On 03/31/2010 04:22 PM, Chris Staub wrote: > On 03/31/2010 04:06 PM, Szabolcs Gyalókay wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> >> OK, then libssp is not supposed to be linked, then why isn't somebody >> asking the obvious question? >> >> In the original post Pete wrote: >> >> It seems that libssp is suppose to be pulled in by >> the gcc option '-fstack-protector' so that '-lssp' >> shouldn't be necessary on the link line. >> >> >> So libssp is included because of '-fstack-protector'. I assume >> '-fstack-protector' is also not supposed to be there. Then why is it here: >> >> gcc res_hconf.c -c -std=gnu99 -fgnu89-inline -O2 -Wall -Winline >> -Wwrite-strings -fmerge-all-constants -g -Wstrict-prototypes >> -DIS_IN_nscd=1 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fpie -fstack-protector >> >> I can only say for sure: I'm pasting instructions from the book, and I >> did not put it there. > > I also see -fstack-protector on my Glibc build, but it doesn't try to > pull in libssp. Perhaps that isn't the real problem.
Hmm, sorry I just noticed that my latest Glibc log is from an older version. Maybe I need to look at the current one again... -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
