Mcgroder, James wrote:
> Discovered the variable "CC" was set incorrectly for my second pass binutils
> build
> can I simply re-execute the build with the correct setting(s)?
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> As early as you are in Chapter 5, I'd recommend restarting that c
Mcgroder, James wrote:
> Discovered the variable "CC" was set incorrectly for my second pass binutils
> build. I assume
>
> I can simply re-execute the build with the correct setting(s) or are there
> things I should
>
> physically delete 1st? And if just a
Discovered the variable "CC" was set incorrectly for my second pass binutils
build. I assume
I can simply re-execute the build with the correct setting(s) or are there
things I should
physically delete 1st? And if just a re-build is OK, is this true in general?
My mistake was
> Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 00:26:46 -0800
> From: "Waitman Gobble"
> To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
> Subject: [lfs-support] creating binutils-build again
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Version 7.5-rc1
>
> In 5.5. GCC-4.8.2 - Pass 1, the book reads "mkdir -v ../
On Sun, February 23, 2014 8:29 am, Pierre Labastie wrote:
> Le 23/02/2014 09:26, Waitman Gobble a écrit :
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> Version 7.5-rc1
>>
>>
>> In 5.5. GCC-4.8.2 - Pass 1, the book reads "mkdir -v
>> ../binutils-build&q
Le 23/02/2014 09:26, Waitman Gobble a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> Version 7.5-rc1
>
> In 5.5. GCC-4.8.2 - Pass 1, the book reads "mkdir -v ../binutils-build",
> then in 5.9. Binutils-2.24 - Pass 2, the book reads "Create a separate
> build directory again: mkd
Waitman Gobble wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Version 7.5-rc1
>
> In 5.5. GCC-4.8.2 - Pass 1, the book reads "mkdir -v ../binutils-build",
> then in 5.9. Binutils-2.24 - Pass 2, the book reads "Create a separate
> build directory again: mkdir -v ../binutils-build&quo
Hi,
Version 7.5-rc1
In 5.5. GCC-4.8.2 - Pass 1, the book reads "mkdir -v ../binutils-build",
then in 5.9. Binutils-2.24 - Pass 2, the book reads "Create a separate
build directory again: mkdir -v ../binutils-build".
There is confusion about whether the binutils-build direc
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 05:39:39AM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 03:10:42AM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 04:53:21AM +0200, Markku Pesonen wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The binutils testsuite crea
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 05:39:39AM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 03:10:42AM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 04:53:21AM +0200, Markku Pesonen wrote:
> > >
> > > The binutils testsuite creates detailed logs in binutils/binutils.lo
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 03:10:42AM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 04:53:21AM +0200, Markku Pesonen wrote:
> >
> > The binutils testsuite creates detailed logs in binutils/binutils.log,
> > ld/ld.log, and gas/testsuite/gas.log in the binutils-build direct
un 'make check' by hand in
> > binutils-build/ld.
>
> The binutils testsuite creates detailed logs in binutils/binutils.log,
> ld/ld.log, and gas/testsuite/gas.log in the binutils-build directory.
> I have found them to be very useful in figuring out unexpected test
> failures.
Ken Moffat wrote:
> I think I'll make a fresh attempt, maybe tomorrow, but in the mean
> time any suggestions are welcome. Although the build was scripted,
> the ld tests still fail if I run 'make check' by hand in
> binutils-build/ld.
The binutils testsuite create
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 12:40:15AM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> I discovered that I had an error in the functions I use while
> building, libc.a was being renamed to libc.a - but even with that
was being renamed to libc.a.hidden
> renamed, and libz.a being made available, for m
ilding, libc.a was being renamed to libc.a - but even with that
renamed, and libz.a being made available, for me the tests still
fail.
