Re: Bk6.6Ch6.9 glibc `__stack_chk_guard' work around.

On 03/31/2010 04:06 PM, Szabolcs Gyalókay wrote: > Hi All, > > > OK, then libssp is not supposed to be linked, then why isn't somebody > asking the obvious question? > > In the original post Pete wrote: > > It seems that libssp is suppose to be pulled in by > the gcc option '-fstack-protect

Re: Bk6.6Ch6.9 glibc `__stack_chk_guard' work around.

On 03/31/2010 04:22 PM, Chris Staub wrote: > On 03/31/2010 04:06 PM, Szabolcs Gyalókay wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> >> OK, then libssp is not supposed to be linked, then why isn't somebody >> asking the obvious question? >> >> In the original post Pete

Re: Bk6.6Ch6.9 glibc `__stack_chk_guard' work around.

On 03/31/2010 04:33 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Szabolcs Gyalókay wrote: >> >> gcc res_hconf.c -c -std=gnu99 -fgnu89-inline -O2 -Wall -Winline >> -Wwrite-strings -fmerge-all-constants -g -Wstrict-prototypes > >> -DIS_IN_nscd=1 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 >> -fpie >> -fstack-protector >> -DNOT_IN_libc=1 > >> -

Re: libgfortranbegin won't execute (chapter 6.16)

On 03/31/2010 10:45 PM, Kaleb Hosie wrote: > > I'm at chapter 6.16 where it asked me to run the following command: "make -k > check" > > When I do that, this is the error I get after about 45minutes to an hour: > > No libgfortranbegin library found, will not execute fortran tests > >

Re: glibc compiling problem in lfs 6.6

On 04/13/2010 12:04 PM, Jordan Peters wrote: > When i compile glibc, it seems to go fine but when i test it, rather > than the output in the terminal being > [Requesting program interpreter: /tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2] > it's > [Requesting program interpreter: /tools/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2] > and

Re: config.guess: unable to guess system type

On 04/26/2010 10:42 AM, Jannis Kafkoulas wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using LFS book 6.6 and try build lfs on a debian etch. > I think I've done everything as described. > > I also downloaded the newest config scripts from git.savannah.gnu.org but the > message remains the same... > > Any idea? > > > Than

Re: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout

On 04/28/2010 12:42 PM, Elmar Fahrendorff wrote: > Hi, > > I try to set up an LFS-System (Book Version 6.5). The System starts and > the login messages is displayed. But at boot time the systems shows > errors that some modules can't be loaded: > > Usbcore: disagrees about version of symbol module_

Re: Make error in glibc

On 05/03/2010 10:24 PM, gaurav k wrote: > Hey Guys, > > This is my first mail to the list- I'm a relative newbie- though not a > complete Linux noob who is clueless about what is happening. > > I have not deviated from the book at all, the only possible difference > might be any differences in the

Re: 6.21 E2fsprogs-1.41.10 101 Tests failured -make check

On 05/04/2010 06:28 PM, Bill Brown wrote: > I have spend a good day trying to figure out the cause of all tests > failing except for the first two and last two when issuing the 'make > check' command; > > I am using the 6.6 version of the LFS book. Running on Ubuntu desktop > 9.10. Which in turn

Re: Make error in glibc

On 05/05/2010 12:57 AM, gaurav k wrote: > I'm inside the extracted glibc directory, and this is what I do: > > $mkdir -v ../glibc-build > $cd ../glibc-build > $echo "CFLAGS += -march=i486 -mtune=native"> configparams Assuming this is a literal copy of what you actually typed, this is incorrect.

Re: Make error in glibc

On 05/05/2010 07:33 AM, Simon Geard wrote: > On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 07:54 +0530, gaurav k wrote: >> I have not deviated from the book at all, the only possible difference >> might be any differences in the host system requirement. For >> example, /bin/sh is not a symlink to bash, but I've only used

Re: 6.32 Inetutils-1.7: make error: telnetd link sees Undefined 'tgetent'

On 05/21/2010 01:06 AM, Bill Brown wrote: > LFS ver 6.6: chapter 6.32 > > while making inetutils-1.7 I get the following error: > > utility.o: In function `terminaltypeok': > /sources/inetutils-1.7/telnetd/utility.c:825: undefined reference to > `tgetent' > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > mak

