Re: [Libreoffice] Is there tag/property in the following example that LO not support yet?

I found the bug in OO that there is the same problem as my: http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92625 I check the document.xml and the image define the same: − In the bug written that it because using the crop tool in office 2007. thanks Nadav On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 4:29 PM,

[Libreoffice] SvxHyperlinkDlg still used?

Hi there, Does anyone know if SvxHyperlinkDlg* is still used? Just by looking at the code, that dialog doesn't appear to be used anymore. It gets registered in Calc and Writer (haven't checked other apps), but they don't appear to be used anywhere in those apps. If it's no longer used, that cla

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix bug where an opening quote mark is treated as a word

Hi Mattias and Cedric, OOo issue #i89042 also has a test document that gives expected results over several selections. http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/file/n1845889/i89042_Word_count_with_quotes.odt i89042_Word_count_with_quotes.odt The issue *appears* to involve only leading special q

Re: [Libreoffice] Styles and Formatting

Selon Cedric Bosdonnat : > > So Hierarchical as default would not be my choice. > > Default is more then enough. Hi, I must admit that even if I been using OpenOffice for nearly 10 years, I never use that dialog so I've maybe not made a good choice for my first jump in the source... I have to un

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix bug where an opening quote mark is treated as a word

On 5 November 2010 02:29, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote: > Hi Mattias, > > On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 23:41 +1100, Mattias Johnsson wrote: >> > Patch attached. It's a very minimal change, so it's probably safe to >> > push into the 3.3 branch as well as master. > > Do you have some bug report describing the p

Re: [Libreoffice] Changing mailing list behavior

At 7:01pm -0400 Thu, 04 Nov 2010, Kohei Yoshida wrote: On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 23:58 +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote: If you're subscribed, and you don't want extra copies, just set a "Reply-To: libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org" header. Most mailers (and people) adhere to that. Also, many email c

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix typo

--- configure.in |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in index 0bb772c..03cb2d7 100644 --- a/configure.in +++ b/configure.in @@ -477,7 +477,7 @@ AC_ARG_WITH(ext-lightproof, ,) AC_ARG_WITH(ext-mysql-connector, -AS_HELP_STRING([

Re: [Libreoffice] Question about Git

On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 6:09 PM, julien wrote: > Hello, > > I've made changes on my repository and now when i type : > bin/g pull -r > > i've got : > extensions/source/activex/main/SOActionsApproval.cpp: needs update > extensions/source/activex/main/SOComWindowPeer.cpp: needs update > extensions/so

[Libreoffice] Question about Git

Hello, I've made changes on my repository and now when i type : bin/g pull -r i've got : extensions/source/activex/main/SOActionsApproval.cpp: needs update extensions/source/activex/main/SOComWindowPeer.cpp: needs update extensions/source/activex/main/SODispatchInterceptor.cpp: needs update refu

Re: [Libreoffice] Changing mailing list behavior

On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 23:58 +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > If you're subscribed, and you don't want extra copies, just set a > "Reply-To: libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org" header. Most mailers > (and people) adhere to that. Also, many email clients have a "reply to list" functionality which on

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Distro-configs: adapt to new configure options for extensions

Some extensions options for configure were renamed to --with-ext-* --- distro-configs/GoOoLinux.conf.in | 10 +- distro-configs/GoOoMacOSX.conf.in| 10 +- distro-configs/LibreOfficeLinux.conf.in | 10 +- distro-configs/LibreOfficeLinuxDe

Re: [Libreoffice] Changing mailing list behavior

Regina Henschel wrote: > I often get mails two times, one over the list and the other > directly. The other way round, I fall into the trap not the answer > to the list but to the poster directly. > > Is it possible to organize the list as the lists are organized for > OOo? There all posts go to t

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Elide all "SO:" and "OOo:" prefixes

Hi Niko, thanks a lot, pushed - slightly tweaked, the SO:... prefixed dependencies can go entirely. -- Thorsten pgpkNbl6RexSP.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/ma

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Renaming extension options

Niko Rönkkö wrote: > Also: We don't want to break builders scripts (as Michael Meeks said) so > deprecated old options not removed but commented instead. > Hm, since we've now branched off 3.3 - I wouldn't mind changing it completely. I think it's better to get nice hard errors once, instead of a

