Quoting Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 4/25/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Quoting Tijnema ! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >
> > > More important is the last thing, make sure the linker exists, and has
> > > the same name as the one that is compiled into the binary (rea
On 4/25/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting Tijnema ! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > More important is the last thing, make sure the linker exists, and has
> > the same name as the one that is compiled into the binary (readelf -l
> > /bin/mount)
> > Also, the dynamic linker nee
Quoting Tijnema ! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 4/25/07, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 4/24/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > It's very odd, mount does sit in /bin and it has the same permissions as
> all the
> > > other files in that directory (such as l
On 4/25/07, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/24/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > It's very odd, mount does sit in /bin and it has the same permissions as
> > all the
> > other files in that directory (such as ls which works perfectly). to make
> > sure i
> >
On 4/24/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It's very odd, mount does sit in /bin and it has the same permissions as all
> the
> other files in that directory (such as ls which works perfectly). to make
> sure i
> made it executable but it still says /bin/mount not found
Here's
Quoting Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 4/24/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > The exact message is this:
> > Mounting kernel-based file systems:
> /proc/etc/rc.d/rcsysinit.d/S00mountkernfs:
> > line 24: /bin/mount: No such file or directory.
>
> Well, there you go
On 4/24/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The exact message is this:
> Mounting kernel-based file systems: /proc/etc/rc.d/rcsysinit.d/S00mountkernfs:
> line 24: /bin/mount: No such file or directory.
Well, there you go. It's trying to mount sysfs, but it can't run
mount. Or mayb
Quoting Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 01:42:48PM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> > On 4/24/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > I finished LFS book but when i boot into LFS i get the messsage thats in
> the
> > > subject line. At first i ran into
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 01:42:48PM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 4/24/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I finished LFS book but when i boot into LFS i get the messsage thats in the
> > subject line. At first i ran into problems with the kernel not being able to
> > recogni
On 4/24/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I finished LFS book but when i boot into LFS i get the messsage thats in the
> subject line. At first i ran into problems with the kernel not being able to
> recognize my sata drive but i recompiled it with some sata drivers (wasnt
> exac
I finished LFS book but when i boot into LFS i get the messsage thats in the
subject line. At first i ran into problems with the kernel not being able to
recognize my sata drive but i recompiled it with some sata drivers (wasnt
exactly sure which one i needed so chose some that were most likely to
I finished LFS book but when i boot into LFS i get the messsage thats in the
subject line. At first i ran into problems with the kernel not being able to
recognize my sata drive but i recompiled it with some sata drivers (wasnt
exactly sure which one i needed so chose some that were most likely to
I finished LFS book but when i boot into LFS i get the messsage thats in the
subject line. At first i ran into problems with the kernel not being able to
recognize my sata drive but i recompiled it with some sata drivers (wasnt
exactly sure which one i needed so chose some that were most likely to
13 matches
Mail list logo
