> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Alexander
> E. Patrakov
> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 4:17 AM
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: RE: Building LFS without gcc, make, etc.
>
>
> Winter Andreas wro
Winter Andreas wrote:
> Yes, good book. I have followed the book and everything worked. But now I
> want to end up whith a system without any development tools. Of course I
> can try to manually remove gcc, etc after the build.
Why manually? Install some package manager. I had success with checki
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 11:14 +0200, Winter Andreas wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> > Winter Andreas wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > after having successfully build a running LFS, I tried to
> > build a system
> > > without gcc, make and other development tools (the goal is
> > to build a
> > > minimal syst
>
> On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 11:14:29 +0200
> Winter Andreas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Yes, good book. I have followed the book and everything worked. But
> > now I want to end up whith a system without any development
> tools. Of
> > course I can try to manually remove gcc, etc after the bui
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 11:14:29 +0200
Winter Andreas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, good book. I have followed the book and everything worked. But
> now I want to end up whith a system without any development tools. Of
> course I can try to manually remove gcc, etc after the build.
> And remember
Hi Andrew,
> Winter Andreas wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > after having successfully build a running LFS, I tried to
> build a system
> > without gcc, make and other development tools (the goal is
> to build a
> > minimal system). So I started by skipping the corresponding
> sections in chap
> > 6.
>
Winter Andreas wrote:
Hi,
after having successfully build a running LFS, I tried to build a system
without gcc, make and other development tools (the goal is to build a
minimal system). So I started by skipping the corresponding sections in chap
6.
Don't skip anything. Follow the book. Good book.
Q