[Libreoffice] Changing mailing list behavior

Hi all, I often get mails two times, one over the list and the other directly. The other way round, I fall into the trap not the answer to the list but to the poster directly. Is it possible to organize the list as the lists are organized for OOo? There all posts go to the list and I recieve

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Elide all "SO:" and "OOo:" prefixes

--- stlport/prj/build.lst |2 +- crashrep/prj/build.lst|2 +- xmlsecurity/prj/build.lst |2 +- connectivity/prj/build.lst |2 +- desktop/prj/build.lst |2 +- boost/prj/build.lst |2 +- moz/prj/build.lst|2 +- python/prj/build.lst |2 +- libxmlsec/prj/

[Libreoffice] Fwd: build failure in dbaccess/qa/complex/dbaccess

Oups, I wanted to respond to the thread opened by Thomas Klausner. Message original Sujet: build failure in dbaccess/qa/complex/dbaccess Date : Thu, 04 Nov 2010 21:13:22 +0100 De :julien Pour : libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org Hello, I have recompiled the whole proj

[Libreoffice] build failure in dbaccess/qa/complex/dbaccess

Hello, I have recompiled the whole project with openjdk 6 and it was ok. However my options to compile are very simple : bin/g pull -r && ./autogen.sh --with-git --disable-kde --disable-kde4 && ./download && make I have openjdk6 and java 6 of sun and with Debian (I've got testing updated), i'

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Renaming extension options

Renamed all extensions to --with-ext-* If "we do want to present them together in ./configure --help", then they all must be a same type of. => Changed all extensions to be AC_ARG_WITH See: b765a28ea9d63b60a14786b1a5484227175d413e Also: We don't want to break builders scripts (as Michael Meeks

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Convert --enable-java to --with-java

Resubmitting :-) now we've split the release and dev versions. It just does a clean rename of the option. As I said last time, I can't find any other reference to enable-java, but loads of references to with-java. Cheers, Wol >From 67d623baf651958070cbc7de3773b6a77ca7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 200

Re: [Libreoffice] Building on Debian squeeze

On 04/11/10 18:09, Takeshi Abe wrote: >> However the page does recommend >> > >> > "./autogen.sh ... --without-junit ..." >> > >> > which would avoid the need for junit4, but I'm not exactly sure why that >> > line is the recommended one. Perhaps because junit isn't universally >> > packaged acr

Re: [Libreoffice] Building on Debian squeeze

Hi Caolá, On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 15:18:04 +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 19:12 +0900, Takeshi Abe wrote: >> > Added to the wiki, feel free to add any other ones yourself to the list >> > at http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/How_to_build >> BTW I have found that bu

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH 3/3] use linux bridge code on all BSDs

Just sent the new diff. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH 3/3] use linux bridge code on all BSDs

On (2010-11-04 16:53), Thomas Klausner wrote: > One thing though: there are some checks for FreeBSD version like: > > +#if __FreeBSD_version < 602103 > +: m_hApp( dlopen( 0, RTLD_NOW | RTLD_GLOBAL ) ) > +#else > : m_hApp( dlopen( 0, RTLD_LAZY ) ) > +#endif > > a) does this work as intend

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH 3/3] use linux bridge code on all BSDs

On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 01:15:29PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > I'm totally in favour of this, especially as I know we fixed bugs in the > Linux x86_64 uno bridge, and I strongly doubt those fixes got merged > into the similar bridges. That's true, there are differences between the two. > wiz:

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix bug where an opening quote mark is treated as a word

Hi Mattias, On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 23:41 +1100, Mattias Johnsson wrote: > > Patch attached. It's a very minimal change, so it's probably safe to > > push into the 3.3 branch as well as master. Do you have some bug report describing the problem? I'ld like to test this and eventually add the fixed b

Re: [Libreoffice] Building on Debian squeeze (Was: Building on CentOS 5)

On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 19:12 +0900, Takeshi Abe wrote: > > Added to the wiki, feel free to add any other ones yourself to the list > > at http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/How_to_build > BTW I have found that building on Debian squeeze requires yet another > package junit4 as long as co

Re: [Libreoffice] Help concerning code style and documentation

On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 09:39 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > > You know, that I work on it in my spare time, so response time might > be > > long. You should tell me, whether the mathematics I used are clear > from > > the code or you want me to write a description. > > Understood. We certainly wa

