On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Kyle Rush wrote:
>
> What's up with the gcc-4.1.2-specs-1.patch?
>
> when I run it, it prompts for what file to patch, and it seems to think it
> should patch a whole bunch of files, none of which actually exist. If I
> try to patch them an
On 09/02/10 12:48, Kyle Rush wrote:
>
> What's up with the gcc-4.1.2-specs-1.patch?
>
> when I run it, it prompts for what file to patch, and it seems to think it
> should patch a whole bunch of files, none of which actually exist. If I
> try to patch them anyway, it says
What's up with the gcc-4.1.2-specs-1.patch?
when I run it, it prompts for what file to patch, and it seems to think it
should patch a whole bunch of files, none of which actually exist. If I
try to patch them anyway, it says "error on line #, can't find file to
patch"
but whe
Kyle Rush wrote:
> hi everyone. I am a total newbie to Linux (of any kind, not just LFS) and
> took this on in order to learn about Linux and computers in general.
> The book I am using is version 6.3 .
> I am currently doing gcc-4.1.2 pass 2 and due to problems during the
> pat
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Kyle Rush wrote:
>
> hi everyone. I am a total newbie to Linux (of any kind, not just LFS) and
> took this on in order to learn about Linux and computers in general.
> The book I am using is version 6.3 .
> I am currently doing gcc-4.1.2 pass 2 and
hi everyone. I am a total newbie to Linux (of any kind, not just LFS) and
took this on in order to learn about Linux and computers in general.
The book I am using is version 6.3 .
I am currently doing gcc-4.1.2 pass 2 and due to problems during the
patching process I created two other directories
On Friday 18 December 2009 22:18:57 Pixel 73 wrote:
> configure:2284:17: error: gmp.h: No such file or directory
You haven't installed gmp correctly.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.l
On 12/18/09, Pixel 73 wrote:
>> trim the '>' quoted text to just the part
>> want to resond to
==
==
>
> grep '/lib.*/crt[1in].*succeeded' dummy.log
>
> is:
> attempt to open /bin/../lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.2/../../../crt1.o
> succeeded
> att
> Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:15:22 -0500
> Subject: Re: LFS 6.3 Chapter 6.12, GCC-4.1.2 startfiles check fails --> no
> output
> From: linuxscra...@gmail.com
> To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
>
> On 12/17/09, Pixel 73 wrote
On 12/17/09, linux fan wrote:
> On 12/17/09, Pixel 73 wrote:
> Are you sure you had the configure command exactly as in the
> book ?
>
And I'm thinking ... I usually copy/paste each entire grey block and
look at i before pressing enter. Notice that the backslashes \ at the
end of some lines mak
On 12/17/09, Pixel 73 wrote:
> But now I found out, that the startfiles show up when I am entering the
> following command:
>
> grep -o '/lib.*/crt[1in].*succeeded' dummy.log
(Can you see above how I trimmed the '>' quoted text to just the part
I want to resond to?)
Show us the output of this co
> Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:06:23 -0500
> Subject: Re: LFS 6.3 Chapter 6.12, GCC-4.1.2 startfiles check fails --> no
> output
> From: linuxscra...@gmail.com
> To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
>
> On 12/16/09, stosss wrote:
&g
ght break which is usually not the case.
At 6.12, GCC-4.1.2, the "Readjusting the toolchain" step has already
been done, so only a super-geek has any chance to go to anything
before that without starting at the beginning.
Something has gone wrong and it is possible that the resulting sys
over with a clean sources. I think
>> that is the way to do it when you have reason to believe that you
>> could have made a mistake in typing your commands.
>>
>> I think you would want to start over 6.12. GCC-4.1.2 ... not the
>> beginning of chapter 6.
>> --
&
> Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 13:00:01 -0500
> Subject: Re: LFS 6.3 Chapter 6.12, GCC-4.1.2 startfiles check fails --> no
> output
> From: linuxscra...@gmail.com
> To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
>
> On 12/15/09, Pixel 73 wrote:
>
> > How can I analyze whic
On 12/15/09, linux fan wrote:
> As long as you didn't do 'make install', it is possible to remove the
> directory extracted from the source tarball, then extract the source
> tarball again, and do the package over with a clean sources. I think
I forgot ... with gcc, you also want to remove the gc
x27;, it is possible to remove the
directory extracted from the source tarball, then extract the source
tarball again, and do the package over with a clean sources. I think
that is the way to do it when you have reason to believe that you
could have made a mistake in typing your commands.
I think you
> Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:33:19 +0530
> Subject: Re: LFS 6.3 Chapter 6.12, GCC-4.1.2 startfiles check fails --> no
> output
> From: aks03081...@gmail.com
> To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 15, 20
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Pixel 73 wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I am new to LFS and am therefore not sure if I am in the right place to ask
> this question:
>
> I am doing LFS 6.3. Everything went well until Chapter 6.12, GCC-4.1.2.