Looking at the last test:
binutils-2.23.2/ld/testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifunc.exp
The tests seem to be run from the check-DEJAGNU target
and that uses LIBS=$(LIBS) whic
On 01/28/2014 09:09 PM, Frans de Boer wrote:
> On 01/28/2014 08:37 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 07:27:58PM +0200, Markku Pesonen wrote:
>>> Frans de Boer wrote:
FAIL: static preinit array
FAIL: static init array
FAIL: static fini array
FAIL: static init array
On 01/28/2014 08:37 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 07:27:58PM +0200, Markku Pesonen wrote:
>> Frans de Boer wrote:
>>> FAIL: static preinit array
>>> FAIL: static init array
>>> FAIL: static fini array
>>> FAIL: static init array mixed
>>> FAIL: Could not link a static executable
>
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 07:27:58PM +0200, Markku Pesonen wrote:
> Frans de Boer wrote:
> > FAIL: static preinit array
> > FAIL: static init array
> > FAIL: static fini array
> > FAIL: static init array mixed
> > FAIL: Could not link a static executable
> >
> > There are five failures and I can't f
Frans de Boer wrote:
> FAIL: static preinit array
> FAIL: static init array
> FAIL: static fini array
> FAIL: static init array mixed
> FAIL: Could not link a static executable
>
> There are five failures and I can't find the cause of it.
> I rebuilded everything from scratch - more then once, but
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 05:30:16PM +0100, Frans de Boer wrote:
> The next messages are produced every single time I encounter this chapter:
>
> Running /sources/binutils-2.24/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/binutils.exp ...
> Running /sources/binutils-2.24/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/comm-data.exp .
Frans de Boer wrote:
> The next messages are produced every single time I encounter this chapter:
> Running /sources/binutils-2.24/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/elf.exp ...
> FAIL: static preinit array
> FAIL: static init array
> FAIL: static fini array
> FAIL: static init array m
The next messages are produced every single time I encounter this chapter:
Running /sources/binutils-2.24/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/binutils.exp ...
Running /sources/binutils-2.24/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/comm-data.exp ...
Running /sources/binutils-2.24/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/compress.exp ...
Running /sources
On 01/11/2014 11:43 PM, Frans de Boer wrote:
> Hm, I decided to restart all over - had to change scripts to follow the
> book more strictly - but building binutils now ends with Error 2.
>
> ...
> mv -f elf32-target.new elf32-target.h
> rm -f elf64-target.h
> sed -e s/NN/64/g
Hm, I decided to restart all over - had to change scripts to follow the
book more strictly - but building binutils now ends with Error 2.
...
mv -f elf32-target.new elf32-target.h
rm -f elf64-target.h
sed -e s/NN/64/g < ../../binutils-2.24/bfd/elfxx-target.h > elf64-target.new
mv -f
port] Step 5.4.1 Installation of Cross Binutils errors
Le 16/11/2013 00:46, Ken Moffat a écrit :
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 01:20:06PM +, Vasco Almeida wrote:
>> OK, I did as instructed in your recommendations above, and tried to
>> be as extra careful as ignorance allows. S
Thanks Bruce Dubbs and all the group...
I have just repeated again and failed at 7.4 binutils section 5.9 (result
below).
Then, I just gave your reply a more careful read and...
