I'm an old LFS user who originally worked with LFS 6.1, and more
recently 6.8. To build these two systems automatically I used jhalfs.
I'd like to upgrade to LFS 7.3, but I can't get jhalfs 2.3.2 (the latest
version of the recommended ALFS build tool) to work.
Is ALFS still active - nothing seems
On 04/10/2013 09:33 AM, Anthony Wright wrote:
> I'm an old LFS user who originally worked with LFS 6.1, and more
> recently 6.8. To build these two systems automatically I used jhalfs.
>
> I'd like to upgrade to LFS 7.3, but I can't get jhalfs 2.3.2 (the latest
> version of the recommended ALFS bui
On 04/10/2013 04:37 PM, Baho Utot wrote:
> On 04/10/2013 09:33 AM, Anthony Wright wrote:
>> I'm an old LFS user who originally worked with LFS 6.1, and more
>> recently 6.8. To build these two systems automatically I used jhalfs.
>>
>> I'd like to upgrade to LFS 7.3, but I can't get jhalfs 2.3.2 (t
Le 10/04/2013 15:51, Thanos Baloukas a écrit :
> On 04/10/2013 04:37 PM, Baho Utot wrote:
>> On 04/10/2013 09:33 AM, Anthony Wright wrote:
>>> I'm an old LFS user who originally worked with LFS 6.1, and more
>>> recently 6.8. To build these two systems automatically I used jhalfs.
>>>
>>> I'd like
On Apr 10, 2013, at 8:51, Thanos Baloukas wrote:
> You can use the development version of jhalfs. It worked for me lately.
> On alfs page says how to fetch it via svn.
Agree,too. Use svn to build current LFS. Worked well for me.
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mai
Using LFS 7.3 I've gotten as far as section 6.7 where I'm setting up the
kernel API's for Glibc. I'm getting the following error:
root:/sources/linux-3.8.1# make headers_check
CHK include/generated/uapi/linux/version.h
HOSTCC scripts/basic/fixdep
/bin/sh: scripts/basic/fixdep: Permissio
Ryan gmail.com> writes:
>
> Using LFS 7.3 I've gotten as far as section 6.7 where I'm setting up the
> kernel API's for Glibc. I'm getting the following error:
>
> root:/sources/linux-3.8.1# make headers_check
> CHK include/generated/uapi/linux/version.h
> HOSTCC scripts/basic/fixdep
Le 10/04/2013 21:01, Ryan a écrit :
> Ryan gmail.com> writes:
>
>>
>> Using LFS 7.3 I've gotten as far as section 6.7 where I'm setting up the
>> kernel API's for Glibc. I'm getting the following error:
>>
>> root:/sources/linux-3.8.1# make headers_check
>> CHK include/generated/uapi/linu
Pierre Labastie neuf.fr> writes:
>
> Have you tried verbose options ('make V=1 headers_check' or 'make V=2
headers_check')?
>
> Pierre
No, I had not tried that, level 1 didn't give me any better other than tell
me what command it was executing. Level 2
gave the extra note "due to a missing
On Friday 05 April 2013 18:19:03 Armin K. wrote:
> > You have to use a initramfs to boot to a drive using a uuid. Other
> > partitions should be OK.
> >
> > -- Bruce
>
> Only true for root=UUID=blah kernel parameter. Nothing to do with
> /etc/fstab - I do it all the time.
>
> UUID=blah in
Hi, lfs 7.3
uname -i and uname -p both return "unknown" which is causing some issues
on software I'm trying to build.
On other distributions - that return x86_64
uname -m however does return x86_64
What went wrong in my build of coreutils?
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-s
On Apr 10, 2013, at 4:45 PM, Alice Wonder wrote:
> Hi, lfs 7.3
>
> uname -i and uname -p both return "unknown" which is causing some
> issues
> on software I'm trying to build.
>
> On other distributions - that return x86_64
>
> uname -m however does return x86_64
>
> What went wrong in my buil
On Wed, 2013-04-10 at 17:15 -0500, William Harrington wrote:
*snip*
> > What went wrong in my build of coreutils?
> >
>
> This has been reported a bug a while ago:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2012-11/msg00172.html
>
> Sincerely,
>
> William Harrington
>
Ah, thanks, OK -
13 matches
Mail list logo