Re: Glibc make fails with Error 2

On 05/24/2010 12:45 AM, Kyle Brennan wrote: > I solved the original error (it was a symlink problem with the gcc stem) > and i got another error: > > mv -f /mnt/lfs/build/glibc-build/shlib.ldsT > /mnt/lfs/build/glibc-build/shlib.lds > i686-lfs-linux-gnu-gcc -shared -static-libgcc -Wl,-O1 -Wl,-z,

Re: /bin/pidof error sym link in 6.53

On 05/27/2010 06:30 AM, xinglp wrote: > 6.53. Psmisc-22.11 > ln -sv killall /bin/pidof > > > 6.56. Sysvinit-2.86 > sysvinit-2.86/src/Makefile:126 > ln -sf ../sbin/killall5 $(ROOT)/bin/pidof Not sure what you're trying to show about Sysvinit's instructions (some explanat

Re: /bin/pidof error sym link in 6.53

On 05/27/2010 01:38 PM, xinglp wrote: > Install sysvinit-2.86 overwrite /bin/pidof. No it doesn't. The instruction to create a /bin/pidof symlink on the Psmisc page is explicitly described as something to add if you *don't* install Sysvinit... "If Sysvinit will not be used for a particular syst

Re: LFS-6.6, Stage2, glibc, nscd.c:442

On 06/02/2010 08:05 PM, Paul Rogers wrote: > > >> I don't see that the necessity of using a relatively recent version of >> the kernel in the host environment to be, in spirit, any different >> from requiring a relatively recent version of a C compiler. If all you >> have is a K&R C compiler, then

Re: perl, gdbm and perl's obsequious help

On 06/02/2010 05:22 PM, Neal Murphy wrote: > Some time back (LFS 6.4), I discovered that perl's configure program can > poison the build; it is designed to be extremely helpful by ferreting out > features of the host system to support. Specifically in my case, because it > found libgdbm on the host

Re: perl, gdbm and perl's obsequious help

On 06/03/2010 11:33 AM, Neal Murphy wrote: > On Thursday 03 June 2010 04:08:33 Simon Geard wrote: >> >> Curious... like Chris, I routinely build LFS from a host with gdbm >> installed (i.e LFS itself), and never observed any problems relating to >> perl. Indeed, even on completed LFS install, /usr/

Re: Linux From Scratch (Version SVN-20100529) - 6.9. Glibc-2.11.2

On 06/11/2010 11:35 PM, Face Man wrote: > > appreciated. > > First, the host system isn't an issue in Chapter 6. Second, Glibc does not need Autoconf. The error is complaining about ld. What is the output of "readelf -l /tools/bin/ld | grep interpret" -- h

Re: Linux From Scratch (Version SVN-20100529) - 6.9. Glibc-2.11.2

On 06/12/2010 12:51 AM, Face Man wrote: > > root:/sources/glibc-build# readelf -l /tools/bin/ld | grep interpretreadelf: > Error: '/tools/bin/ld': No such file > What's the output of "find /tools -name 'ld*" -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/l

Re: Linux From Scratch (Version SVN-20100529) - 6.9. Glibc-2.11.2

On 06/12/2010 01:04 AM, Face Man wrote: > > root:/sources/glibc-build# find /tools -name 'ld*' > /tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ld > /tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ld-old > /tools/bin/ldd > /tools/bin/ld-old > /tools/x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu/bin/ld I'm not seeing a /tools/bin/ld. Looks like

Re: Linux From Scratch (Version SVN-20100529) - 6.9. Glibc-2.11.2

On 06/12/2010 01:55 AM, Face Man wrote: > > well, > I think i should start over however i would like to know if this > what i need to do in chapter 5.8 and 5.9 > cd binutils-2.20.1 > > rm -R ../binutils-build # I am not sure i need to remove this Um... If this means that binutil

Re: LFS (Version SVN-20100529) - 5.19. File-5.04

On 06/14/2010 06:43 AM, Face wrote: > On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 1:25 PM, littlebat wrote: >> >> It seems you have missed something, I remember we should always use >> non-root user (lfs) to compile LFS in chapter 5 at least. >> >> See: >> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/6.6/chapter04/adding

Re: How to skip two settings

On 06/16/2010 05:34 AM, Parmenides wrote: > Hi, > When system starting, there are two settings, namely 'regional > settings' and 'edit settings', > at which the process of starting will pause and I have to press enter > key twice to finish them. > Is there any configurations by which I can skip

Re: How to skip two settings

On 06/16/2010 01:11 PM, Parmenides wrote: > 2010/6/16 Chris Staub: >> On 06/16/2010 05:34 AM, Parmenides wrote: > > > Yes, this is the effect of a live CD indeed. But, I have clone the > live CD onto a partition of hard disk, and tried to altenate some > default settings