*Wait! What is this "su - lfs"? Minus???*
I probably did type the '-' and get a login shell -
Le 16/11/2013 00:46, Ken Moffat a écrit :
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 01:20:06PM +, Vasco Almeida wrote:
>> OK, I did as instructed in your recommendations above, and tried to
>> be as extra careful as ignorance allows. So I am attaching the four
>> logs collected during the 5.4.1 step, for your
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 01:20:06PM +, Vasco Almeida wrote:
> OK, I did as instructed in your recommendations above, and tried to
> be as extra careful as ignorance allows. So I am attaching the four
> logs collected during the 5.4.1 step, for your kind inspection. But
> when I invoked "make ins
g install-info anymore, but GNU install-info
See the man page for ginstall-info for command line arguments
This is not dpkg install-info anymore, but GNU install-info
See the man page for ginstall-info for command line arguments"
which are perhaps not that surprising. Finally, some displays
> Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 11:25:35 -0600
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] SOLVED: lfs 7.4 section 5.9.1. Installation of
> Binutils error: Cannot run C compiled programs
>
> akhiezer wrote:
> >> Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 17:00:3
akhiezer wrote:
>> Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 17:00:31 -0600
>> From: Bruce Dubbs
>> To: LFS Support List
>> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] SOLVED: lfs 7.4 section 5.9.1. Installation of
>> Binutils error: Cannot run C compiled programs
>>
>>>>> Wha
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 7:56 AM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:37:57AM +, Vasco Almeida wrote:
>
> > 1. On my Ubuntu I should install at least/bison, gawk, g++, m4/
> and/makeinfo/ (via apt-get install/packa//ge-name/, assuming these are
> indeed the names).
> Yes.
>
m4 i
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:37:57AM +, Vasco Almeida wrote:
> 1. On my Ubuntu I should install at least/bison, gawk, g++, m4/
> and/makeinfo/ (via apt-get install/packa//ge-name/, assuming these are
> indeed the names).
Yes.
For gawk, you might also need to change the 'awk' symlink to po
iously did not pay enough
attention to the output on the console. Sorry for the oversight and the hassle
caused. In future I shall redirect outputs to files and check them carefully.
Thank you again, gentlemen. Best regards.
Vasco
bash, version 4.2.25(1)-release
/bin/sh -> /bin/dash
Binutils: (G
> Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 17:00:31 -0600
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] SOLVED: lfs 7.4 section 5.9.1. Installation of
> Binutils error: Cannot run C compiled programs
>
> >>> What happens if you do:
> >>> (1
Le 14/11/2013 02:09, Ken Moffat a écrit :
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 09:59:18PM +, Vasco Almeida wrote:
>> Please find attached "mymakelog" file. Thank you again for your support.
>>
>> Vasco
> I see the following -
> [...]
> This looks as if makeinfo in now *required*. Try installing
> tex
ls for a long time and not learned that till now.
> So, that's why I'm here!
> Thanks to all.
>
> My section 7.4 binutils section 5.9 has failed again after another full
> repeat of chapter 5 done with care.
> This time I noticed the warning in 5.7 glibc-2.18 said that a
.
So, that's why I'm here!
Thanks to all.
My section 7.4 binutils section 5.9 has failed again after another full
repeat of chapter 5 done with care.
This time I noticed the warning in 5.7 glibc-2.18 said that autoconf was
missing (along with the expected msgfmt).
Will I need autoconf for 7.
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 09:59:18PM +, Vasco Almeida wrote:
> Please find attached "mymakelog" file. Thank you again for your support.
>
> Vasco
I see the following -
if (/mnt/lfs/sources/binutils-2.23.2/missing makeinfo
--split-size=500 --split-size=5
On 11/13/2013 03:41 AM, Pierre Labastie wrote:
> Le 13/11/2013 02:53, Ken Moffat a écrit :
>> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 07:57:30PM -0500, Baho Utot wrote:
>>> If you are using bash 4.0 or greater
>>>
>>> ../path/to/binutils-source/./configure ... | tee myconflog
akhiezer wrote:
>>> What happens if you do:
>>> (1) highlight & copy the text using the same method - i.e. same mouse
>>> buttons,
>>> same source of text (html/pdf/...), same environment
>>> (terminal/browser/...),
>>> etc - as when it went wrong.
>>> (2) vi -i
>>> (3) do the paste
> Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 14:55:59 -0600
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] SOLVED: lfs 7.4 section 5.9.1. Installation of
> Binutils error: Cannot run C compiled programs
>
> akhiezer wrote:
> >> Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 07:20:38
On 11/13/2013 05:15 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
Well, I'm pleased that you didn't fall into the trap I accidentally
set by putting '2>&1' after the pipe to tee.
