[lfs-support] Q: re. LFS 7.3 errata

Quote: Changes to some distros cause the build of check-0.9.9 to fail in Chapter 5. The proper fix is to add --with-sysroot to the end of the configure line in Binutils-2.23.1 - Pass 2. Is it *always* safe to add --with-sysroot , no matter what your host distro? (My host is LFS-6

Re: [lfs-support] Q: re. LFS 7.3 errata

On May 15, 2013, at 2:02 PM, Jeremy Henty wrote: Quote: Changes to some distros cause the build of check-0.9.9 to fail in Chapter 5. The proper fix is to add --with-sysroot to the end of the configure line in Binutils-2.23.1 - Pass 2. Is it *always* safe to add --with-sysroot , n

Re: [lfs-support] Q: re. LFS 7.3 errata

Jeremy Henty wrote: > > Quote: > > Changes to some distros cause the build of check-0.9.9 to fail in > Chapter 5. The proper fix is to add --with-sysroot to the end of > the configure line in Binutils-2.23.1 - Pass 2. > > Is it *always* safe to add --with-sysroot , no matter what

[lfs-support] Problem with xzless

Apologies for sending to the wrong list. # cat /etc/lfs-release SVN-20130512 64bit, built with jhalfs I am worried about this: Either as normal user or as root: env LANG=C xzless /home/fernando/Downloads/blfs/links-2.7-2013.05.15-17h21m20s.log.xz error message: /usr/bin/xzless: line 49: test: 4

Re: [lfs-support] Problem with xzless

On May 15, 2013, at 3:47 PM, Fernando wrote: xzless /home/fernando/Downloads/blfs/links-2.7-2013.05.15-17h21m20s.log.xz /usr/bin/xzless: line 49: test: 458 (POSIX regular expressions): integer expression expected Line 49 is also an error when a filename isn't given. Works fine here. xzless

Re: [lfs-support] Problem with xzless

Hello, On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 17:47 -0300, Fernando wrote: > error message: > /usr/bin/xzless: line 49: test: 458 (POSIX regular expressions): integer > expression expected > > (used env in order to get English message, but it appears in my locale > LANG too.) > > Line 49 of xzless is: > > if te

Re: [lfs-support] Problem with xzless

El Wed, 15 May 2013 17:47:58 -0300 Fernando escribió: > Apologies for sending to the wrong list. > > # cat /etc/lfs-release > SVN-20130512 > 64bit, built with jhalfs > > I am worried about this: > > Either as normal user or as root: > env LANG=C xzless > /home/fernando/Downloads/blfs/links-2.7-

[lfs-support] Specific Kernel configuration - LFS 7.3

I'm building my LFS 7.3 with main purposes: 1. Live CD Xfce 2. English and Korean language interfaces is there any specific kernel configuration for it? Thank you for your attention. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://

Re: [lfs-support] Problem with xzless

Em 15-05-2013 17:54, Michael E. Maher escreveu:> > On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 17:47 -0300, Fernando wrote: >> error message: >> /usr/bin/xzless: line 49: test: 458 (POSIX regular expressions): integer >> expression expected >> >> (used env in order to get English message, but it appears in my locale >>

Re: [lfs-support] Problem with xzless

On May 15, 2013, at 4:12 PM, Matias A. Fonzo wrote: Seems the `less' of busybox, the output of `less -V' is: less 451 (POSIX regular expressions) [..] So.. the integer cannot be compared. This is a jhalfs build of LFS. Thus no busybox. | Yes. Use better alternatives like zutils[1] or lzip[

Re: [lfs-support] Problem with xzless

On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 18:11 -0300, Fernando wrote: > Em 15-05-2013 17:54, Michael E. Maher escreveu:> > > > On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 17:47 -0300, Fernando wrote: > >> error message: > >> /usr/bin/xzless: line 49: test: 458 (POSIX regular expressions): integer > >> expression expected > >> > >> (used

Re: [lfs-support] Problem with xzless

El Wed, 15 May 2013 16:12:15 -0500 William Harrington escribió: > > On May 15, 2013, at 4:12 PM, Matias A. Fonzo wrote: > > > Seems the `less' of busybox, the output of `less -V' is: > > > > less 451 (POSIX regular expressions) > > [..] > > > > So.. the integer cannot be compared. > > This is a

[lfs-support] LFS Stable errata gcc 4.8 hosts

Greetings, Gcc stable is using gcc 4.7.2 and multiple users have encountered issues when using hosts with gcc 4.8 to build gcc 4.7.2 for LFS stable. I've hinted them to this bug: http://gcc.gnu.org/@/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56927 gcc 4.7.3 came out recently and fixes the issue. Errata may

Re: [lfs-support] Problem with xzless

Em 15-05-2013 18:37, Matias A. Fonzo escreveu: > El Wed, 15 May 2013 16:12:15 -0500 > William Harrington escribió: >> >> On May 15, 2013, at 4:12 PM, Matias A. Fonzo wrote: >> >>> Seems the `less' of busybox, the output of `less -V' is: >>> >>> less 451 (POSIX regular expressions) >>> [..] >>> ***

Re: [lfs-support] Problem with xzless

Michael E. Maher wrote: > The mail from Matias really says it all, it's the extra `(POSIX regular > expressions)' which is screwing up the integer comparison `if test "..." > -ge 429; then'. > > This seems like a bug in either: > less -V giving too much information for xz > - or - > xz

Re: [lfs-support] Problem with xzless

Em 15-05-2013 20:06, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: > Michael E. Maher wrote: > >> The mail from Matias really says it all, it's the extra `(POSIX regular >> expressions)' which is screwing up the integer comparison `if test "..." >> -ge 429; then'. >> >> This seems like a bug in either: >> less -V giv

Re: [lfs-support] Problem with xzless

Just to say that this known, at least since 17 Nov 2012 17:15:02 UTC. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=693537 -- []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information pa

Re: [lfs-support] Problem with xzless

Fernando wrote: > Em 15-05-2013 20:06, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: >> Michael E. Maher wrote: >> >>> The mail from Matias really says it all, it's the extra `(POSIX regular >>> expressions)' which is screwing up the integer comparison `if test "..." >>> -ge 429; then'. >>> >>> This seems like a bug in ei