Re: some issues with grub

On 07/07/2010 01:56 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Dr.-Ing. Edgar Alwers wrote: > >> 2.) the configuration file example given talks about "Be careful not >> to change the 'exec tail' line above." . But the example does not >> contain a exec tail line. However, this line is important. >> >> May be somethi

Re: [lfs-support] Many certitudes and some doubt

On 12/03/2011 04:53 AM, Giorgio Cittadini wrote: > Hi Andy, thanks for your quick answer. I understand that the two > solutions are equivalent: so I kept at work the symlink. > Now, another question, yet discussed - as I could verify - in > lfs-support, but with some residual doubt as concerns myse

Re: [lfs-support] 2nd Pass binutils install fails (LFS-dev)

On 12/05/2011 01:27 AM, str1chn1n3 wrote: > Hello All, > It's unclear whether the email list is restricted to just the stable > version-- if so, just say the word and I'll abandon DEV for STABLE. If > not, I could use a hand figuring out the cause of an install failure. > The details: > 1) Building

Re: [lfs-support] 2nd Pass binutils install fails (LFS-dev)

> Whenever I attempt to install as user lfs sans sudo, I get 'Permission > denied' for the target directory. That's why lfs is sudoed. Any thoughts > why this might be happening? (Btw, that's the reason for the indirect > toolchain adjustment.) > > That means you've missed something earlier in

Re: [lfs-support] help LFS 6.0 Ch 5.7.1 glibc-2.14.1 configure: error: gcc must provide the header

On 12/15/2011 02:18 AM, Henk Teijema wrote: > Guess I overlooked "The LiveCD cannot be used to build LFS 7.0 or later." > So what liveCD should I use then? > > Met vriendelijke groet, > > Henk Just download any fairly recent distro...Fedora, Ubuntu, etc...and if needed install whatever additional

Re: [lfs-support] Host System Versions

On 12/25/2011 03:20 AM, Corey Richardson wrote: > Under 'Host System Requirements', it says minimum versions. It lists > kernel 2.6.25, but later on chapter 8 it says kernel 3.1. Is it safe to > assume that 3.1+ is fine? Should I stick as close to those program's > version numbers as possible or is

Re: [lfs-support] Ch6 coreutils

On 10/11/2012 03:42 PM, Garrett Gaston wrote: > I got this: "./bld: line 16: /usr/bin/mv: No such file or directory" > when I ran my script for coreutils. I navigated to the /usr/bin > directory of the chroot enironment and there is no mv file or directory. > Any ideas? Also, if you want to see my

Re: [lfs-support] bash 6.33

On 10/11/2012 09:14 PM, Garrett Gaston wrote: > I ran my script( http://pastebin.com/95jDZ7ds ) for chapter 6.33 > Bash-4.2 and the prompt ended up just being bash and thus never seeing > my FLAG file or GOOD being echoed to the screen. Was my script still > successful? I'M thinking that it was and

Re: [lfs-support] glibc-2.16.0 build issue LFS-BOOK-7.2

On 10/22/2012 02:04 PM, Gaurav Goel wrote: > Hi, > > I'm following the LFS-BOOK-7.2. > While building glibc in section 6.9 I'm getting following errors: > > -- > root:/source

Re: [lfs-support] How to know how many packages are installed?

On 10/31/2012 04:04 AM, gmspro wrote: > Is there any way to know how many packages are installed? > Is it possible to know if a package is installed or not? > > Thanks. See the page in the LFS book on "Package Management" - http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter06/pkgmgt.html --

Re: [lfs-support] Not set up to use the correct startfiles at the 6.17 sanity check

On 11/05/2012 09:10 PM, Harry Prevor wrote: > This is my second LFS build, but it's been a while. This time I'm > trying to build with Package Users as described in this hint: > > > For the sanity check at 6.17 > <

Re: [lfs-support] What Is "The" LFS Partition?

