running the "certificate authority certificates" scripts from blfs my
system fails with some certificates.
as i learned this is not a coreutils bug but a kernel problem. is there
a solution for 32bit kernels or do i have to rebuild with 64bit?
thanks
tobias
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman
I'm building the development version. Since I didn't want to lose my work in
case I had to backtrack (slight RTFM problem, you know) I backed up my build
environment at chapters 5.34 and 6.61. I ran into boot problems when
finished, so I backed up again at that point, deleted the working file
Newsflash: kernel.org is back online. Repositories are available.
--
Fourth law of programming:
Anything that can go wrong wi
sendmail: segmentation violation - core dumped
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubsc
baldu...@units.it schrieb:
>
> are you sure that xinetd is picking libtirpc up?
>
> pmap_{set,unset} are in libtirpc and in order to force the xinetd build
> process to link in libtirpc I had to:
>
> export LDFLAGS="-ltirpc"
that's it. now libtirpc is linked.
but now i get the next error
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> xinglp wrote:
>
> You are a little impatient. The book starts rendering every day at
> 08:15 GMT and the bootscripts were in place 5 minutes later.
Can I generate the blfs-bootscript by blfs xml, I can do it with lfs xml.
Or where is the bl
Dave Williams wrote:
> I'm building the development version. Since I didn't want to lose my work
> in
> case I had to backtrack (slight RTFM problem, you know) I backed up my build
> environment at chapters 5.34 and 6.61. I ran into boot problems when
> finished, so I backed up again at that
Aleksandar Kuktin wrote:
> Newsflash: kernel.org is back online. Repositories are available.
Yes, some files have been available for a few days, but missing are many
others: udev, util-linux, PAM, autofs, pciutils, and others.
The main page still says the current version of the kernel is 3.0.4.
I'm sorry to be so persistent but I have been stuck with this error
for the last two days.
Any hint would be highly appreciated.
Thanks,
Fred.
"UNIX is very simple, it just needs a genius to understand its simplicity."
-- Dennis Ritchie, D.E.P.
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 4:45 PM, feralert wr
xinglp wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> xinglp wrote:
>>
>> You are a little impatient. Â The book starts rendering every day at
>> 08:15 GMT and the bootscripts were in place 5 minutes later.
>
> Can I generate the blfs-bootscript by blfs xml, I can do it with lfs
In section 2.2, we have the statement
"A minimal system requires a partition of around 1.3 gigabytes (GB).
This is enough to store all the source tarballs and
compile the packages."
I created a 2GB partition, and ran out of space during the make phase
of 6.17 GCC
The package details in that sect
Steve Crosby wrote:
> In section 2.2, we have the statement
>
> "A minimal system requires a partition of around 1.3 gigabytes (GB).
> This is enough to store all the source tarballs and
> compile the packages."
At one time, that was true. Since then packages have increased in size.
> I created
resending as previous is awaiting moderation as I forgot to re-join ML
before posting
---
The LFS LiveCD is listed in the 1.1 introduction as valid to use in
building LFS as a host distribution, with a caveat about newer
hardware not being detected.
However, the kernel version of the LFS LiveCD
12 matches
Mail list logo