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Easy hack patches, remove non-compiled code

Kevin Hunter wrote: > Further (with exceptions, of course), automagic tools provide a much > more consistent and at least acceptable-by-all metric for how code > should look. (And I would argue that how code looks via the > squint-test is very *much* pertinent for longer term gathering of > new de

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Easy hack patches, remove non-compiled code

Kevin Hunter wrote: > Further (with exceptions, of course), automagic tools provide a much > more consistent and at least acceptable-by-all metric for how code > should look. (And I would argue that how code looks via the > squint-test is very *much* pertinent for longer term gathering of > new de

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Easy hack patches, remove non-compiled code

At 9:47am -0400 Thu, 04 Nov 2010, Thorsten Behrens wrote: I'm sorry if [the request not to make any formatting changes] was not too obvious from the EasyHacks page - do you think adding something like this to the preamble would make it more clear: "please avoid larger reformatting of the code fo

Re: [Libreoffice] New credits page up (and linked from TDF)

> Indeed - I'm not sure that the numbers are clean enough, pwrt. releng > commits, and loosing history left & right to make the charts -that- > meaningful. I see they are back on the page now; can we loose them > again ? :-) which charts? ;-) I cannot comment about data cleanliness. But unless we

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] distro_config: adapt to new confgure options for extensions

On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 13:57 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > Some extensions options for configure were renamed to --enable-ext-* > Adapt all distro configs to reflect that. Sorry for the churn. Thanks for the patch, I just pushed it. Regards, -- Cédric Bosdonnat LibreOffice hacker http://docum

Re: [Libreoffice] build error in desktop no 'void desktop::Migration::migrateSettingsIfNecessary()'

On 04/11/10 13:46, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 12:45:25 +, Wols Lists wrote: >> Any particular reason why? Is there a reason it can't use --delete? > Without knowing anything specific I would say because --delete would > remove all compiled files (and the unx* directory). So y

[Libreoffice] Wordcount regression tests

I took the liberty of emailing Pamela Jones when this came up earlier, because I remembered that Word messed it up pretty badly. It seems there's not much by way of official guidance, but she came back with this. I'm a WordPerfect fan, so if you want me to run some stuff past the WP wordcount setu

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Easy hack patches, remove non-compiled code

Kevin Hunter wrote: > Patches against calc/.../miscdlgs/ to remove non-compiled code and > other minor refactors. > Pushed the non-compiled code removals. Many thanks! -- Thorsten pgpQHn4IKZJMI.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ LibreOffice mailing lis

Re: [Libreoffice] build error in desktop no 'void desktop::Migration::migrateSettingsIfNecessary()'

On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 12:45:25 +, Wols Lists wrote: > Any particular reason why? Is there a reason it can't use --delete? Without knowing anything specific I would say because --delete would remove all compiled files (and the unx* directory). So you would need some exclude files as well AFAIK. W

Re: [Libreoffice] New credits page up (and linked from TDF)

Hi there, On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 14:26 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > New iteration of http://libreoffice.org/credits.html in case you want to > show your name on that page to your grandmothers. Cool :-) > Anything else that you want to see there? I was told the pretty > contributor gr

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH 3/3] use linux bridge code on all BSDs

On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 14:06 +0100, Robert Nagy wrote: > Share the linux bridge code with all the BSDs to avoid code duplication > and the hassle of syncing. I'm totally in favour of this, especially as I know we fixed bugs in the Linux x86_64 uno bridge, and I strongly doubt those fixes got merged

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] distro_config: adapt to new confgure options for extensions

Some extensions options for configure were renamed to --enable-ext-* Adapt all distro configs to reflect that. Sorry for the churn. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Spaeth --- distro-configs/GoOoLinux.conf.in | 10 +- distro-configs/GoOoMacOSX.conf.in| 10 +-

Re: [Libreoffice] build problem in instsetoo_native module on linux x86-64

On 4 November 2010 20:07, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > Mattias Johnsson wrote: >> Unfortunately, LO no longer builds. I get the following error when I >> try to build in the instsetoo_native directory. >> >> ERROR: The following files could not be found: >> ERROR: File not found: libmsworkslx.so >> E

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix bug where an opening quote mark is treated as a word

