aspell or something of the sort? > > Right - a properly formed bug re

Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1

2010-12-08 Thread Michael Meeks
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 14:33 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > Marc you mentioned a lack of a spell checker. what bout on any OS using > another dictionary like Aspell or something of the sort? Right - a properly formed bug report for this in the bug tracker with details of language etc.

Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1

2010-12-08 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Alexander, On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 10:04 +0100, Alexander Thurgood wrote: > In countries where power supplies are intermittent, or irregular, it > matters a great deal. If your phone or electricity lines crap out part > way through the download, and you were on a pay-per-minute connection, > what

[Libreoffice] [RESOLVED] Re: Patch review requested

2010-12-08 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 00:46 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > Please someone review my patch at > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32133 > > which fixes the aforementioned bug for 3.3. The patch in comment 7 is > the one that needs reviewing. Just to note on the list that this is reso

Re: [Libreoffice] Patch for Bug 32209 awaiting peer-review

2010-12-08 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 23:24 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > I have another patch awaiting peer-review, to go into the 3.3 branch. > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32209 > > This one makes one hard-coded English string (ouch) localizable. It's a > simple change. Yeah, trivial. Can

Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1

2010-12-08 Thread Alexander Thurgood
Hi Tor, Le 07/12/10 13:24, Tor Lillqvist a écrit : > Does it really matter a lot if downloading the LibreOffice installer takes > four or eight hours on some specific slow connection? Are people going to sit > by the computer staring at the download progress bar doing nothing else > during the

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice WikiHelp

2010-12-08 Thread Alexander Thurgood
Hi Miklos, Le 07/12/10 22:21, Miklos Vajna a écrit : > > I must miss something really trivial, but I do not see where to start > reading. :) The only way to find pages from the main page is to use the > Random page or Recent changes feature. > > Did I miss the point? :) > No you didn't. In fa

Re: [Libreoffice] The future of help [was: Re: Deleting Java from Base]

2010-12-08 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Sophie, On 2010-12-04 at 08:51 +0300, Sophie Gautier wrote: > >> That one might be actually easy - when the wikihelp is online, I'd > >> default to not building the internal help at all, and instead focus on > >> converting it from the wiki version to the platform-native (Windows / > >> MacOSX

Re: [Libreoffice] The future of help [was: Re: Deleting Java from Base]

2010-12-08 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Cor, On 2010-12-03 at 17:51 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote: > > That one might be actually easy - when the wikihelp is online, I'd > > default to not building the internal help at all, and instead focus on > > converting it from the wiki version to the platform-native (Windows / > > MacOSX / Gnome / K

Re: [Libreoffice] RC1 / size redux ...

2010-12-08 Thread Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai
Hi All, Notes, ideas: Idxexamle*.odf – preview of index (insert index/table). In B2 we had msi file with cab file in rc1 we have msi file embedding cab content. Duplicated license and readme files across installation and also in NSIS preinstaller – Windows Installer too. What if: all zip

Re: [Libreoffice] RC1 / size redux ...

2010-12-08 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 17:55:19 +, Michael Meeks wrote: > So - as we all know, RC1 is too large; ... > http://users.freedesktop.org/~michael/sizes.ods This is a phantastic analysis, thanks for doing that Michael. Amazing that OTP + license files make 50% of our used space :). As someo