Re: Re: LFS 6.3 Chapter 6.9.1 readelf Problem

2009-05-15 Thread Simon Geard
On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 21:40 +1200, Simon Geard wrote: > On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 10:49 +0200, lifrsc.m.klsw...@spamgourmet.com > wrote: > > Ken Moffat wrote: > > > > > > I'm also puzzled why anyone would build 6.3 now. It's old. > > > > > > ĸen > > Maybe because the last stable version of BLFS is

Re: Re: LFS 6.3 Chapter 6.9.1 readelf Problem

2009-05-14 Thread Ken Moffat
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 12:29:57PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:49:14AM +0200, lifrsc.m.klsw...@spamgourmet.com > wrote: > > Ken Moffat wrote: > > > > > > I'm also puzzled why anyone would build 6.3 now. It's old. > > > > > > ĸen > > Maybe because the last stable versi

Re: Re: LFS 6.3 Chapter 6.9.1 readelf Problem

2009-05-14 Thread Ken Moffat
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:49:14AM +0200, lifrsc.m.klsw...@spamgourmet.com wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote: > > > > I'm also puzzled why anyone would build 6.3 now. It's old. > > > > ĸen > Maybe because the last stable version of BLFS is BLFS 6.3 ? > > Klaus Sure it is. But, most of the time peop

Re: Re: LFS 6.3 Chapter 6.9.1 readelf Problem

2009-05-14 Thread Simon Geard
On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 10:49 +0200, lifrsc.m.klsw...@spamgourmet.com wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote: > > > > I'm also puzzled why anyone would build 6.3 now. It's old. > > > > ĸen > Maybe because the last stable version of BLFS is BLFS 6.3 ? > > Klaus 6.4 came out about 6 months ago... Simon. si

Re: Re: LFS 6.3 Chapter 6.9.1 readelf Problem

2009-05-14 Thread lifrsc . m . klswlff
Ken Moffat wrote: > > I'm also puzzled why anyone would build 6.3 now. It's old. > > ĸen Maybe because the last stable version of BLFS is BLFS 6.3 ? Klaus -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above i

Re: LFS 6.3 Chapter 6.9.1 readelf Problem

2009-05-13 Thread Kabelmaulwurf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 yep right ;) and because i got no bandwidth at the moment to download the sources but someone hande me over the live cd Chris Staub wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote: >> I'm also puzzled why anyone would build 6.3 now. It's old. >> >> ĸen > > Probably bec

Re: LFS 6.3 Chapter 6.9.1 readelf Problem

2009-05-13 Thread Chris Staub
Ken Moffat wrote: > > I'm also puzzled why anyone would build 6.3 now. It's old. > > ĸen Probably because that's the version on the latest available livecd. Many people find it more convenient just to download the livecd, even if it is old. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lf

Re: LFS 6.3 Chapter 6.9.1 readelf Problem

2009-05-13 Thread Ken Moffat
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 06:50:57PM +0200, Kabelmaulwurf wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi guys, > > I got a problem on the Installation of Glib > > Everything works fine until > > "Prepare Glibc for comilation" > > - ---

LFS 6.3 Chapter 6.9.1 readelf Problem

2009-05-12 Thread Kabelmaulwurf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi guys, I got a problem on the Installation of Glib Everything works fine until "Prepare Glibc for comilation" - --- ../glibc-2.5.1/configure --prefix=/usr \ --disable-profile