Yes, I spotted that after I sent it, and resent with the attachment :-) However, I still forgot to mention: code is contributed under MPL 1.1 / GPLv3+ / LGPLv3+ licenses. In my defence, it's pretty late here :-P On 4 November 2010 23:49, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote: > Hi Mattias, > > On Thu, 2010-11

Re: [Libreoffice] build error in desktop no 'void desktop::Migration::migrateSettingsIfNecessary()'

On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 13:54 +0200, Nadav Vinik wrote: > Digest::MD5 object version 2.39 does not match bootstrap parameter > 2.51 at /usr/lib/perl/5.10/DynaLoader.pm line 215. Similar problem. There's a dir in your solenv with something like solenv/bin/modules/Digest (this is from memory of a week

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix bug where an opening quote mark is treated as a word

Hi Mattias, On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 23:38 +1100, Mattias Johnsson wrote: > Patch attached. It's a very minimal change, so it's probably safe to > push into the 3.3 branch as well as master. It seems that you forgot to actually attach the patch ;) Regards, -- Cédric Bosdonnat LibreOffice hacker ht

Re: [Libreoffice] build error in desktop no 'void desktop::Migration::migrateSettingsIfNecessary()'

On 04/11/10 10:22, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 12:11 +0200, Nadav Vinik wrote: >> > Making:all_mig.dpslo >> > Compiling: desktop/source/migration/migration.cxx >> > /home/projects/build/build/libreoffice-3.2.99.2/desktop/source/migration/migration.cxx:215:44: >> > error: no '

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix bug where an opening quote mark is treated as a word

On 4 November 2010 23:38, Mattias Johnsson wrote: > After spending a number of hours learning more about unicode than I > ever wanted to know, I've fixed the bug where the word counter in > Writer counts an opening quote mark (unicode symbol 0x201C) as an extra > word. > > Turns out that the openi

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] configure.in: Cluster all extension related options at one place

Hi Sebastian, Thanks for the patch. I needed to massage it a bit to make it apply, but it works fine. I pushed it in master branch. Regards, -- Cédric Bosdonnat LibreOffice hacker http://documentfoundation.org OOo Eclipse Integration developer http://cedric.bosdonnat.free.fr _

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix bug where an opening quote mark is treated as a word

After spending a number of hours learning more about unicode than I ever wanted to know, I've fixed the bug where the word counter in Writer counts an opening quote mark (unicode symbol 0x201C) as an extra word. Turns out that the opening quote lives in unicode block 40, which was not given an ass

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix for OO Basic Million-to-one bug #i76852#

On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 04:11 -0600, Noel Power wrote: > nice going, I see little enough risk in this other than introducing a > different error of the same type ;-) ( but it looks good to me ) The key > thing is that the internal number representation is always valid anyway > and this is a presenta

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Corrects problem in sysui while building current master

Hi Giuseppe, On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 13:18 +0100, Giuseppe Castagno wrote: > Subject: [PATCH] Correct problem building menus for BrOffice Thanks for the patch, feel free to provide some others ;) I just pushed it to master branch. Regards, -- Cédric Bosdonnat LibreOffice hacker http://documentfo

Re: [Libreoffice] build error in desktop no 'void desktop::Migration::migrateSettingsIfNecessary()'

On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 12:11 +0200, Nadav Vinik wrote: > Making:all_mig.dpslo > Compiling: desktop/source/migration/migration.cxx > /home/projects/build/build/libreoffice-3.2.99.2/desktop/source/migration/migration.cxx:215:44: > error: no 'void desktop::Migration::migrateSettingsIfNecessary()'

[Libreoffice] . . . . subscription . . .

-- Holger Höft Otternkamp 40 28790 Schwanewede Tel.04209 914892 0170 9821936 email holger.ho...@t-online.de ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Corrects problem in sysui while building current master

Hi all, attached per subj. Releasaed under: MPL 1.1 / GPLv3+ / LGPLv3+ beppec56 -- Kind Regards, Giuseppe Castagno Acca Esse http://www.acca-esse.eu giuseppe.castagno at acca-esse.eu beppec56 at openoffice.org >From c784c3792b4655435ec863930e5368bb895a6713 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Giusep

Re: [Libreoffice] build error in desktop no 'void desktop::Migration::migrateSettingsIfNecessary()'