On 11/06/2012 03:21 PM, Feuerbacher, Alan wrote: > Bruce wrote: > >>> Why does one have to create a directory with that name before >>> executing the "mount" command? >> >> The system has to know where to attach the data structures in the file >> tree. You could create a script to do a 'mkdir -p ;

Re: [lfs-support] Not set up to use the correct startfiles at the 6.17 sanity check

On 11/06/2012 08:13 PM, Harry Prevor wrote: > > On 11/5/12, Chris Staub wrote: >> I see numerous similar lines in your output - basically, it appears to >> be looking in /bin and /lib for gcc files, rather than /usr/{bin,lib}. > > To be honest, I'm not really sure wh

Re: [lfs-support] Not set up to use the correct startfiles at the 6.17 sanity check

On 11/06/2012 09:11 PM, Harry Prevor wrote: > On 11/6/12, Chris Staub wrote: > >> Installing GCC into /usr certainly shouldn't create any >> directories or files in /bin or /lib. Do you have logs of your GCC >> installation? > > Only of the installation as r

Re: [lfs-support] Not set up to use the correct startfiles at the 6.17 sanity check

On 11/06/2012 09:19 PM, Chris Staub wrote: > On 11/06/2012 09:11 PM, Harry Prevor wrote: >> >> Only of the installation as root, as all the previous files were >> deleted. Here is my config.log: >> >> <http://sprunge.us/QUHB> >> >> I c

Re: [lfs-support] libmpfr error while compiling GCC.

On 11/09/2012 12:30 PM, Prabhu wrote: > > Hi, > I'm trying to compile GCC, I done with untaring (MPFR,GMP and > MPC ) and moving the files to its respected folders, and even > configuration part also done. but while making the Gcc its throwing me > an error message says that Please clari

Re: [lfs-support] libmpfr error while compiling GCC.

On 11/10/2012 01:49 AM, Prabhu wrote: > Hi, > I'm trying to compile GCC, I done with untaring (MPFR,GMP and > MPC ) and moving the files to its respected folders, and even > configuration part also done. but while making the Gcc its throwing me > an error message says that > > *checking f

Re: [lfs-support] libmpfr error while compiling GCC.

On 11/10/2012 07:14 AM, Prabhu wrote: > (5.5.1 Installation of cross GCC) > > I successfully compiled Binutilities, then I untared the GCC. In GCC > folder I done the following steps > > *tar -Jxf ../mpfr-3.1.1.tar.xz > mv -v mpfr-3.1.1 mpfr > tar -Jxf ../gmp-5.0.5.tar.xz > mv -v gmp-5.0.5 gmp > ta

Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 Section 6.4 Chroot Error

On 11/10/2012 10:05 AM, yan wrote: > I also get a problem at this point > >chroot "$LFS" /tools/bin/env -i HOME=/root TERM="$TERM" PS1='\u:\w\$ ' > PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/tools/bin /tools/bin/bash --login +h > /tools/bin/env: /tools/bin/bash: Permission denied > > > root@cpu:/home/

Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 Section 6.4 Chroot Error

On 11/10/2012 09:22 PM, yan wrote: > On Sat 10 Nov 2012 11:09:08 PM CST, Chris Staub wrote: >> On 11/10/2012 10:05 AM, yan wrote: >>> I also get a problem at this point >>> >>> chroot "$LFS" /tools/bin/env -i HOME=/root TERM="$TERM" PS1=

Re: [lfs-support] GCC-4.7.1 - Pass 2 Error unrecognized command line option '-V' unrecognized command line option '-qversion'

On 11/12/2012 10:25 AM, lei huang wrote: > Linux 2.6.18-308.16.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue Oct 2 22:01:37 EDT 2012 i686 > i686 i386 GNU/Linux > > config.log > > FATAL: kernel too old > > help!!! There's the problem - your host system doesn't have a recent enough kernel. You will need to upgrade the kernel

Re: [lfs-support] Use a newer kernel than specified?

On 11/14/2012 04:59 AM, Smith, Mitchell wrote: > Hi, > > The package list specifies using linux kernel: Linux-3.5.2 > > Obviously the later releases would contain multiple fixes and security > improvements. > > Any reason why using the latest 3.5.X release (Currently 3.5.7) would > cause any issues

Re: [lfs-support] LFS network configuration for internet access

On 11/16/2012 01:07 AM, Oshadha Gunawardena wrote: > Hi all, > > Since I have completed building complete LFS system now I want to > configure it's network in order to access internet. > > I have read through > > take new kernel, copy old config to .config > make oldconfig > answer the questions

Re: [lfs-support] LFS-7.2 host system tar version

On 11/23/2012 07:33 PM, nettxzl wrote: > (Sorry if this comes through twice. My first attempt seems to have vanished.) > > Hi, > > I was starting the gcc-4.7.1 (Pass 1) build in Chap. 5 and I was > trying to unpack the files compressed with xz following the command > given there: > > tar -Jxf ../mp