Also, configure won't report an error if it gets as far as creating
the Makefiles - but the results of the various tests which configure
Ron Hartikka wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> OK. I'll look at akh's suggstion in my next session.
>
> I already did a similar thing, actually.
>
> I think this was in 5.9 binutils pass 2.
>
> I set the environment variables - like 'export CC=$LFS_TGT-gcc' one
akhiezer wrote:
>> Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 07:20:38 -0500
>> From: Ron Hartikka
>> To: LFS Support List
>> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] SOLVED: lfs 7.4 section 5.9.1. Installation of
>> Binutils error: Cannot run C compiled programs
>>
>>
>>
5.9.1):
> *CC=$LFS_TGT-gcc\
> AR=$LFS_TGT-ar \
> RANLIB=$LFS_TGT-ranlib \
> ../binutils-2.23.2/configure \
> --prefix=/tools\
> --disable-nls \
> --with-lib-path=/tools/lib \
> --with-sysroot*
> I sele
ss.
>
> As for capturing the output, I went about it in two steps:
> /mnt/lfs/sources/binutils-build$ ../binutils-2.23.2/configure
> --prefix=/tools --with-sysroot=$LFS --with-lib-path=/tools/lib
> --target=$LFS_TGT --disable-nls --disable-werror > myconflog 2>&1 and,
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 09:41:33AM +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote:
> Le 13/11/2013 02:53, Ken Moffat a écrit :
> > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 07:57:30PM -0500, Baho Utot wrote:
> >> If you are using bash 4.0 or greater
> >>
> >> ../path/to/binutils-source/
Thanks.
OK. I'll look at akh's suggstion in my next session.
I already did a similar thing, actually.
I think this was in 5.9 binutils pass 2.
I set the environment variables - like 'export CC=$LFS_TGT-gcc' one at a
time.
Then I pasted the whole configure command into
ral you do NOT want to do that in LFS, except when running test
> > suites.
> >
> > Since you have barely started, please also check the Host System
> > Requirements in section Vii of the Preface.
> >
> > Actually, check the Host System Requirements _first_, th
> Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 07:20:38 -0500
> From: Ron Hartikka
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] SOLVED: lfs 7.4 section 5.9.1. Installation of
> Binutils error: Cannot run C compiled programs
>
>
>
> Even supposing the HTML looks innocent, I
Even supposing the HTML looks innocent, I'm wondering if there are other
ways for a multi-line selection to get corrupted.
I experimented with the configure command in 7.4/5.9 Binutils.
I was convinced that the method didn't work there in my situation.
I'll repeat this later.
tarted, please also check the Host System
> Requirements in section Vii of the Preface.
>
> Actually, check the Host System Requirements _first_, then (if
> your host meets _all_ of them : newer versions *probably* work for
> binutils and gcc), repeat your attempt to compile this,
Le 13/11/2013 02:53, Ken Moffat a écrit :
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 07:57:30PM -0500, Baho Utot wrote:
>> If you are using bash 4.0 or greater
>>
>> ../path/to/binutils-source/./configure ... | tee myconflog 2>&1
>>
>> becomes
>>
>> ../path
> Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 22:27:20 -0500
> From: Ron Hartikka
> Subject: [lfs-support] SOLVED: lfs 7.4 section 5.9.1. Installation of
>Binutils error: Cannot run C compiled programs
> To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
> Message-ID:
>
> Content-Type: text/pl
anlib \
../binutils-2.23.2/configure \
--prefix=/tools\
--disable-nls \
--with-lib-path=/tools/lib \
--with-sysroot*
I selected all of that at once, middle-mouse-pasted it into my
terminal, and hit return.
I had entered many multilined commands thi
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 07:57:30PM -0500, Baho Utot wrote:
>
> If you are using bash 4.0 or greater
>
> ../path/to/binutils-source/./configure ... | tee myconflog 2>&1
>
> becomes
>
> ../path/to/binutils-source/./configure ... |& tee myconflog
>
I would
s.
