Just one small nit: As we have members in the community whose platform doesn't
normally have a /bin/bash, please make sure any new shell script introduced
works with a plain non-bash POSIX shell, and use /bin/sh on the hashbang line.
(Just my personal opinion, of course.)
--tml
__
Hi,
3.2.99.1 was fine here, but now that I updated to latest git (I already
tried a clean build), I get the followings when I 'build' in sw:
Entering /home/vmiklos/git/libreoffice/build/libreoffice-3.2.99.1/sw/util
Making:libswli.so
../unxlngi6.pro/slo/cellfml.o: In function `lcl_Conver
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 08:58:26PM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud
wrote:
> # go up the chain until you find a .git
> while [ ${current_dir} != "/" -a -d "${current_dir}" -a ! -d
> "${current_dir}/.git" ] ;
> do
> current_dir=$(dirname "${current_dir}")
> done
do you know 'git rev-parse --show-cdup'
I found myself weary of typing ./ or ../ or ../../ etc to get to ./bin/g
an immediate solution is to make an alias with the full path
alias g='/home/me/git/oo/build/bin/g'
but that imply that you have only one git clone... and I have 2 (one
to work in, the other one to build pristine git pull while
A patch to remove some unused directives.
Graeme
From d82df8d1770a623b0d1943583e1cc070918ac54f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: J. Graeme Lingard
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 23:49:34 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Remove redundant #ifndef & #ifdef directives
This change removes multiple unused #ifndef & #ifdef
Le 08/10/2010 23:10, Christian Lohmaier a écrit :
Hi Julien, *,
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 10:54 PM, julien wrote:
[...]
whereas i don't have a mac.
is there a doc with the different options for with-distro ? (i've got a
Debian in testing 32 bits)
No, it was a stupid mistake on my part,
Hi Julien, *,
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 10:54 PM, julien wrote:
> [...]
> whereas i don't have a mac.
> is there a doc with the different options for with-distro ? (i've got a
> Debian in testing 32 bits)
No, it was a stupid mistake on my part, pull again
ciao
Christian
___
Le 08/10/2010 11:20, Michael Meeks a écrit :
Hi Julien,
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 21:41 +0200, julien wrote:
I've just done these steps :
git pull -r
./autogen.sh --with-git --disable-kde --disable-kde4
./download
You prolly want a:
$ bin/g pull -r
here - which will updat
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 20:42 +0200, Andreas Mantke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I used my spare time to translate some more comments from German to English.
Pushed. Thanks much!
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc
___
LibreOffice mailing list
Libr
Hi,
I used my spare time to translate some more comments from German to English.
Regards,
Andreas
--
## Content Developer OpenOffice.org: lang/DE
## Freie Office-Suite für Linux, Mac, Windows, Solaris
## http://de.openoffice.org
## OpenOffice.org Portable: http://oooportable.org
## OOoPDFConvert
Hello Jim,
Thank you for trying to get started on LibreOffice build and
development!
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 14:02 +, jim bobs wrote:
> ERROR: Product OpenOffice not defined in openoffice.lst
> in function: getproductblock
>
> when running bin/ooinstall
> -l /home/user/Desktop/libreoffice/git/
Present:Thorsten, Caolan, Rene, Michael
Invited:Petr, Fridrich, David, Kendy
* previous actions
+ all completed
* adding emacs/vi formatting comments to files
+ agreed; at top of header
AA: + add to easy-hacks list & do in a week if not done (Thorsten)
* enabl
Hi *,
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 7:35 AM, Eric Hoch wrote:
> [external (non-XCode-provided) dependencies when building on Mac]
>
> In this case yes :-) I didn't know that there are so many libs and
> binaries needed at the moment. [...]
