Done.
--tml
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On 10/27/10, Mattias Johnsson wrote:
> On 28 October 2010 08:42, LeMoyne wrote:
>>
>>
>> All these tests are with the aScanner.GetLen() > 1 check in place. With
>> that Len >=2 check, the new counting routine has no problem with single
>> letter words like A, a, 1, -, or just ,
>> It is puz
Hi Robert,
On 2010-10-28 at 00:17 +0200, Robert Nagy wrote:
> I've started to work on a LibreOffice port for OpenBSD and i'd like to
> start pushing my diffs slowly, here is the first one.
Thank you very much for the patch - pushed! Looking forward to the
other ones :-)
All the best,
Kendy
__
Mattias,
No problem at all. Recompiled with your original simpler if then statement
and I get the same counts for your reference Oasis Metadata Examples odt
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/file/n1783515/07-08-22-MetaData-Examples.odt
07-08-22-MetaData-Examples.odt
>>> Just one quick t
Hello,
I've started to work on a LibreOffice port for OpenBSD and i'd like to
start pushing my diffs slowly, here is the first one.
diff --git a/bin/build-ooo b/bin/build-ooo
index 1f10182..361e8f0 100755
--- a/bin/build-ooo
+++ b/bin/build-ooo
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ fi
export TARFILE_LOCATION
-i
On 28 October 2010 08:42, LeMoyne wrote:
>
> Using the following sample from a git patch one can see one way in which the
> current counting method comes up with fewer words than other methods do.
> +1747,9
> 1.7.0.4
> 14 characters on two lines: either 2, 3 or 6 words depending on how you
> count
At 7:39am -0400 Wed, 27 Oct 2010, Wols Lists wrote:
I just click on "reply list" :-) Thunderbird has that option if you
want to use that ...
So it does! Apparently since the 3.0. I've been using my keyboard friends:
Ctrl+R (respond directly to author)
Ctrl+Shift+R (respond to everyone)
At 5:47pm -0400 Wed, 27 Oct 2010, Wols Lists wrote:
On 27/10/10 18:10, Kevin Hunter wrote:
The file format was created circa 1990 (Phil Katz, maybe?), and,
because of lawsuits against his company, intentionally released
into the public domain. I've forgotten the exact story details,
The wikipe
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 4:39 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 15:39 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
>> > On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 22:03 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
>> >> I have a segfault running smoketest.
>> >
>> > Its
As far as I can see, /build doesn't actually use enable-java,
but it does use with-java. /build/libreoffice... makes extensive
use of with-java and no sign of enable-java.
The comment implies that it was only meant to have an impact on --help,
anyway, and moving it to a "with" should be the same.
On 27/10/10 18:10, Kevin Hunter wrote:
> The file format was created circa 1990 (Phil Katz, maybe?), and,
> because of lawsuits against his company, intentionally released into
> the public domain. I've forgotten the exact story details,
The wikipedia article is pretty brief, but it seems that ac
Using the following sample from a git patch one can see one way in which the
current counting method comes up with fewer words than other methods do.
+1747,9
1.7.0.4
14 characters on two lines: either 2, 3 or 6 words depending on how you
count
Gedit says: 2 lines 6 words 15 chars 14 chars(no s
Cheers Michael.
Sounds like a good plan of attack. I've added some stats to the wiki based on
an analysis I did a while ago.There's some other possible hacks in the analysis
here:
https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0AktmVHYOt-kzcmpnbFE0Rmx2c1lLVTVwaUtDR2t3S0E&hl=en_GB
Many thanks,Andrew
Hi Tor, Michael,
I finally got it working with SAL_DLLPUBLIC_EXPORT as michael suggested.
If there is any possible trouble, let me know ;)
--
Cedric
On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 07:21 -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> > The question (for
> > Tor) is - if we have a __declspec(dllexport) on two identical sym
On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 13:10 -0400, Kevin Hunter wrote:
> To put a different spin on your surprise, I've wondered for awhile why
> it *isn't* installed in the default installation of more desktop-based
> nix distros.
For me, the nicest bit of zip is the un-compressed, find-able,
director
Hi Guiseppe,
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 21:31 +0200, Giuseppe Castagno wrote:
> the following patch should allow testtool to run with LibO.
Did your patch(es) get merged ? if not that sucks, sorry - just working
back through my mail. They look good to me - but for me the testtool
runs reasonab
hi' michael,
located the call to perl -d:DProf -w
and removed the profiling declare
if you think the profiling at every build is redundant
although the build is nowhere near completion so I can't test it yet,
however I've checked and ppc is now with the new sources quoted
and make_install.pl
Hi there,
Pushed :-) [ sorry for the delay ]
Thanks,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedeskto
Hi Andrew,
On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 12:08 +0100, Andrew C. E. Dent wrote:
> > Ah ! ;-) out of interest, how many of these do we have still ?
>
> From a quick count, only ~150 or so... (!)
Nice - only 150 duplicated icons. I've added an easy hack for this, we
should fix in the code first [ it
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 12:22 -0700, Dave Lacy Kusters wrote:
> g++ -L/usr/lib -L/usr/lib
> -L/home/dlacykusters/libre/libreoffice/build/build/libreoffice-3.2.99.2/solver/330/unxlngi6.pro/lib
Aha, indeed, this is why this is breaking for the KDE users. Someone
needs to track where those are coming
ooinstall perl script failed with this message:
Reading setup from ./setup
Running OOo installer
Subroutine installer::epmfile::getcwd redefined at
/usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/Exporter.pm line 65.
at /usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/x86_64-linux/POSIX.pm line 19
Unquoted string "ppc" may clash with future reser
Attached are the three commits that make up the whole patch.
I hope this helps.
On 10/27/2010 01:44 AM, Michael Meeks wrote:
Hi Sean,
On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 02:24 -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
Please note that your earlier MD5::Digest patch was reverted, though,
because it was causing problem
On 27/10/10 15:15, Noel Power wrote:
Just a quick question as whether anyone tried this with beta2 ( on
linux ) on opensuse11.2
opensuse11.3 ( I meant )
I tried
Just a quick question as whether anyone tried this with beta2 ( on linux
) on opensuse11.2
I tried and failed to insert a movie ( ogg format ) in a presentation.
It failed reporting errors ala "format of selected file is unsupported"
etc. Since I have a somewhat dirty installation ( in terms of
> The question (for
> Tor) is - if we have a __declspec(dllexport) on two identical symbols in
> two shared libraries that link to each other: will we get some vile
> linking conflict ? [ or not ] ;-)
As far as I could see by experimenting, yes, as long as you from a DLL don't
both import and exp
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 19:00 +0100, Luke Dixon wrote:
> Thanks, that makes sense. I saw the other commits by people that fixed
> what I had broken, I'm very sorry for any trouble I've caused.
Hah - all my fault for not testing more widely, but Jesus helped out &
we got there in the end.
>
Hi guys,
Soo ... Cedric just had an interesting bug:
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 18:22 +0200, Cédric Bosdonnat wrote:
> Attached is a diff adding the SW_DLLPUBLIC to the ICheckboxFieldmark
> (and friends). To test the problem, open the p11.doc file.
>
> sw/source/core/doc/docbm.cxx, line 448 w
Drat, I meant to send:
I removed the aScanner.GetLen() > 1 check because if you leave that
in, it doesn't count words consisting of a single character as words.
So it wasn't counting words like "a" or "i"
On 27 October 2010 23:38, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
> Hi Mattias,
>
> On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 1
On 27 October 2010 23:38, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
> Hi Mattias,
>
> On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 18:26 +1100, Mattias Johnsson wrote:
>> Here are my patches for the easy hack / programming task "Count
>> characters without whitespace in the Writer statistics." Since it's
>> something translators have app
Hi Mattias,
On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 18:26 +1100, Mattias Johnsson wrote:
> Here are my patches for the easy hack / programming task "Count
> characters without whitespace in the Writer statistics." Since it's
> something translators have apparently been asking for OO.org to have
> for eight years (s
On 27/10/10 00:41, Niko Rönkkö wrote:
> And then there is that:
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/build/tree/configure.in#n128
> Which is definedly wrong and which nobody knows how it should be...
I'm looking at this :-)
It looks to me (looking at the autoconf doc) that this is a clear
> Patch attached!
Thanks, pushed.
--tml
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On 26/10/10 23:53, Kevin Hunter wrote:
> At 6:18pm -0400 Tue, 26 Oct 2010, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
>> I must get used to that this list doesn't set reply to list...
>
> Oh brother, I hear you. I personally prefer that a list gets all
> traffic, end of discussion. However, it was pointed out t
Hi Michael> Ah ! ;-) out of interest, how many of these do we have still ?From
a quick count, only ~150 or so... (!)> IMHO it is a nonsense to distribute
them. I would prefer to have a> single "missing icon" icon, and a fallback path
in the image loader> (vcl/source/gdi/impimage*) that would l
Michael Meeks wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 01:15 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> > I've for the while reverted the commit, will look into this tomorrow.
>
> Ah ! - better to add a prefix to the prj/build.lst dep. or something to
> the makefile.mk so it still build on (only) Linux (?) ;-)
Hi all,
after building a LibO dev installation package, I installed the lot and
the corresponding SDK, just to have a look at it.
It appears there are some issue, or so it seems to me, to be addressed.
Generally speaking, when I try to install it, it tries to use OOo 3
installation whereas I
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Michael Meeks wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 21:39 +0200, René Kjellerup wrote:
> > Very understandable then, I've had build issues since the 17th...
>
>Nasty - can we help out with them ? perhaps the solver is out of
> sync
> somehow - Norbert's recomme
On 27/10/10 10:38, Michael Meeks wrote:
> In configure.in - but can we separate the (more controversial)
> re-ordering of all arguments with the fixing / documenting of the
> options.
>
> I guess we should also try to fix this in the 'inner' configure in
> bootstrap/ since we hope to ab
> but I still stand by
> my comment "what is zip doing on a nix system?"
Given that .odf files are .zip files, I would be surprised if you did
not have a zipper/unzipper on your box. :)
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http:
Hi Dave,
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 12:22 -0700, Dave Lacy Kusters wrote:
> > I don't know why exactly this is happening. It appears to be picking up
> > a stlport_gcc in /usr/lib before the one in /path/to/solver. So what's
> > the output of
> > echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH btw
Soo ... IIWY I would
On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 01:15 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> I've for the while reverted the commit, will look into this tomorrow.
Ah ! - better to add a prefix to the prj/build.lst dep. or something to
the makefile.mk so it still build on (only) Linux (?) ;-) Looking
forward to having it
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:17:59 +0200 (CEST), "David Schröder"
wrote:
> I'm a newcomer and at this point of state I can't real help.
Welcome :)
> Your list isn't correct. It shows only the contributors since
> the - harding to say - fork.
Well, if you look at the title of the page:
"Git contribut
Hi Niko,
On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 02:41 +0300, Niko Rönkkö wrote:
> I think that it would be best to name all options consistently like:
I like the idea of consistent naming; though we need to make sure that
all the distro packagers at least get notified so they can change
their .spec files,
>> This patch is public domain.
> Does it mean LGPLv3+ / MPL as it's the prefered licence for LibreOffice?
It depends on the country of the author, there is no way to make one's work
immediately enter the "public domain" (and not just after its copyright has
expired) in many countries. But sur
> Bear in mind tar is a perfectly good extraction utility (that, in its
> gnu form is probably quite capable of coping with zips),
No it is not.
> what the h***
> are people doing assuming that zip is available on a *nix system!?
> but I still stand by
> my comment "what is zip doing on a nix s
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 21:39 +0200, René Kjellerup wrote:
> Very understandable then, I've had build issues since the 17th...
Nasty - can we help out with them ? perhaps the solver is out of sync
somehow - Norbert's recommendation to remove build/libreoffice/solver in
its entirety may hel
Hi Andrew,
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 22:49 +0100, Andrew C. E. Dent wrote:
> Thanks again for checking so deeply.
> Sorry, I should have been clearer on these images...
> These are the green (/red) crosses that have long existed as icon
> placeholders.
Ah ! ;-) out of interest, how many of th
Hi Sean,
On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 02:24 -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> Please note that your earlier MD5::Digest patch was reverted, though,
> because it was causing problems
Right - it was breaking existing includes of Digest::MD5 at least on my
system. Quite possibly this is because I first
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 14:32 -0700, Sean McMurray wrote:
> This patch is public domain.
Does it mean LGPLv3+ / MPL as it's the prefered licence for LibreOffice?
Regards,
--
Cédric Bosdonnat
LibreOffice hacker
http://documentfoundation.org
OOo Eclipse Integration developer
http://cedric.bosdonnat.
Please note that your earlier MD5::Digest patch was reverted, though, because
it was causing problems, so this follow-up patch which presumably depends on
that earlier one can not be applied. I didn't notice the problems myself as I
hadn't got that far in the build before the patch was applied a
Hi all,
Here are my patches for the easy hack / programming task "Count
characters without whitespace in the Writer statistics." Since it's
something translators have apparently been asking for OO.org to have
for eight years (see
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10356 and
https://b
51 matches
Mail list logo