LO compiled successfully but failed to install: | | Congratulation ! You have successfully built | | ( ) ( )( ,)( ,) ( _) / \( _)( _)( )/ _)( _) | | )(__ )( ) ,\ ) \ ) _) ( () )) _) ) _) )(( (_ ) _) |__| ()(__)(___/(_)\

Re: [Libreoffice] build error in desktop no 'void desktop::Migration::migrateSettingsIfNecessary()'

On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 12:11 +0200, Nadav Vinik wrote: >> Making:    all_mig.dpslo >> Compiling: desktop/source/migration/migration.cxx >> /home/projects/build/build/libreoffice-3.2.99.2/desktop/source/migration/migration.cxx:215:44: >> erro

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] configure.in: Cluster all extension related options at one place

- Pulled together all extension related options in one place in the configure, they were cluttered all around the place. We do want to present extensions together in ./configure --help. - Add an -ext- to these configure options to clarify they are extensions: --enable-ext-presenter-ui, ena

Re: [Libreoffice] {PUSHED} [PATCH] Fix for OO Basic Million-to-one bug #i76852#

On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 21:47 -0700, John LeMoyne Castle wrote: thanks for the cool patch!! Noel ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] build error in desktop no 'void desktop::Migration::migrateSettingsIfNecessary()'

On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 12:11 +0200, Nadav Vinik wrote: > Making:all_mig.dpslo > Compiling: desktop/source/migration/migration.cxx > /home/projects/build/build/libreoffice-3.2.99.2/desktop/source/migration/migration.cxx:215:44: > error: no 'void desktop::Migration::migrateSettingsIfNecessary()' >

[Libreoffice] Building on Debian squeeze (Was: Building on CentOS 5)

Hi, On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 09:36:02 +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 22:16 -0400, Terrell Prude' Jr. wrote: >> Two more. >> >> - cups-devel >> - gstreamer-plugins-base-devel > > Added to the wiki, feel free to add any other ones yourself to the list > at http://wiki.documentfo

[Libreoffice] build error in desktop no 'void desktop::Migration::migrateSettingsIfNecessary()'

Making:all_mig.dpslo Compiling: desktop/source/migration/migration.cxx /home/projects/build/build/libreoffice-3.2.99.2/desktop/source/migration/migration.cxx:215:44: error: no 'void desktop::Migration::migrateSettingsIfNecessary()' member function declared in class 'desktop::Migration' dmake:

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix for OO Basic Million-to-one bug #i76852#

On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 21:47 -0700, John LeMoyne Castle wrote: > Adds '=' to edge test in sbxscan.cxx ImpCvtNum so exponent prints and 1 > million is 1e+6 instead of just 1 for singles. > Same one char change does similar fix for OO Basic doubles and 1e+14. > > When I saw #i76852# -- http://qa.o

[Libreoffice] Build error - desktop -> migration

Entering /home/anthony/gitstuff/loffice/build/build/libreoffice-3.2.99.2/desktop/source/migration Making:all_mig.dpslo Compiling: desktop/source/migration/migration.cxx Compiling: desktop/source/migration/cfgfilter.cxx /home/anthony/gitstuff/loffice/build/build/libreoffice-3.2.99.2/desktop/sou

Re: [Libreoffice] FOO_GTK error when running autogen.sh

On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 16:28 -0400, Terrell Prude' Jr. wrote: > Just checked. Looks like the file is there. Here's an ls -l, and the > contents of the file. What's the output of... pkg-config --cflags --modversion gtk+-2.0 && echo PKG_CONFIG_PATH= $PKG_CONFIG_PATH && uname -m because 64bit RHE

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] SAL_N_ELEMENTS for clone/sdk directory

julien wrote: > Here is a patch for clone/sdk (here again i think there's no more in it). > Pushed as well, thanks muchly! -- Thorsten pgpq8Useg2gUc.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://l

Re: [Libreoffice] Building on CentOS 5

On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 22:16 -0400, Terrell Prude' Jr. wrote: > Two more. > > - cups-devel > - gstreamer-plugins-base-devel Added to the wiki, feel free to add any other ones yourself to the list at http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/How_to_build C. _

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] SAL_N_ELEMENTS for clone/components directory

julien wrote: > Here is a patch for clone/components (i think there's no more in it). > Many thanks, pushed! -- Thorsten pgp55ia6O6aPE.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedeskt

Re: [Libreoffice] Killing kill.exe?

