On 09/10/12 00:05, Mikie wrote:
>
> > "It replaces the current .config " wow... now I'm really confused LOL
>
> >trying to understand
>
> >thanks tw3ak
>
> I am a confused newbie too tw3ak but I'm going to guess that each time
> you run make menuconfig you get a new .config file.
>
> let's see
You may try root=/dev/sda1
Sometimes device naming is not consistent between distros.
On 09/10/12 14:01, Khoa Nguyen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've just finished LFS. However, I'm facing with the problem that I
> can't boot into the LFS kernel.
>
> It displays :
>
> VFS: Cannot open root device "sdb1"
On 09/10/12 14:01, Khoa Nguyen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've just finished LFS. However, I'm facing with the problem that I
> can't boot into the LFS kernel.
>
> It displays :
>
> VFS: Cannot open root device "sdb1" or unkonwn-block(2,0)
> Please append a correct "root=" boot option;
>
>
>
> Kern
On 09/11/12 04:16, Khoa Nguyen wrote:
> I think there was any problem when i built the kernel for LFS.
> You can send me .config file of LFS ?
>
> When I type "make modules_install", It displays :
>
> root:/sources/linux-3.2.6# make modules_install
> INSTALL arch/x86/kernel/test_nx.ko
> INSTAL
On 09/11/12 11:27, Khoa Nguyen wrote:
> I've already select all SCSI driver, all fs driver but I don't find
> out CONFIG_VMWARE .
> CONFIG_VMWARE_PVSCSI=y CONFIG_VMWARE_BALLOON=y"
>
run make menuconfig
type /VMWARE
> I built the kernel again. But problem is same.
You could try to install anoth
On 09/12/12 05:03, Khoa Nguyen wrote:
> Can you tell me more about busybox ?
> What do you mean "busybox in an initramfs" ?
>
> I understand that due to failed boot process because the kernel can't
> mount the root file system to read /etc/inittab.
> So we use busybox to mount manually . Right ?
>
On 09/12/12 14:27, Khoa Nguyen wrote:
> Hi Henrik,
>
> Thank you very much. Your explanation is clear. I get a lot
> of knowledge from you.
> I've already made a initramfs as following:
>
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/postlfs/initramfs.html
>
Great!
(Not using busybox as I sugges
On 09/13/12 04:03, Khoa Nguyen wrote:
Hi Henrik,
When you are in the shell in the initramfs, try
cat /proc/filesystems
cat /proc/partitions
ls -l /dev
blkid
I got your point. But I don't see anything which related to /dev/sdb1.
Maybe the kernel don't recognize abou
On 11/05/12 14:24, Alan Feuerbacher wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I've done a major reset by giving up on installing an LFS system on my
> old 32-bit computer, and am now installing it on a new 64-bit system.
> The new system now has Fedora as the host system. It's installed on
> /dev/sdb and I want to put L
On 11/05/12 17:12, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> For an SSD drive, I suggest getting gptdisk (fdisk syntax) or gparted
> (challenging syntax) and partitioning the drive as a gpt drive.
I have been building on an old 32bit box with rotating disks.
I am considering buying a new 64bit box with SSD.
So I wo
On 11/06/12 16:35, Feuerbacher, Alan wrote:
> Bruce wrote:
>
>>> sda2 is not really a partition. It contains the extended partitions.
>>> In your case, sda5 and sda6.
>> Actually an extended partition is a partition, but it has sub-
>> partitions. All this stuff is avoided with a GUID Partition Ta
On 11/06/12 19:59, Feuerbacher, Alan wrote:
> Seriously, this is among the most useful articles -- and I do mean
> "article" -- that I've read about this topic. Thank you!
Thank you for the nice words, I just hope it can help you...
>> Suggestion: Stick to MBR for now!
>> When you have learned ho
On 11/06/12 21:21, Feuerbacher, Alan wrote:
> Ok, so mounting IS a lot more than just a way of looking at things. It's
> doing something *physically*. That clears up a lot.
>
>>> Why does one have to create a directory with that name before
>>> executing the "mount" command?
>> The system has to
Dear all,
I have build LFS and much of BLFS on my ancient 32bit machine.
With a bit of tweaking, I have also got most of it to work on my new
x86_64 machine.
However, I do have a problem:
I need xen virtualization. xen builds a BIOS using the dev86 package.
This worked fine on i?86, but dev86 rel
On 12/13/12 04:55, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> William Harrington wrote:
>> On Dec 12, 2012, at 6:38 PM, Henrik /KaarPoSoft wrote:
>>
>>> I am new to multilib, so I a wondering about stuff like:
>>> - where in the toolchain building sequence should I target multilib?
On 12/13/12 01:38, Henrik /KaarPoSoft wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I have build LFS and much of BLFS on my ancient 32bit machine.
> With a bit of tweaking, I have also got most of it to work on my new
> x86_64 machine.
> However, I do have a problem:
> I need xen virtualization. xe
On 02/26/2013 04:58 PM, Tobias Gasser wrote:
> Am 26.02.2013 15:24, schrieb Rick Berube:
>
>>>
>>
>> Just as a guess, I moved gmp to the Real Machine and re-attempted the
>> process. This time it was successful. I would infer that LFS doesn't
>> play well on virtualized hosts.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>
17 matches
Mail list logo