Re: [lfs-support] "-z option ...no" issue

On 11/26/2012 12:19 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > 王杰清 wrote: >> hi, >> when i install glibc following lfs.7.2 book, i meet with the error >> "configure: error : linker with -z support required" >> is my gcc wrong in my host? should i reinstall it ,or how can i fix it . >> Any advice is pleasure; > > Ha

Re: [lfs-support] next step wireless

On 11/27/2012 05:15 PM, Dave wrote: > Dr.-Ing. Edgar Alwers wrote: >> On Tuesday 27 November 2012 11:09:33 Dave wrote: >> >>> I only have WiFi with WEP encryption here, can the WICD pkg and DHCP >>> alone handle this connect? >>> >> >> You will need some other packages, like wpa_supplicant, but th

Re: [lfs-support] Help with a linker problem

On 11/30/2012 06:37 AM, Simon Geard wrote: > Hey guys... > > Rewriting my LFS build scripts, I'm getting an interesting linking error > with bash in chapter 6, and am hoping someone can point me in the right > direction for tracking down the cause. > > Basically, bash builds correctly, but the resu

Re: [lfs-support] /dev/pts and /dev/shm not mounted on boot

On 12/02/2012 01:02 AM, d...@fluidnetwork.com wrote: > Hello all, > > Just built two systems, one of HLFS-development and one LFS-7.2. > > Not sure what I did wrong, but neither system would successfully mount > /dev/pts or /dev/shm on bootup - both were complaining about > nonexistant mount points

Re: [lfs-support] error when i build webkitgtk-1.10.1

On 12/02/2012 11:22 AM, Francisco Jesús Navarro Cortés wrote: > Hello. i try build with make-3.82 and make-3.82-upstream_fixes-3.patch > the source webkitgtk-1.10.1 but get this error: > > ./.libs/libwebkit2gtk-3.0.so : undefined > reference to `glCullFace' > ./.libs

Re: [lfs-support] Permission error in Binutil while "make install" (LFS7.2)

On 12/08/2012 03:49 PM, Prabhu wrote: > Hi I'm getting permission error while "make install" the binutil > package, but I could successfully able to create folder in all the 3 dir > (source,tools,usr) with the user lfs. I rollback and reperformed the > chapter 4.1 to 4.4, but I'm still facing the i

Re: [lfs-support] Installation of Bash 5.15 Error on make

On 12/15/2012 02:58 AM, Alexander Spitzer wrote: > Hello all, > > I am on section 5.15.1 (installing bash) on LFS version 7.2 and I am > receiving an error after running make: > $ make -j > yacc -d ./parse.y > make: execvp: yacc: Permission denied > make: *** [y.tab.c] Error 127 > > I have encounte

Re: [lfs-support] Installation of Bash 5.15 Error on make

On 12/15/2012 03:03 AM, Alexander Spitzer wrote: > An additional piece of information that might be important: > The patch asked for in the book is bash-4.2-fixes-8.patch while the one > I have from the website and that one that I applied > is bash-4.2-fixes-10.patch > Could that be the cause of th

Re: [lfs-support] Installation of Bash 5.15 Error on make

On 12/15/2012 03:11 AM, Alexander Spitzer wrote: > Hi Chris, > Thanks for your reply. > > ls -l /usr/bin/yacc gives: > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 41 Dec 13 19:13 /usr/bin/yacc > > That explains it, that script is not executable. "chmod a+x /usr/bin/yacc" and it should work. -- http://linuxfromscratch

Re: [lfs-support] Installation of Bash 5.15 Error on make

On 12/15/2012 03:18 AM, Alexander Spitzer wrote: > I used the sources in wget-list and the list had the fixes-10.patch. I > hope that doesn't turn out to be the issue. Other than that, the only > thing I can think of is during the make of the check package, I received > a undefined reference to pth

Re: [lfs-support] Binutils patch, why?

On 12/16/2012 06:55 AM, JIA Pei wrote: > > Hi, all: > > 1) From > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter05/binutils-pass1.html > , binutils pass 1 requires a patch, why? > What is this patch for? > > *patch -Np1 -i ../binutils-2.22-build_fix-1.patch* > It tells you in the book. Try

Re: [lfs-support] Is it a must to separate Binutils and GCC into Pass 1 and Pass 2?