Hi, On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > I have some very vague memory of this kill perhaps being used in some testing > script? But I might well be thinking of something totally different, or then > that is not done any longer. I did grep for kill in the source code and it a

Re: [Libreoffice] build problem in instsetoo_native module on linux x86-64

Mattias Johnsson wrote: > Unfortunately, LO no longer builds. I get the following error when I > try to build in the instsetoo_native directory. > > ERROR: The following files could not be found: > ERROR: File not found: libmsworkslx.so > ERROR: File not found: libwpgimportlx.so > ERROR: File not

Re: [Libreoffice] OpenBSD bootstrap diffs

On (2010-11-04 08:58), Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 22:02 +0100, Robert Nagy wrote: > > Hey > > > > Attached some diffs to make LibreOffice boostrap on OpenBSD. > > As a matter of interest, would it be possible to e.g. just > > .INCLUDE : unxlng.mk > > at the top of the unxob

Re: [Libreoffice] Killing kill.exe?

I have some very vague memory of this kill perhaps being used in some testing script? But I might well be thinking of something totally different, or then that is not done any longer. --tml ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.or

Re: [Libreoffice] OpenBSD bootstrap diffs

On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 22:02 +0100, Robert Nagy wrote: > Hey > > Attached some diffs to make LibreOffice boostrap on OpenBSD. As a matter of interest, would it be possible to e.g. just .INCLUDE : unxlng.mk at the top of the unxobsd.mk and then just override the individual variables that need

[Libreoffice] LibreOffice build error

cd /mnt/my_book/lang/sources/git/libreoffice/build/libreoffice-3.2.99.2 source ./LinuxX86Env.Set.sh cd vcl build . Entering /mnt/my_book/lang/sources/git/libreoffice/build/libreoffice-3.2.99.2/vcl/unx/kde4 Compiling: vcl/unxlngi6.pro/misc/KDEXLib.moc.cxx ../../unxlngi6.pro/misc/KDEXLib.moc.cxx

Re: [Libreoffice] Styles and Formatting

Hi Cor, On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 20:17 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote: > My experience with users is, that they are often overwhelmed by the > number of available styles. > So Hierarchical as default would not be my choice. > Default is more then enough. Ok, then we need to fix that before pushing the patc

Re: [Libreoffice] OpenBSD patches for ure

Robert Nagy wrote: > Patches for ure, neeed by OpenBSD > Looks good, pushed. Many thanks! -- Thorsten pgp9JXE5g3YQR.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listi

Re: [Libreoffice] build problem in instsetoo_native module on linux x86-64

At 2:46am -0400 Thu, 04 Nov 2010, Mattias Johnsson wrote: ... analyzing files ... ERROR: The following files could not be found: ERROR: File not found: libmsworkslx.so ERROR: File not found: libwpgimportlx.so ERROR: File not found: liblwpftlx.so ERROR: File not found: libwpftlx.so ... cleaning th

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Easy hack patches, remove non-compiled code

Hullo LO Git committers, Patches against calc/.../miscdlgs/ to remove non-compiled code and other minor refactors. Patches created with: $ git format-patch --patience -19 -o ~/tmp/easy_hack_non_compiled $ cd ~/tmp/ # tar -cjf easy_hack_non_compiled{.tbz,} $ sha1sum easy_hack_non_compiled.tbz

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] --exclude is gnutar

On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 01:27:06AM +0100, Robert Nagy wrote: > diff --git a/bin/install-artwork b/bin/install-artwork > index 7695e4a..5f1721d 100755 > --- a/bin/install-artwork > +++ b/bin/install-artwork > @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ if test -d $dest/default_images; then > cp $src/layout/*.png $dest/

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] OpenBSD needs /usr/local/lib in SOLARLIB

On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 01:16:37AM +0100, Robert Nagy wrote: > diff --git a/set_soenv.in b/set_soenv.in > index 834bd34..79e79bd 100644 > --- a/set_soenv.in > +++ b/set_soenv.in > @@ -1369,12 +1369,16 @@ elsif ($platform =~ > m/linux|netbsd|osf1|aix|freebsd|openbsd/) > { $SOLARLIB = $L.