On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 15:21 +0100, Eric Plummer wrote:
> Simon:
> That is one heck of an assumption... If you assume everyone else does
> their job properly, I have a used car you might be interested in...
Oh, I know it's not necessarily accurate, don't get me wrong. But as I
said, if I don't tru
2011/6/23 Bruce Dubbs :
> xinglp wrote:
>> 2011/6/23 xinglp :
>>> 2011/6/23 xinglp :
Grub-1.99 show "symbol grub_xputs not found" on 32bits system. But it
works well on 64bits.
>>> May be my mistake, I'll check it later
>>>
>>
>> It's like that I can't use entire the disk (/dev/sda,
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 19:59:47 +1200
Simon Geard wrote:
> And that's fine - I'm not trying to convince everyone else that running
> tests is unnecessary. I just don't find it worth my time, running tests
> for every piece of software I install.
Same here. If it's broken I'll find out when I try to
I am a beginning LFS student/builder.
I was using the LFS livecd (Version x86-6.3-r2160) for my build. The
binutils build went well.
The gcc build (with the command 'make bootstrap') however, failed with
the following being the last 20 lines of the error output:
warning: structure `reg_info_def' u
Frederick Muriithi wrote:
> I am a beginning LFS student/builder.
> I was using the LFS livecd (Version x86-6.3-r2160) for my build. The
> binutils build went well.
> The gcc build (with the command 'make bootstrap') however, failed with
> the following being the last 20 lines of the error output:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Webmaster wrote:
> http://distro.ibiblio.org/tinycorelinux/welcome.html
>
> Have you ever read this? Such a tiny linux...
This stuff goes on the lfs-chat mailing list, not on the lfs-support
list. Since I don't subscribe to the lfs-chat list, I'm marking it as
OT.
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 6:09 AM, Frederick Muriithi
wrote:
> ./gt-c-decl.h: In function 'gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node':
> ./gt-c-decl.h:61: error: dominator of 7 should be 10, not 9
> ./gt-c-decl.h:61: internal compiler error: in verify_dominators, at
> dominance.c:875
> Please submit a full bug repor
Out of curiosity - I am building from the 6.3 LiveCD but following the 6.8 book
with the proper sources downloaded, etc. Is this not recommended? I can easily
burn a knoppix cd if that would be a better option.
On Jun 23, 2011, at 10:42 AM, William Immendorf wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 6:0
Thank you. I'll do that and get back to you with progress/error report.
--
Frederick M. Muriithi
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Brian Dickens wrote:
> Out of curiosity - I am building from the 6.3 LiveCD but following
> the 6.8 book with the proper sources downloaded, etc.
That is fine.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe:
Op Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:18:45 +0200 schreef William Immendorf
:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:14 PM, jpkaper wrote:
>> After installing Shadow from chapter 6.55, switching as root to a new
>> user
>> with su gave the error:"Setgid: Operation not permitted".
>> I was able to work around this prob
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Frederick Muriithi
wrote:
> Thank you. I'll do that and get back to you with progress/error report.
Before you continue on with your adventure, please be sure to read the
essential prereading hint. This will make life a lot easier for you on
your new journey with
William Immendorf wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Frederick Muriithi
> wrote:
[...]
> Have fun, don't panic, and don't forget to bring your towel!!! (on
> second thought, leave the towel behind)
Is that in large friendly letters? Then he'd better bring
his towel.
Mac
--
p="p=%c%s%
13 matches
Mail list logo
