Quoting Tijnema ! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 4/25/07, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 4/24/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > > It's very odd, mount does sit in /bin and it has the same permissions as > all the > > > other files in that directory (such as ls which works perfectly). to make > sure i > > > made it executable but it still says /bin/mount not found > > > > Here's a possibility. Someone else had a similar problem a few months > > back. Are the directories executable and readable? You should check > > /lib, /bin, /sbin, and the same in /usr. The directories for binaries > > like mount need to be in readable, executable directories, but the > > libraries do, too. This sounds like the same problem that person had > > because /lib had 0700 permissions, so the dynamic linker couldn't work > > properly. > > > > [10:17 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] ls -ld /lib > > drwxr-xr-x 11 root root 4096 2007-04-23 21:06 /lib > > > > -- > > Dan > > More important is the last thing, make sure the linker exists, and has > the same name as the one that is compiled into the binary (readelf -l > /bin/mount) > Also, the dynamic linker needs to be executable. > > Tijnema > -- > http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html > Unsubscribe: See the above information page > Yes it was compiled against /tools/lib/ldsomething.so.x what step i have missed? i recompiled it and now linux boots up and sort of works apart from networking. What should i do? Should i recompile all the stuff? Now i just recompiled util-linux..
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