On 12/17/2012 06:00 AM, JIA Pei wrote: > > Hi, all; > > Sorry to bug all of you again. > I've successfully built > Binutils 2.23.1 > GCC 4.7,2 > Linux-kernel 3.6.10 > Glib 2.16.0 > > However, is it a must for me to proceed to the pass 2 of binutils and gcc? Whatever is in the book is there

Re: [lfs-support] Is it a must to separate Binutils and GCC into Pass 1 and Pass 2?

On 12/18/2012 07:51 AM, JIA Pei wrote: > > Hi, Simon: > > The reason why I'm doing that (use binutils-2.23.1 instead of > binutils-2.22) is I don't want to 100% strictly follow LFS book, so that > I might be able to understand how to build my own Linux deeper. > > And, even now, I've got no idea wh

Re: [lfs-support] Glibc installation in target machine fails

On 12/18/2012 08:25 AM, Prabhu wrote: > Hi, > > Since its a check, I ignored it and I performed with the next step > that's "*make install*" even this fails and throw me an error as > * > *ERROR*: > > make[2]: *** No rule to make target > `/usr/--disable-profile--enable-add-ons--enable-kernel=2.6.2

Re: [lfs-support] Is it a must to separate Binutils and GCC into Pass 1 and Pass 2?

On 12/18/2012 09:23 PM, JIA Pei wrote: > > Now, fail to build check-0.9.9 ... > The error message is: > > //mnt/lfs/tools/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.7.2/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: > note: 'pthread_create@@GLIBC_2.1' is defined in DSO > /tools/lib/libpthread.so.0 so try adding it

Re: [lfs-support] Is it a must to separate Binutils and GCC into Pass 1 and Pass 2?

On 12/18/2012 09:07 PM, JIA Pei wrote: > > Thank you so much Bruce... > I proceed to expect 5.45 now > But, I got two test fails as follows. Is this normal? > If you had read the book like you're expected to, you would already know the answer to this. If you can't be bothered to read it, qui

Re: [lfs-support] make install gcc 4.7.2 fail...

On 12/20/2012 06:33 PM, JIA Pei wrote: > > However, I *failed to make install gcc 4.7.2* > > The error message obtained is: > > /* tar -cf - .; exit 0) | (cd > /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.7.2/include; tar xpf - ) > /bin/sh: line 1: tar: command not found > /bin/sh: line 1: tar: command not fou

Re: [lfs-support] Is it normal that I obtained a lot of error messages while building glibc-2.16.0?

On 12/22/2012 06:30 AM, JIA Pei wrote: > > Hi, all: > > I noticed on > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/chapter06/glibc.html , > I may meet some building errors while building glibc. I obtained the > following errors. I just wonder if as mentioned on the above page, can I > just

Re: [lfs-support] make install gcc 4.7.2 fail...

On 12/22/2012 03:37 PM, JIA Pei wrote: > > Hi, Christ: > > > I recalled it now... This problem is probably caused by the SD > card automatic disconnection from the computer during *Installing Basic > System Software --- probably happened after "make" at page > *http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/v

Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 section 6.52 kmod-9

On 12/26/2012 02:44 AM, Israel Silberg wrote: > Hi all, > I'm building LFS 7.2, and during the running of the configure section of > the kmod-9 I got the following: > > checking for liblzma... no > configure: error: Package requirements (liblzma >= 4.99) were not met: > > No package 'liblzma' found

Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 section 6.52 kmod-9

> You should have liblzma.so in /tools/lib and lzma.h in /tools/include. > >-- Bruce > -- > http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html > Unsubscribe: See the above information page > > > Hi Bruce, > Yes bi

Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 section 6.52 kmod-9

On 12/26/2012 05:25 PM, Baho Utot wrote: > On 12/26/2012 02:10 PM, Chris Staub wrote: >> liblzma should be in /lib, not /usr/lib. Also, can you copy the contents >> of config.log? > > From 6.46. Xz-5.0.4 > > ./configure --prefix=/usr --libdir=/lib --docdir=/usr/share/

Re: [lfs-support] How to upgrade a single package?

On 01/03/2013 04:13 AM, JIA Pei wrote: > > Hi, all: > > sorry for my naive question again. > I now noticed coreutils has been upgraded from 8.19 to 8.20 . I'd love > to upgrade it without rebuilding everything from scratch, but just this > single package. > > I can always chroot into the environmen

Re: [lfs-support] can't compile gcc pass 1

On 01/05/2013 07:35 AM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > > I have recurrently written about this, here. > > My error with this page, even after having built one or two versions of > LFS, was that the last line: > > "gcc compilation OK" > > that made me ignore the other lines, when some of these lines

Re: [lfs-support] sed 'no such file' problem - LFS 7.1, Section 6.13, Binutils-2.22

On 01/06/2013 06:15 PM, Ahmed ELtayeb wrote: > just >> cd binutils-2.22 > and everything will be fine > > > > Valentine Michael Smith gmail.com> writes: > >> >> >> I removed the outdated standards.info file, and then tried the sed >> command:sed > -i.bak '/^INFO/s/standards.info //' etc/Makefile.