>
> Since you have barely started, please also check the Host System
> Requirements in section Vii of the Preface.
>
> Actually, check the Host System Requirements _first_, then (if
> your host meets _all_ of them : newer versions *probably* work for
> binutils and gcc),
n Vii of the Preface.
Actually, check the Host System Requirements _first_, then (if
your host meets _all_ of them : newer versions *probably* work for
binutils and gcc), repeat your attempt to compile this, after
removing the existing binutils-2.32.2 (I'm assuming you are trying
to build LFS-7
On 11/12/2013 09:43 PM, William Harrington wrote:
> On Nov 12, 2013, at 1:48 PM, Vasco Almeida wrote:
>> make[3]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/binutils-build/bfd/po'
>> make[3]: Entering directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/binutils-build/bfd/po'
>> make[3]: Nothing to
On Nov 12, 2013, at 1:48 PM, Vasco Almeida wrote:
> make[3]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/binutils-build/bfd/po'
> make[3]: Entering directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/binutils-build/bfd/po'
> make[3]: Nothing to be done for `info'.
What is before that? We need to know
Have just started an LFS project, and hit a snag with make output on
subject step:
...
make[3]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/binutils-build/bfd/po'
make[3]: Entering directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/binutils-build/bfd/po'
make[3]: Nothing to be done for `info'.
make[3]: Leaving
Bernd Bausch wrote:
> --Boundary-01=_/wHcSKNH4X584sI
> Content-Type: text/plain;
>charset="us-ascii"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> Dear LFS community,
>
> Chapter 6.13 of LFS book 7.4 installs binutils-2.32.2. On my system, configure
> and make
--Boundary-01=_/wHcSKNH4X584sI
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Dear LFS community,
Chapter 6.13 of LFS book 7.4 installs binutils-2.32.2. On my system, configure
and make work, but make check eventually hangs.
I am using Redhat 6.
virgo hotmail.com> writes:
>
> Hello everyone,
> I'm out of luck with binutils as I have an error on the second pass also!
>
> The configure command gives an error:
> ...
> checking for gawk... gawk
> checking for gcc... x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu-gcc
> che
Hello everyone,
I'm out of luck with binutils as I have an error on the second pass also!
The configure command gives an error:
...
checking for gawk... gawk
checking for gcc... x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu-gcc
checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out
checking whether the C com
> You seem to have some required progrms in /usr/local/bin. Does the lfs
> user have /usr/local/bin in the PATH variable? It's not set up that way
> in the book by default. Try adjusting the LFS user's ~/.bashrc to
> include that.
Thank you very much, Bruce.
That was the problem!
For the ot
virgo wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I have a problem on LFS v7.4, chapter 5.4.1: Installation of Cross Binutils
> WARNING: `makeinfo' is missing on your system. You should only need it if
> you modified a `.texi' or `.texinfo' file, or any other file
>
Hello,
I have a problem on LFS v7.4, chapter 5.4.1: Installation of Cross Binutils
'configure' step seemes to be ok.
The 'make' command logs the following lines:
...
make[2]: Entering directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/binutils-build/bfd'
Making info in doc
make[3]: Ent
loki wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-06-07 at 22:05 +0200, loki wrote:
> tried a new build. The same error. The host system is ubuntu 12.04. The
> compile itself was without errors. Can I install binutils even with this
> make check error? Here are some more details:
>
> excerpt from g
On Fri, 2013-06-07 at 22:05 +0200, loki wrote:
> Heya,
>
> am having binutils test problems. I thought that it was the same as
> the problem I had in April with memory and the swap size. But this
> time it is something different. The setup is simillar Pentium 4 and
> 512
Heya,
am having binutils test problems. I thought that it was the same as the
problem I had in April with memory and the swap size. But this time it
is something different. The setup is simillar Pentium 4 and 512MB.
Any ideas?