> When I am checking for the correct sta
Hi
I am new to LFS and am therefore not sure if I am in the right place to ask
this question:
I am doing LFS 6.3. Everything went well until Chapter 6.12, GCC-4.1.2. When I
am checking for the correct startfiles with
grep -o '/usr/lib.*/crt[1in].*succeeded' dummy.log
t
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 03:03:27PM +0200, pisur5 wrote:
> hello,
>
> compil binutils-2.17 is ok
>
> Compil gcc
> make bootstrap
>
> ./xgcc -B./ -B/tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/
> -isystem /tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/include
> -isystem /tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/sys-include
> -L/ho
hello,
compil binutils-2.17 is ok
Compil gcc
make bootstrap
./xgcc -B./ -B/tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/
-isystem /tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/include
-isystem /tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/sys-include
-L/home/lfs/gcc-build/gcc/../ld -O2 -O2 -g -O2 -DIN_GCC-W -Wall
-Wwrite-stri
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, 7. Februar 2008 04:42:34 schrieb Wartan Hachaturow:
> Hi.
>
> I am trying to do a stage 1 build of glibc 2.5.1 for powerpc, on
> Debian sid, with the following configure arguments:
For archs different to the mainstream x86 archs it may not work when using the
LFS book as is.
Hi.
I am trying to do a stage 1 build of glibc 2.5.1 for powerpc, on
Debian sid, with the following configure arguments:
configure --prefix=/tools --disable-profile --enable-add-ons
--enable-kernel=2.6.0 --with-binutils=/tools/bin --without-gd
--with-headers=/tools/include --without-s
; [Requesting program interpreter: /tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2]
> I have no name!:/#
>
> After several pages, command su
> root:/#
> Still [Requesting program interpreter: /tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2]
>
> I set locales only to en_US and pt_BR, both to 8859-1 and UTF-8.
>
nterpreter: /tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2]
I set locales only to en_US and pt_BR, both to 8859-1 and UTF-8.
Everything going until chapter 6.12.1 GCC-4.1.2
The book says to give several sed commands before to say to mkdir ../gcc-build.
But without umpacked gcc-4.1.2 the sed commands are impossible, give a
Dan Nicholson wrote on 01-10-07 20:26:
> On 10/1/07, Bauke Jan Douma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Dan Nicholson wrote on 01-10-07 15:28:
>>> On 10/1/07, Benedikt Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is x86 the only architecture LFS compiles on successfully (apart from CLFS
efforts)?
>>> Ye
On 10/1/07, Bauke Jan Douma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dan Nicholson wrote on 01-10-07 15:28:
> > On 10/1/07, Benedikt Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Is x86 the only architecture LFS compiles on successfully (apart from CLFS
> >> efforts)?
> >
> > Yes. LFS-7.0 should hopefully have suppo
Dan Nicholson wrote on 01-10-07 15:28:
> On 10/1/07, Benedikt Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Is x86 the only architecture LFS compiles on successfully (apart from CLFS
>> efforts)?
>
> Yes. LFS-7.0 should hopefully have support for x86_64.
>
> --
> Dan
I take it then that would be for bui
On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 03:34:44PM +0200, Arsène Dernière wrote:
> On 01/10/2007, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10/1/07, Benedikt Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Is x86 the only architecture LFS compiles on successfully (apart from CLFS
> > > efforts)?
> >
> > Yes.
On 01/10/2007, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/1/07, Benedikt Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Is x86 the only architecture LFS compiles on successfully (apart from CLFS
> > efforts)?
>
> Yes. LFS-7.0 should hopefully have support for x86_64.
>
> --
> Dan
> --
> http://li
On 10/1/07, Benedikt Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is x86 the only architecture LFS compiles on successfully (apart from CLFS
> efforts)?
Yes. LFS-7.0 should hopefully have support for x86_64.
--
Dan
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromsc
Benedikt Schmitt wrote:
> Am Montag, 1. Oktober 2007 08:00 schrieb
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 11:57:22 -0400
>> From: Chris Staub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: Re: gcc 4.1.2 bootstrap error
>> To: LFS Support List
>> Message-ID:
Am Montag, 1. Oktober 2007 08:00 schrieb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 11:57:22 -0400
> From: Chris Staub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: gcc 4.1.2 bootstrap error
> To: LFS Support List
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Ars?ne Derni?r
; didn't help neither.
> >
> > I tried to compile and bootstrap GCC 4.1.2 like written in the 6.3 stable
> > book.
> >
> > First I got this final output before quiting:
> >
> > /tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ld: skipping incompatible
> >
Arsène Dernière wrote:
> Hi, every one,
>
> I searched the previous posts in the mailing list with "gcc bootstrap
> error" search keys before sending this message. WWW google search
> didn't help neither.
>
> I tried to compile and bootstrap GCC 4.1.2 li
Hi, every one,
I searched the previous posts in the mailing list with "gcc bootstrap
error" search keys before sending this message. WWW google search
didn't help neither.
I tried to compile and bootstrap GCC 4.1.2 like written in the 6.3 stable book.
First I got this fina
hi,
i compiled gcc 4.1.2.the configure command was:
../gcc-4.1.2/configure --prefix=/opt/gcc-4.1.2 --enable-shared
--enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-threads=posix --with-system-zlib
--enable-bootstrap
i am not sure whether the zlib should be there,but the make bootstap
finished without errors
38 matches
Mail list logo