Re: [lfs-support] Boot LFS from usb

On 01/07/2013 07:18 PM, Baho Utot wrote: > I am trying to put LFS on a thumbdrive to use a rescue/fixit system. > > When I boot it can not find the usb drive and filesystem. I have the > correct filesystem built into the kernel, not as a module > > I am miising something in my kernel config. > Thi

Re: [lfs-support] Issues with compiling GCC-4.8.1 (LFS 7.4)

On 11/02/2013 08:14 AM, Bernard Hurley wrote: > Hi there! > > I have been trying to compile GCC-4.8.1 in section 5.5 of LFS 7.4. The > first problem was that the compiler didn't seem to understand (a > parameter to configure on p.37): > >--disable-libstdc++-v3 > > In case anyone else has the p

Re: [lfs-support] Issues with compiling GCC-4.8.1 (LFS 7.4)

On 11/02/2013 12:52 PM, Chris Staub wrote: >> >> The second problem is a bit more intractible. Having made the apbove >> adjustment to "configure", when I run "make" it bombs out with: >> >> snip === >> config

Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.4 / 5.5 GCC Pass 1 Question

On 11/24/2013 04:01 PM, Kenan Regez wrote: > Hi, > > It is my first try to build LFS im really excited about the project but > i have got a question about the step GCC 4.8.1. > > I run into the same error many times when i run "make". I followed every > step in the book, i untared the gmp, mpfr and

Re: [lfs-support] lfs 7.4 / Section 6 - Building the LFS System as sudo?

On 11/29/2013 01:56 PM, frozen tuesday wrote: > Hello all -- > > Thanks to the help I have received here or elsewhere, I have made it as > far as section III in the online instructions: "Building the LFS System". > > I am using Linux Mint 15 as my host computer which only allows me to > "sudo" befo

Re: [lfs-support] lfs 7.4 / Section 6 - Building the LFS System as sudo?

On 12/01/2013 06:27 PM, frozen tuesday wrote: > >> Is it sufficient to sudo before every command in the rest of the book, > >> or do I need to find a way to log in as the user "root"? > > > > > > Thanks. > > > You stay root anyway as long as you're in the chroot. > > I see the chroot is coming

Re: [lfs-support] GCC-4.8.1 Pass1 C++

On 01/11/14 03:35, William Darryl Jackson wrote: > Greetings: > > Having rebuilt from scratch, and being certain all steps were followed > accurately - in the proper folder and environment; GCC 'make' is still > giving me the following error: > > configure: error: C++ compiler missing or inoperatio

Re: [lfs-support] folder permissions

On 01/11/14 14:25, William Darryl Jackson wrote: > Yes, > > mount > > /dev/sdb2 on /media/lfs type ext4 > (rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_xattr,barrier=1,data=ordered,uhelper=udisks) > > The echo $LFS, is constantly slipping in and out of /mnt/lfs. I have to > keep doing the 'export'. Right now it r

Re: [lfs-support] Chapter 5.7 glibc-2.1{7,8}

On 01/11/14 14:38, Frans de Boer wrote: > Dear reader, > > I am having problems lately making the tool chain on my x86_64 machine. > I finally traced it back to chapter 5.7, where glibc aborts with the > next messages: > > Makerules:755: *** mixed implicit and normal rules. Stop. > make[1]: Leavin

Re: [lfs-support] folder permissions

On 01/11/14 14:47, William Darryl Jackson wrote: > On 01/11/2014 02:33 PM, Chris Staub wrote: >> On 01/11/14 14:25, William Darryl Jackson wrote: >>> Yes, >>> >> Your output says there is something mounted on /media/lfs, yet you keep >> saying you are as

Re: [lfs-support] Two suspected bugs

On 01/16/14 13:00, parmenides wrote: > Hi, > > I am build the LFS 7.4 following the book, and find two suspected bugs: > > (2) In chapter 5, "5.7. Glibc-2.18" > I got the following warning: > > configure: WARNING: > *** These auxiliary programs are missing or incompatible versions: autoconf > *** s