> ../as-new -o dump.o /sources/binutils-2.23.1/gas/testsuite/
Antony Vincent wrote:
>
> Here I join the complete output I obtained.
Running /sources/binutils-2.23.1/ld/testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifunc.exp ...
FAIL: Common symbol override ifunc test 1b
I think you forgot to
patch -Np1 -i ../binutils-2.23.1-testsuite_fix-1.patch
-- Bruce
--
Here I join the complete output I obtained. The file is attached.
Thanks
> Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 20:27:08 -0500
> From: bruce.du...@gmail.com
> To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Binutils tests problem
>
> Antony Vincent wrote:
> >
>
Antony Vincent wrote:
>
> Sorry, I didn't see there was something at the top. Here is it:
>
> Antony
> === ld Summary ===
>
> # of expected passes784
> # of unexpected failures1
> # of expected failures61
> # of untested testcases
Sorry, I didn't see there was something at the top. Here is it:
Antony
=== ld Summary ===
# of expected passes784
# of unexpected failures1
# of expected failures61
# of untested testcases1
/sources/binutils-build/ld/ld-new 2.23.1
make[5]: *** [check-DE
Antony Vincent wrote:
> Hi! I have a problem with the binutils tests in chapter 6.
After the command make -k check, I got this:
>
> ./test-expandargv
PASS: test-expandargv-0.
PASS: test-expandargv-1.
PASS: test-expandargv-2.
PASS: test-expandargv-3.
PASS: test-expandarg
Hi! I have a problem with the binutils tests in chapter 6. After the command
make -k check, I got this:
./test-expandargvPASS: test-expandargv-0.PASS:
test-expandargv-1.PASS: test-expandargv-2.PASS: test-expandargv-3.PASS:
test-expandargv-4.PASS: test
On Sun, 2013-04-07 at 14:55 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> gcc uses a lot of space. Allocate about 2G of swap and it should be OK,
> but slow.
>
>-- Bruce
>
Working. THX...
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Uns
loki wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 17:38 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>
>
>> I took a look and the file you want is
>> binutils-build/gas/testsuite/gas.log. I can't reproduce your failure,
>> so you need to look. What I have is:
>
>
> Have the same pro
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 17:38 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I took a look and the file you want is
> binutils-build/gas/testsuite/gas.log. I can't reproduce your failure,
> so you need to look. What I have is:
Have the same problem.
Here's the relevant part:
PASS: i386 sp
On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 10:20:46AM +0200, Pierre Labastie wrote:
> Le 06/04/2013 23:50, Ken Moffat a écrit :
>
> > googling for 'powers of e' suggests e*8 is 2,980.9579870409 so the
> > file was approx 8346 seconds in the future, or about 2 hours 20 in
> > coarse figures.
> Not very important, but
Le 06/04/2013 23:50, Ken Moffat a écrit :
> googling for 'powers of e' suggests e*8 is 2,980.9579870409 so the
> file was approx 8346 seconds in the future, or about 2 hours 20 in
> coarse figures.
Not very important, but I would think that 2.8e+08 is the C notation for
floating point real, that i
>
> > • The package or section the problem was encountered in : Binutils first
> > compilation
> > • The exact error message or symptom being received : No error message
> > • Note whether you have deviated from the book at all : didnt deviate.
> >
> > My
don't see anything obviously inadequate - if our stated
versions are correct ]
>
> • The package or section the problem was encountered in : Binutils first
> compilation
> • The exact error message or symptom being received : No error message
> • Note whether you have deviated from th
The version of the book being used (in this case 7.3)
• The host distribution and version being used to create LFS : Debian
• The output from the Section vii, “Host System Requirements” [xviii] :
bash, version 4.1.5(1)-release
/bin/sh -> /bin/bash
Binutils: (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.20.1-sys
nks for the reply. I definitely set them last night, and I just
tried again this morning, checking them before configuring:
lfs@voxbox-dev:/mnt/lfs/sources/binutils-build$ CC=$LFS_TGT-gcc
lfs@voxbox-dev:/mnt/lfs/sources/binutils-build$ AR=$LFS_TGT-ar
lfs@voxbox-dev:/mnt/lfs/sources/binutils-build$
RA
Le 05/04/2013 12:22, Alex Stefan Kaye a écrit :
> Thanks for the reply. I definitely set them last night, and I just
> tried again this morning, checking them before configuring:
> lfs@voxbox-dev:/mnt/lfs/sources/binutils-build$ CC=$LFS_TGT-gcc
> lfs@voxbox-dev:/mnt/lfs/sources/binuti
Thanks for the reply. I definitely set them last night, and I just
tried again this morning, checking them before configuring:
lfs@voxbox-dev:/mnt/lfs/sources/binutils-build$ CC=$LFS_TGT-gcc
lfs@voxbox-dev:/mnt/lfs/sources/binutils-build$ AR=$LFS_TGT-ar
lfs@voxbox-dev:/mnt/lfs/sources/binutils
Le 04/04/2013 23:05, Alex Stefan Kaye a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> I've just started my LFS journey, and I've hit upon a problem when
> running configure during binutils pass 2. I've not deviated from the
> book at all (discounting any mistakes I've not noticed
Hi all,
I've just started my LFS journey, and I've hit upon a problem when
running configure during binutils pass 2. I've not deviated from the
book at all (discounting any mistakes I've not noticed - it's late
here, but I've been careful).
The error:
checking
Thank you, Mr. pierre.labastieThe recompile will solve
> Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2013 15:12:19 +0200
> From: pierre.labas...@neuf.fr
> To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] 5.8. Binutils-2.23.1 - Pass 2 configure: error: C
> compiler cannot create executable
Le 31/03/2013 14:20, سید احمد حسینی a écrit :
> hi
> in
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/7.3/chapter05/binutils-pass2.html
>
> [...]
> configure:4063: checking for C compiler default output file name
> configure:4085: x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu-gcc conftest.c >&5
log is
../../../binutils-2.23.2/bfd/doc/bfd.texinfo:325: unknown command `colophon'
../../../binutils-2.23.2/bfd/doc/bfd.texinfo:336: unknown command `cygnus'
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See
seem to find it.
> The host is a VirtualBox VM running Debian 6.0.
Please delete the portions of the reply (that were below this).
I took a look and the file you want is
binutils-build/gas/testsuite/gas.log. I can't reproduce your failure,
so you need to look. What I have is:
../as-n
> > I'm working through the latest LFS book and am at chapter 6.13 (
> > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter06/binutils.html
> ).
> > The compilation on that page does not throw any errors, however when I
> run
> > the test suite with "
make check" one of the tests fails. Specifically:
>
> Running /sources/binutils-2.23.1/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/i386.exp ...
Yes, it's supposed to do that. gas is the assembler.
> FAIL: gas/i386/rept
I'm afraid I don't recall seeing that before. Is that the only
cally:
Running /sources/binutils-2.23.1/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/i386.exp ...
FAIL: gas/i386/rept
I've looked at the test file in question, but can't see anything obvious,
other than that the host is running i686 architecture, while the system is
testing i386. Also, the error message i
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 2:54 AM, Rubin Saifi wrote:
> Dear LFS community ,
> i am getting this error on binutils-2.22 when issuing "make -c check"
> command
>
> PASS: test-expandargv-3.
> PASS: test-expandargv-4.
> PASS: test-expandargv-5.
> PASS: test-expandar
Dear LFS community ,i am getting this error on binutils-2.22 when issuing
"make -c check" command
PASS: test-expandargv-3.PASS: test-expandargv-4.PASS: test-expandargv-5.PASS:
test-expandargv-6.make[3]: Leaving directory
`/sources/binutils-build/libiberty/testsuite'make[2]: Le
1 - 100 of 945 matches
Mail list logo