>
> Is this because of a new build process that LibO uses compar
ERROR: Product OpenOffice not defined in openoffice.lst
in function: getproductblock
when running bin/ooinstall -l /home/user/Desktop/libreoffice/git/build/scratch/
full text of log file below
Any1 have any ideas please, thanks
=
Already existing directory, did not create: /tmp/ooopackag
Hi Norbert,
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 03:03 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> The patches are attached to Bug 30642
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30642
Soo - I did some more spot review of the patches, and I liked what I
saw :-) things like this:
-sal_uInt16 nColor = 0, n
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 14:18 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 14:43 +0200, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
>
> > Nevertheless, there was agreement on the IRC that we will allow feature
> > branches even in the main repos; but in that case, they have to be
> > prefixed with 'feature/' pre
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 14:43 +0200, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
> Nevertheless, there was agreement on the IRC that we will allow feature
> branches even in the main repos; but in that case, they have to be
> prefixed with 'feature/' prefix. Also, the creator of the branch is
> supposed to remove it whe
On Oct 8, 2010, at 2:42 AM, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 07:35 +0200, Eric Hoch wrote:
>> Looking at this list now it reminds me of the building the X11 OOo
>> on the mac :-)
>
> Wow - we don't want to be that bad - obviously.
>
>> Is this because of a new bu
Hi,
This is a proposal how to handle the feature and release branches in the
LibreOffice git repos.
Terms
-
"Release branch" - branch that is used for a release of a version, like
when we start stabilizing 3.3, we'll create libreoffice-3-3 branch, and
only fixes targeting 3.3 are supposed to
On 8 October 2010 01:59, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> Ok. These 5 patches you've sent all look identical. So I just assume
> these have been sent in error.
Not sure what's happened here. This week I have sent 6 patches with
the same commit message, doing the same thing but for different
repositories,
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 10:48 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> just - rm -Rf sdext/mac*.pro [ assuming mac*.pro matches the output
> directory - for that target ].
rm -rf sdext/unxmac*.pro
FWIW, that "OUTPATH" is set by set_soenv[.in]
C.
___
LibreOffice
Hi Joseph,
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 20:56 -0700, Joseph Powers wrote:
> Ok, it looks like someone changed the way text strings are handled...
Right - this file is no longer compiled it seems, it is not there in
master (bin/g pull -r) - I suspect the problem is related to a stale
build direct
Hi Eric,
On 2010-10-08 at 11:02 +0200, Eric Hoch wrote:
> Once I'm familiar with git, currently it looks like git is winning,
> and have current LibO sources I think I will try to build OOo,
> acting like I just have to download the sources and do a configure,
> make, make install. I hope that
Hi Eric,
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 07:35 +0200, Eric Hoch wrote:
> Looking at this list now it reminds me of the building the X11 OOo
> on the mac :-)
Wow - we don't want to be that bad - obviously.
> Is this because of a new build process that LibO uses compared to
> the one OOo uses?
Hi Julien,
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 21:41 +0200, julien wrote:
> I've just done these steps :
> git pull -r
> ./autogen.sh --with-git --disable-kde --disable-kde4
> ./download
You prolly want a:
$ bin/g pull -r
here - which will update the repositories in clone/
> make
Fasc
Hi,
Am Fri, 08 Oct 2010 10:35:27 +0200 schrieb Jan Holesovsky:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On 2010-10-08 at 01:04 +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote:
>
>>> From what I read, the BSD cp has very annoying behavior wrt. recursive
>>> copying of directories, so I understand why GNU cp is preferred ;-)
>>
>> Where d
Hi Tor,
Am Fri, 08 Oct 2010 02:20:42 -0600 schrieb Tor Lillqvist:
>>> On my 10.6.4 machine, I had to install the following to get
>>> things to build:
> [ a long list of packages ]
>
> That is presumably using a git checkout, intending to start with
> running ./autogen.sh then?
>
>> I just reme
Hi Thomas,
On 2010-10-08 at 01:04 +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> > From what I read, the BSD cp has very annoying behavior wrt. recursive
> > copying of directories, so I understand why GNU cp is preferred ;-)
>
> Where did you read that, or can you explain directly what the problem
> is?
Eg.
>> On my 10.6.4 machine, I had to install the following to get things to build:
[ a long list of packages ]
That is presumably using a git checkout, intending to start with running
./autogen.sh then?
> I just remember that the last time I
> build a pre OOo 3.2.0 I was able to checkout the sourc
Hi Goran,
On 2010-10-07 at 23:56 +0200, Goran Rakic wrote:
> -lo-build-*.po: lo-build.pot /usr/bin/pot2po
> +lo-build-%.po: lo-build.pot /usr/bin/pot2po
Oh, thank you! Pushed :-)
Regards,
Kendy
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesk
30 matches
Mail list logo