Re: [lfs-support] Gcc-4.8.1 Section 5.5.1 - libmpfr

On 01/16/14 18:07, William Darryl Jackson wrote: > On 01/16/2014 04:23 PM, Pierre Labastie wrote: >> Le 16/01/2014 22:15, William Darryl Jackson a écrit : > You are correct - Pierre, I came to that same conclusion. So I very > carefully repeated the steps on page 36 to ensure those folders were > b

Re: [lfs-support] CLFS

On 02/19/14 05:46, loki wrote: > Heya, > > just wanted to ask what happened to CLFS? > > On the address http://www.cross-lfs.org/ I'm getting a Domain for Sale. > > Regards, > Daniel > > Nothing happened to it, it's where it's always been, at trac.cross-lfs.org. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mail

Re: jhalfs?

Galaxy Travel wrote: > How do you install this? > Unpack the tarball and read the README. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: jhalfs?

Galaxy Travel wrote: >> Unpack the tarball and read the README. >> -- >> http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support >> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html >> Unsubscribe: See the above information page >> > > I did that it says make menuconfig which I did then what? it

Re: jhalfs?

Galaxy Travel wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Chris Staub" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "LFS Support List" > Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2007 12:18 PM > Subject: Re: jhalfs? > > >> Galaxy Travel wrote: >>&g

Re: NCURSES 5.6 BUG

Ag. Hatzimanikas wrote: > On Mon, Feb 12, at 08:30 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Can you please specify what the bug is, and perhaps provide a link to the >> patch? > > I guess he is referring to include/MKhashsize.sh > Particularly in the following variable. > > TABSIZE=`grep -v '^[ #]' $CAPS | g

Re: Udev Errors?

Galaxy Travel wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Dan Nicholson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "LFS Support List" > Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 5:17 PM > Subject: Re: Udev Errors? > > >> On 2/14/07, Galaxy Travel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Im having a couple errors when I reb

Re: first pass GCC bootstrap problem

Nick Bowes wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Dan Nicholson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "LFS Support List" > Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 7:09 PM > Subject: Re: first pass GCC bootstrap problem > > >> If it's your first time following the book, chances are that you did >> get co

Re: Coreutils - LFS 6.2

Bartlomiej P. Lyson wrote: > Hello, > I've got a problem with running the test coreutils. > > My lfs version is 6.2. > > an example: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# /usr/sbin/useradd -m test > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# cat /etc/passwd | grep test > test:x:1001:1002::/home/test:/bin/bash > > [EMAIL PROTE

Re: Coreutils - LFS 6.2

Bartlomiej P. Lyson wrote: > Hello, > I've got a problem with running the test coreutils. > > My lfs version is 6.2. > > an example: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# /usr/sbin/useradd -m test > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# cat /etc/passwd | grep test > test:x:1001:1002::/home/test:/bin/bash > > [EMAIL PROTE

Re: chroot chapter 6.6

nick bowes wrote: > Hi, > I can't figure out what should happen in ch6.8. the first command your > asked to run is "make install" but where should I run it from? should I be > running it as root in the previously untared man-pages-2.42 dir? > Sorry I know this should be obvious but as you will h

Re: Retrieving Packages from LiveCD after chroot

John Rodenbiker wrote: > Actually, it says "Downloaded packages and patches will need to be > stored somewhere that is conveniently available throughout the entire > build." It goes on to say that a working directory will also be > required and that $LFS/sources can work for both. The text does

Re: 7.5. Configuring the setclock Script - no /etc/sysconfig

Kai Ulrich wrote: > Hey, > > in chapter I supose to create a /etc/sysconfig/clock file. > > by executing the comand > > cat > /etc/sysconfig/clock << "EOF" > # Begin /etc/sysconfig/clock > > UTC=1 > > # End /etc/sysconfig/clock > EOF > > i get the message, > > /etc/sysconfig/clock: No such f

Re: GCC make install problem

Bob Newell wrote: > I am trying to build my LFS 6.2, and I am currently in > section 5.4.1 (building GCC). So far I havent > deviated from the book other than the mount point of > my LFS sources. When I got to the "make install" > command, here is what I get > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/media/hdc2/sour

Re: 6.9.1 Glibc-2.3.6 problems...

Peter Santimauro wrote: > After mkdir -v ../glibc-build and cd ../glibc-build, I tryed to run > the configure script. I get the following as and output: > ... > the config.log says: > > ... > configure:2631: checking for C compiler version > configure:2634: gcc --version &5 > ../glibc-2.3.6/c

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >